Key Insights on Adults' Informal Learning in Türkiye: Findings from the Adult Education Survey

Peri Tutar; Hande Dindar

doi:10.53444/deubefd.1884204

TR EN

Abstract

Türkiye’de Yetişkinlerin İnformal Öğrenmesine İlişkin Temel Bulgular: Yetişkin Eğitimi Araştırması Verileri

Abstract

İnformal öğrenme, yaşam boyu öğrenmenin en özgün ve gündelik yaşamla iç içe geçmiş bir biçimi olarak giderek daha fazla kabul görmektedir. Bu çalışma, yaş, cinsiyet, eğitim düzeyi, gelir ve istihdam durumu gibi demografik faktörlerin, Türkiye’de yetişkinlerin informal öğrenmeye katılımı ile nasıl ilişkili olduğunu incelemektedir. Ulusal düzeyde temsil gücüne sahip bir veri seti olan 2022 Yetişkin Eğitimi Araştırması (YEA) verileri kullanılarak yapılan analizde, yetişkinlerin sosyal çevre, basılı materyaller, elektronik araçlar, rehberli turlar ve öğrenme merkezleri gibi farklı informal öğrenme kanallarına katılım örüntüleri incelenmiştir. Bulgular, genel olarak informal öğrenme kaynaklarına katılımın düşük düzeyde kaldığını ortaya koymaktadır. Elektronik araçlar en yaygın kullanılan informal öğrenme kanalı olarak öne çıkarken, rehberli turlara ve öğrenme merkezlerine katılımın oldukça sınırlı olduğu görülmüştür. Katılım örüntüleri özellikle eğitim düzeyi, meslek, gelir ve yaş değişkenlerine göre daha belirgin biçimde farklılaşırken, cinsiyete dayalı farklılıkların pratik açıdan genel olarak sınırlı kaldığı belirlenmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular, yetişkin eğitimi alanında çalışan uygulayıcılar, politika yapıcılar ve diğer paydaşlar için daha kapsayıcı ve etkili yaşam boyu öğrenme politikalarının geliştirilmesine katkı sağlayabilecek niteliktedir.

Keywords

informal öğrenme, yetişkin öğrenmesi, öz-yönelimli öğrenme, yaşam boyu öğrenme, katılım örüntüleri

Ethical Statement

Bu çalışma, Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu (TÜİK) tarafından yürütülen 2022 Yetişkin Eğitimi Araştırması mikro verilerine dayalı ikincil veri analizi olarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırma kapsamında yazarlar tarafından doğrudan katılımcılardan veri toplanmamış; yalnızca anonimleştirilmiş resmi mikro veri seti kullanılmıştır. Bu nedenle çalışma etik kurul izni gerektirmemektedir. Veriler 423733 nolu kararla, TÜİK’in veri kullanım koşulları çerçevesinde analiz edilmiş ve raporlanmıştır.

Thanks

Yazarlar, bu çalışmada kullanılan 2022 Yetişkin Eğitimi Araştırması verilerine 423733 nolu kararla erişim olanağı sağladığı için Türkiye İstatistik Kurumuna (TÜİK) teşekkürlerini sunmaktadır. Ayrıca, makalenin geliştirilme sürecine katkı sunan meslektaşlarımıza ve yapıcı geri bildirimleriyle çalışmanın olgunlaşmasına destek olan hakemlere teşekkür ederiz.

Key Insights on Adults' Informal Learning in Türkiye: Findings from the Adult Education Survey

Abstract

Informal learning is increasingly recognized as the most authentic and socially embedded form of lifelong learning. This study investigates how demographic factors—age, gender, education level, income, and employment status—influence adults’ participation in informal learning in Türkiye. Using data from the 2022 Adult Education Survey (AES), a nationally representative dataset, the study analyzes participation in different informal learning channels, including learning through social networks, printed materials, electronic devices, guided tours, and learning centers. Findings reveal that engagement with informal learning sources remains low overall. Electronic devices emerged as the most commonly used informal learning channel, whereas participation in guided tours and learning centers remained relatively limited. Participation patterns were more clearly differentiated by educational attainment, occupation, income, and age, while gender differences were generally small in practical terms.These insights can guide adult educators, policymakers, and other stakeholders in designing more inclusive and effective lifelong learning initiatives.

Keywords

informal learning, adult learning, self-directed learning, lifelong learning, participation patterns

Ethical Statement

This study was conducted based on the 2022 Adult Education Survey microdata provided by the Turkish Statistical Institute (TurkStat). Since the study used only anonymized secondary data and no primary data were collected directly from human participants by the authors, ethics committee approval was not required. Access to the microdata was obtained in accordance with TurkStat’s data access and use conditions under request number 423733.

Thanks

The authors would like to thank the Turkish Statistical Institute (TurkStat) for providing access to the 2022 Adult Education Survey microdata used in this study under request number 423733. Appreciation is also extended to colleagues and reviewers whose feedback contributed to the refinement of the manuscript.

References

Akiva, T., Schunn, C. D., & Louw, M. (2017). What drives attendance at informal learning activities? A study of two art programs. Curator: The Museum Journal, 60(3), 351–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/cura.12206
Association for Monitoring Gender Equality. (2022). Gender equality monitoring report of Türkiye 2021-2022. https://ceid.org.tr
Bachmann, R., & Hertweck, F. (2023). The gender gap in digital literacy: A cohort analysis for Germany. Applied Economics Letters, 32(5), 608–613. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2023.2277685
Bağcı Ş. E. (2015). Yetişkin Eğitimi ve Eşitlik. Kalkedon Yayınları.
Bağcı, Ş. E. (2019). Migration and Participation in Adult Education: The Matthew Effect on Immigrants. Adult Education Quarterly, 69(4), 271-294. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713619848108
Boeren, E. (2009). Adult education participation: The Matthew principle. Filosofija-Sociologija, 20(2), 154–161. http://www.lmaleidykla.lt/filosofijasociologija/2009/2/5337
Boeren, E. (2011). Gender differences in formal, non-formal and informal adult learning. Studies in Continuing Education, 33(3), 333–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2011.610301
Bourdieu, P. (2015a). Pratik Nedenler. (H. U.Tanrıöver, Çev.), Hil Yayın.
Bourdieu, P. (2015b). Ayrım: Beğeni Yargısının Toplumsal Eleştirisi. (D. F. Şannan ve A. G. Berkkurt Çev.), Ankara: Heretik Yayınları.
Callanan, M., Cervantes, C., & Loomis, M. (2011). Informal learning. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 2(6), 646-655. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.143

Cicikler, B. (2022). A structural equation model for adults' problem solving skills in technology-rich environments in Türkiye [Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi]. Ankara Üniversitesi.
Cicikler, B., Ozturk, H. T., & Tutar, P. (2025). What makes adults digitally literate in Türkiye: An evaluation by demographics. European Journal of Education, 60(4), e70340. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70340
Cilasun, S. M., Demir-Şeker, S., Dincer, N. N., & Tekin-Koru, A. (2018). Adult education as a stepping-stone to better jobs: An analysis of the adult education survey in Turkey. Adult Education Quarterly, 68(4), 316-346. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713618783890
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Dinçer, N. N., & Tekin-Koru, A. (2013). Adult education in Turkey: Stylized facts, determinants and further issues. MPRA Paper No. 49496. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/49496/?utm
Erbay, F. (2017). Müzelerin eğitim ve tasarım atölyelerinde informal eğitim. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 46(214), 239–253. https://izlik.org/JA84RM69MH
Essefi, N. (2002). Lifelong learning: Sharing the Tunisian experience. In C. M. Anonueva (Ed.), Integrating lifelong learning perspectives (pp. 89–105). UNESCO Institute for Education.
Field, J., & Tuckett, A. (2016). Informal learning in the family and community. Foresight, Government Office for Science.
Freire, P. (1998). Okuryazarlık: Sözcükleri ve dünyayı okuma (S. Ayhan, Çev.). İmge Kitabevi.
Gür, F., Seggie, F. N., & Başgürboğa, G. K. (2021). Informal adult learning: Advertisements in women’s magazines in Türkiye. Adult Education Quarterly, 71(4), 315–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713621991842
Hakim, C. (1982). Secondary analysis and the relationship between official and academic social research. Sociology, 16(1), 12–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038582016001005
Hein, G. E. (1998). Learning in the museum. Routledge.
Heuer, A., Serratos-Sotelo, L., & Motel-Klingebiel, A. (2025). How perception affects participation: the case of adult learning and continued vocational education and training in Europe. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 44(1), 17-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2024.2398516
Hakim, C. (2000). Research design: Successful designs for social and economic research (2. baskı). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203354971
Hooper-Greenhill, E. (2007). Museums and education: Purpose, pedagogy, performance. Routledge.
Jin, B., Kim, J., & Baumgartner, L. M. (2019). Informal learning of older adults in using mobile devices: A review of the literature. Adult Education Quarterly, 69(2), 120–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713619834726
Johnson, M., & Majewska, D. (2022). Formal, non-formal, and informal learning: What are they, and how can we research them? Cambridge University Press & Assessment.
Kalenda, J., & Boeren, E. (2025). Revisiting the triadic classification of learning activities: rethinking their measurement. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 44(3), 257–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2025.2489506
Karger, T., Kalenda, J., Vaculíková, J., & Kočvarová, I. (2024). Online learning platforms and resources in adult education and training: new findings from four European countries. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 43(4), 417–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2024.2358896
Kaur, M., & Sharma, J. (2023). The role of digital literacy to promote gender equality. Shodh Sari-An International Multidisciplinary Journal, 2(4), 315–327. https://doi.org/10.59231/SARI7642
Kelly, M. M., Martin-Peters, T., & Farber, J. S. (2024). Secondary data analysis: Using existing data to answer new questions. Journal of Pediatric Health Care, 38(4), 615–618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedhc.2024.03.005
King, K.P. (2017). Technology and Innovation in Adult Learning. Jossey-Bass.
Knipprath, H., & De Rick, K. (2015). How social and human capital predict participation in lifelong learning: A longitudinal data analysis. Adult Education Quarterly, 65(1), 50–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713614561855 Knowles, M. S. (1950). Informal adult education: A guide for administrators, leaders, and teachers. Association Press.
Kyndt, E., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Baert, H. (2013). The learning intentions of low-qualified employees: A multilevel approach. Adult Education Quarterly, 63(2), 165–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713612454324
Lai, H. J., Wu, M. L., & Li, A. T. (2011). Adults' participation in informal learning activities: Key findings from the adult education participation survey in Taiwan. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 51(3), 409–432. EID: 2-s2.0-84855615962
Livingstone, D. W. (2001). Adults' informal learning: Definitions, findings, gaps and future research (WALL Working Paper No. 21). Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
Merriam, S. B., & Kee, Y. (2014). Promoting community wellbeing: The case for lifelong learning for older adults. Adult Education Quarterly, 64(2), 128–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713613513633
UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning. (2019). 4th global report on adult learning and education: Leave no one behind: Participation, equity and inclusion. UNESCO. https://www.uil.unesco.org/en/adult-education/global-report-grale
O’Brien, M. A., & Rogers, W. A. (2012). Design for aging: Enhancing everyday technology use. In R. Z. Zheng, R. D. Hill, & M. K. Gardner (Eds.), Engaging older adults with modern technology: Internet use and information access needs (pp. 105–123). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-1966-1.ch006
OECD (2020), Increasing Adult Learning Participation: Learning from Successful Reforms, Getting Skills Right, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/cf5d9c21-en.
OECD (2023), Shaping Digital Education: Enabling Factors for Quality, Equity and Efficiency, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/bac4dc9f-en.
Ostrouch-Kamińska, J., & Vieira, C. C. (2015). Introduction. In J. Ostrouch-Kamińska & C. C. Vieira (Eds.), Private world(s): Gender and informal learning of adults (pp. 1–12). Sense Publishers.
Ostrouch-Kamińska, J., & Vieira, C. C. (2016). Gender-sensitive adult education: Critical perspective. Revista Portuguesa de Pedagogia, 50(1), 37–56. https://doi.org/10.14195/1647-8614_50-1_2
Prestridge, S., Tan, S. C., Jacobsen, M., Hoppe, H. U., Angeli, C., Milrad, M., Pangeni, S. K., Kovatcheva, E., Kafyulilo, A., Flanagan, B., & Khaddage, F. (2024). Disconnected connections of learning beyond formal schooling through human–computer–human interactions. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 29, 1791–1807. DOI: 10.1007/s10758-024-09779-6.
Robson, C. (2017). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri: Gerçek dünya araştırması (Ş. Çınkır & N. Demierkasımoğlu, Çev.). Anı Yayıncılık.
Rogers, A. (2003). What is the difference? A new critique to adult learning and teaching. NIACE.
Rogers, A. (2014). The base of the iceberg: Informal learning and its impact on formal and non-formal learning. Verlag Barbara Budrich.
Somtrakool, K. (2002). Lifelong learning for a modern learning society. In C. M. Medel-Añonuevo (Ed.), Integrating lifelong learning perspectives (pp. 191–199). UNESCO Institute for Education.
Song, D., & Bonk, C. J. (2016). Motivational factors in self-directed informal learning from online learning resources. Cogent Education, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1205838
Sulkunen, S., Nissinen, K. ., & Malin, A. (2021). The role of informal learning in adults’ literacy proficiency. European Journal for Research on the Education and Learning of Adults, 12(2), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.3384/rela.2000-7426.1325
Tutar, P. (2016). Political education of women: Example of KA. DER. Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 49(2). https://doi.org/10.1501/Egifak_0000001381
Tutar, P. (2019). Bir yaşam boyu öğrenme mecrası olarak Türkiye’de planlı dönem kültür politikaları. Yetişkin Eğitimi Dergisi, 2(2-3), 6-47.
Tutar, P. (2020). Yaşam boyu öğrenmeye kültürel alandan bakmak: Öğretmen adaylarının kültürel katılım örüntüleri. (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi), Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
Tutar, P. (2021). An evaluation of the cultural domain in Türkiye in the context of lifelong learning. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 14(2), 137-166. https://doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.804861
Tutar, P. (2022). Öğrenme kültürünü entelektüel bir meslek alanında aramak. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 24(2), 426-444. https://doi.org/10.32709/akusosbil.870699
Tutar, P. (2023). Cultural participation patterns of prospective teachers in the context of informal learning. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 63(2), 206-234.
Tutar Çınar, P., & Bulut, S. F. (2024). Türkiye'de yetişkin eğitimine katılım araştırmalarının (1990–2024) bibliyometrik ve içerik analizi yaklaşımıyla incelenmesi. Yetişkin Eğitimi Dergisi, 7(12), 6–29.
UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning. (2022). Fifth global report on adult learning and education: Citizenship education: Empowering adults for change. UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning. https://www.uil.unesco.org/
UNICEF. (2021). What we know about the gender digital divide for girls: A literature review. https://www.unicef.org/eap/media/8311/file/What%20we%20know%20about%20the%20gender%20digital%20divide%20for%20girls:%20A%20literature%20review.pdf
Van Dijk, J. A. (2005). The deepening divide: Inequality in the information society. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452229812
Van Noy, M., James, H., & Bedley, C. (2016). Reconceptualizing learning: A review of the literature on informal learning. ACT Foundation. Rutgers Education and Employment Research Center.
Vartanian, T. P. (2011). Secondary data analysis. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388817.001.0001
Vermeylen, L., & McLean, S. (2014). Does age matter? Informal learning practices of younger and older adults. Canadian Journal for the Study of Adult Education, 26(1), 19-34. https://doi.org/10.56105/cjsae.v26i1.2837
World Wide Web Foundation (2020a). Women’s Rights Online Digital Gender Gap Audit Scorecards - Global Summary, http://webfoundation.org/docs/2016/09/WRO-Gender-Report Card_Overview.pdf
World Wide Web Foundation. (2020b). Women’s Rights Online: Closing the digital gender gap for a more equal world. http://webfoundation.org/docs/2020/10/Womens-Rights-Online-Report-1.pdf
Yeaxle, B. A. (1929). Lifelong education: A sketch of the range and significance of the adult education movement. Cassel and Company Ltd.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Lifelong learning, Adult Education

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Peri Tutar
0000-0002-1950-6111
Türkiye

Hande Dindar ^*
0000-0002-7077-8032
Türkiye

Early Pub Date

September 29, 2026

Publication Date

September 30, 2026

Submission Date

February 7, 2026

Acceptance Date

August 21, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Number: 69

DOI

https://doi.org/10.53444/deubefd.1884204

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA86ND64AB

APA

Tutar, P., & Dindar, H. (2026). Key Insights on Adults’ Informal Learning in Türkiye: Findings from the Adult Education Survey. Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 69, 370-395. https://doi.org/10.53444/deubefd.1884204

AMA

1.Tutar P, Dindar H. Key Insights on Adults’ Informal Learning in Türkiye: Findings from the Adult Education Survey. Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2026;(69):370-395. doi:10.53444/deubefd.1884204

Chicago

Tutar, Peri, and Hande Dindar. 2026. “Key Insights on Adults’ Informal Learning in Türkiye: Findings from the Adult Education Survey”. Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, nos. 69: 370-95. https://doi.org/10.53444/deubefd.1884204.

EndNote

Tutar P, Dindar H (September 1, 2026) Key Insights on Adults’ Informal Learning in Türkiye: Findings from the Adult Education Survey. Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 69 370–395.

IEEE

[1]P. Tutar and H. Dindar, “Key Insights on Adults’ Informal Learning in Türkiye: Findings from the Adult Education Survey”, Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, no. 69, pp. 370–395, Sept. 2026, doi: 10.53444/deubefd.1884204.

ISNAD

Tutar, Peri - Dindar, Hande. “Key Insights on Adults’ Informal Learning in Türkiye: Findings from the Adult Education Survey”. Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 69 (September 1, 2026): 370-395. https://doi.org/10.53444/deubefd.1884204.

JAMA

1.Tutar P, Dindar H. Key Insights on Adults’ Informal Learning in Türkiye: Findings from the Adult Education Survey. Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2026;:370–395.

MLA

Tutar, Peri, and Hande Dindar. “Key Insights on Adults’ Informal Learning in Türkiye: Findings from the Adult Education Survey”. Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, no. 69, Sept. 2026, pp. 370-95, doi:10.53444/deubefd.1884204.

Vancouver

1.Peri Tutar, Hande Dindar. Key Insights on Adults’ Informal Learning in Türkiye: Findings from the Adult Education Survey. Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2026 Sep. 1;(69):370-95. doi:10.53444/deubefd.1884204

Abstract

Abstract

Türkiye’de Yetişkinlerin İnformal Öğrenmesine İlişkin Temel Bulgular: Yetişkin Eğitimi Araştırması Verileri

Abstract

Keywords

Ethical Statement

Thanks

Key Insights on Adults' Informal Learning in Türkiye: Findings from the Adult Education Survey

Abstract

Keywords

Ethical Statement

Thanks

References

Details

Primary Language

Subjects

Journal Section

Authors

Early Pub Date

Publication Date

Submission Date

Acceptance Date

Published in Issue

DOI

IZ

Cite