Research Article

Patriarchal discourse, episodic journalism, and ideological stances in newspapers’ feminicide news in Türkiye: A case study of Başak Cengiz murder

Number: 68 June 27, 2025
TR EN

Patriarchal discourse, episodic journalism, and ideological stances in newspapers’ feminicide news in Türkiye: A case study of Başak Cengiz murder

Abstract

News coverage of violence against women frequently employs patriarchal discourse that implicitly justifies male perpetrators, especially in cases involving known relationships. Violence against women is also legitimized by focusing on victimblaming notions, such as women’s attire and behaviors. This study examines whether patriarchal discourse persists in Turkish news coverage even when victim and perpetrator have no prior connection and discriminatory justifications based on women’s attire are irrelevant. Additionally, recognizing the significant role of framing in news stories in shaping public discourse, this study explores framing strategies adopted by Turkish newspapers in reporting femicide and investigates whether these frames differ according to newspapers’ ideological orientations. Integrating van Dijk’s Critical Discourse Analysis and Iyengar’s framing approach, this study analyzes news stories from 12 national newspapers regarding the murder of Başak Cengiz by an unfamiliar male perpetrator. Findings reveal that patriarchal language consistently, legitimizing male violence irrespective of the relationship between the parties. In the absence of traditional victimblaming narratives, the press constructed alternative myth centered on perceived female vulnerability. Furthermore, the analyzed newspapers predominantly utilized episodic framing with thematic framing primarily observed in left leaning newspapers. Some right wing newspapers chose not to report on the femicide unless they have political relevance.

Keywords

References

  1. Anadolu Ajansı (2024). Muhabir. AA Kitap google scholar
  2. Akkaş, İ. & Uyanık, Z. (2016). Kadına yönelik şiddet. Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi SBE Dergisi, 6 (1), 32-42. google scholar
  3. Alat, Z. (2006). News coverage of violence against women: The Turkish case. Feminist Media Studies, 6(3), 295–314. https://doi.org/10. 1080/14680770600802041 google scholar
  4. Altınay, G. A. & Arat, Y. (2007). Türkiye’de kadına yönelik şiddet. Punto Baskı. google scholar
  5. Altun, A. & Bek, M. G. (2013). Haberlerde aile içi şiddetin temsili. Kadın Araştırmaları Dergisi, 13, 1-34. google scholar
  6. Antmen, D. (2023). Explaining the justification of violence against women based on the system justification theory. Nesne, 11(29), 503-518. google scholar
  7. Arslan, M. (2017). İktidar ve medyatik şiddet: Özgecan Aslan ve Şefika Etik cinayetleri analizi. Marmara İletişim Dergisi, 27, 135-160. google scholar
  8. Aslan, A., & Kırışkan, İ. (2022). Türkiye’de kadın cinayeti haberlerinin içerik analizi (2008-2021). International Journal of Social Inquiry, 15(1), 85-104. https://doi.org/10.37093/ijsi.1034519 google scholar

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Communication and Media Studies (Other)

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

June 27, 2025

Submission Date

September 7, 2024

Acceptance Date

June 27, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Number: 68

APA
Serttaş, R., & Ünal, B. (2025). Patriarchal discourse, episodic journalism, and ideological stances in newspapers’ feminicide news in Türkiye: A case study of Başak Cengiz murder. Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences, 68, 95-118. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2025-1543750
AMA
1.Serttaş R, Ünal B. Patriarchal discourse, episodic journalism, and ideological stances in newspapers’ feminicide news in Türkiye: A case study of Başak Cengiz murder. Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences. 2025;(68):95-118. doi:10.26650/CONNECTIST2025-1543750
Chicago
Serttaş, Rukiye, and Barışkan Ünal. 2025. “Patriarchal Discourse, Episodic Journalism, and Ideological Stances in Newspapers’ Feminicide News in Türkiye: A Case Study of Başak Cengiz Murder”. Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences, nos. 68: 95-118. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2025-1543750.
EndNote
Serttaş R, Ünal B (June 1, 2025) Patriarchal discourse, episodic journalism, and ideological stances in newspapers’ feminicide news in Türkiye: A case study of Başak Cengiz murder. Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences 68 95–118.
IEEE
[1]R. Serttaş and B. Ünal, “Patriarchal discourse, episodic journalism, and ideological stances in newspapers’ feminicide news in Türkiye: A case study of Başak Cengiz murder”, Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences, no. 68, pp. 95–118, June 2025, doi: 10.26650/CONNECTIST2025-1543750.
ISNAD
Serttaş, Rukiye - Ünal, Barışkan. “Patriarchal Discourse, Episodic Journalism, and Ideological Stances in Newspapers’ Feminicide News in Türkiye: A Case Study of Başak Cengiz Murder”. Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences. 68 (June 1, 2025): 95-118. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2025-1543750.
JAMA
1.Serttaş R, Ünal B. Patriarchal discourse, episodic journalism, and ideological stances in newspapers’ feminicide news in Türkiye: A case study of Başak Cengiz murder. Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences. 2025;:95–118.
MLA
Serttaş, Rukiye, and Barışkan Ünal. “Patriarchal Discourse, Episodic Journalism, and Ideological Stances in Newspapers’ Feminicide News in Türkiye: A Case Study of Başak Cengiz Murder”. Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences, no. 68, June 2025, pp. 95-118, doi:10.26650/CONNECTIST2025-1543750.
Vancouver
1.Rukiye Serttaş, Barışkan Ünal. Patriarchal discourse, episodic journalism, and ideological stances in newspapers’ feminicide news in Türkiye: A case study of Başak Cengiz murder. Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences. 2025 Jun. 1;(68):95-118. doi:10.26650/CONNECTIST2025-1543750