Research Article

Comparison Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms for Steel Plate Fault Detection

Volume: 10 Number: 3 July 31, 2022
EN TR

Comparison Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms for Steel Plate Fault Detection

Abstract

Metals are one of the most important building materials of modern times. Especially the production and metalworking process of flat metal sheets is very sensitive. Control of the manufacturing process affects not only the intermediate products but also the quality of final products. Early detection of defects on steel plate surfaces is an important task in industrial production. Process control and mistake detection have traditionally been done manually by experts. However, this method is not proper in terms of both time and cost. With the industrial revolution IR 4.0, machine learning (ML) techniques have been developed to solve fault detection problems in products. This study focuses on developing basic machine learning methods for the detection of six different error classes that may occur during production on steel surfaces. Five standard ML models: LD, KNN, DT, SVM, RF, and deep learning (DNN) model: one-dimensional DNN was developed for the classification problem. The UCI steel plate deformation data set was used as the experimental data set. Five performance criteria: Accuracy, Sensitivity, Specificity, Precision, and F1 value were used to determine the success of the methods. The success rates of LD, KNN, DT, SVM, RF and DNN classification methods were 90.136%, 91.7880%, 93.013%, 93.287%, 95.479%, 96.986%, respectively. The results show the significant impact of the machine learning approach on the steel plate fault diagnosis problem.

Keywords

References

  1. [1] S.M. Halawani, "A study of decision tree ensembles and feature selection for steel plates faults detection", International Journal of Technical Research and Applications, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 127–131, 2014.
  2. [2] K. Rajan, "Materials informatics". Materials Today, vol. 8, no.10, pp. 38–45, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-7021(05)71123-8
  3. [3] A. Kelly, K.M. Knowles, "Crystallography and crystal defects: second edition", John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., ISBN:9780470750155, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119961468
  4. [4] A. Abdullahi, N.A. Samsudin, M.R. Ibrahim, M.S. Aripin, S.K.A. Khalid, Z.A. Othman, "Towards IR4.0 implementation in e-manufacturing: Artificial intelligence application in steel plate fault detection", Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, vol.20, no.1, pp. 430–436, 2020. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v20.i1.pp430-436
  5. [5] T. Nkonyana, Y. Sun, B. Twala, E. Dogo, "Performance evaluation of data mining techniques in steel manufacturing industry", Procedia Manufacturing, vol. 35, pp. 623–628, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.004
  6. [6] S. Nasiri, M.R. Khosravani, K. Weinberg, "Fracture mechanics and mechanical fault detection by artificial intelligence methods: A review", Engineering Failure Analysis, vol. 81, pp. 270–293, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.07.011
  7. [7] Z. Wang, W. Yang, H. Zhang, Y. Zheng, "SPA-based modified local reachability density ratio wSVDD for nonlinear multimode process monitoring", Complexity, vol. 2021, pp.1–15, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5517062
  8. [8] A. Schumacher, T. Nemeth, W. Sihn, "Roadmapping towards industrial digitalization based on an Industry 4.0 maturity model for manufacturing enterprises". Procedia CIRP, vol. 79, pp. 409–414, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.02.110

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Engineering

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

July 31, 2022

Submission Date

January 16, 2022

Acceptance Date

April 20, 2022

Published in Issue

Year 2022 Volume: 10 Number: 3

APA
Taşar, B. (2022). Comparison Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms for Steel Plate Fault Detection. Duzce University Journal of Science and Technology, 10(3), 1578-1588. https://doi.org/10.29130/dubited.1058467
AMA
1.Taşar B. Comparison Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms for Steel Plate Fault Detection. DUBİTED. 2022;10(3):1578-1588. doi:10.29130/dubited.1058467
Chicago
Taşar, Beyda. 2022. “Comparison Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms for Steel Plate Fault Detection”. Duzce University Journal of Science and Technology 10 (3): 1578-88. https://doi.org/10.29130/dubited.1058467.
EndNote
Taşar B (July 1, 2022) Comparison Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms for Steel Plate Fault Detection. Duzce University Journal of Science and Technology 10 3 1578–1588.
IEEE
[1]B. Taşar, “Comparison Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms for Steel Plate Fault Detection”, DUBİTED, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 1578–1588, July 2022, doi: 10.29130/dubited.1058467.
ISNAD
Taşar, Beyda. “Comparison Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms for Steel Plate Fault Detection”. Duzce University Journal of Science and Technology 10/3 (July 1, 2022): 1578-1588. https://doi.org/10.29130/dubited.1058467.
JAMA
1.Taşar B. Comparison Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms for Steel Plate Fault Detection. DUBİTED. 2022;10:1578–1588.
MLA
Taşar, Beyda. “Comparison Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms for Steel Plate Fault Detection”. Duzce University Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 10, no. 3, July 2022, pp. 1578-8, doi:10.29130/dubited.1058467.
Vancouver
1.Beyda Taşar. Comparison Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms for Steel Plate Fault Detection. DUBİTED. 2022 Jul. 1;10(3):1578-8. doi:10.29130/dubited.1058467

Cited By