Research Article

RADICAL LANDSCAPES OF R. F. LANGLEY’S POETRY: A STYLISTIC ANALYSIS OF TO A NIGHTINGALE

Volume: 170 Number: 2 July 3, 2019
EN TR

RADICAL LANDSCAPES OF R. F. LANGLEY’S POETRY: A STYLISTIC ANALYSIS OF TO A NIGHTINGALE

Abstract

This paper aims to examine R. F. Langley’s poetry as an example of radical landscape poetry, which is characterized by the interplay between landscape and language in an open field of con/textual relationships, with a focus on his poem “To a Nightingale”. Langley’s poetry can be regarded as a Modernist compound of tradition and innovation, affirmation and negation, certainty and doubt, and the human and the non-human. Langley’s poetic landscape(s) or his artistic canvas is associated with the late-modernist writing of his time. In Langley’s poetry, the relationships between landscape/environment and humanity, the human and the non-human are depicted as mutually constructive. Situated between the romantic and the existentialist discourses, Langley’s poetry possesses a modernist, depersonalized, scientific, innovative, experimental and speculative approach to reality and language. “To a Nightingale” epitomizes the modernist indeterminacy of reality and language through the vertiginous vacillation of the speaker between alternatives of truth and expression in the checkerboard of existence, as well as through the disordered structure and shape of the poem, alternating between opposite poles, through the use of stylistic devices such as parataxis, juxtaposition, enjambment, parallelism, deviation, foregrounding and discoursal relations. 

Keywords

References

  1. Bradford, R. (1997). Stylistics. London and New York: Routledge.
  2. Byers, M. (2017). R. F. Langley: Seeing Things. English: Journal of the English Association, Volume 66, Issue 255, 1 December 2017, doi:10.1093/english/efx032. Retrieved 20 February 2019, from https://academic.oup.com/english/article-abstract/66/255/331/4717460. pp. 331–350.
  3. Derrida, J. (1991). Che cos'e la poesia? In Peggy Kamuf (Ed) & (Trans), A Derrida Reader: Between the Blinds (pp. 221-237). New York: Columbia University Press.
  4. Eliot, T. S. (1993). Tradition and the Individual Talent. In M. H. Abrams (Ed), The Norton Anthology of English Literature (pp. 2170-2176). Vol.2. New York: W. W. Norton & Company Ltd.
  5. Eltringham, D. (2013). The idea of the bird: Bird Books, the Problem of Taxonomy, and Some Poems by R.F. Langley. PN Review 210, Volume 39, Number 4, March - April 2013, pp.50-53.
  6. Güzel Köşker, N. H. (2016). Revision of Helen’s Myth and A New Female Discourse in Hilda Doolittle’s Helen in Egypt. Dil Dergisi. 167(1), pp. 5-20.
  7. Hamilton, I. & Noel-Tod, J. (2013). The Oxford Companion to Modern Poetry in English. Oxford: Oxford UP.
  8. Heidegger, M. (1971). The Thing. Poetry, Language, Thought. Albert Hofstadter. (Trans.) New York: Harper& Row.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Language Studies

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

July 3, 2019

Submission Date

March 25, 2019

Acceptance Date

April 19, 2019

Published in Issue

Year 2019 Volume: 170 Number: 2

APA
Vurmay, M. A., Vurmay, M. A., & Vurmay, M. A. (2019). RADICAL LANDSCAPES OF R. F. LANGLEY’S POETRY: A STYLISTIC ANALYSIS OF TO A NIGHTINGALE. Dil Dergisi, 170(2), 54-71. https://izlik.org/JA97EM88EU