Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Doçentliğe Kadar Geçen Süre: Türkiye Uygulaması

Year 2018, Volume: 5 Issue: 2, 210 - 219, 30.10.2018

Hasan Şahin , Ümit Koç

Abstract

Türkiye’deki akademik işgücü piyasası Avrupa ve ABD ile karşılaştırıldığında,
bazı benzerlikler ve farklılıklar olduğu görülmektedir. Rekabetçiliği,  yükselme mekanizmaları ve kamu ve özel
üniversite yapıları benzerlikler arasında yer almaktadır. Farklılıklar ise
kendisini esas olarak ücret yapısında ve iş güvencesi alanında göstermektedir. Bu
farklılığın en belirgin olduğu alanlardan birisi görevin sonlanması sürecidir.
Akademisyenler doçentlik kadrosuna atanıncaya kadarki unvanlarda süreli
sözleşmeli çalışan statüsündedir. Bu kadroya atandıktan sonra ise süreli
sözleşmeli dönemi sona ermekte ve işine son verilmesi nispeten katı kurallara
bağlanmaktadır ki bu akademisyenlerin doçentlik sonrası iş hayatları için iş
güvencesi anlamına gelmektedir. Bu nedenle doçentliğe geçiş süresini etkileyen
değişkenleri belirlemek önemli bir noktadır. 
Bu çalışmada doçentlik ünvanını almaya kadar geçen sürenin belirleyicileri
hazard veya sağkalım (survival) yöntemleri ile analiz edilmektedir. 

Keywords

Doçentlik Süre Modellleri

References

  • Alchian, A, A. (1959). Private Property and the Relative Cost of Tenure. Public Stake in Union Power. Edited by P. D. Bradley, Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press. Akademik Piyasalar, Emek Süreçleri ve Bilimsel Üretim: Keşfedici Bir Alan Çalışması. (2009). Ankara Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri, Ankara.
  • Bosquet, C., and Combes, P. P., and Garcia­Penalosa, C. (2014). Gender and Promotions:Evidence from Academic Economists in France. LIEPP Working Paper No: 29.
  • Carmichael, H. L. (1988). Incentives in Academics: Why Is There Tenure? Journal of Political Economy, 96 (3): 453-72.
  • Cox, D.R. and Oakes, D. (1984) Analysis of Survival Data. Chapman & Hall.
  • Demircioğlu, M. Y. ve Uz, A. (2013). Üniversitelerarası Kurul Üzerine Anayasa ve İdare Hukuku Perspektifinden Bazı Hukuki Değerlendirmeler, AÜHFD, 62(1) 41-72.
  • Greene, William H. (1997). Econometric Analysis. Third Edition, International Edition, Prentice-Hall
  • Jungbauer­Gans, M., and Gross, C. (2013). Determinants of Success in University Careers:Findings from the German Academic Labor Market. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 42, 74–92.
  • Kalbfleisch, J. D., and Prentice, R. L (2002). The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics.
  • Kiefer, N. M. (1988). Economic Duration Data and Hazard Functions. Journal of Economic Literature, 26, 2, 646- 679.
  • Kleinbaum , D. G., and Klein, M. (2011). Survival Analysis- A Self-Learning Text, Third Edition Springer Publishers, New York, Inc.
  • Lancaster, T. (1990). The Econometric Analysis of Transition Data, Cambridge University Press.
  • Lutter, M., and Schröder, M. (2016). Who becomes a tenured professor, and why? Panel data evidence from German sociology. 1980–2013. Research Policy, Volume 45, Issue 5, 999-1013.
  • Long, J. S. (1978). Productivity and Academic Position in the Scientific Career. American Sociological Review, 43, 889–908.
  • Morrison, E., and Rudd, E., and Maresi, N. (2011). Onto, Up, Off the Academic Faculty Ladder: The Gendered Effects of Family on Career Transitions for a Cohort of Social Science Ph.D.s. The Review of Higher Education, 34(4): 525– 553.
  • Nakhaie, M.R. (2007). Universalism, Ascription and Academic Rank: Canadian Professors, 1987-2000. Canadian Review of Sociology, 44(3), 361-386.
  • Sabatier, M. (2010). Do female researchers face a glass ceiling in France? A hazard model of promotions. Journal of Applied Economics, 42(16), 2053-2062.
  • Sans-Menendez, L., and Cruz-Castor, L., and Alva, K. (2013). Time to Tenure in Spanish Universities: An Event History Analysis. Plos ONE, 8(10), https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077028.
  • Siow, A. (1995). The Organization Of The Market For Professors. University Of Toronto, Working Paper Number: Ut-Ecıpa-Sıow-95-01.
  • Stewart, P., and Ornstein, M., and Drakich, J. (2009). Gender and Promotion at Canadian Universities. Canadian Review of Sociology, 46(1), 59-85.
  • Tien, F. F. (2007). To what degree does the promotion system reward faculty research productivity? British Journal of Sociology of Education, 28(1), 105-123.
  • Xie, Y., and Shauman, K. A. (1998). Sex Differences in Research Productivity: New Evidence About an Old Puzzle. American Sociological Review, 80, 847–870.

Year 2018, Volume: 5 Issue: 2, 210 - 219, 30.10.2018

Hasan Şahin , Ümit Koç

Abstract

References

  • Alchian, A, A. (1959). Private Property and the Relative Cost of Tenure. Public Stake in Union Power. Edited by P. D. Bradley, Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press. Akademik Piyasalar, Emek Süreçleri ve Bilimsel Üretim: Keşfedici Bir Alan Çalışması. (2009). Ankara Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri, Ankara.
  • Bosquet, C., and Combes, P. P., and Garcia­Penalosa, C. (2014). Gender and Promotions:Evidence from Academic Economists in France. LIEPP Working Paper No: 29.
  • Carmichael, H. L. (1988). Incentives in Academics: Why Is There Tenure? Journal of Political Economy, 96 (3): 453-72.
  • Cox, D.R. and Oakes, D. (1984) Analysis of Survival Data. Chapman & Hall.
  • Demircioğlu, M. Y. ve Uz, A. (2013). Üniversitelerarası Kurul Üzerine Anayasa ve İdare Hukuku Perspektifinden Bazı Hukuki Değerlendirmeler, AÜHFD, 62(1) 41-72.
  • Greene, William H. (1997). Econometric Analysis. Third Edition, International Edition, Prentice-Hall
  • Jungbauer­Gans, M., and Gross, C. (2013). Determinants of Success in University Careers:Findings from the German Academic Labor Market. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 42, 74–92.
  • Kalbfleisch, J. D., and Prentice, R. L (2002). The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics.
  • Kiefer, N. M. (1988). Economic Duration Data and Hazard Functions. Journal of Economic Literature, 26, 2, 646- 679.
  • Kleinbaum , D. G., and Klein, M. (2011). Survival Analysis- A Self-Learning Text, Third Edition Springer Publishers, New York, Inc.
  • Lancaster, T. (1990). The Econometric Analysis of Transition Data, Cambridge University Press.
  • Lutter, M., and Schröder, M. (2016). Who becomes a tenured professor, and why? Panel data evidence from German sociology. 1980–2013. Research Policy, Volume 45, Issue 5, 999-1013.
  • Long, J. S. (1978). Productivity and Academic Position in the Scientific Career. American Sociological Review, 43, 889–908.
  • Morrison, E., and Rudd, E., and Maresi, N. (2011). Onto, Up, Off the Academic Faculty Ladder: The Gendered Effects of Family on Career Transitions for a Cohort of Social Science Ph.D.s. The Review of Higher Education, 34(4): 525– 553.
  • Nakhaie, M.R. (2007). Universalism, Ascription and Academic Rank: Canadian Professors, 1987-2000. Canadian Review of Sociology, 44(3), 361-386.
  • Sabatier, M. (2010). Do female researchers face a glass ceiling in France? A hazard model of promotions. Journal of Applied Economics, 42(16), 2053-2062.
  • Sans-Menendez, L., and Cruz-Castor, L., and Alva, K. (2013). Time to Tenure in Spanish Universities: An Event History Analysis. Plos ONE, 8(10), https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077028.
  • Siow, A. (1995). The Organization Of The Market For Professors. University Of Toronto, Working Paper Number: Ut-Ecıpa-Sıow-95-01.
  • Stewart, P., and Ornstein, M., and Drakich, J. (2009). Gender and Promotion at Canadian Universities. Canadian Review of Sociology, 46(1), 59-85.
  • Tien, F. F. (2007). To what degree does the promotion system reward faculty research productivity? British Journal of Sociology of Education, 28(1), 105-123.
  • Xie, Y., and Shauman, K. A. (1998). Sex Differences in Research Productivity: New Evidence About an Old Puzzle. American Sociological Review, 80, 847–870.
There are 21 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Hasan Şahin 0000-0001-5922-068X

Ümit Koç

Publication Date October 30, 2018
Submission Date August 15, 2018
Acceptance Date October 26, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2018 Volume: 5 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Şahin, H., & Koç, Ü. (2018). Doçentliğe Kadar Geçen Süre: Türkiye Uygulaması. Çağdaş Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 5(2), 210-219.
 Download Cover Image

In order for the applied article to be evaluated, it must be written according to the journal's writing rules, the full text must not contain the author's information, it must be written according to the article template, the similarity report must be uploaded, and the copyright transfer form must be signed and uploaded. The articles accepted for publication after the evaluation process has been completed should be corrected by the author(s) and uploaded to the journal website again by adding author information. Information about the researches that require the permission of the Ethics Committee can be accessed from the Ethical Principles and Publication Policy page. For studies that do not require Ethics Committee Permission, the Study Declaration Form that does not Require Ethics Committee Permission should be filled out and uploaded to the system and stated in the article.