Kültüre Duyarlı Öğretim: Akademik Eğilimlerin Bibliyometrik Bir İncelemesi

Year 2025, Issue: 64, 2255 - 2272, 30.06.2025

İbrahim Karagöl

https://doi.org/10.53444/deubefd.1625031

Abstract

Bu çalışma, Web of Science veritabanını kullanarak kültüre duyarlı öğretim araştırmalarındaki akademik eğilimleri incelemektedir. 1995'ten 2025'e kadar olan dönemi kapsayan analiz, 551 İngilizce makale, derleme makale ve kitap bölümünü içermekte ve bulguları tablolar, şekiller ve ağ haritaları aracılığıyla görselleştirmektedir. Önemli bulgular arasında, kültüre duyarlı öğretime artan akademik ilgiyi gösteren %7,18'lik istikrarlı bir yıllık büyüme oranı ve belge başına ortalama 13,47 atıf sayısı yer almaktadır ki bu da orta düzeyde bir araştırma etkisine işaret etmektedir. Çalışma, kimlik, kültür ve ırk gibi "motor temaları" gelişmiş ve etkili olarak tanımlarken, uygulamalar ve öğretmen adayı eğitimi gibi "niş temaların" daha geniş alanla daha az bağlantılı olduğunu göstermektedir. Gelişmemiş ancak temel olan "temel temalar" arasında kültüre duyarlı öğretim, çeşitlilik ve eğitim programı yer almaktadır. Elde edilen sonuçlar ayrıca, "kültüre duyarlı" ve "duyarlı öğretim" gibi sıklıkla birlikte geçen başlık bigramlarını ortaya koymakta olup, küresel araştırma iş birliği ağlarında, özellikle de ABD liderliğindeki belirgin kümeler olduğunu vurgulamaktadır.

Keywords

Kültüre duyarlı öğretim , akademik eğilimler , bibliyometrik analiz

Culturally Responsive Teaching: A Bibliometric Investigation of Scholarly Trends

Abstract

This study examines scholarly trends in culturally responsive teaching research using the Web of Science database. spanning from 1995 to 2025, the analysis covers 551 English-language articles, review articles, and book chapters, visualizing findings through tables, figures, and network maps. Key findings include a steady annual growth rate of 7.18%, indicating increasing scholarly interest in culturally responsive teaching, and an average of 13.47 citations per document, suggesting moderate research impact. The study identifies "motor themes" like identity, culture, and race as well-developed and influential, while "niche themes" such as practices and pre-service teacher education show less connection to the broader field. Underdeveloped but essential "basic themes" include culturally responsive teaching, diversity, and curriculum. The results also reveal that frequent title bigrams like "culturally responsive" and "responsive teaching," and highlight distinct clusters in global research collaboration, notably one led by the USA.

Keywords

Culturally responsive teaching , scholarly trends , bibliometric analysis

Ethical Statement

As this bibliometric analysis study did not involve human subjects or data requiring ethical oversight, formal ethics committee approval was not required.

References

• Abacioglu, C. S., Volman, M., & Fischer, A. H. (2020). Teachers’ multicultural attitudes and perspective taking abilities as factors in culturally responsive teaching. British journal of educational psychology, 90(3), 736-752. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12328
• Apple, M. W. (1993). The politics of official knowledge: Does a national curriculum make sense? Teachers college record, 95(2), 222-241.
• Aronson, B., & Laughter, J. (2016). The theory and practice of culturally relevant education: A synthesis of research across content areas. Review of educational research, 86(1), 163-206. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315582066
• Bishop, R., Berryman, M., Cavanagh, T., & Teddy, L. (2009). Te kotahitanga: Addressing educational disparities facing Māori students in New Zealand. Teaching and teacher education, 25(5), 734-742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.01.009
• Bui, Y. N., & Fagan, Y. M. (2013). The effects of an integrated reading comprehension strategy: A culturally responsive teaching approach for fifth-grade students’ reading comprehension. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 57, 59-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2012.664581
• Byrd, C. M. (2016). Does culturally relevant teaching work? An examination from student perspectives. Sage Open, 6(3), 2158244016660744. https://doi.org/10.1177/215824401666074
• Byrd, C. M. (2017). The complexity of school racial climate: Reliability and validity of a new measure for secondary students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(4), 700-721. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12179
• Cammarota, J., & Romero, A. (2011). Participatory action research for high school students: Transforming policy, practice, and the personal with social justice education. Educational Policy, 25, 488-506. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904810361722
• Cheng, M. M., Lacaste, A. V., Saranza, C., & Chuang, H. H. (2021). Culturally responsive teaching in technology-supported learning environments in marine education for sustainable development. Sustainability, 13(24), 13922. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413922
• Cochran-Smith, M. (2004). Walking the road: Race, diversity, and social justice in teacher education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
• Cruz, R. A., Manchanda, S., Firestone, A. R., & Rodl, J. E. (2020). An examination of teachers’ culturally responsive teaching self-efficacy. Teacher Education and Special Education, 43(3), 197-214. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406419875194
• Dee, T. S., & Penner, E. K. (2017). The causal effects of cultural relevance: Evidence from an ethnic studies curriculum. American Educational Research Journal, 54, 127-166. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216677002
• Delpit, L. (2006). Lessons from teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 57, 220-231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487105285966
• Echevarria, J., Frey, N., & Fisher, D. (2015). What it takes for English learners to succeed. Educational Leadership, 72(6), 22-26.
• Esfahani, H., Tavasoli, K., & Jabbarzadeh, A. (2019). Big data and social media: A scientometrics analysis. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 3(3), 145–164.
• Futrell, M. H., Gomez, J., & Bedden, D. (2003). Teaching the children of a new America: The challenge of diversity. Phi Delta Kappan, 84(5), 381-385.
• Gay, G. (2002). Preparing for culturally responsive teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(2), 106-116.
• Gay, G. (2013). Teaching to and through cultural diversity. Curriculum inquiry, 43(1), 48-70. https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.2014.894836
• Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
• Gumus, S., Bellibas, M. S., Esen, M., & Gumus, E. (2018). A systematic review of studies on leadership models in educational research from 1980 to 2014. Educational Management, Administration and Leadership, 46(1), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143216659296
• Gunn, A. A., Brice, A. E., & Peterson, B. J. (2014). Ideas for the classroom: Culturally responsive teaching: Exploring children’s names and cultural identities. Childhood Education, 90(2), 174–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.2014.894836
• Hassan, W., & A. E. Duarte. (2024). Bibliometric analysis: A few suggestions. Current Problems in Cardiology, 49(8):102640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2024.102640
• Iwai, Y. (2019). Culturally responsive teaching in a global era: Using the genres of multicultural literature. Educational Forum, 83(1), 13– 27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2018.1508529
• Kandeel, M., Morsy, M. A., Abd El-Lateef, H. M., Marzok, M., El-Beltagi, H. S., Al Khodair, K. M., Soliman, W. E., Albokhadaim, I., & Venugopala, K. N. (2023). A century of “camel research”: A bibliometric analysis. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 10, 1157667. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1157667
• Kieran, L., & Anderson, C. (2019). Connecting universal design for learning with culturally responsive teaching. Education and Urban Society, 51(9), 1202-1216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124518785012
• Kraft, M. (2007). Toward a school-wide model of teaching for social justice: An examination of the best practices of two small public schools. Equity & Excellence in Education, 40, 77-86. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665680601076601
• Liu, W., Jamaludin, K. A., & Hamzah, M. I. (2025). Systematic review of culturally responsive teaching and implications for technical communication education. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 8(4), 2025117-2025117. https://10.31893/multirev.2025117
• Moore, A. L., Giles, R. M., & Vitulli, P. (2021). Prepared to respond? Investigating preservice teachers’ perceptions of their readiness for culturally responsive teaching. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 15(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2021.150110
• Moral-Munoz, J. A., Lopez-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Cobo, M. J. (2019). Science mapping analysis software tools: A review. In W. Glanzel, H. F. Moed, U. Schmoch & M. Thelwall (Eds.), Springer handbook of science and technology indicators (pp. 159–185). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
• Ober, T. M., Lehman, B. A., Gooch, R., Oluwalana, O., Solyst, J., Phelps, G., & Hamilton, L. S. (2023). Culturally responsive personalized learning: recommendations for a working definition and framework. ETS Research Report Series, 2023(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12372
• Pang, V. O., Alvarado, J. L., Preciado, J. R., & Schleicher, A. R. (2021). Culturally relevant education: Think local within a holistic orientation. Multicultural Perspectives, 23(1), 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/15210960.2021.1877546
• Rychly, L., & Graves, E. (2012). Teacher characteristics for culturally responsive pedagogy. Multicultural perspectives, 14(1), 44-49. https://doi.org/10.1080/15210960.2012.646853
• Scott, K. A., Sheridan, K. M., & Clark, K. (2015). Culturally responsive computing: A theory revisited. Learning, media and technology, 40(4), 412-436. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2014.924966
• Siwatu, K. O. (2007). Preservice teachers’ culturally responsive teaching self-efficacy and outcome expectancy beliefs. Teaching and teacher education, 23(7), 1086-1101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.07.011
• Siwatu, K. O. (2011). Preservice teachers’ sense of preparedness and self-efficacy to teach in America’s urban and suburban schools: Does context matter?. Teaching and teacher education, 27(2), 357-365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.09.004
• Tien, C. L., Hung, H. Y., Hsieh, W. H., & Chen, B. C. (2024). Using Science Mapping to Review Research on Culturally Responsive Teaching in Early Childhood Education. Educational Innovations and Emerging Technologies, 4(4), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.35745/eiet2024v.04.04.0001
• Tobisch, A., & Dresel, M. (2017). Negatively or positively biased? Dependencies of teachers’ judgments and expectations based on students’ ethnic and social backgrounds. Social Psychology of Education, 20(4), 731-752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-017-9392-z
• Ulbricht, J., Schachner, M. K., Civitillo, S., & Juang, L. (2024). Fostering culturally responsive teaching through the identity project intervention: A qualitative quasi-experiment with pre-service teachers. Identity, 24(4), 307-330. https://doi.org/10.1080/15283488.2024.2361890
• Villegas, A. M., & Lucas, T. (2002). Preparing culturally responsive teachers: Rethinking the curriculum. Journal of teacher education, 53(1), 20-32.
• Wah, Y. L., & Nasri, N. B. M. (2019). A systematic review: The effect of culturally responsive pedagogy on student learning and achievement. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(5), 588-596. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v9-i5/5907
• Wang, M. (2007). Designing online courses that effectively engage learners from diverse cultural backgrounds. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(2), 294-311. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00626.x
• Ware, F. (2006). Warm demander pedagogy: Culturally responsive teaching that supports a culture of achievement for African American students. Urban education, 41(4), 427-456. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085906289710
• Young, J., & Young, J. (2023). A systematic review of culturally responsive teaching self-efficacy using confidence intervals. Multicultural Learning and Teaching, 18(2), 251-280. https://doi.org/10.1515/mlt-2021-0011