Research Article

PRICE FORECASTING IN ISLAMIC AND CONVENTIONAL INDICES: HYBRID MODEL PROPOSALS WITH HYPERPARAMETER OPTIMIZATION

Volume: 35 March 9, 2026
TR EN

PRICE FORECASTING IN ISLAMIC AND CONVENTIONAL INDICES: HYBRID MODEL PROPOSALS WITH HYPERPARAMETER OPTIMIZATION

Abstract

Stock price forecasting is a complex, stationary, and nonlinear time series estimation problem influenced by numerous factors. This complexity renders basic models inadequate for producing accurate forecasts of future stock prices.. Thus, precise price forecasting is crucial in this intricate and dynamic market where participants strive to make well-informed decisions to minimize losses and maximize profits. Motivated by this necessity, the present study aims to forecast future prices of selected indices constructed according to both Islamic and traditional criteria and to propose the most effective forecasting model for market participants. . Twelve indices- six traditional and six Islamic- were examined in this context using the ARIMA, XGBoost, LSTM, and Decision Tree methods. The investigation revealed that machine learning models outperformed the conventional approaches in terms of outcomes. The optimal parameters were then acquired and XGBoost-Decision Tree, LSTM-XGBoost, and LSTM-Decision Tree hybrid models were developed based on the results obtained. In this regard, 84 distinct models with seven algorithms- 1 conventional, 3 machine learning, and 3 hybrid models- with optimized hyperparameters were applied to the 12 indices. RMSE values were used to evaluate model performance. The LSTM-Decision Tree model was shown to be the greatest predictor for the BIST Participation 100 Index, while the LSTM-XGBoost model was the best predictor for all other indices.

Keywords

References

  1. Ariyo, A., Adewumi, A., & Ayo, C. (2014). Stock price prediction using the ARIMA model. In 2014 UKSim-AMSS 16th international conference on computer modelling and simulation (s. 106-112). IEEE.
  2. Bhattacharjee, I., & Bhattacharja, P. (2019). Stock Price Prediction: A Comparative Study between Traditional Statistical Approach and Machine Learning Approach. 4th International Conference on Electrical Information and Communication Technology (EICT). IEEE.
  3. Dai, Y., Zhou, Q., Leng, M., Yang, X., & Wang, Y. (2022). Improving the Bi-LSTM model with XGBoost and attention mechanism: A combined approach for short-term power load prediction. Applied Soft Computing, 130. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109632
  4. Göğen, E., & Güney, S. (2024). Machine learning-based weather prediction with radiosonde observations. Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 39(4), 2317-2328. doi:10.17341/gazimmfd.1163079
  5. Han, C., & Fu, X. (2023). Challenge and Opportunity: Deep Learning-Based Stock Price Prediction by Using Bi-Directional LSTM Model. Frontiers in Business, Economics and Management, 8(2), 51-54.
  6. Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997). Long short-term memory. Neural computation. 9(8), 1735–1780. Hossain, M., Karim, R., Thulasiram, R., Bruce, N., & Wang, Y. (2018). Hybrid deep learning model for stock price prediction. In 2018 ieee symposium series on computational intelligence (ssci) (s. 1837-1844). IEEE.
  7. Jijo, B., & Abdulazeez, A. (2021). Classification Based on Decision Tree Algorithm for Machine Learning. ournal of Applied Science and Technology Trends, 2(1), 20-28.
  8. Jing, N., Wu, Z., & Wang, H. (2021). A hybrid model integrating deep learning with investor sentiment analysis for stock price prediction. Expert Systems with Applications, 178. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115019

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

International Economics (Other)

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

March 9, 2026

Submission Date

February 12, 2025

Acceptance Date

May 17, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 35

APA
Türkoğlu, D., & Konak, F. (2026). PRICE FORECASTING IN ISLAMIC AND CONVENTIONAL INDICES: HYBRID MODEL PROPOSALS WITH HYPERPARAMETER OPTIMIZATION. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 35. https://doi.org/10.35379/cusosbil.1638421
AMA
1.Türkoğlu D, Konak F. PRICE FORECASTING IN ISLAMIC AND CONVENTIONAL INDICES: HYBRID MODEL PROPOSALS WITH HYPERPARAMETER OPTIMIZATION. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2026;35. doi:10.35379/cusosbil.1638421
Chicago
Türkoğlu, Diler, and Fatih Konak. 2026. “PRICE FORECASTING IN ISLAMIC AND CONVENTIONAL INDICES: HYBRID MODEL PROPOSALS WITH HYPERPARAMETER OPTIMIZATION”. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 35 (March). https://doi.org/10.35379/cusosbil.1638421.
EndNote
Türkoğlu D, Konak F (March 1, 2026) PRICE FORECASTING IN ISLAMIC AND CONVENTIONAL INDICES: HYBRID MODEL PROPOSALS WITH HYPERPARAMETER OPTIMIZATION. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 35
IEEE
[1]D. Türkoğlu and F. Konak, “PRICE FORECASTING IN ISLAMIC AND CONVENTIONAL INDICES: HYBRID MODEL PROPOSALS WITH HYPERPARAMETER OPTIMIZATION”, Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, vol. 35, Mar. 2026, doi: 10.35379/cusosbil.1638421.
ISNAD
Türkoğlu, Diler - Konak, Fatih. “PRICE FORECASTING IN ISLAMIC AND CONVENTIONAL INDICES: HYBRID MODEL PROPOSALS WITH HYPERPARAMETER OPTIMIZATION”. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 35 (March 1, 2026). https://doi.org/10.35379/cusosbil.1638421.
JAMA
1.Türkoğlu D, Konak F. PRICE FORECASTING IN ISLAMIC AND CONVENTIONAL INDICES: HYBRID MODEL PROPOSALS WITH HYPERPARAMETER OPTIMIZATION. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2026;35. doi:10.35379/cusosbil.1638421.
MLA
Türkoğlu, Diler, and Fatih Konak. “PRICE FORECASTING IN ISLAMIC AND CONVENTIONAL INDICES: HYBRID MODEL PROPOSALS WITH HYPERPARAMETER OPTIMIZATION”. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, vol. 35, Mar. 2026, doi:10.35379/cusosbil.1638421.
Vancouver
1.Diler Türkoğlu, Fatih Konak. PRICE FORECASTING IN ISLAMIC AND CONVENTIONAL INDICES: HYBRID MODEL PROPOSALS WITH HYPERPARAMETER OPTIMIZATION. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2026 Mar. 1;35. doi:10.35379/cusosbil.1638421