Yabancı Dil Öğretim Materyallerinde Özgün Dil Girdisi: Avantajlar ve Dezavantajlar

Öz

İletişimsel yaklaşımın yabancı dil öğretimindeki hâkim anlayış olmasıyla birlikte, dilsel gelişimin mesaj amaçlı girdiyle sağlanacağı düşüncesi; dil öğretim süreçlerinde bireylere sunulan girdinin türü üzerindeki tartışmaları da beraberinde getirmiş ve bu kapsamda özgün dil öğretim materyallerinin (araçlarının), dil öğretim süreçlerinin bir parçası haline getirilerek girdi kaynağı olarak kullanılması iletişimsel dil öğretim yaklaşımının temel savunularından biri haline gelmiştir. Bu noktadan hareketle söz konusu bu çalışmanın amacı, yabancı dil öğretim süreçlerinde önemi giderek artan özgünlük kavramı ve zengin dilsel girdi kaynağı olarak özgün dil öğretim materyallerinin öğretim sürecinde sağladığı avantaj ve dezavantajları, biçimlendirici araştırma yöntemiyle yabancı dil öğretimi alan yazını çerçevesinde ele alıp irdelemektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Yabancı dil öğretimi,Materyal geliştirme,Özgünlük,Uygulamalı dilbilim

Authentic Language Input in Foreign Language Teaching Materials: Advantages and Disadvantages

Abstract

Following the domination of the communicative approach in foreign language teaching, the idea that language development is possible through message-oriented input has resulted in discussions about the kind of input presented to individuals during language teaching, and the use of authentic language teaching materials (tools) by integrating them as input into language teaching processes has become one of the major arguments of the communicative language teaching approach. In line with this, the present study aims to examine the concept of authenticity, which has an ever-increasing importance in foreign language teaching, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of authentic language teaching materials as rich sources of linguistic input within the context of the literature on foreign language teaching following a formative research methodology.

Keywords

• Foreign language teaching,Material development,Authenticity,Applied linguistics

References

1. Benati, A., & Angelovska, T. (2016). Second Language Acquisition: A Theoretical Introduction to Real World Applications. London - New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
2. Berardo, S. A. (2006). The Use of Authentic Materials in The Use of Reading. The Reading Matrix, 6(2), 60-69.
3. Ciorneli, S. I., & Dina, T. A. (2015). Authentic Text in Teaching English. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 180, 274-279
4. Clark, E. (2009). First Language Acquisition (2 nd. Edition). Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.
5. Ellis, R. (2008). The Study Of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Freeman-Larsen, D. (2000). Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching (2 Nd. Edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. Gilmore, A. (2007). Authentic Materials and Authenticity in Foreing Language Learning. Language Teaching, 40(2), 97-118.
8. Guariento, W., & Morley, J. (2001). Text And Task Authenticty in the EFL Classroom. ELT Journal, 55(4), 347-353.

9. Harmer, J. (2001). The Practice of English Teaching (3 th. Edition). Cambridge: Longman.
10. Hyland, K. (2003). Second Language Writing. Cambirdge: Cambirdge University Press.
11. Khashbakht, F., & Gorjian, B. (2017). Using Authentic Materials in the Teaching Reading Comprehension to EFL Learners.
12. Journal Of Applied Linguistics And Language Learning, 3(2), 48-54.
13. Kramsch, C., A'Ness, F., & Lam, W. S. (2000). Authenticty and Authorship in the Computer-Mediated Acquisition of L2 Literacy. Languaage Learning and Technology, 4(2), 78-104.
14. Krashen, S. (2009). The Comprehension Hypothesis Extended. In T. Piske, & M. Young (Eds), Input Matter in SLA (Pp. 81-94). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
15. Lewkowicz, J. A. (2000). Authenticity in Language Testing: Some Outstanding Questions. Language Testing, 17(1), 43-64.
16. Lourdes, O. (2011). Second Language Acquisition. In S. James (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Applied Linguistics (Pp. 171-184). New York: Routledge.
17. Mcgrath, I. (2016). Material Evaluation and Desing For Language Teaching. Edinburg: Edinburg University Press.
18. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education. San Francisco. Jossey-Bass
19. Mishan, F. (2005). Designing Authenticity Into Language Learning Materials. Bristol: Bristol Intellect Books.
20. Morrow, K. (1977). Authentic Text in ESP. In S. Holden (Ed.), English For Specific Purposes (Pp. 13-17). London: Modern English Publications.
21. Nation, I. S. (2011). Research Into Practice: Vocabulary. Language Teaching, 44(4), 526-536.
22. Nunan, D. (2003). Practical English Language Teaching. New York: Mcgraw-Hill.
23. Nuttal, C. (1996). Teaching Reading Skills in A Foreing Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24. Peacock, M. (1997). The Effect Of Authentic Materials On The Motivation Of EFL Learners. ELT Journal, 51(2), 144-156.
25. Reigeluth, C. H. (1999). What is Instructional-Desing Theory and How is It Changing? In. C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-Desing Theories And Models: A New Paradigm Of Instructional Theory (Vol II., Pp. 5-29). Mahwah NJ. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
26. Swaffar, J. K. (1985). Reading Authentic Text in A Foreing Language: A Cognitive Model. The Modern Language Journal, 69, 17-34.
27. Sweet, H. (1899). The Practical Study Of Language. London: Oxford University Press.
28. Tomlinson, B. (2011). Introduction: Principles And Procedure Of Materials Development. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Materials Development in Language Teaching (2 Nd., Pp. 1-31). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Tomlinson, B. (2013). Second Language Acquisition And Materials Development. In. B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Applied Linguistics and Materials Development (Pp. 11-29). London: Bloomsbury Academic.
30. Widdowson, H. G. (1998). Context, Community, and Authentic Language. TESOL Quarterly, 32(4), 705-716.
31. Widdowson, H. G. (2003). Defining Issues in English Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.