İlkokul Öğretmenleri Sağlık ve Sosyal Yardım Sandığı’nın Finansal Performans Analizi

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1, 1 - 31, 30.06.2017

Aşır Özbek

https://izlik.org/JA95PW62LA

Öz

Yardımlaşma
sandıkları da kâr amacı güden işletmeler gibi verimliliğe odaklanarak
faaliyetlerini sürdürmelidir. Üyelerin maksimum seviyede fayda sağlamaları ancak
sandıkların verimli çalışmaları ile  mümkün olabilmektedir. İlkokul Öğretmenleri
Sağlık ve Sosyal Yardım Sandığı (İLKSAN) kanun ile kurulan ve üyelerinin
faydalanma derecesini en yüksek noktaya taşımak durumunda olan bir kuruluştur. Bu
çalışma ile İLKSAN için performans ölçümü yapılmıştır. Performans ölçümünde dokuz
adet ölçüt belirlenmiştir. Belirlenen ölçütlere göre İLKSAN'ın 2006-2015
yılları arasındaki bilanço ve gelir tabloları COPRAS, ELECTRE III ve TOPSIS
yöntemleri kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Analiz sonuçları yöntemlere göre benzerlik
göstermiştir. COPRAS ve TOPSIS yöntem sonuçları birbirine eşit çıkmıştır. Ancak
ELECTRE III sonuçları bu iki yöntemin sonuçlarından biraz ayrılmıştır. COPRAS
ve TOPSIS yöntemlerine göre en başarılı yıl 2007 olurken ELECTRE III'e göre
2014 yılı olmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

COPRAS , ELECTRE III , TOPSIS , Performans Ölçümü , Çok Ölçütlü Karar Verme

Kaynakça

• Aksoy, E., Ömürbek, N. ve Karaatlı, M. (2015). AHP Temelli MULTIMOORA ve COPRAS Yöntemi ile Türkiye Kömür İşletmeleri’nin Performans Değerlendirmesi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 33(4), 3-27.
• Arena, M., Azzone, G. ve Bengo, I. (2015). Performance Measurement for Social Enterprises. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 26(2), 649-672.
• Atıcı, K.B. ve Ulucan, A. (2009). Enerji Projelerinin Değerlendirilmesi Sürecinde Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yaklaşımları ve Türkiye Uygulamaları. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 27(1),161-186.
• Awasthi, A., Chauhan, S. S. ve Omrani, H. (2011). Application of fuzzy TOPSIS in evaluating sustainable transportation systems. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(10), 12270-12280.
• Behzadian, M., Otaghsara, S. K., Yazdani, M. ve Ignatius, J. (2012). A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(17), 13051-13069.
• Cavallaro, F. (2010). A comparative assessment of thin-film photovoltaic production processes using the ELECTRE III method. Energy Policy, 38(1), 463-474.
• Chakraborty, S. (2011). Applications of the MOORA method for decision making in manufacturing environment. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 54(9), 1155-1166.
• Chang, Y. H., Shao, P. C. ve Chen, H. J. (2015). Performance evaluation of airport safety management systems in Taiwan. Safety Science, 75, 72-86.
• Chatterjee, P. ve Chakraborty, S. (2012). Material selection using preferential ranking methods. Materials & Design, 35, 384-393.
• Chatterjee, P., Athawale, V. M. ve Chakraborty, S. (2011). Materials selection using complex proportional assessment and evaluation of mixed data methods. Materials & Design, 32(2), 851-860.
• Das, M. C., Sarkar, B. ve Ray, S. (2012). A framework to measure relative performance of Indian technical institutions using integrated fuzzy AHP and COPRAS methodology. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 46(3), 230-241.
• Ding, L. ve Zeng, Y. (2015). Evaluation of Chinese higher education by TOPSIS and IEW—The case of 68 universities belonging to the Ministry of Education in China. China Economic Review, 36, 341-358.
• Drejeris, R. ve Kavolynas, A. (2014). Multi-criteria Evaluation of Building Sustainability Behavior. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 110, 502-511.
• Fancello, G., Carta, M. ve Fadda, P. (2014). A decision support system based on Electre III for safety analysis in a suburban road network. Transportation Research Procedia, 3, 175-184.
• Figueira, J., Mousseau, V. ve Roy, B. (2005). Electre Methods, in: Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, (J. Figueria, S. Greco, M. Ehrgott) (eds.), Springer: Boston.
• Giannoulis, C. ve Ishizaka, A. (2010). A Web-based decision support system with ELECTRE III for a personalised ranking of British universities. Decision Support Systems, 48(3), 488-497.
• Haq, M., Skully, M. ve Pathan, S. (2010). Efficiency of microfinance institutions: A data envelopment analysis. Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, 17(1), 63-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10690-009-9103-7
• Hashemi, S. S., Hajiagha, S. H. R., Zavadskas, E. K. ve Mahdiraji, H. A. (2016). Multicriteria group decision making with ELECTRE III method based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 40(2), 1554-1564.
• Hokkanen, J. ve P. Salminen (1997). ELECTRE III and IV Decision Aids in an Environmental Problem. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 6, 215–216.
• İLKSAN (2016) http://www.ilksan.gov.tr/Kurumsal?id=1 (Erişim Tarihi: 18.04 2016) Jothimani, D. ve Sarmah, S. P. (2014). Supply chain performance measurement for third party logistics. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 21(6), 944-963.
• Kaklauskas, A., Zavadskas, E. K.ve Raslanas, S. (2005). Multivariant design and multiple criteria analysis of building refurbishments. Energy and Buildings, 37(4), 361-372.
• Karagiannidis, A. ve Moussiopoulos, N. (1997). Application of ELECTRE III for the integrated management of municipal solid wastes in the Greater Athens Area. In Multiple Criteria Decision Making Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
• Kirigia, J. M., Emrouznejad, A., Sambo, L. G., Munguti, N. ve Liambila, W. (2004). Using data envelopment analysis to measure the technical efficiency of public health centers in Kenya. Journal of Medical Systems, 28(2), 155-166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:JOMS.0000023298.31972.c9
• Kirigia, J. M., Sambo, L. G., Renner, A., Alemu, W., Seasa, S. ve Bah, Y. (2011). Technical efficiency of primary health units in Kailahun and Kenema districts of Sierra Leone. International Archives of Medicine, 4(1), 15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1755-7682-4-15
• Li, H. F. ve Wang, J. J. (2007). An improved ranking method for ELECTRE III. In 2007 International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile computing.
• Maity, S. R., Chatterjee, P. ve Chakraborty, S. (2012). Cutting tool material selection using grey complex proportional assessment method. Materials & Design, 36, 372-378.
• Mandal, U. K. ve Sarkar, B. (2012). An Exploratory Analysis of Intelligent Manufacturing System (Ims) Under Fuzzy Utopian Environment. IOSR J. Eng., 2(8), 129-140.
• Nuuter, T., Lill, I. ve Tupenaite, L. (2015). Comparison of housing market sustainability in European countries based on multiple criteria assessment. Land Use Policy, 42, 642-651.
• Oltean-Dumbrava, C., Watts, G. ve Miah, A. (2016). Towards a more sustainable surface transport infrastructure: a case study of applying multi criteria analysis techniques to assess the sustainability of transport noise reducing devices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 2922-2934
• Özbek, A ve Erol, E. (2016). COPRAS ve MOORA Yöntemlerinin Depo Yeri Seçim Problemine Uygulanması, JEBPIR, 2(1), 2016, 23-42.
• Özbek, A. (2013). Performance evaluation of learning management system. NWSA-Education Sciences, 8(2), 156-178. http://dx.doi.org/10.12739/ NWSA.2013.8. 2.1C0580.
• Özbek, A. (2014). Sivil Toplum Kuruluşlarında Yöneticilerin Bütünleşik Bir Yaklaşım İle Seçilmesi. International Journal of Engineering Research and Development, 6(2), 1-10.
• Özbek, A. (2015a). Efficiency Analysis of the Turkish Red Crescent between 2012 and 2014. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 7(9), 322-334.
• Özbek, A. (2015b). Efficiency Analysis of Non-Governmental Organizations Based in Turkey. International Business Research, 8(9), 95-104.
• Özbek, A. (2015c). Gönüllü Kuruluşlarda Çalışanların ELECTRE Yöntemine Göre Değerlendirilmesi, Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 14(54), 219-232.
• Özbek, A. ve Eren, T. (2013). Çok Ölçütlü Karar Verme Teknikleri İle Hizmet Sağlayıcı Seçimi. Akademik Bakış Dergisi, 36,1-22.
• Özdağoğlu, A. (2013). İmalat İşletmeleri İçin Eksantrik Pres Alternatiflerinin COPRAS Yöntemi İle Karşılaştırılması. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 4(8), 71-99.
• Papadopoulos, A. ve Karagiannidis, A. (2008). Application of the multi-criteria analysis method Electre III for the optimisation of decentralised energy systems. Omega, 36(5), 766-776.
• Pazand, K., Hezarkhani, A. ve Ataei, M. (2012). Using TOPSIS approaches for predictive porphyry Cu potential mapping: A case study in Ahar-Arasbaran area (NW, Iran). Computers & Geosciences, 49, 62-71.
• Petkovic, D., Madic, M. ve Radenkovic, G. (2015). Selection of the most suitable non-conventional machining processes for ceramics machining by using MCDMs. Science of Sintering, 47(2), 229.
• Rabbani, A., Zamani, M., Yazdani-Chamzini, A. ve Zavadskas, E. K. (2014). Proposing a new integrated model based on sustainability balanced scorecard (SBSC) and MCDM approaches by using linguistic variables for the performance evaluation of oil producing companies. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(16), 7316-7327.
• Ravi, V. (2011). Selection of third-party reverse logistics providers for End-of-Life computers using TOPSIS-AHP based approach. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 11(1), 24-37.
• Rogers, M. (2000). Using Electre III to Aid The Choice of Housing Construction Process within Structural Engineering. Construction Management and Economics, 18, 333-342.
• Singh, R. K., Gupta, A., Kumar, A. ve Khan, T. A. (2016). Ranking of barriers for effective maintenance by using TOPSIS approach. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 22(1), 18-34.
• Stanujkic, D., Djordjevic, B. ve Djordjevic, M. (2013). Comparative analysis of some prominent MCDM methods: A case of ranking Serbian banks. Serbian Journal of Management, 8(2), 213-241.
• Tetik, S. (2003). İşletme Performansını Belirlemede Veri Zarflama Analizi. Yönetim ve Ekonomi: Celal Bayar Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(2), 221-230.
• Tyagi, M., Kumar, P. ve Kumar, D. (2015). Parametric selection of alternatives to improve performance of green supply chain management system. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 189, 449 – 457.
• Wanke, P., Azad, M. A. K. ve Barros, C. P. (2016). Predicting efficiency in Malaysian Islamic banks: A two-stage TOPSIS and neural networks approach. Research in International Business and Finance, 36, 485-498.
• Wijesiri, M., Viganò, L. ve Meoli, M. (2015). Efficiency of microfinance institutions in Sri Lanka: a two-stage double bootstrap DEA approach. Economic Modelling, 47, 74-83.
• Xi, F. ve Zhang, L. (2011). A personnel selection model based on TOPSIS. Management science and Engineering, 5(3), 107-110.
• Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A., Peldschus, F. ve Turskis, Z. (2007). Multi-Attrıbute Assessment Of Road Design Solutions By Using The Copras Method. Baltic Journal of Road & Bridge Engineering, 2(4).
• Zhang, K. ve Shi, Q. (2010). Safety Evaluation in Power Supply Enterprises Using the ELECTRE III and TOPSIS Methods. In Intelligent Systems and Applications (ISA), 2010 2nd International Workshop on ,IEEE 1-4.