BibTex RIS Cite

KURUMSAL SOSYAL SORUMLULUKTA ÖLÇÜM TEKNİKLERİ

Year 2011, Issue: 8, 60 - 67, 13.07.2016

Abstract

Kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk son yıllarda iş dünyasında öne çıkan başlıca konular arasında yer almaktadır. Bunun iki temel nedeni olduğu söylenebilir. Birincisi, işletmelerin toplumda artan rolü ve toplum bilincinin giderek artmasına paralel olarak işletmelerin kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk uygulamalarının yükümlülük haline gelmesidir. İkincisi ise rekabetçi üstünlük açısından işletmelerin son yıllarda başvurduğu konulardan birisinin de kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk olmasıdır. Bu durum, ekonomik performansın sürdürülebilirliği kadar sosyal performansın da sürdürülebilirliğini ve önemini artırmakta ve gerçekleştirilen kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk uygulamalarının çeşitli ölçüm teknikleriyle denetimini gerekli kılmaktadır.

References

  • Aktan, Coşkun Can, Deniz Börü, Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk, İşletmeler ve Sosyal Sorumluluk, İgiad Yayınları, 2007. Argüden, Yılmaz, Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk, Rota Yayın Yapım, İstanbul, 2002.
  • Bowen, Howard R., Social Responsibilities of the Businessman, NY: Harper & Brothers Publishers, 1953. Buchholtz, Rogene A., Sandra B. Rosenthal, Stakeholder Theory and Public Policy: How Governments Matter, Journal of Business Ethics, 51, 2, 2004, s.143-153.
  • Carroll, Archie B., A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance, The Academy of Management Review, Vol.4, No.4, 1979, s. 497-505.
  • Carroll, Archie B., The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders, Business Horizons, Vol.34, Issue.4, 1991, s.39-48.
  • Carroll, Archie B., Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolution of a Definitional Contract, Business and Society, Cilt. 38, No. 3, 1999. Carroll, Archie B., Ann K. Buchholtz. Business and Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management, Fourth Edition, Australia: South-Western Collage Publishing, 2000.
  • Griffin, Jennifer J., John F. Mahon, The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate, Business and Society, Vol.36, No.1, 1997, s. 5-31.
  • Fung, Archon, Dara O’Rourke, Reinventing Environmental Regulation from the Grassrots Up: Explaining and Expanding the Success of the Toxics Release Inventory, Environmental Management, Vol.25, No.2, 2000, s. 115-127.
  • Gerde, Virginia W., Jeanne M. Logsdon, Measuring Environmental Performance: Use of the Toxics Release Inventory and Other Us Environmental Databases, Business Strategy and the Environmental, 10, 2001, s. 269-285.
  • Harrison, Jeffrey S., R. Edward Freeman, Stakeholders, Social Responsibility, and Performance: Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Perspectives, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 42, No.5, 1999, s. 479-485.
  • Igalens, Jacques, Jean-Pascal Gond, Measuring Corporate Social Performance in France: A Critical and Empirical Analysis of ARESE Data, Journal of Business Ethics, 56, 2005, s. 131-148.
  • Karake, Zeina A., An Examination of the Impact of Organizational Downsizing and Discrimination Activities on Corporate Social Responsibility as Measured by a Company’s Reputation Index, Management Decision, 36, 3, 1998, s. 206-216. Logsdon, Jeanne M., Kristi Yuthas, Corporate Social Performance, Stakeholder Orientation, and Organizational Moral Development, Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 12/13, 1997, s. 1213-1226.
  • Neville, Benjamin A., Simon J. Bell, Bülent Mengüç, Corporate Reputation, Stakeholders and the Social Performance-Financial Performance Relationship, European Journal of Marketing, Vol.39, No.9/10, 2005, s.1184-1198.
  • Peltekoğlu, Filiz Balta, Halkla İlişkiler Nedir?, 2. Baskı, Beta Yayınları, İstanbul, 2001.
  • Sarıkaya, Muammer, Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk, Yönetim Yaklaşımlarıyla Kurumsal Sürdürülebilirlik, Ed. Senem Besler, 1. Basım, Beta Yayınları, İstanbul, 2009.
  • Sethi, S. Prakash, Dimensions of Corporate Social Performance: An Analytical Framework, California Management Review, Vol.17, Issue. 3, 1975, s. 58-64.
  • Steiner, George A., Steiner, Jhon F, Business, Government, and Society: A Managerial Perspective, Eight Edition, Singapore: McGraw-Hill, 1997.
  • Şimşek, M. Şerif, Tahir Akgemici, Adnan Çelik, Davranış Bilimlerine Giriş ve Örgütlerde Davranış, 3. Basım, 2003.
  • Turban, Daniel B., Daniel W. Greening, Corporate Social Performance and Organizational Atrractiveness to Prospective Employees, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 40, No.3, 1996, s. 658-672.
  • Valor, Carmen, Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Citizenship: Towards Corporate Accountability, Business and Society Review; 110, 2, 2005, s.191-212.
  • Wartick, Steven L., Philip L. Cochran, Evolution of the Corporate Social Performance Model, Academy of Management Review, Vol.10, No.4, 1985, s.758-780.
  • Wood, Donna J, Corporate Social Performance Revisted, Academy of Management Review, Vol.16, No.4, 1991, s. 691-718.
  • http://www.kld.com/indexes/data/ fact _sheet/DSI_Fact_ Sheet.pdf; Erişim: 11.07.2010
Year 2011, Issue: 8, 60 - 67, 13.07.2016

Abstract

References

  • Aktan, Coşkun Can, Deniz Börü, Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk, İşletmeler ve Sosyal Sorumluluk, İgiad Yayınları, 2007. Argüden, Yılmaz, Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk, Rota Yayın Yapım, İstanbul, 2002.
  • Bowen, Howard R., Social Responsibilities of the Businessman, NY: Harper & Brothers Publishers, 1953. Buchholtz, Rogene A., Sandra B. Rosenthal, Stakeholder Theory and Public Policy: How Governments Matter, Journal of Business Ethics, 51, 2, 2004, s.143-153.
  • Carroll, Archie B., A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance, The Academy of Management Review, Vol.4, No.4, 1979, s. 497-505.
  • Carroll, Archie B., The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders, Business Horizons, Vol.34, Issue.4, 1991, s.39-48.
  • Carroll, Archie B., Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolution of a Definitional Contract, Business and Society, Cilt. 38, No. 3, 1999. Carroll, Archie B., Ann K. Buchholtz. Business and Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management, Fourth Edition, Australia: South-Western Collage Publishing, 2000.
  • Griffin, Jennifer J., John F. Mahon, The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate, Business and Society, Vol.36, No.1, 1997, s. 5-31.
  • Fung, Archon, Dara O’Rourke, Reinventing Environmental Regulation from the Grassrots Up: Explaining and Expanding the Success of the Toxics Release Inventory, Environmental Management, Vol.25, No.2, 2000, s. 115-127.
  • Gerde, Virginia W., Jeanne M. Logsdon, Measuring Environmental Performance: Use of the Toxics Release Inventory and Other Us Environmental Databases, Business Strategy and the Environmental, 10, 2001, s. 269-285.
  • Harrison, Jeffrey S., R. Edward Freeman, Stakeholders, Social Responsibility, and Performance: Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Perspectives, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 42, No.5, 1999, s. 479-485.
  • Igalens, Jacques, Jean-Pascal Gond, Measuring Corporate Social Performance in France: A Critical and Empirical Analysis of ARESE Data, Journal of Business Ethics, 56, 2005, s. 131-148.
  • Karake, Zeina A., An Examination of the Impact of Organizational Downsizing and Discrimination Activities on Corporate Social Responsibility as Measured by a Company’s Reputation Index, Management Decision, 36, 3, 1998, s. 206-216. Logsdon, Jeanne M., Kristi Yuthas, Corporate Social Performance, Stakeholder Orientation, and Organizational Moral Development, Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 12/13, 1997, s. 1213-1226.
  • Neville, Benjamin A., Simon J. Bell, Bülent Mengüç, Corporate Reputation, Stakeholders and the Social Performance-Financial Performance Relationship, European Journal of Marketing, Vol.39, No.9/10, 2005, s.1184-1198.
  • Peltekoğlu, Filiz Balta, Halkla İlişkiler Nedir?, 2. Baskı, Beta Yayınları, İstanbul, 2001.
  • Sarıkaya, Muammer, Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk, Yönetim Yaklaşımlarıyla Kurumsal Sürdürülebilirlik, Ed. Senem Besler, 1. Basım, Beta Yayınları, İstanbul, 2009.
  • Sethi, S. Prakash, Dimensions of Corporate Social Performance: An Analytical Framework, California Management Review, Vol.17, Issue. 3, 1975, s. 58-64.
  • Steiner, George A., Steiner, Jhon F, Business, Government, and Society: A Managerial Perspective, Eight Edition, Singapore: McGraw-Hill, 1997.
  • Şimşek, M. Şerif, Tahir Akgemici, Adnan Çelik, Davranış Bilimlerine Giriş ve Örgütlerde Davranış, 3. Basım, 2003.
  • Turban, Daniel B., Daniel W. Greening, Corporate Social Performance and Organizational Atrractiveness to Prospective Employees, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 40, No.3, 1996, s. 658-672.
  • Valor, Carmen, Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Citizenship: Towards Corporate Accountability, Business and Society Review; 110, 2, 2005, s.191-212.
  • Wartick, Steven L., Philip L. Cochran, Evolution of the Corporate Social Performance Model, Academy of Management Review, Vol.10, No.4, 1985, s.758-780.
  • Wood, Donna J, Corporate Social Performance Revisted, Academy of Management Review, Vol.16, No.4, 1991, s. 691-718.
  • http://www.kld.com/indexes/data/ fact _sheet/DSI_Fact_ Sheet.pdf; Erişim: 11.07.2010
There are 22 citations in total.

Details

Other ID JA48JT67VD
Journal Section Makale
Authors

Muammer Sarıkaya This is me

Yasemin Akarca This is me

Publication Date July 13, 2016
Published in Issue Year 2011 Issue: 8

Cite

APA Sarıkaya, M., & Akarca, Y. (2016). KURUMSAL SOSYAL SORUMLULUKTA ÖLÇÜM TEKNİKLERİ. Denetişim(8), 60-67.

TR Dizin'de yer alan Denetişim dergisi yayımladığı çalışmalarla; alanındaki profesyoneller, akademisyenler ve düzenleyiciler arasında etkili bir iletişim ağı kurarak, etkin bir denetim ve yönetim sistemine ulaşma yolculuğunda önemli mesafelerin kat edilmesine katkı sağlamaktadır.