HÜMANİSTİK BİR YAKLAŞIMLA ÖRTÜLÜ BİLGİ ANALİZİ: ÖRTÜLÜ BİLGİ GELİŞİMİ VE PAYLAŞIMINDA DUYGUSAL ZEKA İLE BEDEN DİLİNİN ROLÜ VE STRATEJİK KULLANIM YOLLARI

Abstract

Bu makale bilginin kavramsal bir analiziyle birlikte örtülü bilgi, duygusal zeka ve beden dili arasındaki ilişkileri ele almaktadır. Makalenin amacı duygusal zeka ve beden dilinin örtülü bilginin gelişim ve paylaşım sürecindeki rolünü vurgulamak ve bunların örtülü bilgi bağlamındaki stratejik kullanım yollarını ortaya koymaktır

Abstract

This paper reports on a conceptual analysis of tacit knowledge and the relations between tacit knowledge and emotional intelligence and body language. The objective of this paper is to emphasize the important role of emotional intelligence and body language in development and sharing process of tacit knowledege and demonstrate strategic usage ways of these two elements for tacit knowledge

References

1. Boiral, Olivier (2002), “Tacit Knowledge and Environmental Management“, Long Range Planning, Vol. 35: 291-317.
2. Dumas, Angela ve Fentem, Andrew (1998), “Totemics: New Metaphor Techniques to Manage Knowledge From Discovery to Storage and Retrieval”, Technovation, Vol. 18, 513-521.
3. Goleman, Daniel (2001), Duygusal Zeka, (Çev. Banu Seçkin Yüksel), Varlık Yayınları, İstanbul. Hall, Richard ve Andriani, Pierpalo (2003), “Managing Knowledge Associated with Innovation”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 56: 145-152.
4. Johannessen, Jon A.–Olsen, Bjorn ve Olaisen, Johan (1999), “Aspects of Innovation Theory Based on Knowledge Management”, International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 19: 121- 139.
5. Johannessen, Jon A.-Olsen, Bjorn ve Olaisen, Johan (2001), “Mismanagement of Tacit Knowledge: The Impotance of Tacit Knowledge, The Danger of Information Technology and What to Do About It”, International Journal of Information Management, Vol 21: 3-20.
6. Karahan, Kasım (2001), “Hizmet Pazarlamasında Müşteri Tatmin Düzeylerini Etkileyen Bir Faktör Olarak Duygusal Zekanın (EQ) Rolü”, Pazarlama Dünyası, Y. 15, S. 3: 19-24.
7. Koskinen, Kaj U. (2000), “Tacit Knowledge as a Promoter of Project Success”, European Journal of Purchasing And Supply Management, Vol. 6: 41- 47.
8. Koskinen, Kaj U. ve Vanharanta, Hannu (2002), “The Role of Tacit Knowledge In Innovation Process of Small Technology Companies”, Int. J. Production Economics, Vol. 80: 57-64.

9. Lubit, Roy (2001), “Tacit Knowledge and Knowledge Management: The Keys to Sustainable Competitive Advantage”, Organizational Dynamics, Vol. 29, No. 4: 164-178.
10. Malone, David (2002), “Knowledge Management: A Model For Organizational Learning”, International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Vol. 3: 111-123.
11. Mascitelli, Ronald (2000), “From Experience: Harnessing Tacit Knowledge to Achieve Breakthrough Innovation”, J. Prod. Innovation Management, Vol. 17.
12. Nonaka, Ikujiro-Toyama, Ryoko ve Konno, Noboru (2000), “SECI, Ba and Leadership: A Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation”, Long Range Planning, Vol. 33: 5-34.
13. Putti, Joseph M. ve Aryee, S. (1990),. “Communication in Organizations”, Group & Organization Management, Vol. 15, No. 1, 44.
14. Ropo, Arja ve Parvainen, Jaana (2001), “Leadership and Bodily Knowledge in Expert Organizations: Epistemological Rethinking”, Scandinavian Journal of Management, Vol. 17: 1- 18.
15. Schulz, Martin ve JOBE, Lloyd A. (2001), “Codification and Tacitness as Knowledge Management Studies: An Emprical Exploration”, Journal of High Technology Management Research, Vol. 12: 139-165.