Research Article

Comparison of the Clinical Features and Prognostic Value of Inflammation-Based Markers in Uterine Leiomyosarcoma

Volume: 51 Number: 3 September 19, 2024
EN

Comparison of the Clinical Features and Prognostic Value of Inflammation-Based Markers in Uterine Leiomyosarcoma

Abstract

Aim: Inflammation-related markers are the factors affecting prognosis in many types of cancer. In this study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between inflammation-related markers, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) with prognosis of patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS). Methods: Patients diagnosed with uLMS were reviewed retrospectively. NLR, PLR, SII, and PNI values were calculated at the diagnosis and before treatment. Totally 35 patients were included in the study. Results: Median overall survival (OS) in the low-NLR (<2.10) group was not reached using Kaplan-Meier analysis, whereas in the high-NLR (≥2.10) group, median OS was 41.6 months (95% CI:25.7 – 57.4) (p=0.019). Median OS in the low-PLR (<145) group could not be reached using Kaplan-Meier analysis, whereas, in the high-PLR (≥145) group, the median OS was 43.0 months (95% CI:21.9 – 64.1) (p=0.046). The median OS was 107.7 months (confidence interval not reached using Kaplan-Meier analysis) in the low-SII (<806) group, while the median OS was 43.0 months (95% CI:23.7 – 62.3) in the high-SII (≥806) group (p=0.039). In the low-PNI, (<53.7) group, the median OS was 53.2 months (95% CI:20.8 – 90.9), while in the high-PNI (≥53.7) group, the median OS was 41.6 months (0 – 94.0) (p=0.652). In multivariate analysis, mitotic count and NLR were observed as independent factors affecting prognosis in OS (p=0.012 and p=0.035). Conclusions: NLR≥2.10 is an independent marker showing a poor prognosis in uLMS patients.

Keywords

References

  1. 1. Takehara K., Yamashita N, Watanabe R, et al. Clinical status and prognostic factors in Japanese patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2020; 157: 115-120.
  2. 2. Kapp D.S., J.Y. Shin, and J.K. Chan. Prognostic factors and survival in 1396 patients with uterine leiomyosarcomas: emphasis on impact of lymphadenectomy and oophorectomy. Cancer. 2008; 112: 820-30.
  3. 3. Abeler V.M., Røyne O, Thoresen S, et al. Uterine sarcomas in Norway. A histopathological and prognostic survey of a total population from 1970 to 2000 including 419 patients. Histopathology. 2009; 54: 355-64.
  4. 4. Greer B.E., Koh WJ, Abu-Rustum N, et al. Uterine Neoplasms. Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2009; 7: 498-531.
  5. 5. Giuntoli RL 2nd, Metzinger DS, DiMarco CS, et al. Retrospective review of 208 patients with leiomyosarcoma of the uterus: prognostic indicators, surgical management, and adjuvant therapy. Gynecol Oncol. 2003; 89: 460-9.
  6. 6. Mantovani A., Allavena P, Sica A, Balkwill F. Cancer-related inflammation. Nature. 2008; 454:436-44.
  7. 7. Cedrés S., Torrejon D, Martínez A, et al. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as an indicator of poor prognosis in stage IV non-small cell lung cancer. ClinTra nsl Oncol. 2012; 14: 864-9.
  8. 8. Kinoshita A., Onoda H, Imai N, et al. Comparison of the prognostic value of inflammation-based prognostic scores in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2012; 107: 88-93.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Health Care Administration, Medical Education, Health Services and Systems (Other)

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Burak Civelek This is me
Türkiye

Publication Date

September 19, 2024

Submission Date

January 18, 2024

Acceptance Date

August 8, 2024

Published in Issue

Year 2024 Volume: 51 Number: 3

APA
Sekmek, S., Köş, F. T., Uçar, G., Bayram, D., & Civelek, B. (2024). Comparison of the Clinical Features and Prognostic Value of Inflammation-Based Markers in Uterine Leiomyosarcoma. Dicle Medical Journal, 51(3), 325-332. https://doi.org/10.5798/dicletip.1552473
AMA
1.Sekmek S, Köş FT, Uçar G, Bayram D, Civelek B. Comparison of the Clinical Features and Prognostic Value of Inflammation-Based Markers in Uterine Leiomyosarcoma. Dicle Medical Journal. 2024;51(3):325-332. doi:10.5798/dicletip.1552473
Chicago
Sekmek, Serhat, Fahriye Tuğba Köş, Gökhan Uçar, Doğan Bayram, and Burak Civelek. 2024. “Comparison of the Clinical Features and Prognostic Value of Inflammation-Based Markers in Uterine Leiomyosarcoma”. Dicle Medical Journal 51 (3): 325-32. https://doi.org/10.5798/dicletip.1552473.
EndNote
Sekmek S, Köş FT, Uçar G, Bayram D, Civelek B (September 1, 2024) Comparison of the Clinical Features and Prognostic Value of Inflammation-Based Markers in Uterine Leiomyosarcoma. Dicle Medical Journal 51 3 325–332.
IEEE
[1]S. Sekmek, F. T. Köş, G. Uçar, D. Bayram, and B. Civelek, “Comparison of the Clinical Features and Prognostic Value of Inflammation-Based Markers in Uterine Leiomyosarcoma”, Dicle Medical Journal, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 325–332, Sept. 2024, doi: 10.5798/dicletip.1552473.
ISNAD
Sekmek, Serhat - Köş, Fahriye Tuğba - Uçar, Gökhan - Bayram, Doğan - Civelek, Burak. “Comparison of the Clinical Features and Prognostic Value of Inflammation-Based Markers in Uterine Leiomyosarcoma”. Dicle Medical Journal 51/3 (September 1, 2024): 325-332. https://doi.org/10.5798/dicletip.1552473.
JAMA
1.Sekmek S, Köş FT, Uçar G, Bayram D, Civelek B. Comparison of the Clinical Features and Prognostic Value of Inflammation-Based Markers in Uterine Leiomyosarcoma. Dicle Medical Journal. 2024;51:325–332.
MLA
Sekmek, Serhat, et al. “Comparison of the Clinical Features and Prognostic Value of Inflammation-Based Markers in Uterine Leiomyosarcoma”. Dicle Medical Journal, vol. 51, no. 3, Sept. 2024, pp. 325-32, doi:10.5798/dicletip.1552473.
Vancouver
1.Serhat Sekmek, Fahriye Tuğba Köş, Gökhan Uçar, Doğan Bayram, Burak Civelek. Comparison of the Clinical Features and Prognostic Value of Inflammation-Based Markers in Uterine Leiomyosarcoma. Dicle Medical Journal. 2024 Sep. 1;51(3):325-32. doi:10.5798/dicletip.1552473