Öğretmen Liderliği Davranış Ölçeği: Geçerlilik ve Güvenilirlik Çalışması

Year 2023, Issue: 56, 1033 - 1056, 22.06.2023

Özgür Bolat

https://doi.org/10.53444/deubefd.1294608

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Öğretmen liderliği, okul gelişimi için vazgeçilmez bir unsurdur. Okul gelişimi programlarının etkili bir şekilde uygulanması için öğretmen liderliği davranışlarının geçerli ve güvenilir bir şekilde ölçülebilmesi gerekmektedir. Ancak mevcut ölçekler öğretmen liderliğini tek boyutlu olarak ölçmekte ve genelde de liderlik davranışları ile tutumlarını birbirine karıştırmaktadır Bu nedenle betimsel tarama modelinde yapılan bu nicel araştırma, öğretmen liderliğini farklı seviyelerde ölçebilen ve liderlik davranışları ile liderlik tutumlarını ayrıştırabilen geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçek geliştirmeyi amaçlamaktadır. İlk turda 57 maddelik deneme formu 400 öğretmene uygulanmıştır. Açımlayıcı Faktör Analizi sonuçlarına göre, 17 maddeli ve 4 faktörlü bir yapı bulunmuştur. Toplam varyansın %69’unu açıkladığı görülmüştür ve faktörler sırasıyla sınıf, ebeveyn, mikro-seviye ve makro-seviye liderlik olarak isimlendirilmiştir. Faktör puanlarının güvenirlik seviyeleri .79 ile .85 arasında değişmektedir. İkinci turda ise 17 maddelik form ile 154 öğretmenden veri toplanmıştır. Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizi ile 4 faktörlü yapı doğrulanmıştır. Ayrıca ikinci kademe faktör olarak tanımlanan öğretmen liderliği faktörü de model-veri uyumunu geliştirmektedir. 4 alt faktör puanlarının güvenirlik seviyeleri .84 ile .94 arasında değişmekteyken ikinci kademe öğretmen liderliği boyutunun güvenirlik seviyesi .83 olarak bulunmuştur. Ayrıca zamandaş geçerliği ve yordama geçerliği ile ilgili kanıtlar da sunulmuştur. Sonuç olarak, Öğretmen Liderliği Davranış Ölçeği, hem alt faktörleri ile hem de ikinci kademe faktörü ile öğretmen liderliği davranışlarını ölçmede kullanılabilecek geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı olarak araştırmacıların kullanımına sunulmuştur.

Keywords

Öğretmen Liderliği, Eğitim Liderliği, Ölçek Geliştirme

References

• Agustin, Y., Suriansyah, A., & Hadi, S. (2022). The effect of transformational leadership of school principals on work discipline and work motivation on the performance of state vocational school teachers in Banjarmasin city. International Journal of Social Science And Human Research, 6(1), 281-286
• Akyürek, M. İ., & Özdemir, M. (2021). Öğretmen liderliği ölçeğinin Türkçe uyarlaması: geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 23(2), 488-500.
• Angelle, P. S., & DeHart, C. A. (2011). Teacher perceptions of teacher leadership: Examining differences by experience, degree, and position. Nassp Bulletin, 95(2), 141-160.
• Ashford, S. J., Rothbard, N. P., Piderit, S. K., & Dutton, J. E. (1998). Out on a limb: The role of context and impression management in selling gender-equity issues. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23-57.
• Bakioğlu, A. (1998). “Lider Öğretmen”, Marmara Üniversitesi Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 10, 11-19.
• Balyer, A. (2016). Öğretmen liderler: Öğretmen algıları üzerine nitel bir araştırma. İlköğretim Online, 15(2).
• Bentler, P. M., & Chou, C. P. (1987). Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociological Methods & Research, 16(1), 78-117.
• Beycioglu, K., & Aslan, B. (2010). Teacher leadership scale: A validity and reliability study. Elementary Education Online, 9(2).
• Beycioğlu, K., & Şahin, İ. (2017). Liderlik ve etkileme süreci. Pegem Atıf İndeksi, 129-148.
• Bolat, O. & Antalyalı, O. L. (2023). Öğrencilerin liderlik ve başarı göstergelerini ölçen kişisel eğilimler envanterinin psikometrik özelliklerinin incelenmesi. Turkish Studies. (Hakemde)
• Bolat, O. (2013). A non-positional teacher leadership approach to school improvement: an action research study in Turkey. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
• Brandon, J., Hollweck, T., Donlevy, J. K., & Whalen, C. (2018). Teacher supervision and evaluation challenges: Canadian perspectives on overall instructional leadership. Teachers and teaching, 24(3), 263-280.
• Brayfield, A. H., & Rothe, H. F. (1951). An index of job satisfaction. Journal of applied psychology, 35(5), 307.
• Brower, R. E., & Balch, B. V. (2005). Transformational leadership & decision making in schools. Corwin Press.
• Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological methods & research, 21(2), 230-258.
• Can, N. (2009). Öğretmenlerin sınıfta ve okulda liderlik davranışları. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 8(2).
• Can, N. (2014). Öğretmen liderliği. Pegem Akademi.
• Cansoy, R. (2017). Examining the relationships between the level of schools for being a professional learning community and the self-efficacy of teachers and the transformational leadership behaviors of principals. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 3(1), 1-16.
• Cattell, R. B. (1964). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1(2), 245-276.
• Chow, W. S. (2016). Conceptualising the roles of teacher leaders: A Singapore case study. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 15(3), 205-223.
• Cooper, K. S., Stanulis, R. N., Brondyk, S. K., Hamilton, E. R., Macaluso, M., & Meier, J. A. (2016). The teacher leadership process: Attempting change within embedded systems. Journal of Educational Change, 17(1), 85-113.
• Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.
• Crowther, F., Ferguson, M., & Hann, L. (2009). Developing teacher leaders: How teacher leadership enhances school success. Corwin Press.
• Danielson, C. (2007). The many faces of leadership. Educational leadership, 65(1), 14-19.
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2012). Self-determination theory. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 416–436). Sage Publications Ltd.
• Demir, K. (2014). Öğretmen liderliği kültürü ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenilirlik çalışması. İlkogretim Online, 13(2).
• Deniz, L. (2003). Öğretmen liderlik stillerini belirlemeye yönelik bir ölçek çalışması. Marmara Üniversitesi Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 17(17), 55-62.
• DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
• DeVellis, R. F., & Thorpe, C. T. (2021). Scale development: Theory and applications. SAGE Publications.
• Fairman, J. C. & Mackenzie, S. V. (2012). Teacher leadership: A review of research. International Journal of Educational Management, 26(3), 228-237.
• Fitzsimons, D., James, K. T., & Denyer, D. (2011). Alternative approaches for studying shared and distributed leadership. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13(3), 313-328.
• Flora, D. B., & Curran, P. J. (2004). An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychological Methods, 9(4), 466-491.
• Forster, E. M. (1997). Teacher leadership: Professional right and responsibility. Action In Teacher Education, 19(3), 82-94.
• Frost, D. & Durrant, J. (2002). Teacher leadership in primary science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(8), 821-838.
• Frost, D. (2006). The concept of ‘agency’in leadership for learning. Leading & Managing, 12(2), 19-28.
• Frost, D. (2012). From professional development to system change: Teacher leadership and innovation. Professional Development in Education, 38(2), 205-227.
• Frost, D., & Durrant, J. (2002). Teachers as leaders: Exploring the impact of teacher-led development work. School Leadership & Management, 22(2), 143-161.
• Frost, D., & Harris, A. (2003). Teacher leadership: Towards a research agenda. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(3), 479-498.
• Gray, J., Hopkins, D., Reynolds, D., Wilcox, B., Farrell, S., & Jesson, D. (1999). Improving schools: Performance and potential. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
• Gronn, P. (2000). Distributed properties: A new architecture for leadership. Educational Management & Administration, 28(3), 317-338.
• Guenzler, K. (2016). Teacher leadership in education: A review of empirical research. International Journal of Education and Social Science, 3(1), 78-93.
• Güngör, D. (2016). Psikolojide ölçme araçlarının geliştirilmesi ve uyarlanması kılavuzu. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları 19(38). 104-112.
• Guttman, L. (1954). Some necessary conditions for common-factor analysis. Psychometrika, 19(2), 149-161.
• Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2010). Collaborative leadership and school improvement: Understanding the impact on school capacity and student learning. School Leadership & Management, 30(2), 95–110.
• Harris, A., & Lambert, L. (2002). Building leadership capacity for school improvement. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
• Harrison, C. & Killion, J. (2007). Ten roles for teacher leaders. Educational Leadership, 65(1), 74.
• Hoyle E (1974) ‘Professionality, professionalism and control in teaching’. London Educational Review 3(2), 13–19
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.
• Ingersoll, R. M., Sirinides, P., & Dougherty, P. (2017). School leadership, teachers' roles in school decisionmaking, and student achievement. Working Paper. WP# 2017-2. Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
• Ingersoll, R. M., Sirinides, P., & Dougherty, P. (2018). Leadership matters: teachers' roles in school decision making and school performance. American Educator, 42(1), 13.
• Jacobs, J., Gordon, S. P., & Solis, R. (2016). Critical issues in teacher leadership: A national look at teachers’ perception. Journal of School Leadership, 26(3), 374-406.
• Judge, T. A., Locke, E. A., Durham, C. C., & Kluger, A. N. (1998). Dispositional effects on job and life satisfaction: the role of core evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(1), 17.
• Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 141-151.
• Karakoç, F. Y., & Dönmez. L. (2014). Ölçek geliştirme çalışmalarında temel ilkeler. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası 19(40). 39-49.
• Karakoç, N., & Dönmez, L. (2014). Ölçek geliştirme sürecinde yapısal eşitlik modellemesinin kullanılması. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(2), 253-266.
• Katzenmeyer, M. & Moller, G. (2009). Awakening the Sleeping Giant: Helping Teachers Develop as Leaders. Corwin Press.
• Kıral, E. (2021). Hizmetkâr liderlik ölçeği geliştirme çalişmasi: öğretmenler üzerinde bir uygulama. Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 10 (3), 83-99.
• Krieg, J. M., Milanowski, A., & White, B. (2014). Examining teacher involvement in school leadership. In National Center on Performance Incentives Conference (pp. 1-2).
• Lai, E., & Cheung, D. (2015). Enacting teacher leadership: The role of teachers in bringing about change. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 43(5), 673-692.
• Lambert, L. (2003). Leadership Capacity for Lasting School Improvement. ASCD.
• Leithwood, K., and Jantzi, D. (2006). Transformational school leadership for largescale reform: Effects on students, teachers, and their classroom practices. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(2), 201 – 227.
• Leithwood, K., Day, C., Sammons, P., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2004). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership.
• Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D., & Steinbach, R. (1999). Changing leadership for changing times. Buckingham: Open University Press.
• Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D., Earl, L., Watson, N., Levin, B., & Fullan, M. (2004). Strategic leadership for large-scale reform: The case of England’s national literacy and numeracy strategy. School Leadership & Management, 24(1), 57-79.
• Li, C. H. (2016). Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behavior Research Methods, 48(3), 936-949.
• Lovett, S. (2018). Advocacy for teacher leadership: Opportunity, preparation, support, and pathways. Springer.
• Lowery-Moore, H., Latimer, R. M., & Villate, V. M. (2016). The essence of teacher leadership: A phenomenological inquiry of professional growth. International Journal of Teacher Leadership, 7(1), 1-16.
• MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130-149.
• Martínez, M. Á. Á., & Tadeu, P. M. (2018). Teacher leadership: A bibliometric study. Journal of Educational Change, 19(4), 425-449.
• Matsunaga, M. (2010). How to factor-analyze your data right: Do's, don'ts, and how-to's. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(1), 97-110.
• McLaughlin, M. W., & Talbert, J. E. (2006). Building school-based teacher learning communities: Professional strategies to improve student achievement. Teachers College Press.
• Mehra, A., Smith, B. R., Dixon, A. L., & Robertson, B. (2006). Distributed leadership in teams: The network of leadership perceptions and team performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(3), 232-245.
• Meirink, J., Oolbekkink, H., Imants, J., & Bergen, T. (2020). Teacher leadership in professional learning communities: A comparative study in Dutch and Indonesian secondary education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 96, 103-178.
• Muijs, D. & Harris, A. (2006). Teacher leadership in (in)action: Three case studies of contrasting schools. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 34(2), 239-258.
• Muijs, D., and Harris, A. (2003). Teacher leadership: improvement through empowerment: an overview of the literature. Educational Management and Administration, 31(4), 437-449.
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2017). Mplus user's guide. Eighth edition. Muthén & Muthén.
• Neumerski, C. M. (2012). Rethinking instructional leadership, a review: What do we know about principal, teacher, and coach instructional leadership, and where should we go from here? Educational Administration Quarterly, 49(2), 310-347.
• Nguyen, D., Harris, A., & Ng, D. (2020). A review of the empirical research on teacher leadership (2003–2017) Evidence, patterns and implications. Journal of educational administration, 58(1), 60-80.
• Pan, Y., & Chen, J. (2020). Principals' leadership and teacher leadership: A shared and complementary process. Journal of Educational Administration, 58(2), 130-148.
• Pitts, V. M., & Spillane, J. P. (2009). Using social network methods to study school leadership. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 32(2), 185-207.
• Raykov, T. (1997). Estimation of composite reliability for congeneric measures. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21(2), 173-184.
• Rosenberg, M. (1965). Rosenberg self-esteem scale (RSE). Acceptance and commitment therapy. Measures package, 61(52), 18.
• Schober, P., Boer, C., & Schwarte, L. A. (2018). Correlation coefficients: appropriate use and interpretation. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 126(5), 1763-1768.
• Sebastian, J., Huang, H., & Allensworth, E. (2017). Examining integrated leadership systems in high schools: Connecting principal and teacher leadership to organizational processes and student outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 28(3), 463–488.
• Shen, J., Ma, X., Gao, X., Bierlien Palmer, L., Poppink, S., Burt, W., ... & Wegenke, G. (2019). Developing and validating an instrument measuring school leadership. Educational Studies, 45(4), 402-421.
• Shen, J., Wu, H., Reeves, P., Zheng, Y., Ryan, L., & Anderson, D. (2020). The association between teacher leadership and student achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 31, 100357.
• Silva, D. Y., Gimbert, B., & Nolan, J. (2000). Sliding the doors: Locking and unlocking possibilities for teacher leadership. Teachers College Record, 102(4), 779-804.
• Smylie, M. A., & Eckert, J. M. (2018). Beyond superheroes and advocacy: The pathway of teacher leadership development. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(4), 556-577.
• Smylie, M. A., Conley, S., & Marks, H. M. (2002). Exploring new approaches to teacher leadership for school improvement. In New Insights into the Work of Reforming Schools (pp. 41 -73). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
• Supovitz, J., Sirinides, P., & May, H. (2010). How principals and peers influence teaching and learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(1), 31-56.
• Swaffield, S., and MacBeath, J. (2009). Researching leadership for learning across international and methodological boundaries. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego.
• Syarifuddi, A., & Suriansyah, A. (2022). The influence of principal instructional leadership, work environment and job satisfaction on teacher performance in state elementary schools in Cempaka District, Banjarbaru City. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 5(06), 2644-0695.
• Szeto, E. (2020). Teachers’ perceptions of the contribution of school principals to teacher leadership development. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48(2), 234-255.
• Taylor, M., Goeke, J., Klein, E., Onore, C., & Geist, K. (2011). Changing leadership: Teachers lead the way for schools that learn. Teaching and teacher education, 27(5), 920-929.
• Toytok, E. H. (2016). School leaders' innovation managements and organizational stress: A relational model study. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(n12A), 173-179.
• Wang, M., & Xia, J. (2022). A scale for measuring teacher leadership in early childhood education in China: Development and validation. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 50(4), 649-671.
• Warren, L.L. (2021). The Importance of teacher leadership skills in the classroom. Education Journal, 10(1). 8-15.
• Wenner, J. A., & Campbell, T. (2017). The theoretical and empirical basis of teacher leadership: A review of the literature. Review of educational research, 87(1), 134-171.
• Yılmaz, E., & Jafarova, G. (2022). Öğretmen liderliği ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Ahmet Keleşoğlu Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 4(2), 328-346.
• York-Barr, J., & Duke, K. (2004). What do we know about teacher leadership? Findings from two decades of scholarship. Review of educational research, 74(3), 255-316.
• Yukl, G. (2004). Leadership in organizations (6th ed.). Prentice Hall.
• Yurdabakan, İ. & Çüm, S. (2017). Davranış bilimlerinde ölçek geliştirme (açıklayıcı faktör analizine dayalı). Turkish Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care. 11(2). 108-126.