TÜRKİYE’DE HİZMETKÂR LİDERLİK ÜZERİNE YAZILAN LİSANSÜSTÜ TEZLERİN BİBLİYOMETRİK ANALİZİ (2008-2021)

Abstract

Bu araştırmanın amacı, hizmetkar liderlik konusunda yapılmış olan lisansüstü tezlerin bibliyometrik analiz ile incelenmesidir. Bu amaçla, Yükseköğretim Kurulu (YÖK) Ulusal Tez Merkezinde yer alan 2008-2021 yıllarına ait 89 tez analiz edilmiştir. Tezlerin yayınlandığı üniversite, yıl ve yayın dili, tezlerde kullanılan araştırma yöntemleri, hizmetkar liderlikle birlikte çalışılan değişkenler ve kullanılan hizmetkar liderlik ölçekleri tespit edilmiştir. Araştırma sonucunda, tezlerin 70 tanesinin yüksek lisans 19 tanesinin doktora tezi olduğu görülmektedir. 2017 (n= 12) ve 2019 yıllarının (n= 12) en fazla yüksek lisans tezinin; 2015 yılının en fazla doktora tezinin (n= 5) yayınlandığı yıllar olduğu anlaşılmaktadır. Tezlerin yayın dilinin ağırlıklı olarak Türkçe olduğu ve İşletme Ana Bilim Dalında yürütüldüğü bilinmektedir. Yüksek lisans tezleri kapsamında hizmetkar liderlikle birlikte en sık çalışılmış olan değişkenlerin demografik faktörler (n=15) ve örgütsel bağlılık (n= 11); doktora tezlerinde ise iş tatmini (n= 6) olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Yüksek lisans tezlerinin %90’ının doktora tezlerinin tamamının kullandığı yöntemin nicel yöntem olduğu anlaşılmaktadır. Nicel yöntemle hazırlanan yüksek lisans ve doktora tezlerinde araştırmacıların hizmetkar liderliği ölçmek için Van Dierendonck ve Nuijten (2011) tarafından geliştiren ölçeği kullandığı bilinmektedir. Hizmetkar liderlik konulu yüksek lisans ağırlıklı olarak kamu sektöründe (n= 32) ve doktora tezlerinin ağırlıklı olarak özel sektörde (n= 10) yürütülmüş olduğu görülmektedir.

Keywords

• Hizmetkâr Liderlik
• Lisansüstü Tezler
• Bibliyometrik Analiz
• Türkiye

BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF GRADUATE THESIS WRITTEN ON SERVANT LEADERSHIP IN TURKEY (2008-2021)

Abstract

The aim of this research is to examine the postgraduate theses on servant leadership by bibliometric analysis. For this purpose, 89 theses belonging to the years 2008-2021 in the National Thesis Center of the Council of Higher Education (YÖK) were analyzed. The university, year and publication language of the theses, the research methods used in the theses, the variables studied with the servant leadership and the servant leadership scales used were determined. As a result of the research, it is seen that 70 of the theses are master's theses and 19 of them are doctoral theses. In 2017 (n= 12) and 2019 (n= 12) the highest number of master's thesis; It is understood that 2015 was the year in which the most doctoral dissertations (n= 5) were published. It is known that the publication language of the theses is mainly Turkish and they are carried out in the Department of Business Administration. Within the scope of master's theses, the most frequently studied variables together with servant leadership were demographic factors (n=15) and organizational commitment (n= 11); it was determined that there was job satisfaction (n= 6) in doctoral theses. It is understood that the method used by 90% of the master's theses and all of the doctoral theses is the quantitative method. It is known that researchers use the scale developed by Van Dierendonck and Nuijten (2011), to measure servant leadership in master's and doctoral theses prepared with the quantitative method. It is seen that the master's degree on servant leadership was mainly carried out in the public sector (n= 32) and the doctoral theses were mainly carried out in the private sector (n= 10).

Keywords

• Servant Leadership
• Graduate Thesis
• Bibliometric Analysis
• Turkey

References

1. Andersen, J. (2008). The Writings of Robert K. Greenleaf: An Interpretive Analysis and the Future of Servant Leadership, Servant Leadership Research Roundtable, https://www.regent.edu/acad/global/publications/sl_proceedings/2008/anderson.pdf.
2. Bennis, W. (1989). On becoming a leader. Reading. MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company Inc.
3. Boyum, G. (2006). The Historical and Philosophical Influences on Greenleaf’s Concept of Servant Leadership: Setting the Stage for Scientific Theory Building. Servant Leadership Research Roundtable, ss. 1-12.
4. Buchen, I. H. (1998). Servant leadership: A model for future faculty and future institutions. The Journal of Leadership Studies, 5(1), 125-134.
5. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, And Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Pearson Education.
6. Dennis, R. S., & Bocarnea, M. (2005). Development of the servant leadership assessment instrument. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 26(8), ss. 600-615.
7. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Introduction: The Discipline and Practice of Qualitative Research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 1-32). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd.
8. Dierendonck, Van Dirk (2011). Servant Leadership: A Review and Synthesis, Journal of Management, 37(4), ss. 1228-1261.

9. Dierendonck, Van Dirk & Nuijten, I. (2011). The Servant Leadership Survey: Development of a Multidimensional Measure, Journal of Business Psychology, 26(3), ss. 249-267.
10. Duyan, E. C., & Dierendonck, Van Dick (2014). Hizmetkâr Liderliği Anlamak: Teoriden Ampirik Araştırmaya Doğru, Sosyoloji Konferansları Dergisi (İstanbul Journal of Sociological Studies), 49, ss.1-32.
11. Farling, M. L., Stone, A. G., & Winston, B. E. (1999). Servant leadership: Setting the stage for empirical research. Journal of Leadership Studies, 6(1-2), ss.49-72.
12. Fındıkçı, İ. (2012). Bir Gönül Yolculuğu Hizmetkâr Liderlik. İstanbul: Alfa Basım Yayın. Graham, J. W. (1991). Servant-leadership in organizations: Inspirational and moral. The leadership Quarterly, 2(2), ss. 105-119.
13. Greenleaf, R. K. (1970). The Leader as Servant. Indianapolis, IN: The Robert K. Greenleaf Center for Servant Leadership.
14. Greenleaf, R. K. (1977). Servant Leadership: A Journey into the Nature of Legitimate Power and Greatness. New York: Paulist Press.
15. Kaplan, M., & Uzun, A. (2017). Hizmetkâr liderlik algılamalarının tükenmişlik üzerindeki etkisi: otel işletmelerinde bir araştırma. Nevşehir Hac Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi SBE Dergisi, 7(1), ss. 14-26.
16. Keith, K. M. (2017). Definition of Servant Leadership, http://toservefirst.com/definiton-of-servant-leadership.html.
17. Kılıç, K. C., & Aydın, Y. (2016). Hizmetkâr liderlik ölçeğinin Türkçe uyarlaması: güvenirlik ve geçerlik çalışması, KMÜ Sosyal ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 18 (30), ss. 106-113.
18. Laub, J. (2003). From Paternalism to the Servant Organization: Expanding the Organizational Leadership Assessment (OLA) Model, Servant Leadership Research Roundtable.
19. Laub, J. (2004). Defining Servant Leadership: A Recommended Typology for Servant Leadership, Servant Leadership Research Roundtable, August Studies.
20. Laub, J. A. (1999). Assessing the servant organisation: Development of the Organisational Leadership Assessment (OLA) instrument. Dissertation abstracts international, 60(2), 308A. (UMI No. 9921922).
21. Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Meuser, J. D., Hu, J., Wu J., & Liao, C. (2015). Servant Leadership: Validation of A Short Form Of SL-28, The Leadership Quarterly, 26(2), ss. 254-269.
22. Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Zhao, H., & Henderson, D. (2008). Servant leadership: Development of a multidimensional measure and multi-level assessment. Leadership Quarterly, 19(2), ss. 161-177.
23. Mahembe, B., & Engelbrecht, A. S. (2013). A confirmatory factor analytical study of a servant leadership measure in South Africa. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 39(2), ss. 1-8.
24. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Source Book. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25. Page, D., & Wong, T.P. (2000). A Conceptual Framework For Measuring Servant Leadership. Lanham: University Press of America.
26. Patterson, K. (2003). Servant leadership: A theoretical model. Proceedings of the Servant Leadership Roundtable, http://www.regent.edu.
27. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. Sage publication (3rd Ed.).
28. Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical Bibliography or Bibliometrics. Journal of Documentation, 25(4), ss. 348-349.
29. Russell, R. F. (2001). The role of values in servant leadership. Leadership & Organisation Development Journal, 22(2), ss. 76-83.
30. Sendjaya, S., Sarros, J. C., & Santora, J. C. (2008). Defining and measuring servant leadership behaviour in organisations. Journal of Management Studies, 45(2), ss. 402-424.
31. Silverman, D. (1993). The Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analyzing Talk, Text and Interaction. London: Sage.
32. Silverman, D. (2001). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analysing talk, text and interaction. London: Sage.
33. Spears, L. C. (1998). Insights into leadership: Service, stewardship, and servant leadership. New York: Wiley & Sons.
34. Spears, Lary S. (2003). Servant-Leadership and Quakers. Quaker Life, July/August. http://www.spearscenter.org/docs2010/QuakerLife.pdf.
35. Spears, Lary S. (2004). Prescription For Organizational Health Servant Leadership, http://www.spearscenter.org/docs2010/PrescriptionforOrganizationalHealth Spears2004.pdf.
36. Spears, Lary. C. (2010). Character and Servant Leadership: Ten Characteristics of Effective Caring Leaders. The Journal of Virtues & Leadership, School of Global Leadership & Entrepreneurship, Regent University, 1(1), ss. 25-30.
37. Temizkan, P., Çiçek, D., & Özdemir, C. (2015). Bibliometric profile of articles published on health tourism. Journal of Human Sciences, 12(2), ss. 394-415.
38. Ürü Sanı, F. O., Çalışkan, S. C., Atan, Ö., & Yozgat, U. E. (2013). Öğretim üyelerinin hizmetkâr liderlik davranışları ve ardılları üzerine bir araştırma, Akademik Bakış, 13(1), ss. 63-82.
39. Van Dierendonck, D., & Nuijten, I. (2011). The servant-leadership survey (SLS): development and validation of a multidimensional measure. Journal of Business and Psychology, 26(3), ss. 249-267.
40. Wong, P. T., & Davey, D. (2007). Best Practices in Servant Leadership, Servant Leadership Research Roundtable, ss. 4-10.