Which is Difficult: Believe or Deny?
Abstract
In this article will be studied to put forward that "Do you believe
in, or denial, is more difficult to?" in the light of allegations
believers and non-believers. Especially monotheistic believers' basic premise
about "entity" is "there is purpose and order".
Non-believers' ideas as a response to believers and the basic ideas of dealing
with this issue is "coincidence". We will discuss which idea is
"consistency" and "reasonable". So within the light of
these allegations we will ask; "Do you believe in, or denial, is more
difficult to?"
Keywords
References
- Cafer Sadık Yaran, The Argument from Design in Contemporary Tho- ught, University of Wales, Lampeter, 1994 (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi)
- Caner Taslaman, Evrim Teorisi, Felsefe ve Tanrı, İstanbul Yayınevi, İstanbul, 2007
- David Hume, Din Üstüne, çev. Mete Tunçay, İmge Kitabevi, Ankara, 1995
- Gazâlî, İhyâ-u Ulûmi'd-Dîn, Dâru'l-Kütübi'l-llmiyye, Beyrut, trs.
- http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/04/25/us-beliefs-poll- idUSTRE73Q24K20110425
- Laura L. Garcia, "Teleologica anda Design Arguments", A Companion to Philosophy of Religion, ed. Philip L. Quinn, Blackwell Publis- hers, Cambridge, 1997
- Mehmet Aydın, Din Felsefesi, Selçuk Yayınları, Ankara, 1992
- Michael Peterson, William Hasker, Bruce Reichenbach, Akıl ve İnanç- Din Felsefesine Giriş, Küre Yayınları, çev. Rahim Acar, İstan- bul, 2006
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
-
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Abdullah Pakoğlu
This is me
Publication Date
June 15, 2012
Submission Date
February 15, 2012
Acceptance Date
March 15, 2012
Published in Issue
Year 2012 Volume: 16 Number: 1