Abstract
Bu makale Hattuša-Boğazköy’de ele geçen çift dilli bir metin olan Šalašu Ritüeli’nin Hurrice ve Hititçe versiyonlarını içermektedir. KBo 19.145 ritüelin sekizinci tabletidir. Bu ritüel Kizzuwatnalı MUNUSŠU.GI Šalašu tarafından büyüye karşı icra edilmiştir. Hurrice ve Hititçe pasajlar arasında bazı farklılıklar görülmektedir. Bunlardan bazıları şöyledir: Hurrice versiyonunda Ay. IV 41’-42’ kaššap i =a=dil ararē=[ni ašt i =a] 42 fir=vir=išt=i=b “Kapıda [kadını] büyü[den] serbest bıraktık”, Hititçe versiyonunda Ay. III 41’-42’ āški=kán alwanzaḫḫandan MUNUS-an 42 lānun “kapıda büyü yapılmış kadını serbest bıraktım”. Hurrice pasajda -dil birinci çoğul şahıs zamiri kullanılırken Hititçe lanun fiili birinci tekil şahıs formda çekimlenmiştir. Bu pasajda dikkate değer bir diğer nokta; Hurrice fir=vir=išt=i=b fiili Hititçeye geçmiş zaman olarak tercüme edilmiştir -bilindiği gibi Eski Hurrice’de zaman belirten ek yoktur-, aynı cümle Ay .III 47’-49’ Hititçeye emir kipinde tercüme edilmiştir: Ay. IV 47’-50’ aški=kán anda 48’ [alwanzaḫ]ḫ[anda]n MUNUS-an lātten 49’ [āški=kán anda alwanza]ḫḫandan LÚ-an 50’ arḫa [tarnatt]en. “Kapıda [büyü yapı]l[mış] kadını serbest bırakın! [Kapıda büyü yapıl]mış adamı serbest [bırak]ın!”
Keywords
References
- Campbell, D. R. M. 2007a Mood and Modality in Hurrian, Chicago Üniversitesi (Doktora Tezi), Chicago.
- 2007b “The Old Hurrian verb”, VI Congresso Internazionale di Ittitologia, Roma, 5-9 settembre
- 2005, Parte I (Studi Micenei ed Egeo-Anatolici 49): 75-92.
- 2008 “Split Ergativity in Hurrian”, Zeitschrift für Assyriologie und verwandte Gebiete 98: 262-294.
- Giorgieri, M. 1998 “Die erste Beschwörung der 8. Tafel des Šalašu-Rituals” General Studies and Excavations at Nuzi 10/2 (Studies on the Civilization and Culture of Nuzi and the Hurrians 9): 71-86.
- 2000 “Schizzo Grammaticale della Lingua Hurrica”, La Civiltà dei Hurriti (La Parola del Passato 55): 171-277.
- 2002 “Beiträge zu den hurritischen Texten aus Boğazköy”, P. Taracha (ed.), Silva Anatolica, Anatolian Studies Presented to Macciej Popko on the Occasion of His 65th Birthday, 109-117.
- Girbal, C. 1992 “Das hurritische Antipassive” Studi Micenei ed Egeo-Anatolici 29: 171-182.
- Güterbock, H. G. – H. Hoffner 1989 The Hittite Dictionary of the Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago (CHD L-N), Chicago.
- Haas, V. – H. J. Thiel 1978 Die Beschwörungsrituale der Allaiturah(h)i und verwandte Texte (AOAT 31), Neukirchen.
- Haas, V. – I. Wegner 1988 Die Rituale der Beschwörerinnen SALŠU.GI. (Corpus der Hurritischen Sprachdenkmäler I/5/1), Roma.
- Laroche, E. 1980 Glossaire de la langue hourrite, Paris.
- de Martino, S. – M. Giorgieri 2008 Literatur zum Hurritischen Lexikon (LHL) - Band 1.A., Firenze.
Abstract
The present paper includes the Hurrian and the Hittite versions of the Šalašu’s ritual which is a Hurrian-Hittite bilingual text from Hattuša-Boğazköy. KBo 19.145 is eighth tablet of the ritual. This ritual was performed against bewitchment by MUNUSŠU.GI Šalašu from Kizzuwatna. Some differences are observed between the Hurrian and the Hittite passages. Some of them are as follows: In Hurrian version Rev. IV 41’-42’ kaššap i =a=dil ararē=[ni ašt i =a] 42 fir=- vir=išt=i=b “We released the [woman from] sorcery at the gate”, the Hittite version is Rev. III 41’-42’ āški=kán alwanzaḫḫandan MUNUS-an 42 lānun “I released the bewitched woman at the gate”. The Hittite verb lānun occurs in the first person sg. while we find -dil first person pl. pronomen in the Hurrian passage. Another remarkable point in this passage; the Hurrian verb fir=vir=išt=i=b was translated into the Hittite as past tense lānun -as is well known the Old Hurrian doesn’t have temporal indicator- , the same phrases Rev. III 47’-49’ were translated into the Hittite as imperative: Rev. IV 47’-50’ aški=kán anda 48’ [alwanzaḫ]ḫ[anda]n MUNUS-an lātten 49’ [āški=kán anda alwanza]ḫḫandan LÚ-an 50’ arḫa [tarnatt]en. “Release the [bewit]c[he]d woman at the gate! [Relea]se the bewitched man at the gate!”
Keywords
References
- Campbell, D. R. M. 2007a Mood and Modality in Hurrian, Chicago Üniversitesi (Doktora Tezi), Chicago.
- 2007b “The Old Hurrian verb”, VI Congresso Internazionale di Ittitologia, Roma, 5-9 settembre
- 2005, Parte I (Studi Micenei ed Egeo-Anatolici 49): 75-92.
- 2008 “Split Ergativity in Hurrian”, Zeitschrift für Assyriologie und verwandte Gebiete 98: 262-294.
- Giorgieri, M. 1998 “Die erste Beschwörung der 8. Tafel des Šalašu-Rituals” General Studies and Excavations at Nuzi 10/2 (Studies on the Civilization and Culture of Nuzi and the Hurrians 9): 71-86.
- 2000 “Schizzo Grammaticale della Lingua Hurrica”, La Civiltà dei Hurriti (La Parola del Passato 55): 171-277.
- 2002 “Beiträge zu den hurritischen Texten aus Boğazköy”, P. Taracha (ed.), Silva Anatolica, Anatolian Studies Presented to Macciej Popko on the Occasion of His 65th Birthday, 109-117.
- Girbal, C. 1992 “Das hurritische Antipassive” Studi Micenei ed Egeo-Anatolici 29: 171-182.
- Güterbock, H. G. – H. Hoffner 1989 The Hittite Dictionary of the Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago (CHD L-N), Chicago.
- Haas, V. – H. J. Thiel 1978 Die Beschwörungsrituale der Allaiturah(h)i und verwandte Texte (AOAT 31), Neukirchen.
- Haas, V. – I. Wegner 1988 Die Rituale der Beschwörerinnen SALŠU.GI. (Corpus der Hurritischen Sprachdenkmäler I/5/1), Roma.
- Laroche, E. 1980 Glossaire de la langue hourrite, Paris.
- de Martino, S. – M. Giorgieri 2008 Literatur zum Hurritischen Lexikon (LHL) - Band 1.A., Firenze.
Details
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal Section | Advisory Board |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | June 1, 2016 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2016 Issue: 15 |