Kişilik Özelliklerinin Gönüllü Sadelik Bağlamında Sürdürülebilir Satın Alma Davranışına Etkisi

Year 2025, Issue: 86, 313 - 334, 25.10.2025

Emine Pınar Saygın

Abstract

Tüketim yalnızca ihtiyaç temelli bir faaliyet olmaktan çıkıp, bireylerin kişiliklerini ortaya koyan sosyal bir olguya dönüşmüştür. Bu bağlamda, kişilik özelliklerinin tüketim tercihlerine yön verici bir rol oynadığı düşünülmektedir. Dünyadaki kıt kaynakların insanlığı sürdürülebilir tüketime doğru ittiği bu dönemde, yapılan her çalışmanın kıymetli olduğu düşünülmektedir. Araştırmada, gönüllü sadelik; alışverişte temkinli tutumlar, kendi kendine yeterliliği kabul etme, gönüllü sade yaşam arzusu gibi değerlerle ilişkilendirilmiştir. Kişilik özellikleri ise bireylerin bu değerlere ne ölçüde yakınlık gösterdiğini belirlemede temel bir değişken olarak ele alınmıştır. Çalışmanın odak noktası kişilik özelliklerinin, gönüllü sadelik üzerinden sürdürülebilir satın alma niyet ve davranışına etkisini ortaya koymaya çalışmasıdır. Sonuçlar, sürdürülebilir satın alma davranışının en güçlü yordayıcısının, bireylerin sürdürülebilir satın alma niyeti olduğu belirlenmiştir. Sürdürülebilir satın alma niyetini; temkinli alışveriş tutumları, öz yeterlilik inancı ve sade yaşam arzusu anlamlı düzeyde etkilemektedir. Bu yapıların temelinde ise genellikle sorumluluk ve uyumluluk gibi kişilik boyutları yer almaktadır. Buna karşılık, dışa dönüklük, deneyime açıklık ve duygusal dengesizlik (nevrotiklik) gibi kişilik özelliklerinin bu süreç üzerindeki etkileri daha sınırlı kalmıştır. Elde edilen bulgular, sürdürülebilir tüketim davranışlarının kişilik özellikleri çerçevesinde çok boyutlu biçimde değerlendirilebileceğini göstermektedir.

Keywords

Tüketici davranışı , Gönüllü sadelik , Kişilik özellikleri , Sürdürülebilir satın alma

Ethical Statement

Kütahya Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal ve Beşerî Bilimler Yayın Etiği Kurulu’ndan 02.06.2025-228 tarih ve sayılı yazılı izin alınmıştır

The Effect of Personality Traits on Sustainable Purchase Behavior in the Context of Voluntary Simplicity

Abstract

Consumption has evolved from being a purely need-based activity into a social phenomenon through which individuals express their personalities. In this context, personality traits are considered to play a pivotal role in shaping consumer preferences. In an era where the scarcity of global resources is compelling societies toward sustainable consumption, research in this area is regarded as increasingly valuable. In this study, voluntary simplicity is conceptualized in relation to values such as cautious purchasing attitudes, the acceptance of self-sufficiency, and the aspiration for a voluntarily simple lifestyle. Personality traits are treated as a fundamental variable in determining the degree to which individuals adopt these values. The central aim of the research is to examine the influence of personality traits on sustainable purchase intention and behavior, mediated through voluntary simplicity.The findings indicate that the most significant predictor of sustainable purchasing behavior is individuals’ intention to engage in sustainable purchasing. This intention is meaningfully influenced by cautious shopping tendencies, a belief in self-efficacy, and the desire for a simple life. These constructs are primarily underpinned by personality dimensions such as conscientiousness and agreeableness. Conversely, traits such as extraversion, openness to experience, and neuroticism appear to have a more limited impact on this process. The findings show that sustainable consumption behaviors can be evaluated multidimensionally within the framework of personality traits.

Keywords

Consumer behavior , Voluntary simplicity , Personality traits , Sustainable purchasing

Ethical Statement

For this publication, written permission was obtained from Kütahya Dumlupınar University Social and Human Sciences Publication Ethics Committee, dated 02.06.2025 and numbered 228.

References

• Aaker, J. L. (1997). Dimensions of brand personality. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(3), 347–356.
• Allport, G. W., & Odbert, H. S. (1936). Trait-names: A psycho-lexical study. Psychological monographs, 47(1), i.
• Archimi, C. S., Reynaud, E., Yasin, H. M. & Bhatti, Z. A. (2018). How perceived corporate social responsibility affects employee cynicism: The mediating role of organizational trust. Journal of Business Ethics, 151(4), 907-921.
• Argan, M., Argan Tokay, M., & Sevim, N. (2012). Tükenmeden tükettiren yaşam tarzı: gönüllü sadelik. 17. Ulusal Pazarlama Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı içinde (ss. 201-220), Balıkesir.
• Arifin, W. N. (2015). The graphical assessment of multivariate normality using SPSS. Education in Medicine Journal, 7(2), 71-75.
• Awais, M., Samin, T., Gulzar, M. A., Hwang, J., & Zubair, M. (2020). Unfolding the Association between the big five, frugality, e-mavenism, and sustainable consumption behavior. Sustainability, 12(2), 490.
• Ballantine, P. W., & Creery, S. (2010). The consumption and dispositionbehaviour of voluntary simplifiers. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 9(1), 45–56
• Batı, U. (2018). Tüketici davranışları: tüketim kültürü, psikolojisi ve sosyolojisi üzerine şeytanın notları. Alfa.
• Benet-Martinez, V., John, O.P. (1998). Los Cinco Gran des Across Cultures and Ethnic Groups: Multitrait Multimethod Analyses of the Big Five in Spanish and English. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(3), 729-750.
• Bosnjak, M., Galesic, M., & Tuten, T. (2007). Personality determinants of online shopping: Explaining online purchase intentions using a hierarchical approach. Journal of Business Research, 60(6), 597-605.
• Chang, H. H. (2021). Exploring consumer behavioral predispositions toward voluntary simplicity. Current Psychology, 40, 731-743.
• Craig‐Lees, M., & Hill, C. (2002). Understanding Voluntary Simplifiers. Psychology & Marketing, 19(2), 187–210.
• Costa Jr, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). The five-factor model of personality and its relevance to personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 6(4), 343-359.
• DeRiA. (2020). Environmental Education Playbook for Educators. Malaysia: DeRiA.
• Duong, C. D. (2022). Big Five personality traits and green consumption: bridging the attitude-intention-behavior gap. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 34(6), 1123-1144.
• Elgin, D., & Mitchell, A. (1977a). Voluntary simplicity. The Co-Evolution Quarterly, 3, 1-40.
• Elgin, D., & Mitchell, A. (1977b). Voluntary simplicity. Planning Review, 5(6), 13-15.
• Etzioni, A. (1998). Discussion. Journal of Economic Psychology, 19(5), 619-643. doi: 10.1016/S0167-4870(98)00021-X
• Fabrigar, L., Wegener, D., MacCallum, R., & Strahan, E. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272-299.
• Fatoki, O. (2020). Personality traits and green purchasing behaviour of young consumers. Journal of Management Information and Decision Sciences, 23(S1), 354-361.
• Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”: The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1216–1229.
• Gregg, R. B. (1936). The Value of Voluntary Simplicity. Pendle Hill: Wallingford, PA.
• Gregg, R. B. (1936). The value of voluntary simplicity. Visva-Bharati Quarterly, 2(1), 1-8.
• Gürbüz, S., & Şahin, F. (2018). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri, Felsefe-Yöntem-Analiz (5. Baskı). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• Habashi, M. M., Graziano, W. G., & Hoover, A. E. (2016). Searching for the prosocial personality: A big five approach to linking personality and prosocial behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(9), 1177-1192.
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis. China: Cengage.
• Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
• Hammond, K. R. (1996). Human Judgment and Social Policy: Irreducible Uncertainty, Inevitable Error, Unavoidable Injustice. Oxford University Press.
• Hammond, M. S. (2001). The use of the five-factor model of personality as a therapeutic tool in career counseling. Journal of Career Development, 27, 153-165.
• Hanseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135.
• Hassenzahl, D. M., Hager, M. C., & Berg, L. R. (2017). Visualizing environmental science (5th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
• Hirsh, J. B., Kang, S. K., ve Bodenhausen, G. V. (2012). Personalized persuasion: Tailoring persuasive appeals to recipients’ personality traits. Psychological Science, 23(6), 578-581.
• Hoffmann, S.,&Lee, M. S. W. (2016). Consume less and be happy? Consume less to be happy! Journal of Consumer Affairs, 50(1), 3–17.
• Hu, L.,&Bentler, P. (1999). Cut off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.
• Huneke, M. E. (2005). The Face of the Un‐Consumer: An Empirical Examination of The Practice of Voluntary Simplicity in The United States. Psychology&Marketing, 22(7), 527-550.
• Hüttel, A., Balderjahn, I.,&Hoffmann, S. (2020). Welfare beyond consumption: The benefits of having less. Ecological Economics, 176, 106719.
• Iwata, O. (2006). An evaluation of consumerism and lifestyle as correlates of a voluntary simplicity lifestyle. Social Behavior and Personality: an International Journal, 34(5), 557-568.
• John, O. P.,&Srivastava, S. (1999). The big-five trait taxonomy: history, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. Handbook of personality: Theory and research içinde (C. 2, ss. 102–138).
• Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Ilies, R.,&Gerhardt, M. W. (2002). Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 765–780.
• Kalaycı, Ş. (2017). SPSS uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri. Ankara: Dinamik Akademi Yayın Dağıtım.
• Komarraju, M., Karau, S. J.,&Schmeck, R. R. (2011). The Big Five personality traits, learning styles, and academic achievement. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(4), 472-477.
• Koo, D. M.,&Ju, S. H. (2010). The interactional effects of atmospherics and perceptual curiosity on emotions and online shopping intention. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(3), 377-384.
• Kosinski, M., Stillwell, D.,&Graepel, T. (2013). Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(15), 5802-5805.
• Köroğlu, A., Asmadili, V. U.,&Asmadili, İ. (2022). Termal turizm amaçlı seyahat eden turistlerin sürdürülebilir turizm algıları ve gönüllü sade yaşam tarzları arasındaki ilişkinin belirlenmesi: Pamukkale örneği. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 53, 313-325.
• Köysüren, T.,&Şener, E. (2024). Gönüllü sadelik ve minimalizmin sürdürülebilir satın alma davranışı üzerindeki etkisinde sürdürülebilir çevresel bilincin aracı rolü. Pazarlama ve Pazarlama Araştırmaları Dergisi, 17(3), 703-734.
• Kumar, B., Manrai, A. K.,&Manrai, L. A. (2017). Purchasing behaviour for environmentally sustainable products: A conceptual framework and empirical study. Journal of retailing and consumer services, 34, 1-9.
• Le Hai, D.,&Larionow, P. (2022). Towards Pro-enviromental Psychology and Education: Personality Traits and Sociodemographic Correlates of Enviromental Identity and Voluntary Simplicity. Lubelski Rocznik Pedagogiczny, 41(4), 53–76
• Malhotra, N. K., Kim, S. S.,&Patil, A. (2006). Common method variance in IS research: comparison of alternative approaches and a reanalysis of past research. Management Science, 52(12), 1865–1883.
• McDonald, S., Oates, C. J., Young, C. W.,&Hwang, K. (2006). Towardsustainable consumption: Researching voluntary simplifiers.Psychology & Marketing, 23(6), 515–534
• Mowen, J. C. (2000). The 3M Model of Motivation and Personality: Theory and Empirical Applications to Consumer Behavior. Springer Science&Business Media.
• Nolen, T. P.&Clawson, B. (1995). Choosing Voluntary Simplicity as a Lifestyle, Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences Education, 13(2),
• Odabaşı, Y. (2019). Gönüllü sadelik ya da zorunlu sadelik. Eskişehir Ticaret Odası Dergisi, 36(123), 62-64.
• Özgül, E. (2011). Tüketicilerin sosyo-demografik özelliklerinin hedonik tüketim ve gönüllü sade yaşam tarzları açısından değerlendirilmesi. Ege Akademik Bakış, 11(1), 25-38.
• Özhan, Ş.,&Akkaya, D. T. (2018). Kişilik özelliklerinin kompülsif satın alma eğilimi üzerindeki etkisi. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 18(4), 101-116.
• Pallant, J. (2011). SPSS survival manual: A step-by-step guide to data analysis using SPSS (4th ed.). New York: Open University Press.
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y.,&Nathan, P. P. (2003). Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.
• Rebouças, R.,&Soares, A. M. (2021). Voluntary simplicity: A literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 45(3), 303-319.
• Rich, S. A., Wright, B. J.,&Bennett, P. C. (2019). Development of thevoluntary simplicity engagement scale: Measuring low-consumptionlifestyles. Journal of Consumer Policy, 43(2), 295–313
• Roberts, B. W., Jackson, J. J., Fayard, J. V., Edmonds, G.,&Meints, J. (2009). Conscientiousness. Handbook of Individual Differences in Social Behavior içinde (ss. 369–381). The Guilford Press.
• Saygılı, M.,&Bil, E. (2017). The investigation of voluntary simplicity lifestyle from the point of personality characteristics: a research on clothing (garments and shoes) product group. Journal of Life Economics, 4(4), 239-260.
• Shama, A. (1985). The Voluntary simplicity consumer. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 2(4), 57–63.
• Tabachnick, B.,&Fidell, L. (2012). Using multivariate statistics (Global Edition). USA: Pearson.
• Taş, S. (2020). Tüketim karşıtı yaşam tarzları: freeganizm, gönüllü sadelik ve minimalizm. Toplum ve Kültür Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6, 38-64.
• Terracciano, A., Sutin, A. R., McCrae, R. R., vd. (2009). Facets of personality linked to underweight and overweight. Psychosomatic Medicine, 71(6), 682-689.
• Tupes, E. C.,&Christal, R. E. (1992). Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings. Journal of Personality, 60(2), 225-251.
• Tuten, T. L.,&Bosnjak, M. (2001). Understanding differences in web usage: The role of need for cognition and the five factor model of personality. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 29(4), 391-398.
• Watson, D.,&Clark, L. A. (1997). Extraversion and its positive emotional core. Handbook of Personality Psychology içinde (ss. 767–793). Academic Press.
• Widiger, T. A.,&Trull, T. J. (1992). Personality and psychopathology: an application of the five‐factor model. Journal of Personality, 60(2), 363-393.
• Yemez, İ.,&Delice Akca, T. (2024). Yaşam Tarzının Sürdürülebilir Ürün Satın Alma Niyeti ve Sürdürülebilir Tüketim Davranışı Üzerindeki Etkisinin İncelenmesi. Alanya Akademik Bakış, 8(1), 282-299.
• Zaccaro, S. J. (2007). Trait-based perspectives of leadership. American Psychologist, 62(1), 6.