RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MANAGERS’ POWER SOURCES AND EMPLOYEES’ SENSE OF TRUST TO ORGANIZATION

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the relationship between managers’ power source and employees’ sense of trust to organization. Correlational survey model was used in the study. Data has been collected from employees’ working in different organizations, public and private sector in İstanbul (N=152) by “Organizational Power Scale in Schools” and “Organization Oriented Trust Scale”. Data was analyzed by SPSS 21.0 software programme. Pearson Correlation Analyze was used to examine the data testing in order to determine the correlation between employees’ power sources perception from manager and sense of trust to organization and the relation between power and trust dimensions

Keywords

• Employee, power, trust, organization

YÖNETİCİNİN GÜÇ KAYNAĞI İLE ÇALIŞANLARIN ÖRGÜTE DUYDUĞU GÜVEN ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ

Abstract

Bu araştırmanın amacı; yöneticinin kullandığı güç kaynağı ile çalışanların örgüte duydukları güven arasındaki ilişkiyi belirlemektir. Araştırmada ilişkisel tarama yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın örneklemini İstanbul ilinde bulunan farklı örgütlerde kamu ve özel sektörde çalışanlar oluşturmuştur (N=152).  Verilen toplanmasında, örneklem grubuna “Okullarda Örgütsel Güç Ölçeği” ve “Kuruma Güven Anketi” uygulanmıştır. Veriler SPSS 21.0 programıyla analiz edilmiştir.  Çalışanların yöneticiden algıladıkları güç kaynakları ile örgüte duydukları güven boyutları arasında ilişkileri belirlemek amacıyla Pearson Korelasyon Analizi’nden yararlanılmış ve güç ve güven boyutları arasında ilişkiler belirlenmiştir.

Keywords

• Çalışan, güç, güven, örgüt

References

1. Algoe, S.B. (2012). Find, remind and bind: The functions of gratitude in everyday relationship. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6, 455-469.
2. Allen, R. W., Madison, D. L., Porter, L. W., Renwick, P. A., Mayes, B. T. (1979). Organizational politics-tactics and characteristics of its actors. California Management Review, 22(1), 77-83.
3. Altınkurt, Y. ve Yılmaz, K. (2013). Okullarda örgütsel güç ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. E-Uluslararası
4. Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(4), 1-17. Bağcı, Z. ve Bursalı, Y.M. (2011). Yöneticilerin güç kaynaklarının çalışanların örgüte bağlılıkları üzerine etkisi: Çalışanların algılamalarına bağımlı akademik bir inceleme. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9, 9-21.
5. Bess, J.L. and Dee, J.R. (2012). Understanding college and university organization: Theories for effective policy and practice (2 vol). Sterling VA: Stylus Publishing.
6. Burns, T. and Stalker, G.M. (1961). The management of innovation. London: Tavistock Publication.
7. Butler, J. K. and Cantrell, R. S. (1984). A behavioral decision theory approach to modeling dyadic trust in superiors and subordinates. Psychological Reports, 55, 19-28.
8. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2011). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

9. Cameron, K.S. (2013). “Advances in positive organizational scholarship”. A.B. Bakker (Edi.), Advances in Positive Organizational
10. Psychology (p.23-44). UK: Emerald Group Publishing. Coburn, C. and Russell, J. (2008). District policy and teachers’ social networks. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30(3), 203-2
11. Colquitt, B. A. Scott, and J. A. LePine (2007). Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: A Meta-nnalytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 909–927.
12. Coleman, J.S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harward University Press.
13. Dahl, Robert A. (1969). “The Concept of Power”. R. Bell, D.V. Edwards and R.H. Wagner (Eds.), Political Power: A Reader in
14. Thoery and Research (p.80). New York: The Free Press. Deci, E.L, Connell, J.P. and Ryan, R.M. (1989). Self determination in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74 (4), 580-590.
15. Deutsch, M. (1958). Trust and suspicion. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2, 265–279.
16. Dunn, J. and Schwetzer, M. (2005). Feeling and believing: The influnce of emotion in trust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 736-748.
17. Durukan, S., Akyürek, Ç. ve Coşkun, E. (2010). Hacettepe erişkin hastanesinde çalışan hemşirelerin örgütsel güven, güçlendirme ve bağlılık düzeylerinin belirlenmesi. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 15(3), 411-434.
18. Dutton, J. E. and Ragins, B. R. (Eds.). (2006). Exploring positive relationships at work: Building a theoretical and research foundation, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19. Fairholm, G.W. (1994). Trust in top management and immediate supervisor. Communication Quarterly, 49(4), 382-398.
20. Fox, A. (1974). Beyond contract: Work, power and trust relations. London: Faber and Faber.
21. French, J. and Raven, B. H. (1959). “The bases of social power”. D. Cartwright (Edi.), Studies of Social Power (p.150-167). Ann
22. Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research. İslamoğlu, G., Birsel, M. ve Börü, D. (2007). Etik ve Güven. S. Tevrüz (Edi.). İstanbul: Beta Basım A.Ş.
23. Johnson, Jean L., Harold F. Koenig, and James R. Brown (1985). "The bases of marketing channel power: An exploration and confirmation of their underlying dimensions”, Robert F. Luschet (Edi.), AMA Educators' Proceedings (p.160-165). Chicago:
24. American Marketing Association. Karasar, (2002). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
25. Kırel, Ç. (1998). Örgütlerde güç kullanımı. Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi İ.İ.B.F. Yayınları, No:113.
26. Koçel, T. (2007). İşletme yöneticiliği. İstanbul: Arıkan Basım Yayın Dağıtım.
27. Konovsky, M.A. and Pugh, S.D. (1994). Perveived fairness of employee drug testing as a predictor of employee attitudes and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 698-707.
28. Lasswell, H.D. and Kaplan, A. (1950). Power and Society: A framework for political inquiry. New Haven: Yale University Press.
29. McKnight, D. H., Cummings, L. L., ve Chervany, N. L. (1998). Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 23, 473– 490
30. Mintzberg, H. (1983). Power and around organizations. NJ: Prentice Hall.
31. Orhunbilge, N. (2000). Örnekleme yöntemleri ve hipotez testleri. İstanbul: Avcıol Basım Yayın.
32. Petty, R. E., and Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. NY: Springer-Verlag.
33. Pfeffer, J. and Salancik G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York: Harper and Row.
34. Pfeffer, J. (1992). Managing with power. Boston: Harward Business Scholl Press.
35. Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
36. Rahim, M. A. (1989). Relationships of leader power to compliance and satisfaction with supervision: Evidence from a national sample of managers. Journal of Management, 15(4), 545-556.
37. Raven, B. H. (1965). “Social influence and power”. I. D. Steiner and M. Fishbein (Eds.), Readings in contemporary social psychology (p.371-382). New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
38. Raven, B. H. (1993). The bases of power: Origins and recent developments. Journal of Social Issues, 49(4), 227-251.
39. Raven, B.H., Shwarzwald, J. and Koslovsky, M. (2006). Conceptualizing and Measuring a Power Interaction Model of Interpersonal
40. Influence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(4), 307-332. Robins, S.P and Judge, T.A. (2013). Organizational behaviour. NJ: Prentice Hall Inc.
41. Scott, J. (1991). Social network analysis. London: Sage.
42. Stander, M.W. and Rothmann, S. (2010). Psychological empowerment, job security and employee engagement. SA Journal of
43. Industrial Psychology, 36(1), 1-8. Tan, H.H. ve Tan, C.S. (2000). Toward the differentiation of trust in supervisor and trust in organization.
44. Genetic, Social and General Psychology Monographs, 126, 241-260. Ünsal, P. (2004). Örgütsel ortamlarda güven algısı. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 7(14), 23-48.
45. Yukl, G., and Falbe, C. M. (1991). Importance of different power sources in downward and lateral relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 416-423.
46. Yukl, G., and Tracy, J. B. (1992). Consequences of influence bases used with subordinates, peers, and the boss. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 525-535.
47. Weber, M. (1968). Economy and Society: An outline of interpretive sociology. New York: Bedminster Press.