Research Article

Comparison of Dye Decolorization Potential of Gluconacetobacter xylinus and Newly Isolated Trametes trogii

Volume: 9 Number: 2 December 18, 2025
EN TR

Comparison of Dye Decolorization Potential of Gluconacetobacter xylinus and Newly Isolated Trametes trogii

Abstract

In this study, the dye removal ability of Gluconacetobacter xylinus NRRL B759 during bacterial cellulose production and dye decolorization efficiency of the newly isolated white rot fungus Trametes trogii were investigated. The most efficient results for Reactive Blue 171 dye were obtained on the 6th day under both static and agitated conditions at 30°C. The best results for Remazol Brilliant Blue R dye were determined at 30°C on the 10th and 8th days for static and agitated conditions, respectively. Most importantly, it was observed that biosorption was the main mechanism for dye removal activity of this bacterium. The decolorization ability of fungus was investigated under batch and repeated-batch processes. The most effective decolorization values were 48% on the 8th day for RB171 dye and 83% on the 6th day for RBBR dye under batch process. Decolorization activity of the pellets was tested under repeated-batch experiments in both distilled water and Sabouraud Dextrose Broth (SDB) media. In distilled water media, lower decolorization values were obtained for both dyes compared to SDB media. In SDB medium for RB171, the decolorization values are 70% in the 1st cycle and 19% in the 5th cycle. The RBBR dye decolorization values was 57% in the 1st cycle, while this value was reached 74% in the 5th cycle. The decolorization mechanism of the pellets was mainly a result of microbial metabolism.

Keywords

Ethical Statement

Ethics committee approval is not required for this study.

Thanks

We would like to thank Prof. Dr. Abbas GÜNGÖRDÜ for his assistance with the statistical analysis.

References

  1. Akoglu, A., Karahan, A.G., Cakmakci, M.L., & Cakir, I. (2010). Bakteriyel selülozun özellikleri ve gıda sanayide kullanımı. The Journal of Food, 35(2), 127-134.
  2. Anbia, M., Hariri, S., & Ashrafizadeh, S.N. (2010). Adsorptive removal of anionic dyes by modified nanoporous silica SBA-3. Applied Surface Sience, 256(10), 3228-3233, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2009.12.010
  3. Apohan, E., & Yesilada, O. (2005). Role of white rot fungus Funalia trogii in detoxification of textile dyes. Journal of Basic Microbiology, 45(2), 99- 105. https://doi.org/10.1002/jobm.200410463
  4. Azeredo, H.M.C., Barud, H., Farinas, C.S., Vasconcellos, V.M., & Claro, A.M. (2019) Bacterial cellulose as a raw material for food and food packaging applications. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 3-7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2019.00007
  5. Betlej, I., Zakaria, S., Krajewski, K.J., & Boruszewski, P. (2021). Bacterial cellulose -properties and its potential application. Sains Malaysiana, 50(2), 493- 505. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2019.00007
  6. Birben, M. (2019). Microbial selülozun boya gideriminde kullanımının araştırılması. Retrieved from: https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
  7. Birhanli, E., & Yesilada, O. (2010). Enhanced production of laccase in repeated-batch cultures of Funalia trogii and Trametes versicolor. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 52(1), 33-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2010.06.019
  8. Birhanli, E., Erdogan, S., Yesilada, O., & Onal, Y. (2013). Laccase production by newly isolated white rot fungus Funalia trogii: Effect of immobilization matrix on laccase production. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 71, 134–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2012.12.002

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Bioprocessing, Bioproduction and Bioproducts

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

December 18, 2025

Submission Date

April 21, 2025

Acceptance Date

September 17, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 9 Number: 2

APA
Yalçın, M., Boran, F., & Yeşilada, Ö. (2025). Comparison of Dye Decolorization Potential of Gluconacetobacter xylinus and Newly Isolated Trametes trogii. Commagene Journal of Biology, 9(2), 232-239. https://doi.org/10.31594/commagene.1681103
AMA
1.Yalçın M, Boran F, Yeşilada Ö. Comparison of Dye Decolorization Potential of Gluconacetobacter xylinus and Newly Isolated Trametes trogii. Comm. J. Biol. 2025;9(2):232-239. doi:10.31594/commagene.1681103
Chicago
Yalçın, Müge, Filiz Boran, and Özfer Yeşilada. 2025. “Comparison of Dye Decolorization Potential of Gluconacetobacter Xylinus and Newly Isolated Trametes Trogii”. Commagene Journal of Biology 9 (2): 232-39. https://doi.org/10.31594/commagene.1681103.
EndNote
Yalçın M, Boran F, Yeşilada Ö (December 1, 2025) Comparison of Dye Decolorization Potential of Gluconacetobacter xylinus and Newly Isolated Trametes trogii. Commagene Journal of Biology 9 2 232–239.
IEEE
[1]M. Yalçın, F. Boran, and Ö. Yeşilada, “Comparison of Dye Decolorization Potential of Gluconacetobacter xylinus and Newly Isolated Trametes trogii”, Comm. J. Biol., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 232–239, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.31594/commagene.1681103.
ISNAD
Yalçın, Müge - Boran, Filiz - Yeşilada, Özfer. “Comparison of Dye Decolorization Potential of Gluconacetobacter Xylinus and Newly Isolated Trametes Trogii”. Commagene Journal of Biology 9/2 (December 1, 2025): 232-239. https://doi.org/10.31594/commagene.1681103.
JAMA
1.Yalçın M, Boran F, Yeşilada Ö. Comparison of Dye Decolorization Potential of Gluconacetobacter xylinus and Newly Isolated Trametes trogii. Comm. J. Biol. 2025;9:232–239.
MLA
Yalçın, Müge, et al. “Comparison of Dye Decolorization Potential of Gluconacetobacter Xylinus and Newly Isolated Trametes Trogii”. Commagene Journal of Biology, vol. 9, no. 2, Dec. 2025, pp. 232-9, doi:10.31594/commagene.1681103.
Vancouver
1.Müge Yalçın, Filiz Boran, Özfer Yeşilada. Comparison of Dye Decolorization Potential of Gluconacetobacter xylinus and Newly Isolated Trametes trogii. Comm. J. Biol. 2025 Dec. 1;9(2):232-9. doi:10.31594/commagene.1681103