Yeşil Büyüme Sürecinde Farklı Ülke Grupları İçin Farklı Politikaların Gerekliliği Üzerine Bir İnceleme

Yıl 2026, Cilt: 24 Sayı: 1, 435 - 462, 27.03.2026

Necla Kübra Gündüz , Ömer Faruk Biçen

https://izlik.org/JA92NX26DD

Öz

Ekonomik büyümenin zaman içerisinde yol açtığı çevresel etkiler, içinde bulunduğumuz yüzyılda uzun vadeli ekonomik büyümeyi çevresel kalite ile dengeleyecek şekilde büyüme ve kalkınmayı temel alan yaklaşımları da beraberinde getirmiştir. 21. yüzyılın hemen başında gündeme gelen “yeşil büyüme” kavramı da bu amaca hizmet etmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı alt-orta ve düşük gelir grubu, üst-orta gelir grubu ve yüksek gelir grubu ülkeleri için 2000-2022 döneminde yeşil büyümenin iktisadi ve kurumsal belirleyicilerinin incelenmesidir. Sistem genelleştirilmiş momentler yöntemi çerçevesinde elde edilen sonuçlar tüm ülke grupları için hukukun üstünlüğü, ekonomik özgürlük ve siyasi istikrar ve şiddetin / terörün yokluğu gibi kurumsal faktörlerin yeşil büyüme üzerinde herhangi bir etkisinin olmadığını göstermiştir. Bununla birlikte iktisadi değişkenler arasında yer alan ekonomik büyüme, doğrudan yabancı yatırımlar ve dışa açıklık derecesi ise farklı ülke grupları için yeşil büyüme üzerinde anlamlı etkiler doğurmaktadır. Bu sonuçlara göre her ülke grubu için farklı politika önerilerinin dikkate alınması önem taşımaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Ekonomik Büyüme , Yeşil Büyüme , Kurumsal Faktörler , SGMM

A Study on the Necessity of Different Policies for Different Country Groups in the Green Growth Process

https://izlik.org/JA92NX26DD

Öz

Growth and development-based strategies that balance long-term economic growth with environmental quality have emerged in the current century as a result of the environmental impacts of economic growth. The idea of "green growth," which gained popularity at the start of the twenty-first century, also accomplishes this. This study aims to investigate the institutional and economic factors that influence green growth in lower-middle-income, low-income, upper-middle-income, and high-income countries between 2000 and 2022. The results obtained within the framework of the system generalized method of moments showed that institutional factors such as the rule of law, economic freedom and political stability and the absence of violence/terrorism do not have any effect on green growth for all country groups. For various country groups, however, economic factors including economic growth, foreign direct investments, and the degree of openness have significant effects on green growth. Different policy suggestions for each country group should be taken into account in light of these findings.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Economic Growth , Green Growth , Institutional Factors , SGMM

Kaynakça

• Abid, M. (2017). Does economic, financial and institutional developments matter for environmental quality? A comparative analysis of EU and MEA countries. Journal of environmental management, 188, 183-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman . 2016.12.007.
• Ağaoğlu, N. (2023). Sürdürülebi̇li̇r kalkınma bağlamında büyümeme ve yeşi̇l büyüme. Academic Review of Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(2), 83-105.
• Anderson, T. W., & Hsiao, C. (1982). Formulation and estimation of dynamic models using panel data. Journal of econometrics, 18(1), 47-82.
• Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some test of spesification for panel data: monte carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies , 277-279.
• Arellano, M., and Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 29-51.
• Arzova, S. B., & Şahin, B. Ş. (2023). Macroeconomic and financial determinants of green growth: an empirical investigation on BRICS-T countries. Management of environmental quality: an international journal, 35(3), 506-524.
• Bahtiyar, B., & Mukiyen Avcı, G. (2025). Yeşil büyümenin dinamikleri: ekonomik büyüme, ticaret ve yenilenebilir enerjinin rolü. Uluslararası Ekonomi ve Yenilik Dergisi, 11(1), 261-283.
• Bailey, D. (2015). The environmental paradox of the welfare state: The dynamics of sustainability. New political economy, 20(6), 793-811. https://doi.org/10.1080 /13563467.2015.1079169.
• Blundell, R., and Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 115-143.
• Bozkaya, Ş., & Duran, M. S. (2024). Yeşil büyüme sürecinin enerji verimliliği üzerine etkisinin araştırılması: G-7 ülkeleri üzerine bir inceleme. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Meslek Yüksekokulu Dergisi, 27(2), 799-810.
• Brundtland, G.H. (1987). “Our common future—call for action”, Environmental Conservation, 14(4), 291-294.
• Caetano, R. V., Marques, A. C., & Afonso, T. L. (2022). How can foreign direct investment trigger green growth? The mediating and moderating role of the energy transition. Economies, 10(8), 199. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10080199 .
• Charlier, D., & Fizaine, F. (2023). Decoupling gross domestic product and consumption of raw materials: A macro-panel analysis. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 36, 194-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.12.020 .
• Ekins, P., (2002). Economic growth and environmental sustainability: the prospects for green growth. London and New York: Routledge.
• Fraser Institute (2025), Economic freedom of the world, Retrieved from https://www.fraserinstitute.org/ categories/economic-freedom, 26.02.2025.
• Goldin, I. & Winters, L.A. (1995). The economics of sustainable development. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1991). Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement, (No. w3914). National Bureau of Economic Research.
• Haug, A. A., & Ucal, M. (2019). The role of trade and FDI for CO2 emissions in Turkey: Nonlinear relationships. Energy Economics, 81, 297-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.eneco.2019.04.006.
• Hsiao, C. (2003). Analysis of panel data. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Işık, S. (2025). Sürdürülebilir kalkınma ile yeşil büyüme ilişkisi: Seçilmiş AB ülkeleri özelinde ampirik bir analiz. Verimlilik Dergisi, 59(1), 1-12.
• Küçük, G. ve Aksel, E. (2020). Yeşil ekonomi: Kavram ve dinamikler. Duran, M.S (Ed.), Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma ve Büyüme Sürecinde Yeşil Ekonomi. 1. Basım, Ekin Yayınevi: Bursa.
• Mensah, C. N., Long, X., Dauda, L., Boamah, K. B., Salman, M., Appiah-Twum, F., & Tachie, A. K. (2019). Technological innovation and green growth in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development economies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 240, 118204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118204 .
• Naimoğlu, M. (2022). Yenilenebilir enerji kullanımının yeşil büyüme üzerindeki etkisi: Yükselen ekonomiler örneği. Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi, 22(2), 1-13.
• Nguyen, C. P., Nguyen, N. A., Schinckus, C., & Su, T. D. (2018). The ambivalent role of institutions in the CO2 emissions: the case of emerging countries. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 8(5), 7-17.
• OECD (2009). “Declaration on green growth adopted at the meeting of the council at ministerial level on 25 June 2009”, OECD Publishing, Retrieved from https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0374
• OECD (2018) What is green growth, and how can it help deliver sustainable development?. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/greengrowth/whatisgreengrowthandhowcanithelpdeliversustainabledevelopment.htm .
• OECD (2025), Green growth, environment and climate change, Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/ , 05.02.2025.
• Ottelin, J., Heinonen, J., & Junnila, S. (2018). Carbon and material footprints of a welfare state: Why and how governments should enhance green investments. Environmental Science & Policy, 86, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.04.011 .
• Özbek, S. (2023). Yeşil büyümenin belirleyicileri: Çin örneği. Uluslararası İktisadi Ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, (40), 17-32.
• Popp, D. (2012). The role of technological change in green growth, (No. 18506). National Bureau of Economic Research.
• Pothen F, & Welsch H (2019) Economic development and material use. Evidence from international panel data. World Development, 115, 107–119.
• Razzaq, A., Ajaz, T., Li, J.C., Irfan, M., & Suksatan, W., (2021). Investigating the asymmetric linkages between infrastructure development, green innovation, and consumption-based material footprint: novel empirical estimations from highly resource-consuming economies. Resources Policy. 74, 102302 https://doi.org/10.1016/j . resourpol.2021.102302.
• Sahoo, M., Saini, S., & Villanthenkodath, M.A., (2021). Determinants of material footprint in BRICS countries: an empirical analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 28 (28), 37689–37704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13309-7 .
• Salahuddin, M., Alam, K., Ozturk, I., & Sohag, K. (2018). The effects of electricity consumption, economic growth, financial development and foreign direct investment on CO2 emissions in Kuwait. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 81, 2002-2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.009 .
• Samad, G., & Manzoor, R. (2015). Green growth: Important determinants. The Singapore Economic Review, 60(02), 1550014. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217590815500149 .
• Sandberg, M., Klockars, K., & Wilén, K. (2019). Green growth or degrowth? Assessing the normative justifications for environmental sustainability and economic growth through critical social theory. Journal of Cleaner Production, 206, 133-141.
• Sarkodie, S. A., & Adams, S. (2018). Renewable energy, nuclear energy, and environmental pollution: accounting for political institutional quality in South Africa. Science of the total environment, 643, 1590-1601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.320 .
• Solow, R. M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. The quarterly journal of economics, 70(1), 65-94.
• Tawiah, V., Zakari, A., & Adedoyin, F. F. (2021). Determinants of green growth in developed and developing countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(29), 39227-39242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13429-0 .
• United Nations, (2019). World Population Prospects, Retrieved from https://population.un.org /wpp/publications/files/wpp2019_highlights.pdf, 21.06.2025.
• United Nations, (2022). World Population Prospects, Retrieved from https://www.un.org/development/desa/ pd/content/World-Population-Prospects-2022, 23.06.2025.
• Wang, X., & Shao, Q. (2019). Non-linear effects of heterogeneous environmental regulations on green growth in G20 countries: Evidence from panel threshold regression. Science of the Total Environment, 660, 1346-1354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv . 2019.01.094.
• World Bank (2022). Povery and Shared Prosperity: Correcting Course, Retrieved from https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/b96b361a-a806-5567-8e8a-b14392e11fa0/content , 29.06.2025.
• World Bank (2025a). World Development Indicators, Retrieved from https://databank.worldbank . org/home.aspx, 25.02.2025.
• World Bank (2025b). Worldwide Governance Indicators, Retrieved from https://databank.worldbank . org/home.aspx, 26.02.2025.
• Yan, Z., Zou, B., Du, K., & Li, K. (2020). Do renewable energy technology innovations promote China's green productivity growth? Fresh evidence from partially linear functional-coefficient models. Energy Economics, 90, 104842. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104842.
• Yerdelen-Tatoğlu, F. (2012). İleri panel veri analizi: Stata uygulamalı. İstanbul: Beta Yayıncılık.
• Yılmazer, M. & Ersoy Açıkgöz, B. (2009). Kirlilik sığınağı hipotezi, doğrudan yabancı yatırımlar ve kamu politikalar, Ege Akademik Bakış, 9 (4), 1441-1462.