Research Article

A THEATRICAL INACTION: CLIMATE CHANGE RISK, BUREAUCRATIC INERTIA, AND ETHICAL ABDICATION IN STEVE WATERS’S THE CONTINGENCY PLAN

Volume: 35 April 28, 2026
TR EN

A THEATRICAL INACTION: CLIMATE CHANGE RISK, BUREAUCRATIC INERTIA, AND ETHICAL ABDICATION IN STEVE WATERS’S THE CONTINGENCY PLAN

Abstract

This article examines Steve Waters’s two-part play, The Contingency Plan (2009), as a theatrical critique of the structural and ethical failures underlying contemporary climate governance. Drawing on theoretical frameworks such as risk society, the banality of bureaucratic evil, climate justice, and intergenerational ethics, the analysis reveals how the play dramatizes the disjunction between climate change knowledge and political action. When read together, these four frameworks disclose how climate irresponsibility is systematically produced not as a result of information deficit but through a coordinated regime of avoidance operating across the dimensions of risk, ethics, justice, and temporality. Waters depicts policymakers who acknowledge the severity of climate risk yet remain inert due to administrative inertia, short-term political calculations, and the prevalence of formal gestures that substitute for transformative intervention. The article demonstrates how The Contingency Plan critiques performative governance, the moral consequences of delayed responsibility, and the burden shifted onto future generations. Rather than presenting a narrative of denial, the play stages a more insidious form of inaction—one in which risk is recognized but decisive action is perpetually deferred. In this context, the play functions as both a fictional policy document and as an ethical case study that reflects real-world failures in climate governance. Ultimately, the article argues that theatre, as a form of climate storytelling, does not merely mirror institutional breakdowns but offers an emotionally resonant and ethically urgent mode of critique. The Contingency Plan thus stands as a compelling call to action, reminding us that a timely and transformative climate response is not a matter of political choice but a moral necessity.

Keywords

References

  1. Arendt, H. (1963). Eichmann in Jerusalem: A report on the banality of evil. Viking Press.
  2. Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity (M. Ritter, Trans.). Sage Publications. (Original work published 1986)
  3. Beck, U. (2009). World at risk (C. Cronin, Trans.). Polity Press. (Original work published 2007)
  4. Bernstein, R. J. (2008). Are Arendt’s reflections on evil still relevant? The Review of Politics, 70(1), 64–76. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20452957
  5. Bouet, E. (2025, January 3). Pitt Review deep dive: Impact, legacy, and gaps. Unda. https://www.unda.co.uk/latest-news-and-blogs/pitt-review-deep-dive-impact-legacy-and-gaps
  6. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs & Environment Agency. (2023). Managing future flood risk and Thames Barrier: Thames Estuary 2100. hhtps://www.gov.uk/guidance/managing-future-flood-risk-and-thames-barrier-thames-estuary-2100
  7. Foxwell-Norton, K. (2017, December 5). What would Hannah Arendt have seen on a beach covered in plastic bottles? Climate Home News. https://www.climatechangenews.com/2017/12/05/hannah-arendt-seen-beach-covered-plastic-bottles/
  8. Gardiner, S. M. (2011). A perfect moral storm: The ethical tragedy of climate change. Oxford University Press.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Literary Studies (Other)

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

April 28, 2026

Submission Date

March 26, 2025

Acceptance Date

December 2, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 35

APA
Yavaş, N. (2026). A THEATRICAL INACTION: CLIMATE CHANGE RISK, BUREAUCRATIC INERTIA, AND ETHICAL ABDICATION IN STEVE WATERS’S THE CONTINGENCY PLAN. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 35. https://doi.org/10.35379/cusosbil.1666351
AMA
1.Yavaş N. A THEATRICAL INACTION: CLIMATE CHANGE RISK, BUREAUCRATIC INERTIA, AND ETHICAL ABDICATION IN STEVE WATERS’S THE CONTINGENCY PLAN. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2026;35. doi:10.35379/cusosbil.1666351
Chicago
Yavaş, Nesrin. 2026. “A THEATRICAL INACTION: CLIMATE CHANGE RISK, BUREAUCRATIC INERTIA, AND ETHICAL ABDICATION IN STEVE WATERS’S THE CONTINGENCY PLAN”. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 35 (April). https://doi.org/10.35379/cusosbil.1666351.
EndNote
Yavaş N (April 1, 2026) A THEATRICAL INACTION: CLIMATE CHANGE RISK, BUREAUCRATIC INERTIA, AND ETHICAL ABDICATION IN STEVE WATERS’S THE CONTINGENCY PLAN. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 35
IEEE
[1]N. Yavaş, “A THEATRICAL INACTION: CLIMATE CHANGE RISK, BUREAUCRATIC INERTIA, AND ETHICAL ABDICATION IN STEVE WATERS’S THE CONTINGENCY PLAN”, Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, vol. 35, Apr. 2026, doi: 10.35379/cusosbil.1666351.
ISNAD
Yavaş, Nesrin. “A THEATRICAL INACTION: CLIMATE CHANGE RISK, BUREAUCRATIC INERTIA, AND ETHICAL ABDICATION IN STEVE WATERS’S THE CONTINGENCY PLAN”. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 35 (April 1, 2026). https://doi.org/10.35379/cusosbil.1666351.
JAMA
1.Yavaş N. A THEATRICAL INACTION: CLIMATE CHANGE RISK, BUREAUCRATIC INERTIA, AND ETHICAL ABDICATION IN STEVE WATERS’S THE CONTINGENCY PLAN. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2026;35. doi:10.35379/cusosbil.1666351.
MLA
Yavaş, Nesrin. “A THEATRICAL INACTION: CLIMATE CHANGE RISK, BUREAUCRATIC INERTIA, AND ETHICAL ABDICATION IN STEVE WATERS’S THE CONTINGENCY PLAN”. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, vol. 35, Apr. 2026, doi:10.35379/cusosbil.1666351.
Vancouver
1.Nesrin Yavaş. A THEATRICAL INACTION: CLIMATE CHANGE RISK, BUREAUCRATIC INERTIA, AND ETHICAL ABDICATION IN STEVE WATERS’S THE CONTINGENCY PLAN. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2026 Apr. 1;35. doi:10.35379/cusosbil.1666351