2019 Yerel Seçiminde Sosyal Medyadaki Siyasal Katılım Üzerinde, Siyasal Tutumlar, Siyasal Etkinlik ve Sosyal Medya Kullanım Örüntülerinin Rolü: Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Öğrencileri Araştırması

Year 2020, , 55 - 85, 18.01.2021

Şükrü Balcı Hüsamettin Akar

https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2020-0528

Abstract

Siyasal katılım, bir seçmenin sandık başında oy kullanmasından, hükûmet yetkilisinin icraatını desteklemek veya etkilemek ya da vatandaşın siyasete duyduğu ilgiye kadar geniş bir yelpazede değerlendirilebilen bir kavramdır. Siyasal katılım hayatın her anında siyasal otoriteyi etkilemek adına yürütülen eylemler olurken; iletişim teknolojilerinin gelişimi ile birlikte insanların siyasal katılım biçimlerinde değişim ve dönüşüm yaşanmaya başlamıştır. Bu araştırma, üniversite öğrencilerinin 2019 Yerel Seçimleri sürecinde sosyal medyada siyasal katılım biçimlerini belirlemek; siyasal katılım ile siyasal tutumlar, siyasal etkinlik ve sosyal medya kullanım örüntüleri arasındaki ilişkiyi mercek altına almak amacıyla yürütülmüştür. Alan araştırmasının kullanıldığı çalışmada veriler, 283 katılımcıdan yüz yüze anket tekniğiyle toplanmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda katılımcıların yerel seçimlerdeki siyasal karar süreçlerinde internet, sosyal medya ve televizyonu daha etkili gördüğü tespit edilmiştir. Üniversite öğrencilerinin ülke sorunlarına ilgi düzeyi arttıkça, politikaya katılmak için kendisini nitelikli bulma ve ülkenin karşı karşıya kaldığı önemli siyasi sorunları iyi anlama düzeylerinde bir artış yaşanmaktadır. Parti bağlılığı ile hükümet etkinliği ve iç siyasal etkinlik arasında zayıf düzeyde anlamlı ilişki bulunmaktadır. İç siyasal etkinlik, parti bağlılığı, ülke sorunlarına ilgi, siyasal kampanyalara ilgi ve siyasal kararlarda sosyal medya etkisinin sosyal medyada siyasal katılım puanını pozitif yönde anlamlı biçimde yordadığı dikkat çekmektedir.

Keywords

Sosyal medya, siyasal katılım, siyasal etkinlik, tutumlar, yerel seçim

Supporting Institution

Yazarlar bu çalışma için finansal destek almadığını beyan etmiştir.

The Role of Political Attitudes, Political Efficacy and Social Media Usage Patterns on Political Participation in Social Media in the 2019 Local Election: Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University Students Research

Abstract

Political participation is a concept that can be evaluated in many ways, from voting at the ballot box to supporting or influencing the actions and choices of government officials, or the interest of the citizen in politics. With the development of communication technologies, significant changes have started to occur in people’s political participation. In this research, the political participation styles of university students on social media during the 2019 Turkish local elections were determined. The research examines the relationship between political participation and political attitudes, as well as between political activity and social media usage. Field research was the principal form of data collection: 283 participants took part in face-to-face surveys. As a result of the research, it was determined that the participants saw internet, social media, and television more effective in the political decision process during local elections. As the level of interest of university students in the country’s problems increases, there is an increase in the participation in politics and understanding the important political problems faced by the country. There is a not so significant relationship between party loyalty and government and internal political efficacy. It is noteworthy that internal political efficacy, party loyalty, interest in country’s problems, interest in political campaigns, and social media effectiveness in political decisions positively predict the political participation score in social media.

Keywords

Social media, political participation, political activity, attitudes, local election

References

• Ahmad, T., Alvi, A., & Ittefag M. (2019). The use of social media on political participation among university students: An analysis of survey results from rural Pakistan, Sage Open, 1-9. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/2158244019864484
• Ainsworth, S. H. (2000). Modeling political efficacy and interest group membership. Political Behavior, 22(2), 89-108.
• Amna, E., Munck, I. & Zetterberg, P. (2004). Meaningful participation? Political efficacy of adolescents in 24 countries. Retrieved from https://ecpr.eu/Filestore/PaperProposal/e8a5f984-6738-4c7b-bebf-f2e385562b0f.pdf
• Arslan, S., & Seçim, H. (2015). Bir siyasal iletişim aracı olarak Facebook’un seçmenlerin oy verme kararı üzerindeki etkileri: KKTC 2013 milletvekilliği erken genel seçimleri örneği. Folklor/Edebiyat, 21(84), 9-32.
• Baker, K. L. (1973). Political participation, political efficacy, and socialization in Germany. Comparative Politics, 6(1), 73-98.
• Balcı, Ş., & Bor, T. (2015). Siyasal bilgilenmede televizyonun önem düzeyi: Üniversite öğrencileri üzerine bir inceleme. Media Global Journal, 5(10), 47-70.
• Balcı, Ş., & Gölcü, A. (2013). The role and impacts of social media in social movements: "Example of the Arab Spring". The Fourth Asian Conference on the Social Sciences, June 6-9 2013, Osaka Japan, pp. 269-281.
• Balcı, Ş., & Sarıtaş, H. (2015). Facebook ve siyasal katılım: 2014 yerel seçimleri araştırması. Türkiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, 37, 511-535.
• Balcı, Ş. (2016). Siyasal karar sürecinde iletişim araç ve yöntemlerinin etki düzeyleri: “7 Haziran 2015 genel seçimleri örneği”. In Ş. Balcı (Ed.), 7 Haziran'dan 1 Kasım'a Türkiye'de Siyasal İletişim Uygulamaları (pp. 71-108). İstanbul, Turkey: LiteraTürk Academia Yayınları.
• Balcı, Ş., Damlapınar, Z., Pınarbaşı, T. E., & Astam, F. K. (2016). Siyasal bilgilenmede medyanın rolü ve etkinliği: Üniversite öğrencileri araştırması. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 53, 111-126.
• Balcı, Ş., Tanacı, F., Dağlı, A. N., & Bayrak, E. (2019). 16 Nisan 2017 anayasa değişikliği referandumu sürecinde siyasal bilgilenme ve medya: Eğitim düzeyine göre bir karşılaştırma. Erciyes İletişim Dergisi, 6(1), 1-16.
• Balcı, Ş., Bal, E. & Delal, Ö. (2019). Instagram kullanım alışkanlıkları ve motivasyonları ile narsisizm arasındaki ilişki üzerine bir inceleme: Selçuk Üniversitesi öğrencileri örneği. Erciyes İletişim Dergisi, 6(2), 955-974.
• Best, S. J., & Kruger, B. S. (2005). Analyzing the representativeness of internet political participation. Political Behavior, 27(2), 183-216.
• Bode, L. (2016). Political news in the news feed: Learning politics from social media. Mass Communication and Society, 19(1), 24-48.
• Bolzendahl, C., & Coffe, H. (2013). Are “good” citizens “good” participants? Testing citizenship norms and political participation across 25 nations. Political Studies, 61(1), 45-65.
• Brehm, J., & Rahn, W. (1997). Individual-level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital. American Journal of Political Science, 41(3), 999-1023.
• Castells, M. (2009). Communication power. England: Oxford University Press.
• Chen, C., Bai, Y., & Wang, R. (2019). Online political efficacy and political participation: A mediation analysis based on the evidence from Taiwan. New Media & Society, 21(8), 1667-1696.
• Claassen, R. L. (2008). Testing the reciprocal effects of campaign participation. Political Behavior, 30(3), 277-296.
• Cohen, A., Vigoda, E., & Samorly, A. (2001). Analysis of the mediating effect of personal-psychological variables on the relationship between socioeconomic status and political participation: A structural equations framework. Political Psychology, 22(4), 727-757.
• Cohen, J. (1992). Statistical power analysis. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1(3), 98-101.
• Craig, S. C., & Maggiotto, M. A. (1982). Measuring political efficacy. Political Methodology, 8(3), 85-109.
• Craig, S. C., Niemi, R. G., & Silver, G. E. (1990). Political efficacy and trust: A report on the NES pilot study items. Political Behavior, 12(3), 289-314.
• Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (Fourth Edition). Boston, USA: Pearson Press.
• Çağlar, N., & Asığbulmuş, H. (2017). X ve Y kuşaklarının siyasal davranışında sosyal medyanın etkisi: Gaziosmanpaşa ilçesinde bir araştırma. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 29, 85-112.
• Dalton, R. J. (2014). Citizen politics: Public opinion and political parties in advanced industrial democracies. Los Angeles, USA: Sage Publications.
• Damlapınar, Z., & Balcı, Ş. (2014). Siyasal iletişim sürecinde seçimler, adaylar, imajlar. İstanbul, Turkey: Literatürk Yayınları.
• De Marco, S., Robles, J. M., & Antino, M. (2017). Reasons to participate: The role of political attitudes in digital activism. International Review of Social Psychology, 30(1), 131-140.
• Ellison, N., Lampe, C. & Steinfield, C. (2009). Social networking sites and society: Current trends and future possibilities. Interactions Magazine, 16(1), 6-9.
• Erdoğan Demir, S. (2016). İnternetin politik katılıma etkisi. Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(2), 161-191.
• Finkel, S. E. (1985). Reciprocal effects of participation and political efficacy: A panel analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 29(4), 891-913.
• Finkel, S. E. (1987). The effects of participation on political efficacy and political support: Evidence from a West German panel. The Journal of Politics, 49(2), 441-464.
• Gennaro, C., & Dutton, W. (2006). The Internet and the public: Online and offline political participation in the United Kingdom. Parliamentary Affairs, 59(2), 299-313.
• Halpern, D., Valenzuela, S., & Katz, J. E. (2017). We face, I tweet: How different social media influence political participation through collective and internal efficacy. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(6), 320-336.
• Hooghe, M., & Marien, S. (2013). A comparative analysis of relations between political trust and forms of political participation Europe. European Societies, 15(1), 131-152.
• Jennings, K. M., & Zeitner, V. (2003). Politics and the virtual event: An overview of the Hill-Thomas hearings. Political Communication, 11(3), 263-275.
• Jung, N., Kim, Y., & Zúñiga, H. G. (2011). The mediating role of knowledge and efficacy in the effects of communication on political participation. Mass Communication and Society, 14(4), 407-430.
• Kahne, J., & Bowyer, B. (2018). The political significance of social media activity and social networks. Political Communication, 35(3), 470-493.
• Kenski, K., & Stroud, N. J. (2006). Connections between internet use and political efficacy, knowledge, and participation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 50(2), 173-192.
• Kim, Y., & Chen, H. (2016). Social media and online political participation: The mediating role of exposure to cross-cutting and like-minded perspectives. Telematics and Information, 33(2), 320-330.
• McDonnell, J. (2019). Municipality size, political efficacy and political participation: A systematic review. Local Government Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930. 2019.1600510
• Moeller, J., Kühne, R., & De Vreese, C. (2018). Mobilizing youth in the 21st century: How digital media use fosters civic duty, information efficacy, and political participation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 62(3), 445-460.
• Morrell, M. E. (2003). Survey and experimental evidence for a reliable and valid measure of internal political efficacy. Public Opinion Quarterly, 67(4), 589-602.
• Morrell, M. E. (2005). Deliberation, democratic decision-making and internal political efficacy. Political Behavior, 27(1), 49-69.
• Moy, P., Xenos, M. A., & Hussain, M. M. (2013). News and political entertainment effects on democratic citizenship. In E. Scharrer (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of media studies (pp. 463–483). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
• Nisbet, M. C., & Scheufele, D. A. (2004). Political talk as a catalyst for online citizenship. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 81(4), 877-896.
• Olkun, E. O., Yüksel, E., & Akdemir, G. Y. (2018). Sosyal medya ve siyasal katılım: 2017 referandumunda bir saha araştırması. Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 11(60), 991-1000.
• Quintelier, E., & Hooghe, M. (2012). Political attitudes and political participation: A panel study on socialization and self-selection effects among late adolescents. International Political Science Review, 33(1), 63-81.
• Quintelier, E., & van Deth, J. W. (2014). Supporting Democracy: Political Participation and Political Attitudes. Exploring Causality Using Panel Data. Political Studies, 62(1), 153-171.
• Pastrana-Valls, A. (2018). Values, attitudes and political participation in Mexico. Palabra Clave, 21(3), 673-709. https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2018.21.3.3
• Reichert, F. (2016). How internal political efficacy translates political knowledge into political participation. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 12(2), 221-241.
• Sharoni, S. (2012). E-citizenship: Trust in government, political efficacy, and political participation in the internet era. Electronic Media & Politics, 1(8), 119-135.
• Steinberg, A. (2014). Genç seçmenler ve web 2.0 ile politik katılım: Facebook genç vatandaşların seçime katılımını artırabilir mi? (A. E. Pilgir, Trans.). In B. Çoban (Ed.), Sosyal Medya Devrimi (pp. 154-171). İstanbul, Turkey: Su Yayınevi.
• Tekindal, M. (2017). The position of the youth in political participation. Sosyal Politika Çalışmaları Dergisi, 17(39), 119-140.
• Tolbert, C. J., & McNeal, R. S. (2003). Unraveling the effects of the internet on political participation? Political Research Quarterly, 56(2), 175-185.
• Wang, S.-I. (2007). Political use of the internet, political attitudes and political participation. Asian Journal of Communication, 17(4), 381-395.
• Valentino, N. A., Gregorowicz, K., & Groenendyk, E. W. (2009). Efficacy, emotions and the habit of participation. Political Behavior, 31(3), 307-330. van Deth, J. W. (2014). A conceptual map of political participation. Acta Politica, 49(3), 349-367.
• Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, UK: Harvard University Press.
• Vitak, J., Zube, P., Smock, A., Carr, C. T., Ellison, N., & Lampe, C. (2011). It’s complicated: Facebook users’ political participation in the 2008 election. CyberPsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(3), 107-114.
• Vromen, A., Xenos, M. A., & Loader, B. (2015) Young people, social media and connective action: From organizational maintenance to everyday political talk. Journal of Youth Studies, 18(1), 80-100.
• Wei L., & Zhao, L. (2017). social media use, political efficacy, and political participation in China: The moderating role of need for orientation. In K. Xue & M. Yu (Eds.), New Media and Chinese Society. Communication, Culture and Change in Asia (pp. 55-73). Singapore: Springer.
• Zhang, X., & Lin, W. Y. (2014). Political participation in an unlikely place: How individuals engage in politics through social networking sites in China. International Journal of Communication, 8, 21-42.
• Zúñiga, H. G., Diehl, T., & Ardévol-Abreu, A. (2017). Internal, external, and government political efficacy: Effects on news use, discussion, and political participation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 61(3), 574-596.