BRYANT ALGILANAN KONTROL VE DUYGU ÖLÇEĞİNİN TÜRKÇE ADAPTASYONU VE PSİKOMETRİK ÖZELLİKLERİNİN İNCELENMESİ

Yıldız Bilge; Ecenur Pekçetin

doi:10.35379/cusosbil.1647348

EN TR

Abstract

TURKISH ADAPTATION OF THE BRYANT PERCEIVED CONTROL AND EMOTION SCALE AND AN EXAMINATION OF ITS PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES

Abstract

The study aims to adapt the Bryant Perceived Control and Emotion Scale into Turkish and to examine its psychometric properties. Data were collected from a total of 471 university students, including 310 females (65.8%) and 161 males (34.2%), with the age range of 18-43 (22.05±3.86). The test-retest was administered to 46 university students with a three-week interval. Within the scope of convergent validity, a group of 105 participants completed the Bryant Perceived Control and Emotion Scale together with measures assessing locus of control, psychological symptoms, life satisfaction, and pleasure levels. As a result of the analysis, it was seen that the reliability and validity findings of the scale were at an acceptable level. In this context, Cronbach's alpha internal consistency coefficients of the Bryant Perceived Control and Emotion Scale were found to vary between .40 and .72. The adapted scale was found to be a good fit to the four-factor structure of the original scale, considering the values obtained as a result of the confirmatory factor analysis. In addition, statistically significant relationships were found in the correlation analysis for convergent validity. The results suggest that perceived control represents a construct distinct from locus of control and that the Bryant Perceived Control and Emotion Scale may broaden researchers’ understanding of perceived control by providing a multidimensional assessment of this concept. Overall, the findings support the use of the Turkish version of the scale as a valid and reliable instrument for assessing perceived control and emotion-related processes.

Keywords

BRYANT ALGILANAN KONTROL VE DUYGU ÖLÇEĞİNİN TÜRKÇE ADAPTASYONU VE PSİKOMETRİK ÖZELLİKLERİNİN İNCELENMESİ

Abstract

Bu çalışma, olaylar ve duygular üzerinde algılanan kontrolü ölçmeyi amaçlayan Bryant Algılanan Kontrol ve Duygu Ölçeği’nin Türkçe’ye uyarlanmasını ve psikometrik özelliklerinin incelenmesini amaçlamıştır. Çalışmada yaş aralığı 18-43 (22.05±3.86) olan 310 (%65.8) kadın, 161 (%34.2) erkek olmak üzere toplam 471 üniversite öğrencisinden veri toplanmıştır. Test tekrar uygulaması 46 kişilik üniversite öğrencisi grubuna üç hafta ara ile yapılmıştır. Yakınsak geçerlik kapsamında katılımcılardan 105 kişilik bir grup Bryant Algılanan Kontrol ve Duygu Ölçeği ile birlikte kontrol odağı, psikolojik semptomlar, yaşam doyumu ve hoşnutluk düzeylerini değerlendirmeye yönelik ölçekleri de doldurmuştur. Analizler sonucunda ölçeğin güvenirlik ve geçerlik bulgularının kabul edilebilir düzeyde olduğu görülmüştür. Bu kapsamda, Bryant Algılanan Kontrol ve Duygu Ölçeği’nin Cronbach alfa iç tutarlık katsayılarının .40 ila .72 arasında değiştiği saptanmıştır. Doğrulayıcı faktör analizi sonucunda elde edilen değerler dikkate alındığında uyarlanan ölçeğin orijinal ölçeğin dört faktörlü yapısına kabul edilebilir uyum sağladığı görülmüştür. Ayrıca yakınsak geçerlik için yapılan korelasyon analizleri sonucunda istatistiksel olarak anlamlı düzeyde ilişkiler tespit edilmiştir. Sonuçlar algılanan kontrolün kontrol odağından farklı bir yapıyı ölçtüğünü ve Bryant Algılanan Kontrol ve Duygu Ölçeği’nin araştırmacıların algılanan kontrole ilişkin bakış açısını genişletmelerine katkı sağlayabilecek özellikte bir ölçek olduğunu göstermiştir.

Keywords

References

Akın, A. (2007). Akademik kontrol odağı ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 3(34), 9-17.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
Bandura, A. (1991). Human agency: The rhetoric and the reality. American Psychologist, 46(2), 157-162. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.46.2.157
Barlow, D. H. (2002). Anxiety and its disorders: The nature and treatment of anxiety and panic (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
Bentley, K. H., Gallagher, M. W., Boswell, J. F., Gorman, J. M., Shear, M. K., Woods, S. W., & Barlow, D. H. (2013). The interactive contributions of perceived control and anxiety sensitivity in panic disorder: A triple vulnerabilities perspective. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 35(1), 57-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-012-9311-8
Bollini, A. M., Walker, E. F., Hamann, S., & Kestler, L. (2004). The influence of perceived control and locus of control on the cortisol and subjective responses to stress. Biological Psychology, 67(3), 245-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2003.11.002
Brown, T. A., White, K. S., Forsyth, J. P., & Barlow, D. H. (2004). The structure of perceived emotional control: Psychometric properties of a revised Anxiety Control Questionnaire. Behavior Therapy, 35(1), 75-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(04)80005-4
Bryant, F. B. (1989). A four‐factor model of perceived control: Avoiding, coping, obtaining, and savoring. Journal of Personality, 57(4), 773-797. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1989.tb00494.x

Bryant, F. B. (2003). Savoring Beliefs Inventory (SBI): A scale for measuring beliefs about savouring. Journal of Mental Health, 12(2), 175–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/0963823031000103489
Bryant, F. B., & Veroff, J. (2017). Savoring: A new model of positive experience. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315088426
Burger, J. M. (1989). Negative reactions to increases in perceived personal control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(2), 246-256. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.246
Burger, J. M., & Cooper, H. M. (1979). The desirability of control. Motivation and Emotion, 3(4), 381- 393. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00994052
Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2020). Eğitimde bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (30. baskı). Pegem Akademi.
Chorpita, B. F. (2001). Control and the development of negative emotions. In M. W. Vasey & M. R. Dadds (Eds.), The developmental psychopathology of anxiety (pp. 112-142). Oxford University Press.
Chung, M. L., Bakas, T., Plue, L. D., & Williams, L. S. (2016). Effects of self-esteem, optimism, and perceived control on depressive symptoms in stroke survivor-spouse dyads. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 31(2), E8-E16. https://doi.org/10.1097/JCN.0000000000000232
Dağ, İ. (1991). Rotter’in İç-Dış Kontrol Odağı Ölçeği (RİDKOÖ)’nin üniversite öğrencileri için güvenirliği ve geçerliği. Psikoloji Dergisi, 7(26), 10-16.
Dağ, İ. (2002). Kontrol odağı ölçeği (KOÖ): Ölçek geliştirme, güvenirlik ve geçerlik çalışması. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 17(49), 77-90.
Dağlı, A., & Baysal, N. (2016). Yaşam Doyumu Ölçeğinin Türkçe’ye uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 15(59), 1250-1262. https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.263229
Dereli, E., & Eryılmaz, A. (2012). İlköğretim çocukları için alan genel algılanan kontrol ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi. TAF Preventive Medicine Bulletin, 11(3), 331-338. https://doi.org/10.5455/pmb.1-1304501045
Derogatis, L. R. (1992). The Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI): Administration, scoring, & procedures manual-II (2nd ed.). Clinical Psychometric Research Inc.
Derogatis, L. R., & Melisaratos, N. (1983). The Brief Symptom Inventory: An introductory report. Psychological Medicine, 13(3), 595–605. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291700048017
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71-75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
Eryılmaz, A. (2007). Alan genel algılanan kontrol ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi. Psikoloji Öğrencileri Lisansüstü Öğrencileri Kongresi Bildiri Metinleri, İzmir Ekonomi Üniversitesi Yayınları, 15, 62-68.
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2010). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference, 17.0 update (10th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
Gregory, W. L. (1978). Locus of control for positive and negative outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(8), 840-849. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.36.8.840
Güngör, M. (2021). Algılanan kontrolün obsesif inançlar ve obsesif kompulsif belirtilerle ilişkisi (Tez No. 669408) [Doktora tezi, Maltepe Üniversitesi]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
Güzel, A., Turan, S., & Üner, S. (2020). Turkish validity and reliability of Multidimensional Health Locus of Control Scale Form A. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 26(5), Article e12813. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijn.12813
Hambleton, R. K., & Patsula, L. (1998). Adapting tests for use in multiple languages and cultures. Social Indicators Research, 45(1), 153-171. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006941729637
Hofmann, S. G. (2005). Perception of control over anxiety mediates the relation between catastrophic thinking and social anxiety in social phobia. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 43(7), 885-895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2004.07.002
Hong, Y., Liu, L., Lin, R., & Lian, R. (2022). The relationship between perceived control and life satisfaction in Chinese undergraduates: The mediating role of envy and moderating role of self-esteem. Current Psychology, 41, 3501-3509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00863-5
Hutner, N. L., & Locke, S. E. (1984). Health locus of control: A potential moderator variable for the relationship between life stress and psychopathology. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 41(4), 186-194. https://doi.org/10.1159/000287808
Kahraman, C. Ş., & Ayhan, N. Y. (2022). Investigation of the psychometric properties of the Turkish version Multidimensional Weight Locus of Control Scale (T-MWLCS) in individuals with different body mass index. Eating and Weight Disorders, 27(5), 1847-1854. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-021-01328-9
Karagöz, Y. (2016). SPSS 23 ve AMOS 23 uygulamalı istatistiksel analizler. Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
Kesebir, S., Yıldız, H., Göçmen, D., & Tezcan, E. (2015). Snaith-Hamilton Hoşnutluk Değerlendirme Ölçeği: Geçerlik, güvenilirlik, toplumumuzda psikometrik özellikleri. Çukurova Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, 40(2), 252-257. https://doi.org/10.17826/cutf.40986
Kline, P. (2000). Handbook of psychological testing (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Köker, S. (1991). Normal ve sorunlu ergenlerin yaşam doyumu düzeyinin karşılaştırılması (Tez No. 16802) [Yüksek lisans tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
Liu, Q., Zhao, X., & Liu, W. (2022). Are perfectionists always dissatisfied with life? An empirical study from the perspective of self-determination theory and perceived control. Behavioral Sciences, 12(11), Article 440. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12110440
Lundberg, U., & Frankenhaeuser, M. (1978). Psychophysiological reactions to noise as modified by personal control over noise intensity. Biological Psychology, 6(1), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-0511(78)90006-6
McLaren, S., & Crowe, S. F. (2003). The contribution of perceived control of stressful life events and thought suppression to the symptoms of obsessive–compulsive disorder in both non-clinical and clinical samples. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 17(4), 389-403. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0887-6185(02)00224-4
Meehan, M. P., Durlak, J. A., & Bryant, F. B. (1993). The relationship of social support to perceived control and subjective mental health in adolescents. Journal of Community Psychology, 21(1), 49-55. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6629(199301)21:1<49::AID-JCOP2290210106>3.0.CO;2-I
Miller, W. R., & Seligman, M. E. P. (1975). Depression and learned helplessness in man. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 84(3), 228–238. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076720
Misono, S., Meredith, L., Peterson, C. B., & Frazier, P. A. (2016). New perspective on psychosocial distress in patients with dysphonia: The moderating role of perceived control. Journal of Voice, 30(2), 172-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.02.002
Mostowik, J., Cyranka, K., Mielimąka, M., Ostrowski, T., & Rutkowski, K. (2018). The intensity of anxiety, neurotic symptoms and perceived control among patients with neurotic and personality disorders. Archives of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, 20(1), 33-44. https://doi.org/10.12740/APP/80756
Moulding, R., & Kyrios, M. (2007). Desire for control, sense of control and obsessive-compulsive symptoms. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 31(6), 759-772. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-006-9086-x
Myles, L., & Merlo, E. (2022). Incongruities between perceived control and desire for control: Accounting for depressive symptomology in adolescence. Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology, 22(1), 40-44. https://doi.org/10.15557/PiPK.2022.0005
Myles, L. A. M., Merlo, E. M., & Obele, A. (2021). Desire for control moderates the relationship between perceived control and depressive symptomology. Journal of Mind and Medical Sciences, 8(2), 299-305. https://doi.org/10.22543/7674.82.P299305
Peker, K. B. (2005). Kentli erişkinlerde ağız diş sağlığı algısı ve sağlık davranışının incelenmesi (Tez No. 165235) [Doktora tezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
Pietrzyk, A., & Lizinczyk, S. (2008). Perceived control over life and coping strategies with own illness and daily problems after one year psychosocial rehabilitation programme for schizophrenics. Psychiatria Polska, 42(1), 59-72.
Punch, K. F. (2005). Sosyal araştırmalara giriş: Nicel ve nitel yaklaşımlar (D. Bayrak, H. B. Arslan, & Z. Akyüz, Çev.). Siyasal Kitabevi.
Putwain, D. W., & Aveyard, B. (2018). Is perceived control a critical factor in understanding the negative relationship between cognitive test anxiety and examination performance? School Psychology Quarterly, 33(1), 65-74. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000183
Rapee, R. M., Craske, M. G., Brown, T. A., & Barlow, D. H. (1996). Measurement of perceived control over anxiety-related events. Behavior Therapy, 27(2), 279-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(96)80018-9
Rezaei, A., & Mousanezhad Jeddi, E. (2020). Relationship between wisdom, perceived control of internal states, perceived stress, social intelligence, information processing styles and life satisfaction among college students. Current Psychology, 39(3), 927-933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9804-z
Rothbaum, F., Weisz, J. R., & Snyder, S. S. (1982). Changing the world and changing the self: A two-process model of perceived control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(1), 5-37. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.5
Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0092976
Rotter, J. B. (1975). Some problems and misconceptions related to the construct of internal versus external control of reinforcement. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43(1), 56-67. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076301
Sarıçam, H. (2014). Akademik kontrol odağı ölçeği ergen formunun psikometrik özellikleri. İlköğretim Online, 13(4), 1135-1141. https://doi.org/10.17051/io.2014.32429
Schulz, R., & Heckhausen, J. (1999). Aging, culture and control: Setting a new research agenda. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 54B(3), P139-P145.https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/54B.3.P139
Seligman, M. E. P. (1975). Helplessness: On depression, development, and death. W. H. Freeman.
Skinner, E. A. (1996). A guide to constructs of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(3), 549-570. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.3.549
Snaith, R. P., Hamilton, M., Morley, S., Humayan, A., Hargreaves, D., & Trigwell, P. (1995). A scale for the assessment of hedonic tone the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 167(1), 99-103. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.167.1.99
Sümbüloğlu, K., & Akdağ, B. (2009). İleri biyoistatistiksel yöntemler. Hatipoğlu Yayınları.
Şahin, N. H., Batıgün, A. D., & Uğurtaş, S. (2002). Kısa semptom envanteri (KSE): Ergenler için kullanımının geçerlilik, güvenirlik ve faktör yapısı. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi, 13(2), 125-135.
Şahin, N. H., & Durak, A. (1994). Kısa semptom envanteri: Türk gençleri için uyarlanması. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 9(31), 44-56.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2014). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
Thompson, S. C. (1981). Will it hurt less if I can control it? A complex answer to a simple question. Psychological Bulletin, 90(1), 89-101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.90.1.89
Thompson, S. C., & Spacapan, S. (1991). Perceptions of control in vulnerable populations. Journal of Social Issues, 47(4), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1991.tb01831.x
Uçar, G. K., Hasta, D., & Malatyalı, M. K. (2019). The mediating role of perceived control and hopelessness in the relation between personal belief in a just world and life satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 143, 68-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.02.021
Vujanovic, A. A., Marshall, E. C., Gibson, L. E., & Zvolensky, M. J. (2010). Cognitive affective characteristics of smokers with and without posttraumatic stress disorder and panic psychopathology. Addictive Behaviors, 35(5), 419-425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2009.12.005
Wagener, J. J., & Taylor, S. E. (1986). What else could I have done? Patients' responses to failed treatment decisions. Health Psychology, 5(5), 481-496. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.5.5.481
Wallston, K. A. (1997). Perceived control and health behaviour. In A. Baum, S. Newman, J. Weinman, R. West, & C. McManus (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of psychology, health and medicine (pp. 151–154). Cambridge University Press.
Wallston, K. A., Wallston, B. S., Smith, S., & Dobbins, C. J. (1987). Perceived control and health. Current Psychological Research & Reviews, 6(1), 5-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686633
Wood, J. V., Heimpel, S. A., & Michela, J. L. (2003). Savoring versus dampening: Self-esteem differences in regulating positive affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 566-580. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.566
Xiong, M., & Zou, H. (2023). How does relative deprivation influence Chinese migrant adolescents’ life satisfaction? Testing two integrated models of perceived control and two types of belief in a just world. Current Psychology, 42, 15261-15276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-02821-9
Zhao, T., Fu, Z., Lian, X., Ye, L., & Huang, W. (2021). Exploring emotion regulation and perceived control as antecedents of anxiety and its consequences during Covid-19 full remote learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 675910. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.675910

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

Behaviour-Personality Assessment in Psychology

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Yıldız Bilge ^*
0000-0003-2315-0055
Türkiye

Ecenur Pekçetin
0000-0002-0059-5548
Türkiye

Publication Date

October 6, 2026

Submission Date

February 26, 2025

Acceptance Date

July 3, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 35

DOI

https://doi.org/10.35379/cusosbil.1647348

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA74HH73YT

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Bilge, Y., & Pekçetin, E. (2026). BRYANT ALGILANAN KONTROL VE DUYGU ÖLÇEĞİNİN TÜRKÇE ADAPTASYONU VE PSİKOMETRİK ÖZELLİKLERİNİN İNCELENMESİ. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 35. https://doi.org/10.35379/cusosbil.1647348

AMA

1.Bilge Y, Pekçetin E. BRYANT ALGILANAN KONTROL VE DUYGU ÖLÇEĞİNİN TÜRKÇE ADAPTASYONU VE PSİKOMETRİK ÖZELLİKLERİNİN İNCELENMESİ. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2026;35. doi:10.35379/cusosbil.1647348

Chicago

Bilge, Yıldız, and Ecenur Pekçetin. 2026. “BRYANT ALGILANAN KONTROL VE DUYGU ÖLÇEĞİNİN TÜRKÇE ADAPTASYONU VE PSİKOMETRİK ÖZELLİKLERİNİN İNCELENMESİ”. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 35 (October). https://doi.org/10.35379/cusosbil.1647348.

EndNote

Bilge Y, Pekçetin E (October 1, 2026) BRYANT ALGILANAN KONTROL VE DUYGU ÖLÇEĞİNİN TÜRKÇE ADAPTASYONU VE PSİKOMETRİK ÖZELLİKLERİNİN İNCELENMESİ. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 35

IEEE

[1]Y. Bilge and E. Pekçetin, “BRYANT ALGILANAN KONTROL VE DUYGU ÖLÇEĞİNİN TÜRKÇE ADAPTASYONU VE PSİKOMETRİK ÖZELLİKLERİNİN İNCELENMESİ”, Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, vol. 35, Oct. 2026, doi: 10.35379/cusosbil.1647348.

ISNAD

Bilge, Yıldız - Pekçetin, Ecenur. “BRYANT ALGILANAN KONTROL VE DUYGU ÖLÇEĞİNİN TÜRKÇE ADAPTASYONU VE PSİKOMETRİK ÖZELLİKLERİNİN İNCELENMESİ”. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 35 (October 1, 2026). https://doi.org/10.35379/cusosbil.1647348.

JAMA

1.Bilge Y, Pekçetin E. BRYANT ALGILANAN KONTROL VE DUYGU ÖLÇEĞİNİN TÜRKÇE ADAPTASYONU VE PSİKOMETRİK ÖZELLİKLERİNİN İNCELENMESİ. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2026;35. doi:10.35379/cusosbil.1647348.

MLA

Bilge, Yıldız, and Ecenur Pekçetin. “BRYANT ALGILANAN KONTROL VE DUYGU ÖLÇEĞİNİN TÜRKÇE ADAPTASYONU VE PSİKOMETRİK ÖZELLİKLERİNİN İNCELENMESİ”. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, vol. 35, Oct. 2026, doi:10.35379/cusosbil.1647348.

Vancouver

1.Yıldız Bilge, Ecenur Pekçetin. BRYANT ALGILANAN KONTROL VE DUYGU ÖLÇEĞİNİN TÜRKÇE ADAPTASYONU VE PSİKOMETRİK ÖZELLİKLERİNİN İNCELENMESİ. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2026 Oct. 1;35. doi:10.35379/cusosbil.1647348

The rules that must be followed when writing articles to be sent to the journal are summarized below:

1. Çukurova University Journal of Social Sciences Institute is a refereed journal published in Continuous Publication Model.

2. The article to be sent must not have been published anywhere before.

3. Articles can be published in Turkish, English, French or German. If the article is written in English, French or German, a Turkish abstract and title must be included.

4. Articles must be written in accordance with the Turkish Language Association spelling rules.

5. Articles must be written in Microsoft Word 2003 or later versions and sent online via the internet.

6. The title of the article must be appropriate to the text, centered; short and clear; written in capital letters.

7. The full text must not contain any author information for blind peer review purposes.

8. The first page of the article should consist of only ABSTRACT and ABSTRACT.

9. Paper size in articles: A-4 vertical, page structure bottom: 2.5 cm, top: 2.5 cm, left: 2.5 cm, right: 2.5 cm, header: 3 cm, footer: 3 cm, font: Times New Roman, point: 10, line spacing: single. The entire article should not exceed 8000 words.

10. Footnotes should be written in Times New Roman font, 8 point and line spacing “single”. Footnotes should not be used except for notes on old-lettered text studies and important explanations about the study.

11. The abstract should be written in 8 point and Times New Roman font. It should consist of one paragraph (even if it consists of several paragraphs, it should fit into one paragraph), and line spacing should be set to “single”. It should consist of at least 150 and at most 200 words. The abstract should be placed in capital letters on the left side of the text.

12. In original articles, sections should be organized as follows:
INTRODUCTION (maximum 3 pages)
LITERATURE REVIEW
METHOD
RESEARCH FINDINGS
CONCLUSION

13. The main section headings above should be written in bold, capital letters, aligned to the left. Headings should not be numbered, and there should be no paragraph indentation.

14. Subsection headings should be written in bold, with the first letter of each word capitalized, and should start 0.5 cm. indentation. All paragraph indents should be aligned.

15. If tables are to be included in the text, they should be shown as follows: “Table 1.”. The name of the table should be written centered above the table, with the first letter of each word capitalized, and should not be italicized. In figures, it should be written centered under the figure, with the word “Figure 1.” capitalized. Figures and graphics should be drawn on the computer; photos or pictures should have high resolution and should be numbered.

16. If hypotheses will be included in the study, the hypothesis indication should be as follows: “H1:”. Hypotheses should not be written in italics.

17. The sources used in the article should be given under the title “RESOURCES” after the “RESULTS” section. It should be prepared with Times New Roman font, 10 points, right-left 0, hanging 1.25, and line spacing “single”. 1 line space should be left after each source.

18. The sources in the article should be written in accordance with APA 7 (https://apastyle.apa.org/) style.

Guidelines for writing articles to be sent to the journal:

1. The Journal of Institute of Social Sciences of Çukurova University is a peer-reviewed journal published Continious Publication Model.
2. Papers must be submitted on the understanding that they have not been published elsewhere.
3. The articles can be written in Turkish, English, French or German. If the article has been written in English, French or German, a summary in Turkish must also be included.
4. The articles should be written in accordance with the spelling rules of the Turkish Language Association.
5. Articles should be written in Microsoft Word 2003 or higher and they should be submitted through the online system.
6. Use a concise and clearly written title that reflects the paper's content. Use capital letters and center alignment.
7. Author names should be center aligned on the article; if there is more than one author, their names should be written side by side. Authorship information (University name, Faculty name, e-mail address, ORCID number) should be given in the footnote.
8. The first page of the article should consist of only SUMMARY and ABSTRACT.
9. Please adhere to the following formatting guidelines: a. Paper size: A-4 vertical b. Page layout: bottom 2.5 cm, top: 2.5 cm, left: 2.5 cm, right: 2.5 cm, header: 3 cm, footer: 3 cm.
c. Font: Times New Roman

Ethical Principles

This guideline should be carefully reviewed by all researchers who will submit a study to the Journal.

Çukurova University Journal of Social Sciences Institute is a peer-reviewed journal published in accordance with the ethical principles and rules specified below, with the aim of publishing qualified scientific articles in the field of Social Sciences.
Articles sent to Çukurova University Journal of Social Sciences Institute are evaluated through a double-blind peer-review process.
The journal is published electronically with free access.
The journal only accepts articles through the Dergi Park system.
Çukurova University Journal of Social Sciences Institute is a journal aware of the fact that information must be easily accessible in order for scientific studies to advance, and supports the initiative to make refereed journal literature open access, as stated in the Budapest Open Access Declaration, and offers all published articles in an environment where everyone can read and download them, free of charge.
In this declaration, open access is used in the sense that “scientific literature can be accessed, read, saved, copied, printed, scanned, linked to full text, indexed, transferred to software as data and used for any lawful purpose via the Internet without financial, legal and technical barriers”.
Considering the role of knowledge sharing in the advancement of science, open access is of great importance for researchers and readers. For this reason, articles in this journal can be used as long as the author and original source are cited. Permission from authors or publishers is not required.
It is aimed that all stakeholders (author, editor, referee, publisher and reader) who present a scientific study contribute to the correct advancement of science. In accordance with this goal, compliance with scientific ethical principles is important in scientific studies prepared.
These ethical principles have been accepted by us based on the guidelines prepared by COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) and are presented below with some of them, with the recommendation that stakeholders adopt them as well.
Accordingly, the ethical responsibilities, roles and duties of authors, journal editor, referees and publisher are included in our Journal. In addition, information is provided regarding plagiarism and unethical behaviors in Çukurova University Social Sciences Institute Journal. The sources used while preparing these policies are stated at the end of the guide.

Author(s)
• Articles sent to Çukurova University Social Sciences Institute Journal must be original studies in the field of Social Sciences.

All sources used in the articles (authors, online pages, personal interviews, etc.) must be cited correctly and appropriately.

• It must be stated that the articles sent to the journal have not been sent to another journal and the Copyright Transfer Form must be filled out.

People who have not contributed to the article intellectually should not be listed as authors.

• Conflicts of interest regarding the submitted article must be stated and the reason must be explained.

• Authors may be asked to submit the raw data of their work to the editorial board during the refereeing process, in which case the authors are expected to share their raw data with the editorial board. Authors are obliged to keep the data related to a published article for 5 years.

• Authors must inform the editor and the editorial board when they detect an error in their work and cooperate for the correction or retraction process.

Authors cannot use language and attitudes that degrade or belittle any individual, community or institution in their articles.

Referees
All articles sent to Çukurova University Journal of Social Sciences are evaluated with a double-blind refereeing process. Double-blind refereeing means that authors are kept confidential from referees and referees are kept confidential from authors in order to ensure an impartial, objective and independent evaluation process.
Articles are sent to the referees for evaluation through the Dergi Park system.
Referees are required to fill out a form that includes the contribution of the article they are evaluating to their field, their decisions on whether the article is publishable or not, and the reasons for these decisions.
The ethical responsibilities and roles of referees of Çukurova University Journal of Social Sciences are as follows:
• Referees are required to referee articles related to their fields of expertise only.
• Referees are expected to agree to referee articles that do not have any conflicts of interest. If referees discover any conflicts of interest, they must inform the editor and decline to referee the relevant article.

• Referees must evaluate articles impartially and objectively.

• Referees are required to fill out the Referee Evaluation Form for the articles they evaluate, and

İmtiyaz Sahibi (Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Adına)

Hüseyin GÜLER

Econometric and Statistical Methods, Statistics

Editor

Mustafa YAŞAR

Psychological Counseling Education, Adult Education, Early Childhood Education, Educational Psychology

Mizanpaj Editörü

Mustafa Can KIZGINDEMIR

Information Systems User Experience Design and Development, Visual Communication Design, Graphic Design, Video Design, Web Design

Son Okuyucu

Ayşenur SÖYÜ

Psychology of Religion, Religious Studies (Other)

Alan Editörü

C. Hakan ÇUHADAR

Music, Interpretation in Western Classical Music, Theories of Music, Musicology and Ethnomusicology

Marella BODUR ÜN

Comparative Political Movement, Gender and Politics, Political Sociology, European Union-Turkiye Relations, Globalisation, International Relations Theories

Engin ÇETIN

Turkish Language and Literature, Old Turkic Language (Orhon, Uyghur, Karahan), Historical North East Turkish Language (Khwarezm, Kipchak, Chagatai)

Ebru ÖZGÜR GÜLER

Econometric and Statistical Methods, Quantitative Decision Methods

NÖ

Nurcihan ÖZDOĞAN

Equity and Trusts Law

EK

Ebru KAYA

English As A Second Language

AB

Ayten Pınar BAL

Education, Curriculum and Instration , Mathematics Education

Nuran ÖZTÜRK

Turkish Islamic Literature, Classical Turkish Literature of Ottoman Field

Fehime Yeşim GÜRANI

Built Environment and Design, Interior Architecture , Sustainable Architecture

Fatma ŞAHIN

Archaeological Science, Ceramics in Archeology, Early Bronze Age Archeology, Neolithic Age Archeology, The Archaeology of Middle Bronze Age

Aydın ÇAM

Cinema Sociology, Cinema Theories, Cinema History

Birsel AYBEK

Education

AB

Almıla BURGAÇ ÇIL

International Economics

Raziye GÜNAY BILALOĞLU

Early Childhood Education

Mustafa MAVAŞOĞLU

Applied Linguistics and Educational Linguistics

Özlem USLU

Fine Arts Education, Museum Education, Photography, Interdisciplinary Art, Installation

İÜ

İlksun Didem ÜLBEĞI

Industrial Organisation, Entrepreneurship, Organizasyon, Organisation and Management Theory, Organisational Planning and Management, Organisational Behaviour, Strategy, Management and Organisational Behaviour (Other)