Türkiye’de Kurumsal Teori Alanında Çalışan Akademisyenlerin Küçük Dünya Varsayımı

Yıl 2020, , 731 - 750, 25.12.2020

Ela Özkan Canbolat , Aydın Beraha , Emine Çeliksoy , Abdullah Baş

https://doi.org/10.18074/ckuiibfd.697469

Öz

Bu makalede yönetim bilimleri alanında kurumsal teori çalışan akademisyenlerin çalıştıkları kurumlar, doktora derecelerini aldıkları üniversiteler ve beraber yayın yaptıkları kişiler göz önünde bulundurularak ilişki bağları derecelendirilmiştir. Bu çalışmanın temel sorusu Türkiye’de yönetim- organizasyon ve yönetim bilimleri alanlarında kurumsal teori konusunda çalışan ve en çok yayın yapan akademisyenlerin aralarında bir ağ düzeneği olup olmadığı ve varsa bu ağın “küçük dünya “ varsayımı ile örtüşüp örtüşmediğidir. Farklı denemeler ve özel hesaplamalar “küçük dünya fenomeni”ni zamanla akademik bir fenomene dönüştürmüştür. Elde edilen bulgulara göre Türkiye’de yönetim bilimleri alanında çalışan akademisyenler arasında “küçük dünya ”varsayımını destekleyici nitelikte bir ağ düzeneği bulunmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

ağ düzenekleri, küçük dünya varsayımı

Kaynakça

• Adler, P. S. (2001). Market, hierarchy, and trust: The knowledge economy and the future of capitalism. Organization Science, 12(2), 215-234. Adler, P. S. ve Kwon, S-W. 2002. Social capital: Prospects for a new concept, Academy of Management Review, 27 (1):17-40. Alba, R D. (1982). Taking stock of network analysis: A decade results, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, (1):39-74. Aldrich, H. E. (1999). Organizations Evolving. London: Sage. Barabási, A. L., & Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286(5439), 509-512. Brust, M. R., & Rothkugel, S. (2007). Small worlds: Strong clustering in wireless networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:0706.1063. Burt, R. S. (1987). Social contagion and innovation: Cohesion versus structural equivalence. American Journal of Sociology, (92): 1287–1335. Chen, Y. Y., & Jaw, Y. L. (2014). How do business groups’ small world networks effect diversification, innovation, and internationalization?. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 31(4), 1019-1044. Crossley, N. (2008). Small-world networks, complex systems and sociology. Sociology, 42(2), 261-277. Di Fatta, D., Caputo, F., Evangelista, F., & Dominici, G. (2016). Small world theory and the World Wide Web: linking small world properties and website centrality. International Journal of Markets and Business Systems, 2(2), 126-140. DiMaggio, P. J. (1991). Constructing an organizational field as a professional project: U.S. Art Museums, 1920-1940. Powell, W.W., ve P.J. DiMaggio (Der.) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis: 267-292. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660-679. Fass, C., Turtle, B., ve Ginelli, M. (1996). Six Degrees of Kevin Bacon. New York City: Plume. ISBN 978-0-452-27844-8. Festinger, L. (1954). A Theory of Social Comparison Processes. Human Relations, (7): 114–140. Friedkin, N. (1988). A Structural Theory of Social Influence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Galaskiewicz, J. ve Burt, R. S. (1991). Interorganizational Contagion in Corporate Philanthropy. Administrative Science Quarterly, (36): 88-105. Goffman, C. (1969). And what is your Erdős number? American Mathematical Monthly, (76): 791. doi:10.2307/2317868. Grannis, R. (2010). Six degrees of “who cares?”. American Journal of Sociology, 115(4), 991-1017. Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91 (3): 481-510. Greve, H. R. (1996). Patterns of competition: The diffusion of a market position in radio broadcasting. Administrative Science Quarterly, (41): 29-60. Gu, W., & Liu, J. (2019). Exploring small-world network with an elite-clique: Bringing embeddedness theory into the dynamic evolution of a venture capital network. Social Networks, 57, 70-81. Guare, John (1990). Six Degrees of Separation: A Play. New York: Random House. ISBN 0-679-40161-X. Gurevich, M. (1961). The Social Structure of Acquaintanceship Networks, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Hanneman ve Riddle, (2005). Introduction to social network methods. Riverside, CA: University of California. Karinthy, Frigyes. (1929). Chain-Links. Translated from Hungarian and annotated by Adam Makkai and Enikö Jankó. Kastelle, T., & Steen, J. (2010). Are small world networks always best for innovation?. Innovation, 12(1), 75-87. Kilduff, M. ve Tsai, W. (2003). Social networks and organizations. London, UK: Sage Publications. Kochen, M. (1978–1979). Contacts and Influence. Social Networks 1(1): 5–51. Korte, C., ve Milgram, S. (1970). Acquaintance links between White and Negro populations: Application of the small world method. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 15(2), 101-108. Leskovec, J., & Horvitz, E. (2007). Worldwide Buzz: Planetary-scale views on an instant-messaging network Sayı: 60, Technical Report, Microsoft Research. Lounsbury, M., & Ventresca, M. J. (Der.). (2002). Social Structure and Organizations Revisited, (19): 3-38. JAI. Maslov, S., Sneppen, K., & Zaliznyak, A. (2004). Detection of topological patterns in complex networks: correlation profile of the internet. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 333, 529-540. Milgram,S. (1967). The Small World Problem, Psychology Today, 2, 60-67. Moore, K. (1999). Political protest and institutional change: The anti-Vietnam War movement and American science. M. Giugni, D. McAdam, and C. Tilly (Der.), How Social Movements Matter. 97-118. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. Newman, M. E. J. ve Strogatz, S. H. and Watts, D. J. (2001). Random graphs with arbitrary degree distributions and their applications. Physical Review E. 64(2), 26-118. Özen, Ş. ve Aslan, Z. (2006). İçsel ve dışsal sosyal sermaye yaklaşımları açısından Türk toplumunun sosyal sermaye potansiyeli: Ortadoğu Sanayi ve Ticaret Merkezi (OSTİM) örneği, Akdeniz Üniversitesi İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 12(2), 130-161. Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Shotland, R. L. (1976). University communication networks: The small world method. New York: Wiley. Strang, D. ve Soule, S. A. (1998). Diffusion in organizations and social movements: From hybrid corn to poison pills. Annual Review of Sociology, 24: 265–290. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews. Tanimoto, J. (2016). A multi-community homogeneous small-world network and its fundamental characteristics. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 460, 88-97. The Erdös Number Project. "Some Famous People with Finite Erdős Numbers". http://wwwp.oakland.edu/enp/. adresinden erişildi. <1 Haziran 2015>. Travers, J. ve Milgram, S. (1969). An Experimental Study of the Small World Problem, Sociometry, 32(4), 425–443 Watts, D.J. ve Strogatz, S.H. (1998). Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks. Nature 393 (6684): 409–10. Wellman, B. (1988). Structural Analysis: From method and metaphor to theory and substance. Wellman, B. ve Berkowitz, S. D. (Der.), Social Structures: A Network Approach. New York: Cambridge University Press. West, E., Barron, D. N., Dowsett, J., & Newton, J. N. (1999). Hierarchies and cliques in the social networks of health care professionals: implications for the design of dissemination strategies. Social science & medicine, 48(5), 633-646.