Investigation of Yarn Count Variation that Occurred After the Intermingling Process

Year 2015, Volume: 30 Issue: 1, 167 - 174, 25.07.2016

İlkan Özkan Pınar Duru Baykal

https://doi.org/10.21605/cukurovaummfd.242813

Cited By: 2

Abstract

In this study, variation of yarn count that occurred after the intermingling process was investigated. For this purpose, POY polyester filaments having 283 dtex linear density and four different filament numbers (34, 47, 68, 100) in cross section were used for raw material and intermingled for producing the yarns in different number of nips. Intermingled yarns number of nips and yarn count have been tested. Yarn count was evaluated as dependent variables. The relationship among variation of yarn count with number of nips and filament number were analyzed as statistically by using SPSS 15.0 software package and results were interpreted

Keywords

Intermingling, POY-Polyester, Yarn count variation

Filamentlerde Puntalama Sonrasında Görülen Numara Değişimlerinin Araştırılması

Abstract

Yapılan çalışmada kısmi çekimli (POY) polyester ipliklerin puntalama sonrası meydana gelen numara değişimleri araştırılmıştır. Bu amaçla 34, 47, 68 ve 100 filament sayılarına ve 283 dtex lineer yoğunluğa sahip POY polyester iplikler hammadde olarak kullanılmış ve farklı punta sayılarına sahip iplikler üretilmiştir. Üretilen ipliklerin punta sayıları ve iplik numaraları test edilmiştir. İplik numarası bağımlı değişken olarak değerlendirilerek, punta sayısı ve filament sayısı ile arasındaki ilişki istatistiksel olarak analiz edilmiştir

Keywords

Puntalama, POY-Polyester, Numara değişimi

References

• 1. Demir, A., Günay, M., 1999. Tekstil Teknolojisi, Şan Ofset, İstanbul.
• 2. Alagirusamy, R., Ogale, V., Vaidya, A., Subbarao, P. M.V., 2005. Effect of Jet Design on Commingling of Glass/nylon Filaments, Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials, 18, 255–268.
• 3. Rwawiire, S., Kasedde, A., Nibikora, I., Vandera, G., 2014. Prediction of Polyester/Cotton Ring Spun Yarn Unevenness Using Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference System, Journal of Textile and Apparel Technology and Management, 8(4): 1-12.
• 4. Carvalho, V., Gonçalves, N., Soares, F., Besley, M., Vasconcelos, R. M., 2011. An Overview over Yarn Mass Parameterization Methods, The Second International Conference on Sensor Device Technologies and Applications, ISBN: 978-1-61208-145-8,19-24.
• 5. Carvalho, V., Pinto, G. J., Monterio, J. L.,Vasconcelos, R. M., Soares, F., 2004. Yarn Parameterization Based on Mass Analysis, Sensors and Actuators A 115, 540–548.
• 6. Kılıç, M., Okur, A., 2006. Relationships Between Yarn Diameter/diameter Variation and Strength, Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe, 14(5), 84-87,
• 7. Carvalho, V., Soares, F., Vasconcelos, R. M. and Besley, M., A. 2008. Comparative Study Between Yarn Diameter and Yarn Mass Variation Measurement System using Capacitive and Optical Sensors, Indian Journal of Fibre and Textile Research, 33: 119-125.
• 8. Addisu, F. and Hameed, M. A., 2007. Investigation into the Periodicity of Mass Variation of Yarn and its Effect on Fabric Appearance, AUTEX Research Journal, 7(2), 89-94.
• 9. Sinha, S. K., Kumar, P., 2013. An Investigation of the Behavior of Thin Places in Ring Spun Yarns. Journal of Textile and Apparel Technology and Management, 8(2): 1-11.
• 10. Özkan, İ., Duru Baykal, P., 2012. Puntalama İşleminde Üretim Parametrelerinin ve Filament Özelliklerinin Punta Kalıcılığına Etkisi, Tekstil ve Mühendis, 19(87): 1-6.
• 11. Duru Baykal, P., Özkan, İ., 2013. The Effects of Intermingling Process Parameters and Number of Filaments on Intermingled Yarn Properties, Journal of the Textile Institute, 104(12): 1292-1302.
• 12. Miao, M., Soong, M., 1995. Air Interlaced Yarn Structure and Properties, Textile Research Journal, 65, 433–440.