Nanoteknoloji Öğretimi Üzerine Yapılan Çalışmaların Uluslararası Literatür Kapsamında Tematik İncelenmesi

Year 2021, Issue: 52, 77 - 96, 31.12.2021

Tamer Yıldırım

https://doi.org/10.53444/deubefd.838236

Abstract

Maddenin nanometre seviyesinde incelenmesi ve işlenmesi ile ilgilenen nanoteknoloji, popüler bir alan olması ve disiplinler arası doğası gereği eğitim çalışmalarının öncelik vermesi gereken bir alandır. Eğitimcilere yol gösterici olması amacı ile bu çalışmada; uluslararası literatür incelenerek nanoteknoloji öğretim çalışmalarında kullanılan kavram/konular tematik olarak analiz edilmiş ve yapılan etkinlikler derlenerek sentezlenmeye çalışılmıştır. İnceleme sonucunda nanoteknoloji öğretim çalışmalarında en çok kullanılan kavramlar; boyut/ölçek, boyuta bağlı özellikler, nanoskopik araçların yapısı, nanoteknoloji uygulamaları, nano malzemeler ve nano teknolojinin etik unsurları olmuştur. Bu kavramların öğrenilmesine yönelik olarak farklı deneysel etkinlikler, modelleme çalışmaları, video ve görsel araçlar, bilim merkezi gezisi ve tartışma etkinlikleri yapıldığı görülmüştür. Yapılan çalışmanın öğretmenlere, araştırmacılara, öğrencilere ve nano eğitim etkinliklerine katkı sunacağı düşünülmektedir.

Keywords

FeTeMM, nanoeğitim, nanoteknoloji, nanobilim, nano öğretim, nano etkinlik

References

• Adadan, E., Akaygun, S., & Sanyal, A. (2017). Size-dependent properties of matter: Is the size of a pill important?. Science Activities, 54(3-4), 86-95.
• Alpat, S. K., Uyulgan, M. A., Şeker, S., Altaş, H. Ş. ve Gezer, E. (2017). Nanoteknoloji konusunda işbirlikli öğrenme yönteminin ortaöğretim 10. sınıf öğrencilerinin akademik başarı ve görüşlerine etkisi. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 18(1), 27-57.
• Blonder, R. (2010) The influence of a teaching model in nanotechnology on chemistry teachers’ knowledge and their teaching attitudes. Journal of Nano Education 2, 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1166/jne.2010.1004
• Blonder, R. (2011). The story of nanomaterials in modern technology: An advanced course for chemistry teachers. Journal of Chemical Education, 88(1), 49-52.
• Blonder, R., & Dinur, M. (2011). Teaching nanotechnology using student-centered pedagogy for increasing students' continuing motivation. Journal of Nano Education, 3(1-2), 51-61.
• Blonder, R., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2016). Learning about teaching the extracurricular topic of nanotechnology as a vehicle for achieving a sustainable change in science education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(3), 345-372.
• Blonder, R., & Sakhnini, S. (2012). Teaching two basic nanotechnology concepts in secondary school by using a variety of teaching methods. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 13(4), 500-516. https://doi.org/10.1166/jne.2011.1016.
• Blonder, R., & Sakhnini, S. (2017). Finding the connections between a high-school chemistry curriculum and nano-scale science and technology. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(4), 903-922.
• Çalık, M. ve Sözbilir, M. (2014). İçerik analizinin parametreleri. Eğitim ve Bilim, 39(174),33-38.
• Demircioğlu, H. ve Özdemir, R. (2019). Bağlam temelli öğrenme yaklaşımının öğretmen adaylarının nanoteknoloji konusunu anlamaları üzerindeki etkisi. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 7(14), 314-336.
• Drane, D., Swarat, S., Light, G., Hersam, M., & Mason, T. (2009). An evaluation of the efficacy and transferability of a nanoscience module. Journal of Nano Education, 1(1), 8-14.
• Erkoç, Ş. (2007). Nanobilim ve nanoteknoloji. Odtü Yayıncılık, 2. Baskı, Ankara.
• Furlan, P. Y. (2009). Engaging students in early exploration of nanoscience topics using hands-on activities and scanning tunneling microscopy. Journal of Chemical Education, 86(6), 705–711.
• Gardner, G., Jones, M. G., & Falvo, M. (2009). " New science" and societal issues. The Science Teacher, 76(7), 49.
• Gilbert, J. K., & Lin, H. S. (2013). How might adults learn about new science and technology? The case of nanoscience and nanotechnology. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 3(3), 267-292.
• Healy, N. (2009). Why nano education?. Journal of Nano Education, 1(1), 6-7.
• Hingant, B., & Albe, V. (2010). Nanosciences and nanotechnologies learning and teaching in secondary education: A review of literature. Studies in Science Education, 46(2), 121-152.
• Jackman, J. A., Cho, D. J., Lee, J., Chen, J. M., Besenbacher, F., Bonnell, D. A., et al. (2016). Nanotechnology education for the global world: training the leaders of tomorrow. ACS Nano, 10, 5595−5599.
• Jones, M. G., Blonder, R., Gardner, G. E., Albe, V., Falvo, M., & Chevrier, J. (2013). Nanotechnology and nanoscale science: Educational challenges. International Journal of Science Education, 35(9), 1490-1512.
• Johnstone, A. H. (2000). Teaching of chemistry-logical or psychological?. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 1(1), 9-15.
• Kampschulte, L., Akaygün, S., Adadan, E., Eilert, K., & Heyduck, B. (2018). Interdisciplinary research brought to school-connecting chemistry and biology through nanotechnology. Journal of Microbiology Biology Education, 19(1), 1-3.
• Kulik, T., & Fidelus, J. D. (2007). Education in the field of nanoscience. European Nanotechnology Gateway Warsaw.
• Lati, W., Triampo, D., & Yodyingyong, S. (2019). Exposure to nanoscience and nanotechnology using guided-inquiry-based activities with silica aerogel to promote high school students’ motivation. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(6), 1109-1116.
• Lin, S. Y., Wu, M. T., Cho, Y. I., & Chen, H. H. (2015). The effectiveness of a popular science promotion program on nanotechnology for elementary school students in I-Lan City. Research in Science & Technological Education, 33(1), 22-37.
• Mallmann, M. (2008). Nanotechnology in School. Science in School 10, 70–75.
• Mandrikas, A., Michailidi, E., & Stavrou, D. (2020). Teaching nanotechnology in primary education. Research in Science & Technological Education, 38(4), 377-395.
• Murday, J.S. (2009). NSF workshop report: Partnership for nanotechnology education. University of South California, Los Angeles.
• Nanosense Project. (2007). Size matters:ıntroduction to nanoscience. Retrived from https://nanosense.sri.com/
• Planinšič, G., & Kovač, J. (2008). Nano goes to school: a teaching model of the atomic force microscope. Physics Education, 43(1), 37.
• Roco, M. C. (2003). Broader social issues of nanotechnology. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 5, 181-189.
• Roco, M. C., Mirkin, C. A., & Hersam, M. C. (2011). Nanotechnology research directions for societal needs in 2020: retrospective and outlook (Vol. 1). Springer Science & Business Media.
• Sagun-Gököz B (2012) Design and implementation of a nanoscience & nanotechnology workshop: Investigating 11th grade students’ awareness and conceptual understanding of nanoscience & nanotechnology. (Unpublished Master Thesis), Boğaziçi University: İstanbul, Turkey.
• Sagun-Gököz, B. ve Akaygün, S. (2013). Üniversiteden liseye uzanan köprü: Bir nanobilim atölye çalışması. Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Eğitim Dergisi, 31(2), 49-72.
• Sakhnini, S., & Blonder, R. (2016). Nanotechnology applications as a context for teaching the essential concepts of NST. International Journal of Science Education, 38(3), 521-538.
• Sakhnini, S., & Blonder, R. (2018). Insertion points of the essential nanoscale science and technology (NST) concepts in the Israeli middle school science and technology curriculum. Nanotechnology Reviews, 7(5), 373-391.
• Sarıtaş, O., Taymaz, E. & Tumer, T. (2007). Vision 2023: Turkey's national technology foresight program: a contextualist analysis and discussion. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(8), 1374-1393.
• Schank, P., Krajcik, J., & Yunker, M. (2007). Can nanoscience be a catalyst for educational reform. Nanoethics: The ethical and social implications of nanotechnology, 277-290.
• Schwarzer, S., Akaygun, S., Sagun-Gokoz, B., Anderson, S., & Blonder, R. (2015). Using atomic force microscopy in out-of-school settings—two case studies ınvestigating the knowledge and understanding of high school students. Journal of Nano Education, 7(1), 10-27.
• Sgouros, G., & Stavrou, D. (2019). Teachers’ professional development in nanoscience and nanotechnology in the context of a community of learners. International Journal of Science Education, 41(15), 2070-2093.
• Stavrou, D., Michailidi, E., & Sgouros, G. (2018). Development and dissemination of a teaching learning sequence on nanoscience and nanotechnology in a context of communities of learners. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(4), 1065-1080.
• Stavrou, D., Michailidi, E., Sgouros, G., & Dimitriadi, K. (2015). Teaching high-school students nanoscience and nanotechnology. LUMAT: International Journal on Math, Science and Technology Education, 3(4), 501-511.
• Stevens S, Sutherland L, Schank P, Krajcik J (2009) The big ideas of nanoscience: a guidebook for secondary teachers. NSTA Press, Arlington
• Şenel Zor, T. (2017). Etkinlik temelli nanobilim ve nanoteknoloji eğitiminin fen bilimleri öğretmen adaylarının nanobilim ve nanoteknoloji farkındalıklarına ve kavramsal anlayışlarına etkisi. (Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi) Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Konya.
• The NISE Network (2016). Nanodays collection. Ithaca, New York.
• Wansom, S., Mason, T. O., Hersam, M. C., Drane, D., Light, G., Cormia, R ve diğerleri. (2009). A rubric for postsecondary degree programs in nanoscience and nanotechnology. International Journal of Engineering Education, 25, 615–627.
• Zor, T. Ş., & Aslan, O. (2018). The effect of activity-based nanoscience and nanotechnology education on pre-service science teachers’ conceptual understanding. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 20(3), 75.