Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Endüstri 4.0’a Örgütsel Davranış Perspektifinden Bibliyometrik Bir İnceleme

Year 2023, , 234 - 247, 28.07.2023
https://doi.org/10.51290/dpusbe.1297132

Abstract

Bu çalışma endüstri 4.0’la birlikte yaşanan dönüşümde örgütsel davranış konularının bu sürece ne kadar uyum sağladığını tespit etmek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Bu kapsamda akademik çalışmalarda endüstri 4.0 ile örgütsel davranış konularının birlikte çalışılma seviyeleri değerlendirilmiştir. Araştırma kapsamında endüstri 4.0’ın örgütsel davranış konularıyla beraber incelendiği çalışmalar Web of Science veri tabanından alınmıştır. Ulaşılan veriler WOSviewer 1.6.18 programı kullanılarak bibliyometrik analiz yapılmıştır. 02 Mayıs 2023 tarihi itibariyle Web of Science veri tabanında endüstri 4.0 ile ilgili 21422 çalışma tespit edilmiştir. Bu çalışmalardan sadece 546 tanesi (%2.5’i) yönetim alanında endüstri 4.0’ın örgütsel davranış konularıyla beraber incelendiği çalışmalar olarak tespit edilmiştir. Literatürde endüstri 4.0’ın çoğunlukla teknik konularla beraber çalışıldığı, örgütsel davranış konularının yani insan unsurunun ikinci planda kaldığı ve endüstri 4.0’ın gelişim hızıyla örgütsel davranış konularının çalışılma hızı arasında uyum olmadığı sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Çalışma kapsamında gelecekte yapılacak çalışmalara endüstri 4.0 ile örgütsel davranış konularının birlikte daha fazla çalışılmasına yönelik tavsiyelerde bulunulmuştur.

References

  • Adekanmbi, F. P. ve Ukpere, W. I. (2022). Sustaining organizational performance and employee wellbeing in the 4IR: the impact of leadership 4.0, PSYCAP, and high-performance HR practices. EUREKA: Social and Humanities, 3, 24-39. doi:https://doi.org/10.21303/2504-5571.2022.002403.
  • Aderibigbe, J. K. (2021a). Psychological capital: the antidote for the consequences of organisational citizenship behaviour in industry 4.0 workplace. Agile Coping in the Digital Workplace: Emerging Issues for Research and Practice içinde (ss. 259-273). Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70228-1_13.
  • Aderibigbe, J. K. (2021b). The dynamism of psychological contract and workforce diversity: Implications and challenges for Industry 4.0 HRM. Redefining the Psychological Contract in the Digital Era içinde (ss. 247-259). Springer, Cham. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63864-1_13.
  • Bavaresco, R., Arruda, H., Rocha, E., Barbosa, J. ve Li, G. P. (2021). Internet of Things and occupational well-being in industry 4.0: A systematic mapping study and taxonomy. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 161, 107670. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107670.
  • Berglund, R., Omorede, A. ve Backström, T. (2021). Avoiding the pitfall of work-related stress in the transition to industry 4.0. EUROMA 2021.
  • Bibby, L. ve Dehe, B. (2018). Defining and assessing industry 4.0 maturity levels–case of the defence sector. Production Planning & Control, 29(12), 1030-1043. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2018.1503355.
  • Chinyamurindi, W. T. (2021). [Re] defining the psychological contract within ındustry 4.0: An expert opinion analysis. Redefining the Psychological Contract in the Digital Era: Issues for Research and Practice, 37-53. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63864-1_3.
  • Cetinkaya, A. S. (2021). The impact of industry 4.0 strategy on the work-life balance of employees. University of South Florida M3 Center Publishing, 5(2021), 64. doi:https://www.doi.org/10.5038/9781955833035.
  • Doğru, B. ve Meçik, O. (2018). Türkiye’de endüstri 4.0’in işgücü piyasasına etkileri: Firma beklentileri. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 23 (Endüstri 4.0 ve Örgütsel Değişim Özel Sayısı), 1581-1606.
  • Dyahrini, W., Novendri, A., Darda, A., Gultom, K., Riyanda, M. ve Saudi, M. H. (2020). The influence of organizational cultural, organizational commitment to performance with competitive advantage as intervening variable ındustrial era 4.0 (case study at multi garmentama company). Solid State Technology, 63(4), 3835-3847.
  • Ghobakhloo, M. (2018). The future of manufacturing industry: a strategic roadmap toward Industry 4.0. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 29(6), 910-936. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-02-2018-0057.
  • Ghobakhloo, M., Fathi, M., Iranmanesh, M., Maroufkhani, P. ve Morales, M. E. (2021). Industry 4.0 ten years on: A bibliometric and systematic review of concepts, sustainability value drivers, and success determinants. Journal of Cleaner Production, 302, 127052. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127052.
  • Goksu, N., Koska, A., Erdem, M. B. ve Yılmaz, A. (2018). Yeni ürün geliştirme noktasında endüstri 4.0 rolü: Kahramanmaraş metal mutfak sanayiinde bir araştırma. PressAcademia Procedia, 7(1), 418-421. doi:https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2018.927.
  • Ing, T. S., Lee, T. C., Chan, S. W., Alipal, J. ve Hamid, N. A. (2019). An overview of the rising challenges in implementing industry 4.0. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 8(6), 1181-1188.
  • Jamwal, A., Agrawal, R., Sharma, M. ve Giallanza, A. (2021). Industry 4.0 technologies for manufacturing sustainability: a systematic review and future research directions. Applied Sciences, 11(12), 5725. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/app11125725.
  • Jermsittiparsert, K. (2020). Leadership and industry 4.0 as a tool to enhance organization performance: Direct and indirect role of job satisfaction, competitive advantage and business sustainability. Agile Business Leadership Methods for Industry 4.0 içinde (ss. 233-257). Emerald Publishing Limited. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80043-380-920201014.
  • Karaboğa, H. A. (2019). Örgütsel davranış araştırmalarının bibliyometrik analizi. [Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi]. Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. İstanbul.
  • Koçel, T. (2018). İşletme yöneticiliği, İstanbul:Beta Yayıncılık.
  • Kwiotkowska, A. ve Gębczyńska, M. (2022). Job satisfaction and work characteristics combinations in Industry 4.0 environment—Insight from the Polish SMEs in the Post–Pandemic era. Sustainability, 14(20), 12978. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su142012978.
  • McShine, S.L. ve Von Glinow, M.A. (2016). Örgütsel davranış (A. Günsel ve S. Bozkurt, Çev.). Ankara:Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık (Orijinal eserin yayın tarihi 2014).
  • Mohelska, H. ve Sokolova, M. (2018). Management approaches for Industry 4.0–the organizational culture perspective. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 24(6), 2225-2240. doi:https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2018.6397.
  • Molino, M., Cortese, C. G. ve Ghislieri, C. (2020). The promotion of technology acceptance and work engagement in industry 4.0: From personal resources to information and training. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(7), 2438. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072438.
  • Mourtzis, D. ve Vlachou, E. (2018). A cloud-based cyber-physical system for adaptive shop-floor scheduling and condition-based maintenance. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 47, 179-198. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072438.
  • Mücevher, M. H., Demirgil, Z., Çetinceli, K. ve Özdemir, K. (2020). Örgütsel davranış alanındaki yönelimler: Örgütsel davranış kongrelerinde sunulan bildirilerin bibliyometrik analizi. Kayseri Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2(2), 24-36. doi:https://doi.org/10.51177/kayusosder.809447.
  • Nedjwa, E., Bertrand, R. ve Sassi Boudemagh, S. (2022). Impacts of Industry 4.0 technologies on Lean management tools: a bibliometric analysis. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 16(1), 135-150. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-021-00795-9.
  • Newman, C., Edwards, D., Martek, I., Lai, J., Thwala, W.D. ve Rillie, I. (2021), Industry 4.0 deployment in the construction industry: A bibliometric literature review and UK-based case study, Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, Vol. 10 No. 4, 557-580. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-02-2020-0016.
  • Okutan, E. ve Turdı, M. (2020). Örgütsel davranış alanında yapılan çalışmaların değerlendirmesi: Web of science örneği. Altınsoy, A. (Ed), Sakarya Üniversitesi Çalışma Ekonomisi ve Endüstri İlişkileri: Seçme Yazılar-IV içinde (ss.95-107). Sakarya:Sakarya Yayıncılık.
  • Olsen, T. L. ve Tomlin, B. (2020). Industry 4.0: Opportunities and challenges for operations management. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 22(1), 113-122. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2019.0796.
  • Oztemel, E. ve Gursev, S. (2020). Literature review of Industry 4.0 and related technologies. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 31(1), 127-182. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-018-1433-8.
  • Öztürk, O. ve Gürler, G. (2022). Bibliyometrik araştırmaların tasarımına ilişkin bir çerçeve. Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
  • Porubčinová, M. ve Fidlerová, H. (2020). Determinants of industry 4.0 technology adaption and human-Robot collaboration. Vedecké Práce Materiálovotechnologickej Fakulty Slovenskej Technickej Univerzity v Bratislave so Sídlom v Trnave, 28(46), 10-21. doi:https://doi.org/10.2478/rput-2020-0002.
  • Pradipto, Y. D. ve Ibrahim, M. I. (2022). The effect of working environment on burnout in millennial employees in Jakarta with job performance as moderating variable. 3rd Tarumanagara International Conference on the Applications of Social Sciences and Humanities içinde (ss. 1731-1735). Atlantis Press. doi:10.2991/assehr.k.220404.281.
  • Prause, M. ve Weigand, J. (2016). Industry 4.0 and object-oriented development: incremental and architectural change. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 11(2), 104-110. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242016000200010.
  • Robbins S.P. ve Judge T.A. (2012). Örgütsel davranış (İ.Erdem, Çev). Ankara:Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık (Orijinal eserin yayın tarihi 2011).
  • Rosa, R., Rahayu, S., Yudi, Y. ve Gowon, M. (2022). Internal auditor transformation strategy in the industrial revolution 4.0 era: Literature review. Proceedings of the First Lekantara Annual Conference on Public Administration, Literature, Social Sciences, Humanities, and Education, Malang, Indonesia. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/eai.3-8-2021.2315085.
  • Schultz, C. M. (2021). The relationship between self-leadership, the future of human resource management, and work engagement. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 19. 1-12. doi:https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhrm.v19i0.1701.
  • Schumacher, A., Erol, S. ve Sihn, W. (2016). A maturity model for assessing Industry 4.0 readiness and maturity of manufacturing enterprises. Procedia Cirp, 52, 161-166. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.07.040.
  • Shabur, A. ve Hridoy, M. W.(2021). Analysis of the factors of applying fourth industrial revolution in context of Bangladesh. Journal of Advanced Research in Industrial Engineering, 4(1), 1-8. doi:http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4624767.
  • Sony, M. ve Mekoth, N. (2022). Employee adaptability skills for industry 4.0 success: a road map. Production & Manufacturing Research, 10(1), 24-41. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/21693277.2022.2035281.
  • Soomro, M. A., Hizam-Hanafiah, M., Abdullah, N. L. ve Jusoh, M. S. (2021). Change readiness as a proposed dimension for industry 4.0 readiness models. Logforum, 17(1), 83-86. doi:http://doi.org/10.17270/J.LOG.2021.544.
  • Şahin, M. D. ve Yangil, F. M. (2018). Türkiye’de örgütsel davranış yazınına bir bakış: 2012-2016 yılları arasında yayımlanmış üniversite sosyal bilimler dergileri üzerine içerik analizi. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 10(2), 371-383. doi:10.20491/isarder.2018.434.
  • Tanç, Ş. G. ve Öz, A. Ö. (2020). Endüstri 4.0 kapsamında lojistik 4.0’ın incelenmesine yönelik teorik bir çalışma, Akademik Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 8(110), 460-469. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.29228/ASOS.46834.
  • Terzi, A. (2021). Endüstri 4.0 sürecinde üretim maliyetlerinde meydana gelmesi beklenen etkiler üzerine bir inceleme. Journal of Accounting and Taxation Studies, 14(2), 837-872. doi:https://doi.org/10.29067/muvu.852880.
  • Trotta, D. ve Garengo, P. (2018). Industry 4.0 key research topics: A bibliometric review. 7th International Conference on Industrial Technology and Management (ICITM) içinde (ss. 113-117). IEEE. doı: 10.1109/ICITM.2018.8333930.
  • Weiss, A., Huber, A., Minichberger, J. ve Ikeda, M. (2016). First application of robot teaching in an existing industry 4.0 environment: Does it really work?. Societies, 6(3), 20. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/soc6030020.
  • Wichmann, R. L., Eisenbart, B. ve Gericke, K. (2019). The direction of industry: a literature review on Industry 4.0. Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design içinde (ss. 2129-2138). Cambridge University Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.219.
  • Xu, L. D., Xu, E. L. ve Li, L. (2018). Industry 4.0: state of the art and future trends. International Journal of Production Research, 56(8), 2941-2962. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1444806.
  • Yıldız, A. (2018). Endüstri 4.0 ve akıllı fabrikalar. Sakarya Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 22(2), 546-556. doi: 10.16984/saufenbilder.321957.
  • Ziaei Nafchi, M. ve Mohelská, H. (2020). Organizational culture as an indication of readiness to implement industry 4.0. Information, 11(3), 174. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/info11030174.

A Bibliometric Review of Industry 4.0 from Organizational Behavior Perspective

Year 2023, , 234 - 247, 28.07.2023
https://doi.org/10.51290/dpusbe.1297132

Abstract

This study was conducted in order to determine how well the organizational behavior issues adapt to the process in the transformation that has been experienced with industry 4.0. In this context, the levels considering industry 4.0 and organizational behavior issues together in academic studies were evaluated. Regarding scope of the research, the studies in which industry 4.0 and organizational behavior issues were examined together were taken from the Web of Science database. The bibliometric analysis of the data that was obtained was performed through employing the WOSviewer 1.6.18 program. As of 02 May 2023, 21422 studies related to industry 4.0 have been identified in the Web of Science database. Only 546 (2.5%) of these studies were identified as studies examining industry 4.0 and organizational behavior issues together in the field of management. In the literature, it has been concluded that industry 4.0 is mostly studied with technical issues; organizational behavior issues, in other words, the human aspect, are in the background, and there is no parallelism between the speed of development of industry 4.0 and that of the studies regarding organizational behavior issues. Within the scope of the study, recommendations were made for future studies that industry 4.0 and organizational behavior issues should be studied together more.

References

  • Adekanmbi, F. P. ve Ukpere, W. I. (2022). Sustaining organizational performance and employee wellbeing in the 4IR: the impact of leadership 4.0, PSYCAP, and high-performance HR practices. EUREKA: Social and Humanities, 3, 24-39. doi:https://doi.org/10.21303/2504-5571.2022.002403.
  • Aderibigbe, J. K. (2021a). Psychological capital: the antidote for the consequences of organisational citizenship behaviour in industry 4.0 workplace. Agile Coping in the Digital Workplace: Emerging Issues for Research and Practice içinde (ss. 259-273). Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70228-1_13.
  • Aderibigbe, J. K. (2021b). The dynamism of psychological contract and workforce diversity: Implications and challenges for Industry 4.0 HRM. Redefining the Psychological Contract in the Digital Era içinde (ss. 247-259). Springer, Cham. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63864-1_13.
  • Bavaresco, R., Arruda, H., Rocha, E., Barbosa, J. ve Li, G. P. (2021). Internet of Things and occupational well-being in industry 4.0: A systematic mapping study and taxonomy. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 161, 107670. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107670.
  • Berglund, R., Omorede, A. ve Backström, T. (2021). Avoiding the pitfall of work-related stress in the transition to industry 4.0. EUROMA 2021.
  • Bibby, L. ve Dehe, B. (2018). Defining and assessing industry 4.0 maturity levels–case of the defence sector. Production Planning & Control, 29(12), 1030-1043. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2018.1503355.
  • Chinyamurindi, W. T. (2021). [Re] defining the psychological contract within ındustry 4.0: An expert opinion analysis. Redefining the Psychological Contract in the Digital Era: Issues for Research and Practice, 37-53. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63864-1_3.
  • Cetinkaya, A. S. (2021). The impact of industry 4.0 strategy on the work-life balance of employees. University of South Florida M3 Center Publishing, 5(2021), 64. doi:https://www.doi.org/10.5038/9781955833035.
  • Doğru, B. ve Meçik, O. (2018). Türkiye’de endüstri 4.0’in işgücü piyasasına etkileri: Firma beklentileri. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 23 (Endüstri 4.0 ve Örgütsel Değişim Özel Sayısı), 1581-1606.
  • Dyahrini, W., Novendri, A., Darda, A., Gultom, K., Riyanda, M. ve Saudi, M. H. (2020). The influence of organizational cultural, organizational commitment to performance with competitive advantage as intervening variable ındustrial era 4.0 (case study at multi garmentama company). Solid State Technology, 63(4), 3835-3847.
  • Ghobakhloo, M. (2018). The future of manufacturing industry: a strategic roadmap toward Industry 4.0. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 29(6), 910-936. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-02-2018-0057.
  • Ghobakhloo, M., Fathi, M., Iranmanesh, M., Maroufkhani, P. ve Morales, M. E. (2021). Industry 4.0 ten years on: A bibliometric and systematic review of concepts, sustainability value drivers, and success determinants. Journal of Cleaner Production, 302, 127052. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127052.
  • Goksu, N., Koska, A., Erdem, M. B. ve Yılmaz, A. (2018). Yeni ürün geliştirme noktasında endüstri 4.0 rolü: Kahramanmaraş metal mutfak sanayiinde bir araştırma. PressAcademia Procedia, 7(1), 418-421. doi:https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2018.927.
  • Ing, T. S., Lee, T. C., Chan, S. W., Alipal, J. ve Hamid, N. A. (2019). An overview of the rising challenges in implementing industry 4.0. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 8(6), 1181-1188.
  • Jamwal, A., Agrawal, R., Sharma, M. ve Giallanza, A. (2021). Industry 4.0 technologies for manufacturing sustainability: a systematic review and future research directions. Applied Sciences, 11(12), 5725. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/app11125725.
  • Jermsittiparsert, K. (2020). Leadership and industry 4.0 as a tool to enhance organization performance: Direct and indirect role of job satisfaction, competitive advantage and business sustainability. Agile Business Leadership Methods for Industry 4.0 içinde (ss. 233-257). Emerald Publishing Limited. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80043-380-920201014.
  • Karaboğa, H. A. (2019). Örgütsel davranış araştırmalarının bibliyometrik analizi. [Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi]. Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. İstanbul.
  • Koçel, T. (2018). İşletme yöneticiliği, İstanbul:Beta Yayıncılık.
  • Kwiotkowska, A. ve Gębczyńska, M. (2022). Job satisfaction and work characteristics combinations in Industry 4.0 environment—Insight from the Polish SMEs in the Post–Pandemic era. Sustainability, 14(20), 12978. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su142012978.
  • McShine, S.L. ve Von Glinow, M.A. (2016). Örgütsel davranış (A. Günsel ve S. Bozkurt, Çev.). Ankara:Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık (Orijinal eserin yayın tarihi 2014).
  • Mohelska, H. ve Sokolova, M. (2018). Management approaches for Industry 4.0–the organizational culture perspective. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 24(6), 2225-2240. doi:https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2018.6397.
  • Molino, M., Cortese, C. G. ve Ghislieri, C. (2020). The promotion of technology acceptance and work engagement in industry 4.0: From personal resources to information and training. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(7), 2438. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072438.
  • Mourtzis, D. ve Vlachou, E. (2018). A cloud-based cyber-physical system for adaptive shop-floor scheduling and condition-based maintenance. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 47, 179-198. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072438.
  • Mücevher, M. H., Demirgil, Z., Çetinceli, K. ve Özdemir, K. (2020). Örgütsel davranış alanındaki yönelimler: Örgütsel davranış kongrelerinde sunulan bildirilerin bibliyometrik analizi. Kayseri Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2(2), 24-36. doi:https://doi.org/10.51177/kayusosder.809447.
  • Nedjwa, E., Bertrand, R. ve Sassi Boudemagh, S. (2022). Impacts of Industry 4.0 technologies on Lean management tools: a bibliometric analysis. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 16(1), 135-150. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-021-00795-9.
  • Newman, C., Edwards, D., Martek, I., Lai, J., Thwala, W.D. ve Rillie, I. (2021), Industry 4.0 deployment in the construction industry: A bibliometric literature review and UK-based case study, Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, Vol. 10 No. 4, 557-580. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-02-2020-0016.
  • Okutan, E. ve Turdı, M. (2020). Örgütsel davranış alanında yapılan çalışmaların değerlendirmesi: Web of science örneği. Altınsoy, A. (Ed), Sakarya Üniversitesi Çalışma Ekonomisi ve Endüstri İlişkileri: Seçme Yazılar-IV içinde (ss.95-107). Sakarya:Sakarya Yayıncılık.
  • Olsen, T. L. ve Tomlin, B. (2020). Industry 4.0: Opportunities and challenges for operations management. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 22(1), 113-122. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2019.0796.
  • Oztemel, E. ve Gursev, S. (2020). Literature review of Industry 4.0 and related technologies. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 31(1), 127-182. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-018-1433-8.
  • Öztürk, O. ve Gürler, G. (2022). Bibliyometrik araştırmaların tasarımına ilişkin bir çerçeve. Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
  • Porubčinová, M. ve Fidlerová, H. (2020). Determinants of industry 4.0 technology adaption and human-Robot collaboration. Vedecké Práce Materiálovotechnologickej Fakulty Slovenskej Technickej Univerzity v Bratislave so Sídlom v Trnave, 28(46), 10-21. doi:https://doi.org/10.2478/rput-2020-0002.
  • Pradipto, Y. D. ve Ibrahim, M. I. (2022). The effect of working environment on burnout in millennial employees in Jakarta with job performance as moderating variable. 3rd Tarumanagara International Conference on the Applications of Social Sciences and Humanities içinde (ss. 1731-1735). Atlantis Press. doi:10.2991/assehr.k.220404.281.
  • Prause, M. ve Weigand, J. (2016). Industry 4.0 and object-oriented development: incremental and architectural change. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 11(2), 104-110. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242016000200010.
  • Robbins S.P. ve Judge T.A. (2012). Örgütsel davranış (İ.Erdem, Çev). Ankara:Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık (Orijinal eserin yayın tarihi 2011).
  • Rosa, R., Rahayu, S., Yudi, Y. ve Gowon, M. (2022). Internal auditor transformation strategy in the industrial revolution 4.0 era: Literature review. Proceedings of the First Lekantara Annual Conference on Public Administration, Literature, Social Sciences, Humanities, and Education, Malang, Indonesia. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/eai.3-8-2021.2315085.
  • Schultz, C. M. (2021). The relationship between self-leadership, the future of human resource management, and work engagement. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 19. 1-12. doi:https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhrm.v19i0.1701.
  • Schumacher, A., Erol, S. ve Sihn, W. (2016). A maturity model for assessing Industry 4.0 readiness and maturity of manufacturing enterprises. Procedia Cirp, 52, 161-166. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.07.040.
  • Shabur, A. ve Hridoy, M. W.(2021). Analysis of the factors of applying fourth industrial revolution in context of Bangladesh. Journal of Advanced Research in Industrial Engineering, 4(1), 1-8. doi:http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4624767.
  • Sony, M. ve Mekoth, N. (2022). Employee adaptability skills for industry 4.0 success: a road map. Production & Manufacturing Research, 10(1), 24-41. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/21693277.2022.2035281.
  • Soomro, M. A., Hizam-Hanafiah, M., Abdullah, N. L. ve Jusoh, M. S. (2021). Change readiness as a proposed dimension for industry 4.0 readiness models. Logforum, 17(1), 83-86. doi:http://doi.org/10.17270/J.LOG.2021.544.
  • Şahin, M. D. ve Yangil, F. M. (2018). Türkiye’de örgütsel davranış yazınına bir bakış: 2012-2016 yılları arasında yayımlanmış üniversite sosyal bilimler dergileri üzerine içerik analizi. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 10(2), 371-383. doi:10.20491/isarder.2018.434.
  • Tanç, Ş. G. ve Öz, A. Ö. (2020). Endüstri 4.0 kapsamında lojistik 4.0’ın incelenmesine yönelik teorik bir çalışma, Akademik Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 8(110), 460-469. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.29228/ASOS.46834.
  • Terzi, A. (2021). Endüstri 4.0 sürecinde üretim maliyetlerinde meydana gelmesi beklenen etkiler üzerine bir inceleme. Journal of Accounting and Taxation Studies, 14(2), 837-872. doi:https://doi.org/10.29067/muvu.852880.
  • Trotta, D. ve Garengo, P. (2018). Industry 4.0 key research topics: A bibliometric review. 7th International Conference on Industrial Technology and Management (ICITM) içinde (ss. 113-117). IEEE. doı: 10.1109/ICITM.2018.8333930.
  • Weiss, A., Huber, A., Minichberger, J. ve Ikeda, M. (2016). First application of robot teaching in an existing industry 4.0 environment: Does it really work?. Societies, 6(3), 20. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/soc6030020.
  • Wichmann, R. L., Eisenbart, B. ve Gericke, K. (2019). The direction of industry: a literature review on Industry 4.0. Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design içinde (ss. 2129-2138). Cambridge University Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.219.
  • Xu, L. D., Xu, E. L. ve Li, L. (2018). Industry 4.0: state of the art and future trends. International Journal of Production Research, 56(8), 2941-2962. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1444806.
  • Yıldız, A. (2018). Endüstri 4.0 ve akıllı fabrikalar. Sakarya Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 22(2), 546-556. doi: 10.16984/saufenbilder.321957.
  • Ziaei Nafchi, M. ve Mohelská, H. (2020). Organizational culture as an indication of readiness to implement industry 4.0. Information, 11(3), 174. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/info11030174.
There are 49 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Organisational Behaviour
Journal Section RESEARCH ARTICLES
Authors

Ümit Şevik 0000-0002-3543-5923

Publication Date July 28, 2023
Published in Issue Year 2023

Cite

APA Şevik, Ü. (2023). Endüstri 4.0’a Örgütsel Davranış Perspektifinden Bibliyometrik Bir İnceleme. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi(77), 234-247. https://doi.org/10.51290/dpusbe.1297132
AMA Şevik Ü. Endüstri 4.0’a Örgütsel Davranış Perspektifinden Bibliyometrik Bir İnceleme. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. July 2023;(77):234-247. doi:10.51290/dpusbe.1297132
Chicago Şevik, Ümit. “Endüstri 4.0’a Örgütsel Davranış Perspektifinden Bibliyometrik Bir İnceleme”. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, no. 77 (July 2023): 234-47. https://doi.org/10.51290/dpusbe.1297132.
EndNote Şevik Ü (July 1, 2023) Endüstri 4.0’a Örgütsel Davranış Perspektifinden Bibliyometrik Bir İnceleme. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 77 234–247.
IEEE Ü. Şevik, “Endüstri 4.0’a Örgütsel Davranış Perspektifinden Bibliyometrik Bir İnceleme”, Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, no. 77, pp. 234–247, July 2023, doi: 10.51290/dpusbe.1297132.
ISNAD Şevik, Ümit. “Endüstri 4.0’a Örgütsel Davranış Perspektifinden Bibliyometrik Bir İnceleme”. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 77 (July 2023), 234-247. https://doi.org/10.51290/dpusbe.1297132.
JAMA Şevik Ü. Endüstri 4.0’a Örgütsel Davranış Perspektifinden Bibliyometrik Bir İnceleme. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2023;:234–247.
MLA Şevik, Ümit. “Endüstri 4.0’a Örgütsel Davranış Perspektifinden Bibliyometrik Bir İnceleme”. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, no. 77, 2023, pp. 234-47, doi:10.51290/dpusbe.1297132.
Vancouver Şevik Ü. Endüstri 4.0’a Örgütsel Davranış Perspektifinden Bibliyometrik Bir İnceleme. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2023(77):234-47.

Dergimiz EBSCOhost, ULAKBİM/Sosyal Bilimler Veri Tabanında, SOBİAD ve Türk Eğitim İndeksi'nde yer alan uluslararası hakemli bir dergidir.