İnşaatta Sıfır Atığa Doğru:Yeşil Bina Sertifika Sistemleriyle Vaka Analizi

Year 2020, , 875 - 888, 15.06.2020

Duygu Erten

https://doi.org/10.24012/dumf.650228

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Dünyanın
birçok ülkesinde mesela Türkiye’de,  binalar, gökdelenler, barajlar, köprüler, kanallar,
boru hatları, su kanalları ve yollar gibi devasa inşaat mühendisliği yapıları
bulunmaktadır.  Bu yapıların hepsinin
inşaatlarından çıkan atıkları çevre dostu yöntemlerle sürdürülebilirlik adına ekonomik,
sosyal ve çevresel parametreleri gözönüne alarak bertaraf etmek gerekmektedir.  Yapı malzemelerinin ham maddelerinin ne olduğu,
kullanımları ve yıkımlarında,  minimum
atık çıkarma adına son ürünlerin tekrar kullanılma potansiyeli olması
gerektiğinden özel bir dikkat gerektirir. Ardışık kaynakların lineer süreçleri,
kullanımları ve katı atık sahalarının planlanması  mahalleler ve ülkeler ölçeğinde özellikle yerel
belediyeler ve şirketler tarafından uygulanan en kolay çözüm alternatifidir. Atığın
kullanımı ve katı atık arazilerine gömülmesi arasında marjinal bir fark vardır,
bu da katı atık sahalarına tekrar kullanılma potansiyeli olan atık gömülmüştür.
Son on yılda, katı atık sahalarına gönderilecek ve tekrar kullanılma
potansiyeli olan malzemeleri sıfır atık (SA) hedefi kapsamında değerlendirmek
için,  geniş çapta görünürlüğü olan döngüsel
atık kullanma programları ortaya konmaktadır. Ekstra ekonomik dönüşüm için uygulama
kaynakları ve olanakları  ile yıkım atıklarının
ticarileştirilmesi trendi,  Türkiye
inşaat sektöründe de yerini bulması için ortaya konmuştur.  Bu araştırma, inşaat sektöründe  İnşaat Atık ve Yönetim Planları kullanarak, SA
yol haritaları çıkarmak isteyen politika yapıcılar ve karar vericiler için
faydalı olabilir.

Keywords

Sıfır Atık, İnşaat, Yıkım, sertifikasyon

Supporting Institution

ISTANBUL MEDİPOL ÜNİVERSİTESİ

Thanks

Pilot Projelerin verilerini veren 11 firmaya teşekkür ederim.

Towards Zero Waste in Construction: A Case Study Using Green Building Certification Systems

Abstract

In many countries of the world like Turkey there are extensive civil engineering constructions in the forms of buildings, skyscrapers, dams, bridges, canals, culverts, pipes and roads. Each one of these activities lead to wastages that need to be dealt with ecosystem friendly coupled with economic, social and environmental sustainability purposes. Construction materials from the resources through their usages and demolishment need special attention for end-product as minimum as wastage generation after reuse possibilities. The linear process of successive resources, usages and landfill end planning is the simplest alternative, which has been applied so far in any country or society, especially, by local governments and companies. Although, between usage and the landfill are interstate reuse benefits, but they are marginal, because the landfills bury large amounts of reuse benefits. Since almost ten years, circular waste treatment programs came into view with extensive consideration, which prior to landfill extracts demolishment materials as much as possible for reuse with the aim of zero waste (ZW). The application sources and possibilities of this trend is exposed for Turkish construction circles with the commercialization of more demolished materials for extra economic return. Thus, this study can be useful to policy and decision makers in developing the ZW guidelines in construction sector by using Site Waste Management Plans (SWMP)s.

Keywords

Zero Waste, Construction, Demolition, Certification

References

• 1. Kaza, S., Yao, Lisa C., Bhada-Tata, P., Van Woerden, F., (2018). What a Waste 2.0: A Global Snapshot of Solid Waste Management to 2050, doi: 10.1596/978-1-4648-1329-0. Washington, DC, World Bank.
• 2. Tchobanoglous, G. and Kreith, F. (2002) Handbook of Solid Waste Management. McGraw-Hill, New York.
• 3. UK Technology Strategy Board Report, 2016, Print ISBN 9781474134378.
• 4. Ameh O.J., Itodo E.D. (2013). Professionals’ views of material wastage on construction sites and cost overruns, Org. Technol. Manage. Constr.: Int. J., 5 (1), pp. 747-757.
• 5. Mcdonald, B., & Smithers, M. (1998). Implementing a waste management plan during the construction phase of a project: A case study. Construction Management & Economics, 16 (1), 71-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/014461998372600.
• 6. EESI, (2014). How Better Recycling Can Minimize Waste and Boost the Economy, Environmental and Energy Study Institute, Washington DC.
• 7. Ekanayake L.L. Ofori , G. , (2004). Building waste assessment score: design-based tool, Build. Environ., 39 (7), pp. 851-861.
• 8. BRE, Available on URL https://www.bregroup.com/products/breeam/ (Accessed on 5.5.2019).
• 9. Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives.
• Available on URL: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2008/98/oj (Accessed on 10.2.2019).
• 10. L. Jaillon, C.S. Poon, Life cycle design and prefabrication in buildings: a review and case studies in Hong Kong, Autom. Con Struct., 39 (2014), pp. 195, 202, 10.1016/j.autcon.2013.09.006.
• 11. European Commission (EC), 2015b, Closing the Loop - an EU Action Plan for the Circular Economy. Communication from the EC to the EU Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, EC, Brussels.
• 12. European Commission, 2018a, European CommissionCircular Economy Package, Available on URL: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/circular-economy/index_en.htm (Accessed on 3.10.2019).
• 13. Masudi, A. F., Hassan, Ch. R. Ch., Mahmood, N. Z., Mokhtar, S. N., Sulaiman, N. M. (2011). “Construction waste quantification and benchmarking: A study in Klang Valley, Malaysia” Journal of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Vol. 5, pp. 909-916.
• 14. Bergstal H., Bohne, R.E., Brattebø, H., (2007). Projection of construction and demolition waste in Norway. J. Ind. Ecol. 11 (3).
• 15. Monier V., Hestin, M., Trarieux, M., Mimid, S., Domrose, L., Van Acoleyen, M., Hjerp, P., Mudgal, S., 2011. Study on the Management of Construction and Demolition Waste in the EU. Contract 07.0307/2009/540863/SER/G2, Final report for the European Commission (DG Environment).
• 16. Rogier H., Kök N., Pogue D. (2018). International Green Building Adoption Index: A report by prepared by CBRE.
• 17. Ellen MacArthur Foundation (EMF) and Fung Global Institute (FGI), (2014). Towards a Circular Economy in Asia: Issues and Opportunities. Hong Kong: Fung Global Institute.
• 18. Begum R.A, Siwar C., Pereira J. J., Jaafar A. H. (2007). Implementation of waste management and minimization in the construction industry of Malaysia, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Volume 51, Issue 1, Pages 190-202, ISSN 0921-3449.
• 19. TCA (2018). Analysis of Construction Sector of Turkey. A report prepared by Turkish Contractors Association, Ankara, Turkey.
• 20. Erten D., (2018). Cradle to Cradle: Waste, SD Journal, Volume: 45, April 78-81.
• 21. Esin T. and Cosgun N., (2007). A study conducted to reduce construction waste generation in Turkey., Building and Environment Vol. 42(4), pp. 1667-1674.
• 22. Flyvbjerg B. (2014). What you should Know about Megaprojects and Why: An Overview. Project Management Journal, Vol 45 (April/May), Number 2.
• 23. Law 6306, URL Available at: https://webdosya.csb.gov.tr/db/altyapi/icerikler/6306-sayili-kanun-20190927161544.pdf. (Accessed on 3.10.2019).
• 24. Kılıç Y., Kara M., Şahin A., Demir M., Özalp F., Yılmaz H. D., (2016). Urban Regeneration and Implementation Processes in Turkey, First International Congress on Urban Environment and Health, May 11-15.
• 25. MEF (2004). Regulation on control of excavation soil, construction and demolition waste. Ministry of Environment and Forestry. Issue of Official Gazette: 25406.
• 26. MEU (2018). National waste management action plan 2023. Ministry of Environment and Urbanization.
• 27. Ulubeyli, S., Kazaz A., Arslan V. (2017). Construction and demolition waste recycling plants revisited: management issues. Procedi Engineering. 172: 1190-1197.28. Thornback J. (2016). Circular Economy Thinking in Construction: A View from UK Manufacturers. Construction Products Association, London, UK. http://www.constructionproducts.org. uk/media/87907/cpa-circular-economy-thinking-the-role-ofmanufacturers-12-february-2016.pdf . (Accessed on 3.10.2019).
• 29. Thornback J. and Adams K. (2016). Knowledge Resource for Circular Economy Thinking in Construction. Green Construction Board, London, UK. URL Available at: http://www.greenconstructionboard. (Accessed on 3.10.2019).
• 30. Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2015). Towards a circular economy: Business rationale for an accelerated transition.
• 31. Adams K., Osmani M., Thorpe A. and Thornback J., (2017). Circular economy in construction: current awareness, callenges and enablers, ICE Proceedings.
• 32. Walsh, B., (2012). Construction & Demolition Sector, Module L2m5-1 in WR1403, Business Waste Prevention Evidence Review, London.
• 33. Zero Waste Alliance, URL available:URL Available at: http://zwia.org/zero-waste-definition/ (Accessed on 3.10.2019).
• 34. Elgizawy, S., El-Haggar, S. and Nassar, K. (2016). Approaching Sustainability of Construction and Demolition Waste Using Zero Waste Concept. Low Carbon Economy, 7, 1-11. doi: 10.4236/lce.2016.71001.
• 35. BREEAM, URL Available at: https://www.breeam.com/ (Accessed on 3.10.2019).
• 36. LEED, URL Available at: https://new.usgbc.org/leed (Accessed on 3.10.2019).
• 37. Smart Waste, URL Available at. http://www.smartwaste.co.uk/smartstart/about.jsp (Accessed on 1.1. 2019).
• 38. ICC-ES Program, URL Available at: https://icc-es.org/environmental-program/ (Accessed on 1.1. 2019).
• 39. International Green Construction Code (IGCC) URL Available at: https://www.iccsafe.org/products-and-services/i-codes/2018-i-codes/igcc/ (Accessed on 1.1. 2019).40. National Association of Homebuilders (NAHB) URL Available at: https://www.nahb.org/ (Accessed on 1.2.2019).
• 41. UK Regulations: URL Available at: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/2854/regulation/2/made, (Accessed on 2.2.2019).
• 42. EU Waste Catalogue, URL Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.C_.2018.124.01.0001.01.ENG&toc=OJ:C:2018:124:TOC (Accessed on 5.5.2019).
• 43. Wilks D.S., (1995). Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences, V59, Chapter 4, Pages 64-113, URL Available on: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0074-6142(06)80040-9, (Accessed on 6.5.2019).
• 44. Nsowah-Nuamah N. N. (2018). Theoretical Probability Distributions, A first Course in Probability Theory – Volume II, ISBN: 978-87-403-2194-4.