Yabancı dil öğreniminde bireysel farklılıkların biçem bileşenine genel bir bakış

Year 2012, Issue: 156, 29 - 47, 01.06.2012

Özlem Aktaş

https://doi.org/10.1501/Dilder_0000000169

Abstract

Bu çalışma, yabancı dil öğreniminde öğrenme biçemleri konusuna yöneliktir.Öğrenme biçemleri, dil öğrenimi sürecinin en önemli bileşenlerindendir. Zira insansosyal bir varlıktır ve farklı sosyal çevre ve kültürlerde yetişir. Bireysel farklılıklarve yaşam tarzı farklılıkları sonucunda bireylerin öğrenme biçemleri da farklılıkgösterir. Sözü edilen farklılıklar ise bireylerin farklı öğrenme biçemlerine sahipbulunmalarını kaçınılmaz kılar. Öğretim sürecinde bireylerin farklı öğrenme biçemlerine sahip olduğu gerçeği göz ardı edilmemelidir. Ancak öğrencilerin öğrenmebiçimlerine uygun şekilde öğretim yapıldığında öğrenme süreci etkili, verimli vekalıcı olur. Araştırmanın gelecek çalışmalara ışık tutması umulmaktadır

Keywords

Yabancı dil öğrenimi, bireysel farklılıklar, öğrenme biçemi, öğrenme biçemi modelleri, öğrenme durumları

A GENERAL PERSPECTIVE ON FOREIGN LANGUAGE LEARNING BASED ON THE STYLE COMPONENT OF INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES

Abstract

This research is subjected to learning styles within the context of foreign languagelearning. Learning styles are one of the foremost components of language learning.Yet, human is a social being and is grown up within different social environmentsand culture. As a result of individual differences and different life styles, learners’learning styles also differ. The above mentioned differences make learnersinevitably have different learning styles. During teaching process the fact thatlearners have different learning styles shouldn’t be ignored since learning processbecomes efficient, productive and permanent when it is convenient for the learners’learning styles. With the study it is expected to illuminate the future studies on theparticular subject

Keywords

Foreign language learning, individual differences, learning style, learning style models, learning situations

References

• Abraham, R. (1985). Field Dependence/Independence in the Teaching of Grammar. TESOL Quarterly, 19 (4), 680–702.
• Akkoyunlu, B. (1995). Bilgi Teknolojilerinin Okullarda Kullanımı ve Öğretmenlerin Rolü. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11, 105-109.
• Aksoy, M. (2006). Orta Öğretim Öğrencilerinin Yabancı Dil Öğrenme Biçemlerinin Belirlenmesi Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi/Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
• Altun, S., Canca, D. (2011). Öğretmen Adaylarının Öğrenme Stillerinin Cinsiyetlerine Üni- versitelerine Alanlarına ve Mesleği Tercih Etme Sıralarına Göre İncelenmesi. Uluslararası Yükseköğretim Kongresi: Yeni Yönelişler ve Sorunlar (UYK-2011), 3 (14), 1993-2000.
• Aşkar, P., Akkoyunlu B.(1993). Kolb Öğrenme Stili Envanteri. Eğitim ve Bilim, 87, 37-47.
• Atman, K.S. (1988). Psychological Type Elements and Goal Accomplishment Style: Implications for Distance Education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 2 (3), 36-44.
• Babadoğan, C. (1996). Modern Öğretim Stratejilerinin Öğretim-Öğrenim Süreçlerine Yansıması. (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Ankara Üniversitesi/Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
• Babadoğan, C. (2000). Öğretim Stili Odaklı Ders Tasarımı Geliştirme. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 147, Ankara. http://www.meb-yayimlar.gov.tr/147/babadogan.htm (29.10.2012)
• Bennett, C. (2003). Comprehensive Multicultural Education: Theory and Practice (5. Baskı). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
• Boydak, A. (2001). Öğrenme Stilleri. İstanbul: Beyaz.
• Brown, H.D. (1994). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. (3. Baskı). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Chapelle, C. (1995). Field Dependence/Field Independence in the L2 Classroom. J. Reid (Ed.), Learning Styles in the ESL/EFL Classroom içinde (s. 158–168) Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
• Chapelle, C., Abraham, R.G. (1990). Cloze Method: What Difference Does It Make?. Language Testing, 7, 121–146.
• Chapelle, C., Roberts, C. (1986). Ambiguity Tolerance and Field Independence as Predictors of Proficiency in English as a Second Language. Language Learning, 36, 27–45.
• Chapman, A. (1995). David Kolb’s Learning Styles Model and Experiential Learning Theory. (ELT) http://www.businessballs.com/kolblearningstyles.htm (25.10.2012)
• Claxton, C.S., Ralston, I. (1978). Learning Styles: Their Impact on Teaching and Administration. Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.
• Cohen, A. D., Dörnyei, Z. (2002). Focus on the Language Learner: Motivation, Styles and Strategies. N. Schmitt (Ed.), An Introduction to Applied Linguistics içinde (s. 170–190). London: Edward Arnold.
• Cornet, C. E. (1983). What You Should Know About Teaching and Learning Styles. ERIC Document, 228, 235.
• Cox, V. (1988). Some Implications of Cognitive Science, Cognitive Psychology and Human Information Processing For Engineering Education of the Future: Problem Solving, Cognition and Metacognition. 1988 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, Portland.
• Curry, L. (1983). Learning Style in Continuing Medical Education. Ottawa: Canadian Medical Association.
• Curry, L. (1983). An Organization of Learning Styles Theory and Constructs. ERIC Document, 235, 185.
• De Bello, T.C., (1990). Comparison of Eleven Major Learning Styles. International Journal of Reading, Writing and Learning Disabilities, 6, 203-222.
• Dreyer, C. (1992). Learner Variables as Predictors of ESL Proficiency. (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Potchefstroom University for Christian Higher Education, South Africa.
• Dreyer, C., Wissing, D., Wissing, M. (1996) The Relationship Between Cognitive Styles and Pronunciation Accuracy in English as a Second Language. South African Journal of Linguistics, 34, 37–62.
• Dunn, R., Beaudry J.S., Clavas, A. (1989). Survey of Research on Learning Styles. Educational Leadership, 46, 50-58.
• Dunn, R.S., Dunn, K. (1992). Teaching Elementary Students Through Their Individual Learning Styles: Practical Approaches for Grades 3–6, Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
• Ehrman, M.E., Leaver, B.L. (2003). Cognitive Styles in the Service of Language Learning. System, 31, 393–415.
• Ehrman, M. E., Leaver, B. L., Oxford R.L. (2003). A Brief Overview of Individual Differences in Second Language Learning. http://www2.hlss.mmu.ac.uk/wp-con- tent/uploads/2010/08/MATEFLPreProgrammeTasksAppendix1.pdf (30.10.2012)
• Ekici, G. (2003). Uzaktan Eğitim Ortamlarının Seçiminde Öğrencilerin Öğrenme Stillerinin Önemi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 24, 47-55.
• Ekici, G. (2013). Gregorc ve Kolb Öğrenme Stili Modellerine göre Öğretmen Adaylarının Öğrenme Stillerinin Cinsiyet ve Genel Akademik Başarı Açısından İncelenmesi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 38 (167), 211-225.
• Felder, R.M (1996). Matters of Style. ASEE Prism, 6, 18-23.
• Felder, R.M., Henriques E.R. (1995). Learning and Teaching Styles In Foreign and Second Language Education. Foreign Language Annals, 28 (1), 21-31.
• Friedman, P., Alley R. (1984). Learning/Teaching Styles: Applying the Principles. Theory into Practice, 23, 77-81.
• Gezmiş, N. (2005). Yabancı Dil Öğretiminde Öğrenme Biçemleri ile Öğrenci Başarısı Arasındaki İlişki, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi/Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
• Grasha, A. (2002). Teaching With Style, USA: Alliance.
• Grasha, A. F. (1996). Teaching with Style: A Practical Guide to Enhancing Learning by Understanding Teaching and Learning Styles. Pittsburgh: Alliance.
• Gregorc, A. F. (1984). Style as a Symptom: A Phenomenological Perspective. Theory into Practice, 23, 1-12.
• Griffiths, C. (2008). Age and Good Language Learners. Carol Griffiths (Ed), Lessons From Good Language Learners içinde (s. 35-48). New York: Cambridge.
• Griggs, S.A., Dunn R.S. (1984). Selected Case Studies of the Learning Style Preferences of Gifted Students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 28, 115-119.
• Guild, P.B., Garger, S. (1998). Marching to Different Drummers. ASCD (2. Baskı). USA: Alexandria.
• Güven, B. (2003). İlköğretim 5. Sınıf Sosyal Bilgiler Dersinde Alan Bağımlılık- Alan Bağımsızlık Bilişsel Stil Boyutlarına Uygun Olarak Hazırlanan Öğretim Etkinliklerinin Akademik Başarı ve Tutumlar Üzerindeki Etkisi. (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Anadolu Üniversitesi/Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Eskişehir.
• Hasırcı, K. Ö. (2006). Sınıf Öğretmenliği Öğrencilerinin Öğrenme Stilleri: Çukurova Üni- versitesi Örneği. Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama Dergisi, 2 (1), 15-25.
• Hudson, L. (1966). Contrary Imaginations. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
• Hunt, D.E. (1971). Matching Models in Education: The Coordination of Teaching Methods with Student Characteristics. Toronto: Institute for Studies in Education.
• Jenssen, E. (1998). Introduction to Brain-Compatible Learning. San Diego, CA: The Brain Store.
• Jonassen, D., Grabowski B. (1993). Handbook of Individual Differences, Learning and Instruction, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Keffe, J. W., Ferrel, B. G. (1990). Developing a Defensible Learning Style Paradigm. Educational Leadership, 48 (1), 57–61.
• Keri, G. (2002). Male and Female College Students Learning Styles Differ: An Opportunity for Instructional Diversificiation. College Student Journal, 36 (3), 433-442.
• Kılıç, E. (2002). Baskın Öğrenme Stilinin Öğrenme Etkinlikleri Tercihi ve Akademik Başarıya Etkisi. Eğitim Bilimleri ve Uygulama, 1, 1-15.
• Kirby, J.R. (1988). Style, Strategy, and Skills in Reading. R.R. Schmeck (Ed.), Learning Strategies and Learning Styles içinde (s. 229–274). New York: Plenum.
• Kogan, N. (1971). Educational Implications of Cognitive Styles. G.S. Lesser (Ed.), Psychology and Educational Practice içinde (s. 242–292). Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman & Company.
• Kogan, N., Wallach, M.A. (1964). Risk-taking: A Study in Cognition and Personality, New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
• Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
• Küçükahmet, L. (1995). Öğretim İlke ve Yöntemleri. Ankara: Gazi Büro.
• Lewenfeld, V. (1945). Tests for Visual and Haptical Aptitudes. American Journal of Psychology, 58, 100–112.
• Mahiroğlu, A. (1999) Gazi Üniversitesi Teknik Eğitim Fakültesi Öğrencilerinin Öğrenme Stilleri, IV. Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Kongresi Bildiri Kitabı, Eskişehir: Anadolu Üni- versitesi.
• Naiman, N., Fröhlich, M., Stern, H.H., Todesco, A. (1978). The Good Language Learner. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
• National Development Plan (2002). Learning Styles: Kolb’s Theory of Experiential Learning. Trinity College, Dublin. http://www.reviewing.co.uk/research/experienti- al.learning.htm (30.10.2012)
• Nel, C. (2008). Learning Style and Good Language Learners. Carol Griffiths (Ed), Lessons From Good Language Learners içinde (s. 49-60). New York: Cambridge.
• Oxford, R. L. (1990). Missing Link: Evidence from Research on Language Learning Styles and Strategies. Washington DC: Georgetown University.
• Oxford, R.L. (1993). Style Analysis Survey (SAS). Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama.
• Özgüven, E. (1974). Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Akademik Başarılarını Etkileyen Zihinsel Olmayan Faktörler. Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi.
• Öztuzcu, D. (1997). The Role of Learning Style in Learning English as a Second by Turkish University Students. (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Pasific Western University, USA.
• Pask, G. (1972). A Fresh Look at Cognition and the Individual. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 4, 211–216.
• Pask, G. (1976). Styles and Strategies of Learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 128-148.
• Peters A.M. (1977). Language Learning Strategies: Does the Whole Equal the Sum of the Parts?. Language, 53, 560–573.
• Reid, J.M. (1987). The Learning Style Preferences of ESL Students. TESOL Quarterly, 21 (1), 87–111.
• Richardson, A. (1977). Verbalizer-visualizer: A Cognitive Style Dimension. Journal of Mental Imagery, 1 (1), 109–126.
• Riding, R., Cheema, I. (1991). Cognitive Styles: An Overview and Integration. Educational Psychology, 11 (3-4), 193-215.
• Schmeck, R.R. (1981). Improving Learning by Improving Thinking. Educational Leadership, 38, 384.
• Shuell, T.J. (1986). Cognitive Conceptions of Learning. Review of Educational Research, Winter, 411-436.
• Smith, L.H., Renzuli J.S. (1984). Learning Style Preferences: A Practical Approach for Classroom Teachers. Theory into Practice, 23, 44-50.
• Soylu, M. Y., Akkoyunlu B. (2002). The Effect of Learning Styles on Achievement in Different Learning Environments. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 43-50.
• Stice, J.E. (1987). Using Kolb’s Learning Cycle to Improve Student Learning. Engineering Education, 77, 1-29.
• Stroot, S., Keil, V., Stedman, P., Lohr, L., Faust R., Schincariol-Randall, L., Sullivan A., Czerniak, G., Kucheinski, J., Orel, N., Richter, M. (1998). Peer Assistance and Review Guidebook, Colombus, OH: Ohio Department of Education.
• Torrance, E.P., Rockenstein, Z.L. (1988). Styles of Thinking and Creativity. R.R. Schmeck (Ed.), Learning Strategies and Learning Styles içinde (275–290). New York: Plenum.
• Uğur, B., Akkoyunlu, B., Kurbanoğlu S. (2011). Students’ Opinions on Blended Learning and Its Implementation in terms of Their Learning Styles. Education and Information Technology, 16, 5-25.
• Uluğ, F. (1999). Okulda Başarı. (6. Baskı). İstanbul: Remzi.
• Witkin, H.A., Goodenough, D.R. (1981). Cognitive Styles: Essences and Origins, New York: International Universities.
• Witkin, H.A., Lewis, H.G., Hertzman, M., Machover, K., Meisener, P.B., Wapner, S. (1954). Personality Through Perception, New York: Harper.