Comparison of the Clinical Features and Prognostic Value of Inflammation-Based Markers in Uterine Leiomyosarcoma
Abstract
Keywords
References
- 1. Takehara K., Yamashita N, Watanabe R, et al. Clinical status and prognostic factors in Japanese patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2020; 157: 115-120.
- 2. Kapp D.S., J.Y. Shin, and J.K. Chan. Prognostic factors and survival in 1396 patients with uterine leiomyosarcomas: emphasis on impact of lymphadenectomy and oophorectomy. Cancer. 2008; 112: 820-30.
- 3. Abeler V.M., Røyne O, Thoresen S, et al. Uterine sarcomas in Norway. A histopathological and prognostic survey of a total population from 1970 to 2000 including 419 patients. Histopathology. 2009; 54: 355-64.
- 4. Greer B.E., Koh WJ, Abu-Rustum N, et al. Uterine Neoplasms. Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2009; 7: 498-531.
- 5. Giuntoli RL 2nd, Metzinger DS, DiMarco CS, et al. Retrospective review of 208 patients with leiomyosarcoma of the uterus: prognostic indicators, surgical management, and adjuvant therapy. Gynecol Oncol. 2003; 89: 460-9.
- 6. Mantovani A., Allavena P, Sica A, Balkwill F. Cancer-related inflammation. Nature. 2008; 454:436-44.
- 7. Cedrés S., Torrejon D, Martínez A, et al. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as an indicator of poor prognosis in stage IV non-small cell lung cancer. ClinTra nsl Oncol. 2012; 14: 864-9.
- 8. Kinoshita A., Onoda H, Imai N, et al. Comparison of the prognostic value of inflammation-based prognostic scores in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2012; 107: 88-93.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Health Care Administration, Medical Education, Health Services and Systems (Other)
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Serhat Sekmek
*
Türkiye
Fahriye Tuğba Köş
Türkiye
Gökhan Uçar
Türkiye
Doğan Bayram
Türkiye
Burak Civelek
This is me
Türkiye
Publication Date
September 19, 2024
Submission Date
January 18, 2024
Acceptance Date
August 8, 2024
Published in Issue
Year 2024 Volume: 51 Number: 3