ÖRGÜTSEL DAVRANIŞ LİTERATÜRÜNDE YENİ BİR PERSPEKTİF: NÖROBİLİM

Salih Zeki İmamoğlu; Neslihan Latifoğlu; Hüseyin İnce

doi:10.31671/doujournal.972987

ÖRGÜTSEL DAVRANIŞ LİTERATÜRÜNDE YENİ BİR PERSPEKTİF: NÖROBİLİM

Abstract

Örgütsel davranış çalışmaları farklı disiplinlerden beslenerek gelişimini sürdürmektedir. Bireysel düzeyde incelemeler için psikolojiden, örgütsel düzeyde incelemeler için sosyolojiden veya incelenen değişkenlere göre iki disiplinden de yararlanılmakta ve örgütsel davranış literatürü paradigma dönüşümünü sürdürmektedir. Teknolojik gelişmeler sonucu insan beyninin yakından incelenebilmesiyle elde edilen verilerin davranışların ardındaki gizli kalmış mekanizmaları ortaya çıkarmaya elverişli olması, örgütsel davranış araştırmalarında nörobilimden yararlanmayı gerekli kılmaktadır. Bu çalışma örgütsel davranışın nörobilimle ilişkisini ele almaktadır. Örgütsel davranışlara ilişkin mevcut teorilerin psikoloji ve sosyoloji yanında nörobilim perspektifi ile yeniden değerlendirilmesi, çalışan davranışlarını tahmin etmede eksik parçaların tamamlanmasına ve örgütsel ortamda çalışan davranışlarına ilişkin daha fazla bilgi aktarılmasına katkı sağlayacaktır.

Keywords

References

Acharya, S. ve Shukla, S. (2012). Mirror neurons: Enigma of the metaphysical modular brain. Journal of Natural Science, Biology and Medicine, 3(2), 118-124.
Ashkanasy, N. M., Becker, W. J. ve Waldman, D. A. (2014). Neuroscience and organizational behavior: Avoiding both neuro-euphoria and neuro-phobia. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(7), 909–919.
Balconi, M. ve Venturella, I. (2017). Neuromanagement. What about emotion and communication?. Neuropsychological Trends, 21(1), 9-21.
Balconi, M. ve Fronda, G. (2020). Morality and management: An oxymoron? fNIRS and neuromanagement perspective explain us why things are not like this. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 20(6), 1336-1348.
Balthazard, P. A., Waldman, D. A., Thatcher, R. W. ve Hannah, S. T. (2012). Differentiating transformational and non-transformational leaders on the basis of neurological imaging. Leadership Quarterly, 23(2), 244–258.
Bandura, A., Ross, D. ve Ross, S. A. (1961). Transmission of aggression through imitation of aggressive models. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63(3), 575–582.
Barry, A. M. (2009). Mirror neurons: How we become what we see. Visual Communication Quarterly, 16(2), 79–89.
Bechara, A., Damasio, H. ve Damasio, A. R. (2000). Emotion, decision making and the orbitofrontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 10(3), 295–307.

Becker, W. J. ve Cropanzano, R. (2010). Organizational neuroscience: The promise and prospects of an emerging discipline. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(7), 1055–1059.
Becker, W. J., Cropanzano, R. ve Sanfey, A. G. (2011). Organizational neuroscience: Taking organizational theory inside the neural black box. Journal of Management, 37(4), 933–961.
Beugré, C. D. (2009). Exploring the neural basis of fairness: A model of neuro-organizational justice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 110(2), 129–139.
Beugré, C. D. (2010). Resistance to socialization into organizational corruption: A model of deontic justice. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(3), 533–541.
Boyatzis, R. E., Passarelli, A. M., Koenig, K., Lowe, M., Mathew, B., Stoller, J. K. ve Phillips, M. (2012). Examination of the neural substrates activated in memories of experiences with resonant and dissonant leaders. Leadership Quarterly, 23(2), 259–272.
Boyatzis, R. E. (2014). Possible contributions to leadership and management development from neuroscience. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 13(2), 300–303.
Brewer, M. B. (2001). The many faces of socialidentity: Implications for political psychology. Political Psychology, 22(1), 115–125.
Brüne, M. (2005). “Theory of mind” in schizophrenia: A review of the literature. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 31(1), 21–42.
Butler, M. J. R. ve Senior, C. (2007). Toward an organizational cognitive neuroscience. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1118(1), 1–17.
Cacioppo, J. T., Berntson, G. G., Sheridan, J. F. ve McClintock, M. K. (2000). Multilevel integrative analyses of human behavior: Social neuroscience and the complementing nature of social and biological approaches. Psychological Bulletin, 126(6), 829–843.
Camerer, C., Loewenstein, G. ve Prelec, D. (2005). Neuroeconomics: How neuroscience can inform economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 43(1), 9–64.
Carr, L., Iacoboni, M., Dubeaut, M. C., Mazziotta, J. C. ve Lenzi, G. L. (2003). Neural mechanisms of empathy in humans: A relay from neural systems for imitation to limbic areas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100(9), 5497–5502.
Carter, R. (2019). The brain book: An illustrated guide to its structure, functions, and disorders. Londra: Dorling Kindersley Ltd.
Cropanzano, R., Bowen, D. E. ve Gilliland, S. W. (2007). The management of organizational justice. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(4), 34–48.
Decety, J. ve Batson, C. D. (2007). Social neuroscience approaches to interpersonal sensitivity. Social Neuroscience, 2(3-4), 151-157.
Dumas, G., Nadel, J., Soussignan, R., Martinerie, J. ve Garnero, L. (2010). Inter-brain synchronization during social interaction. PloS one, 5(8), e12166.
Dunin-Barkowski, W. ve Solovyeva, K. (2018). Pavlov principle and brain reverse engineering. 2018 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology (CIBCB içinde (1-5. ss.).
Eisenberger, N. I., Lieberman, M. D. ve Williams, K. D. (2003). Does rejection hurt? An fMRI study of social exclusion. Science, 302(5643), 290-292.
Erkal, H., Tatarlar, C. D. ve Kesken, J. (2017). Yönetim yazınındaki nörobilim çalışmalarına genel bakış. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, 16. UİK Özel Sayısı, 403-412.
Feser, C., Mayol, F. ve Srinivasan, R. (2015). Decoding leadership: What really matters. McKinsey Quarterly, 4, 88-91.
Floresco, S. B. (2015). The nucleus accumbens: An interface between cognition, emotion, and action. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 25-52.
Gallagher, M. ve Chiba, A. A. (1996). The amygdala and emotion. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 6(2), 221-227.
Gallese, V. ve Goldman, A. (1998). Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2(12), 493-501.
Ghadiri, A., Habermacher, A. ve Peters, T. (2013). Neuroleadership: A journey through the brain for business leaders. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
Grossberg, S. (1972). A neural theory of punishment and avoidance, I: Qualitative theory. Mathematical Biosciences, 15(1–2), 39–67.
Gutsell, J. N. ve Inzlicht, M. (2010). Empathy constrained: Prejudice predicts reduced mental simulation of actions during observation of outgroups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(5), 841–845.
Hellige, J. B. (1990). Hemispheric asymmetry. Annual Review of Psychology, 41(1), 55–80.
Holmes, M. (2013). The force of face-to-face diplomacy: Mirror neurons and the problem of intentions. International Organization, 67(4), 829–861.
Juhro, S. M. ve Aulia, A. (2018). Transformational leadership through applied neuroscience: Transmission mechanism of the thinking process. International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 7(3), 211–229.
Kaplan, J. T. ve Iacoboni, M. (2006). Getting a grip on other minds: mirror neurons, intention understanding, and cognitive empathy. Social Neuroscience, 1(3–4), 175–183.
Klos, M. (2018). Neuro (management) through the prism of brain research. Modern Management Review, Vol. XXIII, 25(4), 81-93.
Lee, N., Broderick, A. J. ve Chamberlain, L. (2007). What is “neuromarketing”? A discussion and agenda for future research. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 63(2), 199–204.
Lieberman, M. D. (2007). Social cognitive neuroscience: A review of core processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 259–289.
Lindblom, J. (2015). Embodiment and social interaction. J. Lindblom (Ed.), Embodied Social Cognition içinde (115-159. ss.). Cham: Springer.
Lindebaum, D. (2013). Pathologizing the healthy but ineffective: Some ethical reflections on using neuroscience in leadership research. Journal of Management Inquiry, 22(3), 295–305.
Luffman, G. (2019). Making organizational change happen – Does what we now know from neuroscience have any impact? Development and Learning in Organizations, 33(4), 5-8.
Margulies, D. S., Kelly, A. C., Uddin, L. Q., Biswal, B. B. ve Milham, M. P. (2007). Mapping the functional connectivity of anterior cingulate cortex. Neuroimage, 37(2), 579-588.
Mason, M. F., Dyer, R. ve Norton, M. I. (2009). Neural mechanisms of social influence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 110(2), 152–159.
Molenberghs, P., Prochilo, G., Steffens, N. K., Zacher, H. ve Haslam, S. A. (2017). The neuroscience of inspirational leadership: The importance of collective-oriented language and shared group membership. Journal of Management, 43(7), 2168–2194.
Muckenhoupt, M. (1939). Sigmund Freud explorer of the unconscious. Journal of Personality, 8(2), 163-169.
Nabavi, R. T. (2012). Bandura’s social learning theory & social cognitive learning theory. ResearchGate, 1–23.
Naqvi, N., Shiv, B. ve Bechara, A. (2006). The role of emotion in decision making: A cognitive neuroscience perspective. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(5), 260–264.
O'Doherty, J., Kringelbach, M. L., Rolls, E. T., Hornak, J. ve Andrews, C. (2001). Abstract reward and punishment representations in the human orbitofrontal cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 4(1), 95-102.
Olds, J. ve Milner, P. (1954). Positive reinforcement produced by electrical stimulation of septal area and other regions of rat brain. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 47(6), 419–427.
Reisyan, G. D. (2016). Neuro-organizational culture: A new approach to understanding human behavior and interaction in the workplace. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
Rizzolatti, G. ve Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169–192.
Rock, D. (2010). Impacting leadership with neuroscience. People & Strategy, 33(4), 6–7.
Sanfey, A. G., Rilling, J. K., Aronson, J. A., Nystrom, L. E. ve Cohen, J. D. (2003). The neural basis of economic decision-making in the ultimatum game. Science, 300(5626), 1755–1758.
Satpathy, J., Mishra, S. ve Rath, B. P. (2014). Explorations in neuro-decision making. Odisha Journal of Social Science, 1(1), 101-111.
Schaufenbuel, K. (2014). The neuroscience of leadership: Practical applications. UNC Kenan Flagler Business School.
Senior, C., Lee, N. ve Butler, M. (2011). Organizational cognitive neuroscience. Organization Science, 22(3), 804–815.
Sezgın, O. B. ve Uçar, Z. (2015). Nörobilimin örgütsel davranışa yansıması: Örgütsel nörobilim. Ege Akademik Bakiş (Ege Academic Review), 15(3), 353–365.
Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99–118.
Stanton, A. A. (2010). Hormonal influence on male decision-making: Implications for organizational management. Angela A. Stanton, Mellani Day, & Isabel M. Welpe (Ed.), Neuroeconomics and the Firm içinde (131-150. ss.) Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., UK.
Teacu-Parincu, A. M., Capatina, A., Varon, D. J., Bennet, P. F. ve Recuerda, A. M. (2020). Neuromanagement: The scientific approach to contemporary management. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, 14(1), 1046-1056.
Tzouramani, E. (2017). Leadership and empathy. J. Marques, & S. Dhiman (Ed.), Leadership Today içinde (197-216. ss.). Springer Texts in Business and Economics, Springer, Cham.
Venturella, I., Gatti, L., Vanutelli, M. E. ve Balconi, M. (2017). When brains dialogue by synchronized or unsynchronized languages: Hyperscanning applications to neuromanagement. Neuropsychological Trends, 21, 35-51.
Walter, H., Abler, B., Ciaramidaro, A. ve Erk, S. (2005). Motivating forces of human actions: Neuroimaging reward and social interaction. Brain Research Bulletin, 67(5), 368–381.
Ward, M. K., Volk, S. ve Becker, W. J. (2015). An overview of organizational neuroscience. Organizational Neuroscience (Monographs in Leadership and Management), 7, 17-50.
Yousaf, H. Q. ve Rehman, C. A. (2017). How neurosciences effects on decision making and leadership. International Review of Management and Business Research, 6(1), 33-39.
Zak, P. J. ve Nadler, A. (2010). Using brains to create trust: A manager’s toolbox. Angela A. Stanton, Mellani Day, & Isabel M. Welpe (Ed.), Neuroeconomics and the Firm içinde (69-77. ss.). Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., UK.

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

Business Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Salih Zeki İmamoğlu ^* This is me
0000-0002-7160-2370
Türkiye

Neslihan Latifoğlu This is me
0000-0001-9854-9277
Türkiye

Hüseyin İnce This is me
0000-0002-5953-6497
Türkiye

Publication Date

July 18, 2021

Submission Date

March 12, 2021

Acceptance Date

July 8, 2021

Published in Issue

Year 2021 Volume: 22 Number: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31671/doujournal.972987

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA67SR38YP

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

İmamoğlu, S. Z., Latifoğlu, N., & İnce, H. (2021). ÖRGÜTSEL DAVRANIŞ LİTERATÜRÜNDE YENİ BİR PERSPEKTİF: NÖROBİLİM. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 22(2), 89-105. https://doi.org/10.31671/doujournal.972987

AMA

1.İmamoğlu SZ, Latifoğlu N, İnce H. ÖRGÜTSEL DAVRANIŞ LİTERATÜRÜNDE YENİ BİR PERSPEKTİF: NÖROBİLİM. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi. 2021;22(2):89-105. doi:10.31671/doujournal.972987

Chicago

İmamoğlu, Salih Zeki, Neslihan Latifoğlu, and Hüseyin İnce. 2021. “ÖRGÜTSEL DAVRANIŞ LİTERATÜRÜNDE YENİ BİR PERSPEKTİF: NÖROBİLİM”. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi 22 (2): 89-105. https://doi.org/10.31671/doujournal.972987.

EndNote

İmamoğlu SZ, Latifoğlu N, İnce H (July 1, 2021) ÖRGÜTSEL DAVRANIŞ LİTERATÜRÜNDE YENİ BİR PERSPEKTİF: NÖROBİLİM. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi 22 2 89–105.

IEEE

[1]S. Z. İmamoğlu, N. Latifoğlu, and H. İnce, “ÖRGÜTSEL DAVRANIŞ LİTERATÜRÜNDE YENİ BİR PERSPEKTİF: NÖROBİLİM”, Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 89–105, July 2021, doi: 10.31671/doujournal.972987.

ISNAD

İmamoğlu, Salih Zeki - Latifoğlu, Neslihan - İnce, Hüseyin. “ÖRGÜTSEL DAVRANIŞ LİTERATÜRÜNDE YENİ BİR PERSPEKTİF: NÖROBİLİM”. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi 22/2 (July 1, 2021): 89-105. https://doi.org/10.31671/doujournal.972987.

JAMA

1.İmamoğlu SZ, Latifoğlu N, İnce H. ÖRGÜTSEL DAVRANIŞ LİTERATÜRÜNDE YENİ BİR PERSPEKTİF: NÖROBİLİM. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi. 2021;22:89–105.

MLA

İmamoğlu, Salih Zeki, et al. “ÖRGÜTSEL DAVRANIŞ LİTERATÜRÜNDE YENİ BİR PERSPEKTİF: NÖROBİLİM”. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, vol. 22, no. 2, July 2021, pp. 89-105, doi:10.31671/doujournal.972987.

Vancouver

1.Salih Zeki İmamoğlu, Neslihan Latifoğlu, Hüseyin İnce. ÖRGÜTSEL DAVRANIŞ LİTERATÜRÜNDE YENİ BİR PERSPEKTİF: NÖROBİLİM. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi. 2021 Jul. 1;22(2):89-105. doi:10.31671/doujournal.972987

Cited By

Örgütsel Çevikliğin Öncülleri: Proaktif Kişilik, Bilişsel Esneklik, Örgütsel Öğrenme

TroyAcademy

https://doi.org/10.31454/troyacademy.1480937

YÖNETİMDE YENİ BİR KAVRAM OLARAK NÖROYÖNETİM: DENEYSEL ÇALIŞMALARIN SİSTEMATİK OLARAK İNCELENMESİ

Pamukkale University Journal of Social Sciences Institute

https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.1398796