Teknolojik İnovasyonun İhracat Üzerindeki Etkisi: Türkiye-AB 15 Ülkeleri Örneği

Abstract

İnovasyon, ülkelerin daha nitelikli bir ihracat yapısına sahip olabilmeleri konusunda oldukça önemli bir faktördür. İnovasyona dayalı ürünler üreterek küresel piyasalarda tercih edilebilirliğini arttıran ülkeler bu noktada pek çok ülkeden ayrışmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, teknolojik inovasyonun ihracat üzerindeki etkisi incelenmiştir. 1998-2013 dönemini kapsayan çalışmada öncelikle TAI ve Ar-Co endeksleri referans alınarak teknolojik inovasyon endeks değerleri hesaplanmıştır. Bu veriler modellerde bağımsız değişken olarak kullanılmıştır. Çalışmanın ikinci aşamasında Türkiye’nin AB-15 ülkelerine yaptığı toplam ihracat, yaygın ve yoğun ihracat olarak bileşenlerine ayrıştırılmıştır. Yaygın ihracattaki artış, niteliksel artışı, yoğun ihracattaki artış ise niceliksel artışı ifade etmektedir. Elde edilen ihracat verileri bağımlı değişken olarak modellerde kullanılmıştır. Teknolojik inovasyonun yaygın ve yoğun ihracat üzerindeki etkisi Panel ARDL yöntemi ile analiz edilmiştir. Analiz sonucuna göre, teknolojik inovasyonun yaygın ihracat üzerinde etkisi olduğuna ilişkin kuvvetli bir bulgu elde edilememiştir. Diğer taraftan, yoğun ihracatı istatistiksel olarak anlamlı ve pozitif etkilediği tespit edilmiştir.

Keywords

• Teknolojik İnovasyon Endeksi, Yaygın İhracat, Yoğun İhracat, Panel ARDL

The Effect Of Technological Innovation On Exports: The Case Of Turkey-EU 15 Countries

Abstract

Innovation is a very important factor for countries to have a more qualified export structure. Countries that increase their preference in global markets by producing products based on innovation are separated from many countries at this point. In this study, the effect of technological innovation on exports is examined. Technological innovation index values were calculated with reference to TAI and ArCo indices in the study covering 1998-2013 period. This data is used as an argument in the models. In the second phase of the study, Turkey's total exports to the EU-15 countries, has been separated into components as extensive and intensive margins. The increase in Extensive exports; the qualitative increase, and the increase in intensive exports means the quantitative increase. The export data obtained is used as a dependent variable in the models. The impact of technological innovation on extensive and intensive margin was analyzed by Panel ARDL method. According to the result of analysis, there is no strong finding that technological innovation is the effect on extensive margin. On the other hand, it has been determined that intense margin have a statistically significant and positive effect

Keywords

• Technological Innovation Index, Extensive Margins, Intensive Margins, Panel ARDL.

References

1. Archibugi, D. ve Coco, A. (2002). A New İndicator Of Technological Capabilities For Developed And Developing Countries (Arco). The World Development, 32(4), 629-654.
2. Bingzhan, S. (2011). Extensive Margin, Quantity And Price In China's Export Growth. China Economic Review, 22(2), 233-243.
3. Chen, W.-C. (2013). The Extensive And Intensive Margins Of Exports: The Role Of Innovation. The World Economy, 36(5), 607-635.
4. Desai, M., Fukuda-Parr, S., Johansson C. ve Sagasti, F. (2002). Measuring The Technology Achievement of Nations and The Capacity to Participate In The Network Age. Journal of Human Development, 3(1), 95-122.
5. Eaton, J. ve Kortum, S. (1997). Technology And Bilateral Trade. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series, No. 6253, 1-53.
6. Eurostat (2016, 20 Mart). Erişim adresi http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database.
7. Fagerberg, J. (1988). International Competitiveness. The Economic Journal, 98(391), 1988, 355-374.
8. Gaulier, G. ve Zignago, S. (2010). Baci: International Trade Database at The Product

9. Level (the 1994-2007 version). Munich Personal RePEc Archive, CEPII.
10. Hirsch, S. ve Bijaoui, I. (1985). R&D Intensity And Export Performance: a Micro View. Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), 121(2), 238- 251.
11. Keesing, D. B. (1967). The Impact of Research And Development on United States Trade. The Journal of Political Economy, 75(1), 38-48.
12. Kirbach, M. ve Schmiedeberg, C. (2008). Innovation And Export Performance: Adjustment And Remaining Differences In East And West German Manufacturing. Economics of Innovation New Technology, 17(5), 435-457.
13. Laursen, K. (1999). The Impact Of Technological Opportunity On The Dynamics Of Trade Performance. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 10(3), 341-357.
14. Márquez-Ramos, L. ve Martínez-Zarzoso, I. (2010). The Effect Of Technological Innovation On International Trade: Non-Linear Approach. Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Discussion Paper, No.4, 1-34.
15. Martínez-Zarzoso, I. ve Márquez-Ramos, L. (2005). International Trade, Technological Innovation And Income: A Gravity Model Approach. Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, No.2005-15, 1-31.
16. Narayan, P. K. ve Narayan, S. (2006). Savings Behaviour In Fiji: An Empirical Assessment Using The ARDL Approach To Cointegration. International Journal Of Social Economics, 33(7), 468-480.
17. OECD Database (2016, Mart 25). Erişim adresi https://data.oecd.org/.
18. Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A Simple Panel Unit Root Test In The Presence Of Cross- Section Dependence. Journal of Applied Economics, 22(2), 265–312.
19. Pesaran, M. H. ve Shin, Y. (1998). An Autoregressive Distributed-Lag Modelling Approach To Cointegration Analysis. Econometric Society Monographs, 31, 371- 413.
20. Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y. ve Smith, R. (1999). Pooled Mean Group Estimation Of Dynamic Heterogeneous Panels. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(446), 621-634.
21. Pesaran, M. H. ve Smith, R. (1995). Estimating Long-Run Relationships From Dynamic Heterogeneous Panels. Journal Of Econometrics, 68(1), 79-113.
22. Schumpeter, J. A. (1947). The Creative Response in Economic History. The Journal Of Economic History, 7(2), 149-159.
23. Uzay, N., Demir, M. ve Yıldırım, E. (2012). İhracat Performansı Açısından Teknolojik Yeniliğin Önemi: Türkiye İmalat Sanayi Örneği. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 13(1), 147-160.
24. World Bank (2016, 10 Mayıs). World Development Indicators, Erişim adresi http://databank.worldbank.org/data/reports.aspx?source=world-development- indicators.
25. Zhao, H. ve Li, H. (1997). R&D And Export: An Empirical Analysis Of Chinese Manufacturing Firms. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 8(1), 89-105.