KİRLİLİK SIĞINAĞI HİPOTEZİ, DOĞRUDAN YABANCI YATIRIMLAR VE KAMU POLİTİKALARI

Abstract

Gelişmekte olan ülkeler katı çevre politikaları uygulayarak sanayileşme hedeflerini tehlikeye atmaktan ve yabancı sermayeyi kaçırmaktan çekinmektedirler. Bu durum, kirlilik yaratan endüstrilerin gelişmiş ülkelerden, kirlilik sığınağı olarak gördükleri gelişmekte olan ülkelere kaymasına neden olmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, literatürde Merican ve diğerleri tarafından analiz edilen “kirlilik sığınağı hipotezi”, altı gelişen piyasa ekonomisi için 1975–2006 dönemi verileri kullanılarak, panel eşbütünleşim yöntemi ile test edilmiştir. Merican ve diğerlerinin çalışma bulgularının aksine değişkenler arasında eşbütünleşim ilişkisi saptanamamıştır

Keywords

• Panel Eşbütünleşim, Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırımlar, Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma, CO2, Çevre üzerine Kamu Politikaları

POLLUTION HAVEN HYPOTHESIS, FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT AND PUBLIC POLICY

Abstract

The developing countries are not willing to endanger the goals of industrialization and avoid foreign direct investment by implementing strict environmental policies. This situation causes industries which create pollution, to move to developing countries which are perceived as pollution havens. In this study, the pollution haven hypothesis, analyzed in the literature by Merican et all, is tested by using panel cointegration technique and 1975-2006 data sets of six emerging markets. Contrary to the findings of Merican et al, a cointegration relationship between variables does not exist

References

1. ACAR A., “Vergilendirmede Tahsis İlkesinin Çevre Vergileri Açısından Değerlendirilmesi”, S.D.Ü. İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, Cilt 11, Sayı 1, 2006.
2. AKBOSTANCI, E.; G.İ. TUNÇ ve S. TÜRÜT AŞIK (2004) “İmalat Sanayi ve Kirlilik: Bir kirli Endüstri Sığınağı Olarak Türkiye”, ERC Working Paper in Economic 04/03 T, Ankara.
3. ALFARO, L.; A. CHANDA; S. KALEMLİ-OZCAN ve S. SAYEK (2004) “FDI and Economic Growth: The Role of Local Financial Markets”, Journal of International Economics 64: 89–112.
4. AMINU, A.M. (2005) “Foreign Direct Investment and The Environment: Pollution
5. Haven Hypothesis Revisited”, Paper prepared for the Eight Annual Conference on Global Economic Analysis, Lübeck, Germany, June 9 - 11, 2005.
6. BACON, R.W. ve S. BHATTACHARYA. (2007) “Growth and CO2 Emmisions
7. How Do Different Countries Fare?”, Environment Department Papers Paper Number 113, World Bank, 2007.
8. BALASUBRAMANYAM, V. N.; M. SALISU ve D. SAPSFORD (1996) “Foreign

9. Direct Investment and Growth in EP and IS Countries”, Economic Journal, (1), 92-105. BALTAGI, B.H. Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, 2nd ed. John Willey&Sons, , s.37-38. BIRDSALL, N. ve D. WHEELER (1993) Trade Policy and Industrial Pollution in
10. Latin America: Where Are the Pollution Havens?”, Journal of Environment & Development 2(1), 137-147. BORENSZTEIN, E.; J. De GREGORIO and J-W. LEE (1998) “How Does
11. Foreign Direct Investment Affect Economic Growth”, Journal of International Economics, Vol. 45: 115-135. CARKOVIC, M. and R. LEVINE (2005) “Does Foreign Direct Investment
12. Accelerate economic growth?, in: Moran, H., Graham, E.M. (Eds.), Does foreign direct investment promote development? Institute for International Economics, Washington, D.C. CHAREMZA W.W., D. DEADMAN, New Directions in Econometric Practice, Second Edition, Edward Elgar Press, UK, 1997, s.19.
13. COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Communication from the Commission on the Sixth Environment Action Programme of the EC, Brussels, December 2000, s.3-4.
14. CUADROS, A.; V. ORTS and M. ALGUACİL (2004) “Openness and Growth:
15. Re-examining Foreign Direct Investment, Trade and Output Linkages in Latin America”, Journal of Development Studies, 26: 167–92. DÇKK (1989) “Ortak Geleceğimiz”, (Çev. Belkıs ÇORAKÇI), Türkiye Çevre
16. Sorunları Vakfı Yayını, Ankara, 496 s. DJANKOV, S. and B. HOEKMAN (2000) “Foreign Investment and Productivity
17. Growth in Czech Enterprises”. The World Bank Economic Review, 14/1: 49–64. DPT (2006) “Arazi Kullanımı ve Kıyı Alanlarının Yönetimi, Ulusal Çevre Eylem
18. Planı”, Mart 1997,s.60, http://ekutup.dpt.gov.tr/cevre/eylempla/arazikul.pdf, (02.06.2006)
19. DÜNDAR, Y. (1997) “Sürdürülebilir Yasam Koşullu Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma,
20. Sürdürülebilir Kalkınmanın Uygulanması”, Türkiye Çevre Vakfı Yayını, Ankara. ENGLE R.F., and C.W.J. GRANGER (1987) “Cointegration and Error
21. Correction: Representation, Estimation and Testing”, Econometrica, 55, s.251– ESKELAND, G.S. and A.E. HARRISON (1997) “Moving to Greener Pastures:
22. Multinationals and Pollution-havens”, The World Bank Environment, Infrastructure and Agriculture Divisions: Policy Research Department, World Bank, Washington. EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, (2001) “Report on Environment Policy and Sustainable Development: Preparing for the Gothenburg European Council”,
23. Reporter: A. Hulthén, Final A5-0171/2001, 15 May, s.15.
24. FEDDERKE, J.W. and A.T. ROMM (2006) Growth Impact and Determinants of
25. Foreign Direct Investment into South Africa, 1956–2003, Economic Modelling : 738–760.
26. FERHATOGLU, E. (2003) “Avrupa Birligi’nde Ortak Çevre Politikası
27. Çerçevesinde Çevre Vergileri”, e-yaklasım, sayı:3. GRANGER C.W.J., P.NEWBOLD (1974) “Spurious Regressions in
28. Econometrics”, Journal of Econometrics, 2 (2), s. 118. GRETHER, J.M. and J. de MELO (2003) “Gloablization and Dirty Industries: Do
29. Pollution Havens Matter?”, NBER Working Papers 9776, National Bureau of
30. Economic Research, Inc. GROSSMAN, G. and E. HELPMAN (1991) “Innovation and Growth in the Global
31. Economy”, MIT Press Cambridge, MA. GROSSMAN, G. M. and A. B. KRUEGER (1991), “Environmental Impact of a
32. North American Free Trade Agreement”, NBER Working Paper 3914.
33. HARRIS, M.N.; L. MATYAS and L. KONYA (2002) “Modelling the Impact of
34. Environmental Regulations on Bilateral Trade Flows: OECD 1990-96”, The World Economy, 25(3), 387-405.
35. HERZER, D.; S. KLASEN and F. NOWAK-LEHMANN D. (2008) “In Search of
36. FDI-led Growth in Developing Countries: The Way Forward”, Economic Modelling 25: 793-810. HOFFMANN, R.; C. LEE; B. RAMASAMY and M. YEUNG (2005) “FDI and Pollution: a Granger Causality Test Using Panel Data”, Journal of International Development, 17, 311–7.
37. IM K.S., MH PESARAN, Y SHIN (2003) “Testing for Unit Roots in
38. Heterogeneous Panels”, Journal of Econometrics 115, s. 53–74. JAVORCİK SMARZYNSKA, B. and S. WEI (2004) “Pollution Havens and Foreign Direct Investment: Dirty Secret or Popular Myth?”, Contributions to
39. Economic Analysis & Policy, 3(2), article 8. KARAKAYA, E., ÖZÇAG, M. (2007) “Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma ve İklim Değişikliği: Uygulanabilecek http://www.econturk.org/Turkiyeekonomisi/manas.pdf, (04.03.2007) İktisadi Araçların Analizi”, ,
40. KOLSTAD, C.D. and Y. XING (1998) Do Lax Environmental Regulations Attract
41. Foreign Investment?”, Department of Economics, UCSB, Departmental Working Papers, Paper wp28-98pt1. LEE, C.G. (2008) “Foreign Direct Investment, Pollution and Economic Growth:
42. Evidence from Malaysia”, Applied Economics, 1-8. LETCHUMANAN R. and F. KODAMA (2000) “Reconciling the Conflict Between the “Pollution-haven” Hypothesis and an Emerging Trajectory of International
43. Technology Transfer”, Research Policy, Vol 29/: 59-79. LEVIN A., C. F. LIN, C.,S.J. CHU (2002) “Unit Root Tests in Panel Data:
44. Asymptotic and Finite-Sample Properties”, Journal of Econometrics, 108, 2002, s. 1–24.
45. LEVINE, R. and D. RENELT (1992) “A Sensitivity Analysis of Cross-country
46. Growth Regressions”, American Economic Review 82: 942–963. LIST, J.A. and C.Y. CO (2000) “The Effects of Environmental Regulations on
47. Foreign Direct Investment”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 40, 1-20. LOW, P. and A. YEATES. (1992) "Do 'Dirty' Industries Migrate", in Low P (ed)
48. International Trade and the Environment, World Bank discussion paper, No. , 89-104. LUCAS, R.; P. WHEELER and H. HETTIGE (1992) “Economic Development,
49. Environmental Regulation and International Migration of Toxic Pollution 1960- ”, In Low (1992).
50. MABEY, N. and R. MCNALLY (1999) “Foreign Direct Investment and the Environment: from Pollution Havens to Sustainable Development”, A WWF-UK Report.
51. MADDALA, G. S. and S. WU (1999) “A Comparative Study of Unit Root Tests with Panel Data and A New Simple Test”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 61: 631–52.
52. MANI M. and D. WHEELER (1998) “In Search of Pollution Havens? Dirty
53. Industry in the World Economy 1960 to 1995”, the Journal of Environment &
54. Development, Vol 7, No 3: 215-247. MANI, M. S. (1996) "Environmental Tariffs on Polluting Imports: An Empirical
55. Study," Environmental and Resource Economics, 7, 391-411. MARWAH, K. and L. KLEIN (1998) “What are Some Prospects for India’s
56. Joining the Asian Growth Process?”, in Asia Pacific Economic Co-operation: Theory and Practice, R. Hooley et al (editors), Research in Asian Economic Studies, Volume 7, Part B, JAI Press, pp.419-439. MERICAN, Y.; Z. YUSOP; Z. MOHD.NOOR and L. SIONG HOOK (2007)
57. “Foreign Direct Investment and the Pollution in Five ASEAN Nations”, International Journal of Economics and Management 1(2): 245-261. MUTLU, A. (2006) “Küresel Kamusal Mallar Bağlamında Sağlık Hizmetleri ve Çevre
58. Kirlenmesi: Üretim,Finansman ve Yönetim Sorunları”, 21.Türkiye Maliye Sempozyumu: Kamu Maliyesinde Güncel Gelişmeler, Lara/ANTALYA,10-14 Mayıs NAIR-REICHERT, U. and D. WEİNHOLD (2001) “Causality Tests for Cross- country Panels: A New Look at FDI and Economic Growth in Developing
59. Countries”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 63(2): 153–171. OECD (1992) “Environmental Policy: How to Apply Economic Instruments”, s.10.
60. ÖZAY, C ve A. YUMRUKAYA (2008) “Kyoto Protokolü’nin Kabulü Durumunda
61. Türkiye Sanayinde Meydana Gelecek Değişiklikler”, XI. İktisat Öğrencileri Kongresi, Küresel Isınma: Ekonomik, Politik ve Sosyal Etkiler 8-9 Mayıs 2008.
62. PEARCE D. W. , R. K. TURNER (1990) “The Economics of Natural Resources and the Environment”, Harvester Wheatsheaf.
63. PEDRONI, P. (2001) "Purchasing Power Parity Tests in Cointegrated Panels,"
64. Review of Economics and Statistics, 83, 2001,s.727-731.
65. PEDRONI, P. (1999) “Critical Values for Cointegration Tests in Heterogeneous
66. Panels with Multiple Regressors”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, , s.653-70. PEDRONI., P. (2000) “Fully Modified Ols For Heterogeneous Cointegrated
67. Panels”, Nonstationary Panels, Panel Cointegration and Dynamic Panels, Volume 15, s.93–130. PEDRONI, P. (1995) “Panel Cointegration; Asymptotic and Finite Sample
68. Properties of Pooled Time Series Tests with an Application to the PPP Hypothesis”, Indiana University Working Papers in Economics, No. 95–013, Revised 4/97, 8/01, s. 4. RAMIREZ, M. D. (2006) “Is Foreign Direct Investment Beneficial for Mexico? An
69. Empirical Analysis, 1960-2001”, World Development Vol. 34/5: 802-817.
70. SELDON, T. M. and D. SONG (1994), “Environmental Quality and Development: Is There a Kuznets Curve for Air Pollution Emissions?” Journal of
71. Environmental Economics and Management, 27, 147–62. SHAFIK, N. and S. BANDYOPADHYAY (1992), “Economic Growth and Environmental Quality: Time Series and Cross Section Evidence”, World
72. Development Report Background Paper. Washington, D.C., World Bank. TEKİN, A. ve VURAL, İ.Y. (2007) “Global Kamusal Malların Finansman Aracı Olarak sos_mak/makaleler%5CAhmet%20TEK%C4%B0N%20%20%C4%B0stiklal%20 Y. %20VURAL%5C323-337.pdf,(04.03.2007) http://www.sosyalbil.selcuk.edu.tr/
73. TEMURSHOEV, U. (2006) “Pollution Haven Hypothesis or Factor Endownment
74. Hypothesis: Theory and Empirical Examination for US and China”, Charles University Center for Economic Research and Graduate Education, Working paper series (ISSN 1211-3298) Electronic Version.
75. TOBEY, J.A. (1990) “The Effects of Domestic Environmental Policies on
76. Patterns of World Trade: an Empirical Test”, Kyklos, Vol 43/2: 191-209. TOPRAK D. (20069 “Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Çerçevesinde Çevre Politikaları ve Mali Araçlar”, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi ,Yıl:2 Sayı: 4, Güz, 2006.
77. UNCTAD (1999) World Investment Report 1999, United Nations, New York and Geneva
78. UNCTAD (2007) World Investment Report 2007, United Nations, New York and Geneva.
79. UNCTADhttp://stats.unctad.org/FDI/TableViewer/tableView.aspx?ReportId=899 , 22.09.08. UNDP (2008) Human Development Report 2007-2008.
80. VAN BEERS, C. and J.C.J.M. VAN DEN BERGH (1997) “An Emprical Multi- country Analysis of the Impact of Environmental Regulations on Foreign Trade Flows”, Kyklos, 50(1), 29-46.
81. WHEELER D. (1999) “Racing to the Bottom? Foreign Investment and Air
82. Pollution in Developing Countries”, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2524.
83. WORLD BANK (2008) World Development Indicators 2008 CD Rom.
84. XU, B. (2000) “Multinational Enterprises, Technology Diffusion, and Host
85. Country Productivity Growth”, Journal of Development Economics, 62, 477–93. YAO, S. And K. WEI (2007) “Economic Growth in the Presence of FDI: The Perspective of Newly Industrialising Economies”, Journal of Comparative Economics 35: 211-234. EKLER
86. Ek 1. Çalışmada Kullanılan Altı Ülke Endonezya Filipinler Malezya Singapur Tayland Türkiye Ek 2. Çalışmada Kullanılan Değişkenlerin Panel Birim Kök Testi Sonuçları Değişkenler Birim Kök Testleri (Unit Root Tests) Sabitli (Individual effects) Düzey Fark Hes 0.66085 63699 89539 9481 1.69973 0.09600 4111 2490 2.24728 0.21506 1443 8390 0.64364 1.33466 3108 7478 0060 972 PP Fisher 0000 MAN 0004 0000 0000 0000 GDPPC 0000 0000 0000 0000 FDI 0000 0000 0000 0000