PLANLAMANIN AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ BOYUTU

Abstract

The European Union's interest in the general area of planning or spatial planning has increased considerably over the past twenty years. Although the development of European spatial planning has rested on informality, thereby, the planning policy documents and Community initiatives have legally nonbinding status, the EU activities in spatial planning have been exerting a great influence on the planning systems of the member states. This study is an attempt to examine the development of European spatial planning with an emphasis on main policy documents (e.g. Europe 2000, Europe 2000+ and ESDP) and Community initiatives (e.g. ESPON and INTERREG III), and to discuss the implications of new European spatial planning field for the Turkish planning system

Keywords

• EU, European spatial planning, ESDP, Turkish planning system

PLANLAMANIN AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ BOYUTU

Abstract

Avrupa Birliği'nin genel olarak planlama veya mekansal planlama alanına ilgisi son yirmi yılda önemli ölçüde artmıştır. Avrupa mekansal planlamasının gelişiminin gayrı resmi olmasına, dolayısıyla planlama politika belgelerinin ve topluluk inisiyatiflerinin yasal olarak bağlayıcılığı olmayan bir statüye sahip olmasına rağmen, mekansal planlama alanında Avrupa Birliği faaliyetlerinin Birliğe üye ülkelerinin planlama sistemleri üzerinde çok büyük etkileri olmuştur. Bu çalışma, Avrupa mekansal planlamasının gelişimini Avrupa 2000, Avrupa 2000+ ve ESDP gibi önemli politika belgelerine ve ESPON ve INTERREG III gibi topluluk inisiyatiflerine ağırlık vererek incelemekte ve bu yeni ortaya çıkan Avrupa mekansal planlama alanının Türkiye'de planlama sistemi üzerine muhtemel etkilerini tartışmaktadır

Keywords

• AB, Avrupa mekansal planlaması, ESDP, Türk planlama sistemi

References

1. Akçura, T. (1981). İmar Kurumu Konusunda Gözlemler, ODTÜ Mimarlık
2. Fakültesi Yayın No: 36, Ankara. Atkinson, R. (2001). “The Emerging “Urban Agenda” and European Spatial
3. Develepment Perspectives: Towards on EU Urban Policy”, European Planning Studies, 9: 395-406. Atkinson, R. (2002). “The White Paper on European Governence:
4. Implications for Urban Policy”, European Planning Studies, 10: 781-792. Bayındırlık ve İskan Bakanlığı (2005). Planlama ve İmar Kanunu Tasarısı Taslağı, (2005).
5. Bishop, K., Tewdwr-Jones, M. ve Wilkinson, D. (2000). “From Spatial to
6. Local: The Impact of the European Union on Local Authority Planning in the UK”, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 43: 309-334. CEMAT (European Conference of Ministers Responsible for Regional Planning) (2000). Guiding Principles for Sustainable Spatial Development of the European Continent (adopted at the 12th Session of the European
7. Conference of Ministers responsible for Regional Planning on 7-8 September 2000 Hannover) http://www.alpinespace.org/uploads/media/CEMAT_guiding- principles_EN.pdf (12.10.2005).
8. Chorianopoulos, I. (2002). “UrbanResructructing and Governence: North

9. South Differences in Europe and the EU URBAN Initiative”, Urban Studies, 3: 705-709. Clement, K. Bradley, K. ve Hansen, M. (2004). Environment and Sustainable
10. Development Integration in the Nordic Structural Funds: An Appraisal of Programming Documents, http://www.nordregio.se/Files/r0407.pdf (02006)
11. Davies, H.W.E. (1996). “Planning and the European Question”, British
12. Planning Policy in Transition, (Ed. By) TewdwrJones, M. UCD Press, London, 220-237. Davoudi, S. (2003). “Polycentricity in European Spatial Planning: From an
13. Analytical Tool to a Normative Agenda” European Planning Studies, 11: 979- 9
14. Demirdizen, E. (2006). “Şehir Plancıları, Kentlerimizin ve Planlama
15. Sistemimizin Savunucusu Olmayı Sürdürecek”, TMMOB Şehir Plancıları Odası Haber Bülteni 169: 1-2. Dinler, Z. (2005). Bölgesel İktisat, (7. Basım ) Ekin Kitapevi, Bursa.
16. Erzi, G. (2005). “Yeni Bölgecilik Akımı ve Bölgesel Kalkınma Ajansları”, 8
17. Kasım Dünya Şehircilik Günü 29. Kollokyumu Planlamada Yeni Politika ve Stratejiler 25-35
18. ESDP Action Programme (1999). European Co-Operatıon in Spatıal
19. Plannıng 2000-2005, Final Version 22.9.99 http://www.espon.lu/online/documentation/objective/links/1701/esdp_action_ programme.pdf(12.10.2005).
20. European Comission (1999a). ESDP European Spatial Development
21. Perspective, Towards Balanced and Sustainable Development of the Territory of the European Union, http://europa.eu.int/comm/regional_policy/sources/docoffic/official/reports/p df/sum_en.pdf (12.10.2005)
22. European Comission (1999b). Final Conclusions issued by the German
23. Presidency at The Close of the Informal Council of EU Ministers Rresponsible for Spatial Planning, Potsdam on 10-11 May 1999 http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docoffic/official/reports/pdf/concl _en.pdf (12.10.2005).
24. European Comission (2000). TERRA- An Experimental Labaratory in Spatial
25. Planning, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg http://europa.eu.int/comm/regional_policy/innovation/innovating/terra/exppla n/terrac.pdf (12.10.2005).
26. Faludi, A. (2002). “Positioning European Spatial Planning”, European Planning Studies, 10: 897-909.
27. Faludi, A. (2004). “Spatial Planning Traditions in Europe: Their Role in the ESDP Process”, International Planning Studies, 9: 155172.
28. Friedmann, J. (2005). “Globalization and The Emerging Culture of Planning”,
29. Progress in Planning, 64: 183-234. Gezici, F. ve Ervin, S. (2005). “Sınır Bölgelerinin Gelişiminde Fırsatlar ve Tehditler”, 8 Kasım Dünya Şehircilik Günü 29. Kollokyumu
30. Planlamada Yeni Politika ve Stratejiler, 45-57, Cenkler matbaası, ;İstanbul. Goldsmith, Martha V. (2004). Spatial Planning for Future Development in the European Union, ULI Land Use Policy Forum Report, Urban Land Institute, Washington.
31. Governa, F. ve Salone, C. (2005). “Italy and European Spatial Policies:
32. Polycentrism, Urban Networks and Local Innovation Practices”, European Planning Studies, 13: 265-283. Harrison, Christopher E. (2002). “European Spatial Plannig: Unity or Difference? A Comparable Review of Countries within the North Sea
33. Region”, Dr R.H. Williams Travel Award for European Planning Studies 2002, University of Newcastle, http://www.ncl.ac.uk/guru/newsitems/RHW%20STUDY.pdf (02005).
34. Kalkınma Ajanslarının Kuruluşu, Koordinasyonu ve Görevleri Hakkında Kanun, Kanun No: 5449, kabul tarihi 25.01.2006
35. Kılıç, S. E. (2005). “AB'ye Giriş Sürecinde Türkiye'de Planlama Hiyerarşisi
36. Açısından Bölge Yönetimleri”, 8 Kasım Dünya Şehircilik Günü 29. Kolokyumu Planlamada Yeni Politika ve Stratejiler, 3-12, Cenkler matbaası, İstanbul. Newman, P. ve Thorney, A. (1996). Urban Planning in Europe, London: Routledge.
37. Northern Periphery Programme (2005) Datasheet 6: European Spatial
38. Development Perspective, http://www.northernperiphery.net/managers/Library%5CDatasheets%5C06% 20DATASHEET%206%20European%20Spatial%20Development%20Perspe ctive.pdf (09.11.2005).
39. Pedrazzini, L. (2005). “Applying the ESDP Through Interreg IIIB: A
40. Southern Perspective”, European Planning Studies 13: 297-317. Richardson, T. ve Jensen, O.B. (2000), “Discourses of Mobility and Polycentric Development: A Contested View of European Spatial Planning”,
41. European Planning Studies, 8: 503-520. Rivolin, J.R. ve Faludi, A. (2005). “The Hidden Face of European Spatial
42. Planning: Innovations in Governance”, European Planning Studies, (13) 2, 195-2
43. Royal Town Planning Institute (RTPI) (2001). A New Vision for Planning, http://www.rtpi.org.uk/about-the-rtpi/vision.pdf (12.10.2005).
44. Shaw, D. ve Sykes, O. (2004). “The Concept of Policentricity in European
45. Spatial Planning: Reflections on its Interpretation and Applicationin the Practice of Spatial Planning”, International Planning Studies, 9: 283-306. Shehrin, P. K. (2005) “AB Bölgesel Kalkınma Programlarının Türkiye'deki
46. Sektörel Öncelikleri ve Uygulama Alanları “,8 Kasım Dünya Şehircilik Günü Kollokyumu Planlamada yeni Politika ve Stratejiler, 19-24. Tewdwr-Jones, M. ve Williams, R.H. (2001). European Dimension of British
47. Planning, Spon Press, London. TMMOB Şehir Plancıları Odası (2005) “TMMOB Şehir Plancıları Odasının
48. “Planlama ve İmar Kanunu” Tasarısı Taslağı” Hakkında Görüş ve Önerileri”, http://www.spo.org.tr/html2 (20.04.2006).
49. Walsh, J. (2005) “Spatial Development of Europe's North Western Periphery”
50. Position Paper Prepared By Professor Jim Walsh For Espon Seminar Queen's University, Belfast, February 22-23. Wiebusch, M. (2004). “On the Road to a European Planning System” http://www.ceu-ectp.org/inc/cgi/dd/dd20041125.pdf (28.11.2005).
51. Wikipedia (2007). Spatial Planning, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spatial_Planning (19.04.2007).
52. Williams, R. H. (1999). “Constructing the European Spatial Development
53. Perspective: Consensus without a Competence”, Regional Studies, 33: 793- 7