Comparison of the Clinical Features and Prognostic Value of Inflammation-Based Markers in Uterine Leiomyosarcoma
Öz
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- 1. Takehara K., Yamashita N, Watanabe R, et al. Clinical status and prognostic factors in Japanese patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2020; 157: 115-120.
- 2. Kapp D.S., J.Y. Shin, and J.K. Chan. Prognostic factors and survival in 1396 patients with uterine leiomyosarcomas: emphasis on impact of lymphadenectomy and oophorectomy. Cancer. 2008; 112: 820-30.
- 3. Abeler V.M., Røyne O, Thoresen S, et al. Uterine sarcomas in Norway. A histopathological and prognostic survey of a total population from 1970 to 2000 including 419 patients. Histopathology. 2009; 54: 355-64.
- 4. Greer B.E., Koh WJ, Abu-Rustum N, et al. Uterine Neoplasms. Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2009; 7: 498-531.
- 5. Giuntoli RL 2nd, Metzinger DS, DiMarco CS, et al. Retrospective review of 208 patients with leiomyosarcoma of the uterus: prognostic indicators, surgical management, and adjuvant therapy. Gynecol Oncol. 2003; 89: 460-9.
- 6. Mantovani A., Allavena P, Sica A, Balkwill F. Cancer-related inflammation. Nature. 2008; 454:436-44.
- 7. Cedrés S., Torrejon D, Martínez A, et al. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as an indicator of poor prognosis in stage IV non-small cell lung cancer. ClinTra nsl Oncol. 2012; 14: 864-9.
- 8. Kinoshita A., Onoda H, Imai N, et al. Comparison of the prognostic value of inflammation-based prognostic scores in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2012; 107: 88-93.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi, Tıp Eğitimi, Sağlık Hizmetleri ve Sistemleri (Diğer)
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar
Serhat Sekmek
*
Türkiye
Fahriye Tuğba Köş
Türkiye
Gökhan Uçar
Türkiye
Doğan Bayram
Türkiye
Burak Civelek
Bu kişi benim
Türkiye
Yayımlanma Tarihi
19 Eylül 2024
Gönderilme Tarihi
18 Ocak 2024
Kabul Tarihi
8 Ağustos 2024
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2024 Cilt: 51 Sayı: 3