PERCEPTIONS OF PRESERVICE PRESCHOOL TEACHERS’ REGARDING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND THE MEANINGS THEY ATTRIBUTE

Abstract

In the current era, the use of artificial intelligence is rapidly becoming widespread. However, there is limited research on how artificial intelligence can be utilized in preschool education both in our country and globally and how educators’ perceive it. This study aims to investigate preservice teachers’ perceptions of artificial intelligence and the meanings they attributed to it by preservice teachers who will be preschool educators in the near future. The study was designed as qualitative research. The participants of the study consisted of 107 preservice preschool teachers selected through convenience sampling. Data were collected using a semi-structured form that included prompts such as: “Artificial intelligence is like... because...” and “Artificial intelligence is... because..." They were asked to explain their views on AI in detail. As a result of data analysis, the preservice preschool teachers’ perceptions regarding artificial intelligence were grouped into ten categories. The metaphorical perceptions of AI included: human-like, assistant teacher, convenience, future essentials, complexity, innovation and change, double-sided meaning, dangerous, play and experience, and philosophy. Most of the participants stated that AI has human-like features, while the others focused on its functionality. Regarding the meaning attributed to AI, five categories emerged: features, effects, philosophy, usage of AI, and other. It was determined that pre-service teachers attributed the highest number of meanings to the functional, technical, human-like, dynamic, and human interaction features of artificial intelligence and the lowest number to the necessary, unnecessary, mandatory, and important meanings in the other category. The findings suggest that preservice preschool teachers perceive AI as a necessity of the modern age with the potential to shape the future of education. They also emphasize that need for cautious use to its dual impacts- both positive and negative. Thus, it should be used cautiously. While the participants expressed willingness to integrate AI into preschool education, they approached it with a critical perspective.

Keywords

• Artificial Intelligence
• Preservice Preschool Teacher
• Metaphor
• Meaning
• Content Analysis

OKUL ÖNCESİ ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARININ YAPAY ZEKAYA İLİŞKİN ALGILARI VE YÜKLEDİKLERİ ANLAMLAR

Abstract

Günümüzde yappay zekanın kullanımı gün geçtikçe yaygınlaşmaktadır Bu doğrultuda ülkemizde ve dünyada yapay zekanın okul öncesi eğitşmde nasıl kullanıldığı ve öğretmenlerin okul öncesi eğitimde yapay zekayı nasıl algıladıkları ile iglili araştırmalar oldukça kısıtlıdır. Bu çalışma yakın zamanda okul öncesi eğitimcisi olacak öğretmen adaylarinin yapay zeka yönelik algılarını ve yapay zekaya yükledikleri incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bu araştırma nitel desende tasarlanmıştır. Araştırmanın katılımcıları kolay ulaşılabilir örnekleme yoluyla 107 okul öncesi öğretmen adayından oluşmaktadır. Veri toplamak için geliştirilen yarı yapılandırılmış formda şu ifadelere yer verilmiştir: “Yapay zeka... gibidir, çünkü...” ve ”Yapay zeka... gibidir, çünkü...” Katılımcılardan yapay zeka hakkındaki görüşlerini ayrıntılı olarak açıklamaları istenmiştir. Verilerin analizi sonucunda, okul öncesi öğretmen adaylarının yapaya zekaya ilişkin metaforik algıları on kategoride toplanmıştır. YZ'ye yönelik metaforik algılar insana benzer, yardımcı öğretmen, kolaylık, geleceğin vazgeçilmezleri (temelleri), karmaşıklık, yenilik ve değişim, çift taraflı anlam, tehlikeli, oyun ve deneyim ve felsefe olarak belirlenmiştir. Katılımcıların büyük çoğunluğu yapay zekanın insana ait özellikler taşıdığına; çok azı yapay zekanın işlevselliği ilişkin algılara sahip olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. YZ'nin anlamı ile ilgili olarak beş kategori bulunmaktadır: özellikler, etkiler, felsefe, YZ kullanımı ve diğerleri. Öğretmen adaylarının en çok yapay zekanın fonsiyonel, teknik, insana benzeyen, dinamiklik ve insan etkileşimi özelliklerine; en az ise diğer kategorisinde yer alan gerekli, gereksiz, zorunlu ve önemli anlamlar yükledikleri belirlenmiştir. Araştırma bulgularına göre, geleceği şekillendirme potansiyeline sahip olan öğretmen adayları için YZ çağın bir gerekliliğidir. Öğretmen adayları, YZ'nin hem olumlu hem de olumsuz etkileri olabileceğini, bu nedenle dikkatli kullanılması gerektiğini vurgulamışlardır. Geleceğin öğretmenlerinin yapay zekayı okul öncesi düzeyde eğitim sürecine dâhil etmeye istekli oldukları, ancak bu süreçte eleştirel bir bakış açısıyla ilerleyecekleri açıktır.

Keywords

• Yapay Zekâ
• Okul Öncesi Öğretmen Adayı
• Metafor
• Anlam
• İçerik Analizi

References

1. AAAI (Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence). (2020). The artificial intelligence (AI) for K-12. Retrieved from https://ai4k12.org/
2. Amershi, B. (2020). Culture, the process of knowledge, perception of the world and emergence of AI. AI & SOCIETY, 35(2), 417-430.
3. Aslıyüksek, M., Taş, V. O., Türkoğlu, E., & Sezer, C. (2023). Okul öncesi öğretmenlerinin dijital teknoloji kullanımı ve etkileri. Academic Social Resources Journal, 8(53), 3766-3775. Doi: 10.29228/ASRJOU
4. Ayanwale, M. A., Adelana, O. P., Molefi, R. R., Adeeko, O., & Ishola, A. M. (2024). Examining artificial intelligence literacy among pre-service teachers for future classrooms. Computers and Education Open, 6, 1-15. Doi: 10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100179
5. Balıkçı, H. C., Alpsülün, M., & Hayoğlu, G. (2024). Determination of teachers' perceptions of artificial intelligence concept: A metaphor analysis. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 14(2), 179-193. Doi:10.19126/suje.1433360
6. Bautista, A., Estrada, C., Jaravata, A. M., Mangaser, L. M., Narag, F., Soquila, R., & Asuncion, R. J. (2024). Preservice Teachers' Readiness towards Integrating AI-Based Tools in Education: A TPACK Approach. Educational Process: International Journal, 13(3), 40-68.Doi: 10.22521/edupij.2024.133.3
7. Binns, R. (2018). Fairness in machine learning: Lessons from political philosophy. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (pp. 149-159). Doi: 10.1145/3287560.3287590
8. Bostrom, N., & Yudkowsky, E. (2018). The ethics of artificial intelligence. In Roman V. Yampolskiy (Edt.), Artificial Intelligence Safety and Security (pp. 316-334). NewYork: Chapman and Hall/CRC.

9. Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2017). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. New York & London: W.W. Norton & Company.
10. Bulut, M., Bulut, M. A., Ecer, H., Ekinci, M., Gökçe, M. S., Duymuş, Y., ... & Çoban, K. (2023). Eğitim öğretim ve kültür kavramları ışığında etkili öğretmen davranışları. International Journal of Social and Humanities Sciences Research (JSHSR), 10(96), 1372-1385. Doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8112146
11. Cates, W. M. (1994). Designing hypermedia is hell: Metaphor's role in instructional design. In Proceedings of Selected Research and Development Presentations at the 1994 National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 16-20).
12. Cath, C., Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2018). Artificial intelligence and the ‘good society’: The US, EU, and UK approach. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24(2), 505-528. Doi:10.1007/s11948-017-9901-7
13. Cortazzi, M., & Jin, L. (2020). Elicited metaphor analysis: Researching teaching and learning. In Handbook of Qualitative Research in Education (pp. 488-505). Edward Elgar Publishing.
14. Demirtaş, E., & Türksoy, E. (2023). Perception of the stakeholders of primary school education on artificial intelligence . In full text Book of Ufuk University 2nd International Congress on Social Sciences (pp. 194–207).
15. Denning, P. J., & Tedre, M. (2021). Computational thinking: A disciplinary perspective. Informatics in Education, 20(3), 361-390. Doi:10.15388/infedu.2021.21
16. Dijksterhuis, A., & Van Knippenberg, A. (1998). The relation between perception and behavior, or how to win a game of trivial pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(4), 865-877. Doi:10.1037//0022-3514.74.4.865
17. Druga, S., Vu, S. T., Likhith, E., & Qiu, T. (2019). Inclusive AI literacy for kids around the world. In Proceedings of FabLearn 2019 (pp. 104-111). Doi: 10.1145/3311890.3311904
18. Duvarcı, A. (2005). Türklerde tabiat üstü varlıklar ve bunlarla ilgili kabuller, inanmalar, uygulamalar. Bilig, (32), 125-144. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/bilig/issue/25372/267804
19. Erdoğan, Ş., & Bozkurt, E. (2023). Examining the Perceptions of Prospective Physics Teachers on the Concept of “Artificial Intelligence”: A Metaphor Study. Medeniyet ve Toplum Dergisi, 7(2), 152-163. Doi: 10.51117/metder.2023.41
20. Frydenberg, M., & Lorenz, B. (2020). Lizards in the Street! Introducing Cybersecurity Awareness in a Digital Literacy Context. Information Systems Education Journal, 18(4), 33-45. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1258201
21. Gerlich, M. (2023). Perceptions and acceptance of artificial intelligence: A multi-dimensional study. Social Sciences, 12, 502, 1-24. Doi:10.3390/socsci12090502
22. Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Boston, MA: Center for Curriculum Redesign.
23. İşler, B., & Kılıç, M. (2021). The use and development of artificial intelligence in education. Yeni Medya Elektronik Dergisi, 5(1), 1-11. Doi:10.17932/IAU.EJNM.25480200.2021/ejnm_v5i1001
24. Jin, L. (2019, August). Investigation on potential application of artificial intelligence in preschool children’s education. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1288, No. 1) (pp. 1-5). IOP Publishing. Doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1288/1/012072
25. Kandlhofer, M., Steinbauer, G., Hirschmugl-Gaisch, S., & Huber, P. (2016, October). Artificial intelligence and computer science in education: From kindergarten to university. In 2016 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1-9). Doi:10.1109/FIE.2016.7757570
26. Kashive, N., Powale, L., & Kashive, K. (2020). Understanding user perception toward artificial intelligence (AI) enabled e-learning. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 38(1), 1-19. Doi:10.1108/IJILT-05-2020-0090
27. Kelley, P. G., Yang, Y., Heldreth, C., Moessner, C., Sedley, A., Kramm, A., ... & Woodruff, A. (2021, July). Exciting, useful, worrying, futuristic: Public perception of artificial intelligence in 8 countries. In Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (pp. 627-637).
28. Kim, B. (2022). Analysis of the relationship between metaphor type and attitudes for artificial intelligence in middle school students. The Journal of Korean Language and Literature Education, 85. Doi: 10.17253/swueri.2022.85.007
29. Küçükkara, M. F., Ünal, M., & Sezer, T. (2024). Preschool education teachers’ views on artificial intelligence. Journal of Research in Elementary Education, 4(1), 17-2 . Doi:10.55008/te-ad.1431142
30. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2020). Conceptual metaphor in everyday language. In Shaping Entrepreneurship Research (pp. 475-504). London: Routledge.
31. Langub, L. W., & Lokey-Vega, A. (2017). Rethinking instructional technology to improve pedagogy for digital literacy: A design case in a graduate early childhood education course. TechTrends, 61, 322–330. Doi: 10.1007/s11528-017-0185-1
32. Lim, E. M. (2015). The factors influencing young children's social interaction in technology integration. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 23(4), 545-562. Doi: 10.1080/1350293X.2013.810484
33. Lim, E. M. (2024). Metaphor analysis on preservice early childhood teachers’ conception of AI (artificial intelligence) education for young children. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 51, 101455. Doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101455
34. Lin, P., Van Brummelen, J., Lukin, G., Williams, R., & Breazeal, C. (2020). Zhorai: Designing a Conversational Agent for Children to Explore Machine Learning Concepts. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 34(09), 13381-13388. Doi: 10.1609/aaai.v34i09.7061
35. Maghsudi, S., Lan, A., Xu, J., & van Der Schaar, M. (2021). Personalized education in the artificial intelligence era: what to expect next. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 38(3), 37-50. Doi: 10.1109/MSP.2021.3055032
36. Mahajan, S. (2023). Artificial intelligence and its impacts on society. Contemporary Social Sciences, 32(4), 135-151.
37. Mermer, S., Özer, N., & Şad, S. N. (2021). Öğretmenlerin Akıllı Tahta Kullanımına İlişkin Kaygıları: Bir Ölçek Geliştirme Çalışması. Ahi Evran Akademi, 2(2), 98-111. Retrieved from: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/aea/issue/66168/1016125
38. Merriam, S. B., and Grenier, R. S. (2019). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
39. McCarthy, J., Minsky, M. L., Rochester, N., & Shannon, C. E. (2006). A proposal for the Dartmouth summer research project on artificial intelligence, August 31, 1955. AI Magazine, 27(4), 12-12. Doi: 10.1609/aimag.v27i4.1904
40. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. A. (1994). An expanded sourcebook qualitative data analysis. London: Sage Publications.
41. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı (MEB). (2024). Eğitimde kullanılan yapay zeka araçları: Öğretmen el kitabı. Retrieved August 1, 2024, from http://meb.ai/p8eYjs
42. Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, S. K. W., & Qiao, M. S. (2021). Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100041. Doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2021.1000
43. Osiceanu, M. E. (2015). Psychological implications of modern technologies:“technofobia” versus “technophilia”. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 180, 1137-1144. Doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.229
44. Ouyang, F., & Jiao, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence in education: The three paradigms. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 1-6. Doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100020
45. Saçan, S., Yaralı, K. T., & Kavruk, S. Z. (2022). Investigation of metaphorical perceptions of children on the concept of "artificial intelligence." Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Education Faculty, (64), 274-296. Doi: 10.21764/maeuefd.1074024
46. Selwyn, N., Cordoba, B. G., Andrejevic, M., &Campbell, L. (2020). AI for social good? Australian public attitudes toward AI and society (Monash Data Futures Institute 00008C). Retrieved from Monash University website:https://www.monash.edu/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/2313280/MDFI_AI_for_Social_Good_report_Final.pdf
47. Sperling, K., Stenberg, C. J., McGrath, C., Åkerfeldt, A., Heintz, F., & Stenliden, L. (2024). In search of artificial intelligence (AI) literacy in Teacher Education: A scoping review. Computers and Education Open, 6, 1-13. Doi: 10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100169
48. Standford Encylopedia of Philosophy (SEP) (2024). Pragmatism. https://plato.sydney.edu.au/entries/pragmatism/
49. Tartuk, M. (2023). Metaphorical perceptions of middle school students regarding the concept of artificial intelligence. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 11(2), 108-11
50. Touretzky, D. S., & Gardner-McCune, C. (2022). Artificial intelligence thinking in K–12. Doi: 10.7551/mitpress/13375.001.0001
51. Tseng, T., Murai, Y., Freed, N., Gelosi, D., Ta, T. D., & Kawahara, Y. (2021, June). PlushPal: Storytelling with interactive plush toys and machine learning. In Proceedings of the 20th annual ACM interaction design and children conference (pp. 236-245). Doi: 10.1145/3459990.3460694
52. Turing, A. M. (1950). Computing Machinery and Intelligence. In Minds and Machines (pp. 4-30). London: Prentice-Hall.
53. Uğur, S., & Kurubacak, G. (2019). Artificial Intelligence to Super Artificial Intelligence, Cyber Culture to Transhumanist Culture. Handbook of Research on Learning in the Age of Transhumanism, 1.
54. Vartiainen, H., Tedre, M., & Valtonen, T. (2020). Learning machine learning with very young children: Who is teaching whom?. International journal of child-computer interaction, 25. Doi: 10.1016/j.ijcci.2020.100182
55. Wang, P. (2019). On defining artificial intelligence. Journal of Artificial General Intelligence, 10(2), 1-37. Doi: 10.2478/jagi-2019-0002
56. Williams, M. C. (2000). Encouraging creativity in university education by using metaphors and rich pictures. In Proceedings of the Third Biennial Communication Skills in University Education (CSUE) Conference (pp. 1-6). Edith Cowan University, Western Australia.
57. Williams, R. (2018). PopBots: leveraging social robots to aid preschool children's artificial intelligence education (Doctoral dissertation). Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
58. Williams, R., Park, H. W., & Breazeal, C. (2019, May). A is for artificial intelligence: the impact of artificial intelligence activities on young children's perceptions of robots. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1-11).
59. Yang, M., & Kim, J. (2016). Development a scale for e-Learning digital literacy. The Journal of Educational Information and Media, 22(3), 485–507.
60. Yang, W. (2022). Artificial intelligence education for young children: Why, what, and how in curriculum design and implementation. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 1-7. Doi: /10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100061
61. Yıldırım, A., & Simsek, H. (2021). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative Research Methods in Social Sciences] (12. Edt.). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık
62. Yildiz Durak, H. (2021). Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate teaching technologies into their classrooms: Examining the effects of teaching environments based on open-ended, hands-on and authentic tasks. Education and Information Technologies, 26(5), 5365-5387. Doi: 10.1007/s10639-021-10511-5
63. Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York: PublicAffairs.