BibTex RIS Cite

BİLGİ YÖNETİMİ VE ÖRGÜTSEL ETKİNLİK İLİŞKİSİ: ÖRGÜT KÜLTÜRÜ VE ÖRGÜT YAPISININ TEMEL ETKİLERİ

Year 2010, Volume: 10 Issue: 1, 71 - 93, 01.02.2010

Abstract

Örgüt kültürü temelde paylaşılan değerler bütünü olarak tanımlanır ve bilgi yönetimi süreci için ön koşul niteliği taşır. Destekleyici nitelikte bir örgüt kültürü ve örgüt yapısı ile örgütsel bilgi yönetimi kolaylaşabilir ve örgütsel etkinlik de artırılabilir. Bu araştırmanın amacı örgüt kültürü ve örgüt yapısının bilgi yönetimi süreçleri ve örgütsel etkinliği ne şekilde etkilediğini ortaya koymaktır. Bunun yanında bu çalışmada bilgi yönetimi süreçlerinin örgütsel etkinlik üzerindeki doğrudan etkileri de araştırılmaktadır. Araştırma süreci anket çalışması ile yürütülmüş, örneklemi denetim ve bankacılık sektöründen çalışanlar oluşturmuştur. Çoklu regresyon analizleri ve hiyerarşik regresyon modelleri örgütsel yapı ve örgüt kültürünün bilgi yönetimi süreçleri üzerinde etkili olduğunu, bilgi yönetimi süreçlerinin de örgütsel etkinliği artırdığını ortaya çıkarmıştır

References

  • Aidla, A. and Vadi, M. (2007): “Relationships between Organizational Culture and Performance in Estonian Schools with Regard to Their Size and Location”, Baltic Journal of Economics, 7(1): 3-17.
  • Almeida, P. (1996): “Knowledge Resourcing by Foreign Multinationals: Patent Citation Analysis in the U.S. Semiconductor Industry”, Strategic Management Journal, 7:155-165.
  • Aktan, C.C., and Vural, İ.Y.(2004). “Bilgi Yönetimi Nedir?”,http://www.canaktan.org/yeni-trendler/bilgi-yonetimi/bilgi-yon-nedir.htm
  • Appleyard, M.M. (1996): “How does Knowledge Flow? Interfirm Patterns in the Semiconductor Industry”, Strategic Management Journal, 7: 137-154.
  • Argote, L, and Ingram, P. (2000); “Knowledge Transfer: A Basis for Competitive Advantage in Firms”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision, 82(1):150- 169
  • Audretsch, D. B. (2001): “Research Issues Relating to Structure, Competition, and Performance of Small Technology-Based Firms”, Small Business Economics, 16(1): 37–51.
  • Awad, E. and Ghaziri, H. (2004): Knowledge Management. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Publishing. 8-32.
  • Bailey, C. and Clarke, M. (2000): “How do Managers Use Knowledge about Knowledge Management?”, Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(3):235-243.
  • Barca M., and Geyik M. (2004); “Etkin Bilgi Üretimi İçin Örgütler Nasıl Tasarlanmalıdır?”, http://iibf.ogu.edu.tr/kongre/bildiriler/10-02.pdf
  • Barquin R.C.: Bennet A., and Remez S.G. (2001): Knowledge Management: The Catalyst for E-Government, Vienna, VA: Management Concepts, Inc., forcoming.
  • Barutçugil, İ. (2002): Bilgi yönetimi. İstanbul: Kariyer Yayıncılık. 7-16. Bassi, J.B. (1997); “Intellectual Capital”, Training & Development, December: 25-30.
  • Beijerse, R. P. (1999): “Questions in Knowledge Management: Defining and Conceptualizing a Phenomenon”, Journal of Knowledge Management, 3(2): 94- 109.
  • Bharadwaj, S., Bhushan S., and Saxena, C., (2005): “Knowledge Management in Global Software Teams”, Vikalpa, 30(4): 65-75.
  • Bogenrieder, I., and Nooteboom, B. (2004): “Learning groups: What types are there? A theoretical analysis and an empirical study in a consultancy firm”. Organization Studies, 25(2), 287–313.
  • Brooking, A. (1997): “The Management of Intellectual Capital”, Long, Range Planning, 30(3): 364-365.
  • Bülbül, H. (2008): “Bilgi yönetim modellerinin üretim ve firma performansına etkisi”,http://www.sosyalbil.selcuk.edu.tr/sos_mak
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş.(2002): Veri Analizi El Kitabı, Pegem A. Yayıncılık. Ankara. 10- 48.
  • Carneiro, A. (2000): “How Does Knowledge Management Influence Innovation and Competitiveness?”, Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(2): 87-98.
  • Calori, R. and Sarnin, P. (1991): “Corporate Culture and Economic Performance: A French Study”, Organization Studies, 12:49-74.
  • Chen, C.-J., and Huang, J.-W. (2007): “How organizational climate and structure affect knowledge management: The social interaction perspective”. International Journal of Information Management, 27, 104–118.
  • Darroch, J. and Naughton, R.M. (2003): “Beyond Market Orientation: Knowledge Management and the Innovativeness of New Zealand Firms”, European Journal of Marketing, 37(3-4), 572-593.
  • Davenport. T. and Klahr, P.(1998): “Managing Customer Support Knowledge”. Califomia Management Review, 40:195-208.
  • Demir, H, and Okan, T (2008): “Teknoloji, Örgüt Yapısı Ve Performans Arasındaki İlişkiler Üzerine Bir Araştırma”, 16. Ulusal Yönetim ve Organizasyon Kongresi El Kitabı.
  • Demircan, N.(2003): “Örgütsel Güvenin Bir Ara Değişken Olarak Örgütsel Bağlılık Üzerindeki Etkisi: Eğitim Sektöründe Bir Uygulama”, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Gebze Yüksek Teknoloji Enstitüsü, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
  • Denison, D.R. (1990): Corporate Culture and Organizational Effectiveness. New York, John Wiley. 22-60.
  • Denison, D.R. and Mishra A.K. (1995): “Toward a Theory of Organizational Culture and Effectiveness”, Organization Science, 6(2). 204-223.
  • Deshpande, R. and Farley J. U. (2004); “Organizational Culture, Market Orientation, Innovativeness, and Firm Performance: An International Research Odyssey”, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21:3-22.
  • Dyer, J.H. (1997): “Effective Interfirm Collaboration: How Firms Minimize Transaction Costs and Maximize Transaction Value”, Strategic Management Journal, 18:535-556
  • Fugate, B.S., Stank, T.P., and Mentzer, J.T., (2009): “Linking Improved Knowledge Management to Operational and Organizational Performance”, Journal of Operations Management, 27: 247-264.
  • Ghani, K.A., Jayanalan, V., and Sugumar, M,. (2002): “Impact of Advanced Manufacturing Technology on Organizational Structure”, the Journal of High Technology Management Research, 13:157-175.
  • Gold, H.A., Malhotra, A.,and Segars, A.H,. (2001): “Knowledge Management: An Organizational Capabilities Perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems”,18: 185-214.
  • Gordon, G. G. and DiTomaso, N. (1992): “Predicting Corporate Performance from Organizational Culture”, Journal of Management Studies, 29(6): 783-798. Gümüştekin G.E. (2008): “Bilgi Yönetiminin Stratejik Önemi”, www.genbilim.com.
  • Heskel, J. (1999): “Small Firms, Contracting-out, Computers and Wage Inequality: Evidence from UK Manufacturing”. Economica, 66: 1–21.
  • Inkpen. A. (1996): “Creating Knowledge Through Collaboration”, California Management Review, 39:123-141.
  • Inkpen, A, and Dinur. A.(1998): “Knowledge Management Processes and International Joint Ventures”, Organization Science. 9(4): 454-468.
  • Jarrar, Y.F. (2002): “Knowledge Management: Learning for Organisational Experience”, Managerial Auditing Journal, 17(7).
  • Kimura, F. (2002): “Subcontracting and the Performance of Small and Medium Firms in Japan”, Small Business Economics 18(3), 163–175.
  • Kivijarvi, H. (2004): “Knowledge Conversion in Organizational Context: A Framework and Experiments”, Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1-10, http://Csdl2.Computer.org/comp/proceedings/hicss/2004/2056/08/2056 80 242a.pdf.
  • Koene, B.A.S. (1996): “Organizational Culture, Leadership and Performance in Context: Trust And Rationality in Organizations”. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Rijksuniversiteit Limburg.
  • Kotter, J.P. and Heskett, J.L. (1992): Corporate Culture and Performance, The Free Press, New York. 40-77.
  • Lei, D., Hitt, M.A., and Bettis, R,. (1996): Dynamic Core Competences Through Met Learning And Strategic Context, Journal of Management, 22(4):549-569.
  • Lim, B. (1995): “Examining the Organizational Culture and Organizational Performance Link”, Leadership & Organization Development Journal 16(5):16- 21.
  • Marcoulides G. and Heck R. (1993): “Organizational Culture and Performance: Proposing and Testing a Model”. Organization Science, 4(2): 209-225.
  • McEvily, S. K. and Chakravarthy, B. (2002): “The Persistence of Knowledgebased Advantage: an Empirical Test for Product Performance and Technological Knowledge”, Strategic Management Journal, 23, 285-305.
  • Nelson, R.R. and Winter, S.G. (1982): An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Belknap Press of Harvard University, Cambridge, MA. Nickell, S. J. (1996): “Competition and Corporate Performance”, Journal of Political Economy, 104(4): 724–746.
  • Nickell, S., Nicolitsas. D., and N. Dryden., (1997): What Makes Firms Perform Well?, European Economic Review, 41(3): 783–796.
  • Nunally, J.C. (1978): Psychometric theory, New York, McGraw-Hill.
  • O’Dell CA. (1997): A Current Review of Knowledge Management Best Practice. Conference on Knowledge Management and the Transfer of Best Practices. Business Intelligence: London.
  • Oghonna, E. and Harris, L. (2000): “Leadership style, Organizational Culture and Performance: Empirical Evidence from UK Companies”. International Journal of Human Resource Management 11(4): 766-788.
  • Onken, M. H. (1999): “Temporal Elements Of Organizational Culture And Impact on Firm Performance”. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 14(3/4): 231- 243.
  • Özdemirci, F. and Aydın, C.(2008): “Kurumsal Bilgi Kaynakları ve Bilgi Yönetimi”. Türk Kütüphaneciliği. 22(1) 59-81.
  • Petrash, G. (1996): Managing Knowledge Assets for Value. Knowledge-Based Leadership Conference. Linkage Inc.: Boston, October.
  • Petty, M.M., Beadles, N.A., Lowery C.M., Chapman, D.E., Connel, D.W (1995): “Relationships Between Organizational Culture and Organizational Performance”, Psychological Reports, 76:483-492.
  • Robson, P. J.A. and Bennett, R. J. (2000): “SME Growth: The Relationship with Business Advice and External Collaboration”, Small Business Economics, 15(3):193–208.
  • Rousseau D.M. (1990): “Normative Beliefs in Fund-Raising Organizations”, Group & Organization Management, 15(4), 448-460.
  • Sarvay, M. (1999): “Knowledge Management and Competition in The Consulting Industry”. California Management Review, 41(2): 95–107.
  • Smith P. (2002): “A Performance Based Approach to Knowledge Management”, Journal of Knowledge Management Practice, March. Skyrme, D. and Amidon. D. (1998): “New Measures of Success”. Journal of Business Strategy, January/February: 20-24.
  • Soliman, F. and Spooner, K. (2000): “Strategies for Implementing Knowledge Management: Role of Human Resource Management”, Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(4), 337-345.
  • Spender, J.C. (1996): “Making Knowledge the Basis of a Dynamic Theory of the Firm”, Strategic Management Journal. 7: 45-62.
  • Starbuck, W.H. (1983): “Organizations as Action Generators”, American Sociological Review, 48:91-102.
  • Teece. D. (1998): “Capturing Value From Knowledge Assets: The New Economy, Markets for Know How and Intangible Assets”. California Management Review. 40(3):55-79.
  • Yeung, A. C. L., , Lai, K., and Yee, R. W,. (2007): “Organizational Learning, Innovativeness, and Organizational Performance: A Qualitative Investigation”, International Journal of Production Research, 45(11): 2459–2477.
  • Wiig, K. M. (1997): “Knowledge Management: An Introduction and Perspective”, Journal of Knowledge Management, 1(1): 6-14.
  • Willem, A. and Buelens, M. (2009): “Knowledge Sharing in İnter-Unit Cooperative Episodes: The Impact of Organizational Structure Dimensions,” International Journal of Information Management , 29, 151-160.
  • Zander, U., and Kogut. B.(1995): “Knowledge and The .Speed of the Transfer and Imitation of Organizational Capabilities: An Empirical Test”, Organization Science, 6: 76-92.

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS: THE EFFECTS OF ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE AND STRUCTURE

Year 2010, Volume: 10 Issue: 1, 71 - 93, 01.02.2010

Abstract

Organizational culture is defined as an organization’s shared values and concerned as a precondition for knowledge management processes. Supportive organizational culture and structure may also enable to increase organizational effectiveness. The purpose of this research is to examine the effects of organizational culture and structure on knowledge management processes as well as organizational effectiveness. Additionally, in this study direct effects of knowledge management processes on organizational effectiveness are also investigated. The research process was conducted using structured questionnaires, and the sample included employees from auditing and banking sectors. Multiple regression analyses and hierarchical regression models demonstrated that organizational culture and structure affect knowledge management processes and these processes increase organizational effectiveness if managed properly

References

  • Aidla, A. and Vadi, M. (2007): “Relationships between Organizational Culture and Performance in Estonian Schools with Regard to Their Size and Location”, Baltic Journal of Economics, 7(1): 3-17.
  • Almeida, P. (1996): “Knowledge Resourcing by Foreign Multinationals: Patent Citation Analysis in the U.S. Semiconductor Industry”, Strategic Management Journal, 7:155-165.
  • Aktan, C.C., and Vural, İ.Y.(2004). “Bilgi Yönetimi Nedir?”,http://www.canaktan.org/yeni-trendler/bilgi-yonetimi/bilgi-yon-nedir.htm
  • Appleyard, M.M. (1996): “How does Knowledge Flow? Interfirm Patterns in the Semiconductor Industry”, Strategic Management Journal, 7: 137-154.
  • Argote, L, and Ingram, P. (2000); “Knowledge Transfer: A Basis for Competitive Advantage in Firms”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision, 82(1):150- 169
  • Audretsch, D. B. (2001): “Research Issues Relating to Structure, Competition, and Performance of Small Technology-Based Firms”, Small Business Economics, 16(1): 37–51.
  • Awad, E. and Ghaziri, H. (2004): Knowledge Management. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Publishing. 8-32.
  • Bailey, C. and Clarke, M. (2000): “How do Managers Use Knowledge about Knowledge Management?”, Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(3):235-243.
  • Barca M., and Geyik M. (2004); “Etkin Bilgi Üretimi İçin Örgütler Nasıl Tasarlanmalıdır?”, http://iibf.ogu.edu.tr/kongre/bildiriler/10-02.pdf
  • Barquin R.C.: Bennet A., and Remez S.G. (2001): Knowledge Management: The Catalyst for E-Government, Vienna, VA: Management Concepts, Inc., forcoming.
  • Barutçugil, İ. (2002): Bilgi yönetimi. İstanbul: Kariyer Yayıncılık. 7-16. Bassi, J.B. (1997); “Intellectual Capital”, Training & Development, December: 25-30.
  • Beijerse, R. P. (1999): “Questions in Knowledge Management: Defining and Conceptualizing a Phenomenon”, Journal of Knowledge Management, 3(2): 94- 109.
  • Bharadwaj, S., Bhushan S., and Saxena, C., (2005): “Knowledge Management in Global Software Teams”, Vikalpa, 30(4): 65-75.
  • Bogenrieder, I., and Nooteboom, B. (2004): “Learning groups: What types are there? A theoretical analysis and an empirical study in a consultancy firm”. Organization Studies, 25(2), 287–313.
  • Brooking, A. (1997): “The Management of Intellectual Capital”, Long, Range Planning, 30(3): 364-365.
  • Bülbül, H. (2008): “Bilgi yönetim modellerinin üretim ve firma performansına etkisi”,http://www.sosyalbil.selcuk.edu.tr/sos_mak
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş.(2002): Veri Analizi El Kitabı, Pegem A. Yayıncılık. Ankara. 10- 48.
  • Carneiro, A. (2000): “How Does Knowledge Management Influence Innovation and Competitiveness?”, Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(2): 87-98.
  • Calori, R. and Sarnin, P. (1991): “Corporate Culture and Economic Performance: A French Study”, Organization Studies, 12:49-74.
  • Chen, C.-J., and Huang, J.-W. (2007): “How organizational climate and structure affect knowledge management: The social interaction perspective”. International Journal of Information Management, 27, 104–118.
  • Darroch, J. and Naughton, R.M. (2003): “Beyond Market Orientation: Knowledge Management and the Innovativeness of New Zealand Firms”, European Journal of Marketing, 37(3-4), 572-593.
  • Davenport. T. and Klahr, P.(1998): “Managing Customer Support Knowledge”. Califomia Management Review, 40:195-208.
  • Demir, H, and Okan, T (2008): “Teknoloji, Örgüt Yapısı Ve Performans Arasındaki İlişkiler Üzerine Bir Araştırma”, 16. Ulusal Yönetim ve Organizasyon Kongresi El Kitabı.
  • Demircan, N.(2003): “Örgütsel Güvenin Bir Ara Değişken Olarak Örgütsel Bağlılık Üzerindeki Etkisi: Eğitim Sektöründe Bir Uygulama”, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Gebze Yüksek Teknoloji Enstitüsü, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
  • Denison, D.R. (1990): Corporate Culture and Organizational Effectiveness. New York, John Wiley. 22-60.
  • Denison, D.R. and Mishra A.K. (1995): “Toward a Theory of Organizational Culture and Effectiveness”, Organization Science, 6(2). 204-223.
  • Deshpande, R. and Farley J. U. (2004); “Organizational Culture, Market Orientation, Innovativeness, and Firm Performance: An International Research Odyssey”, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21:3-22.
  • Dyer, J.H. (1997): “Effective Interfirm Collaboration: How Firms Minimize Transaction Costs and Maximize Transaction Value”, Strategic Management Journal, 18:535-556
  • Fugate, B.S., Stank, T.P., and Mentzer, J.T., (2009): “Linking Improved Knowledge Management to Operational and Organizational Performance”, Journal of Operations Management, 27: 247-264.
  • Ghani, K.A., Jayanalan, V., and Sugumar, M,. (2002): “Impact of Advanced Manufacturing Technology on Organizational Structure”, the Journal of High Technology Management Research, 13:157-175.
  • Gold, H.A., Malhotra, A.,and Segars, A.H,. (2001): “Knowledge Management: An Organizational Capabilities Perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems”,18: 185-214.
  • Gordon, G. G. and DiTomaso, N. (1992): “Predicting Corporate Performance from Organizational Culture”, Journal of Management Studies, 29(6): 783-798. Gümüştekin G.E. (2008): “Bilgi Yönetiminin Stratejik Önemi”, www.genbilim.com.
  • Heskel, J. (1999): “Small Firms, Contracting-out, Computers and Wage Inequality: Evidence from UK Manufacturing”. Economica, 66: 1–21.
  • Inkpen. A. (1996): “Creating Knowledge Through Collaboration”, California Management Review, 39:123-141.
  • Inkpen, A, and Dinur. A.(1998): “Knowledge Management Processes and International Joint Ventures”, Organization Science. 9(4): 454-468.
  • Jarrar, Y.F. (2002): “Knowledge Management: Learning for Organisational Experience”, Managerial Auditing Journal, 17(7).
  • Kimura, F. (2002): “Subcontracting and the Performance of Small and Medium Firms in Japan”, Small Business Economics 18(3), 163–175.
  • Kivijarvi, H. (2004): “Knowledge Conversion in Organizational Context: A Framework and Experiments”, Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1-10, http://Csdl2.Computer.org/comp/proceedings/hicss/2004/2056/08/2056 80 242a.pdf.
  • Koene, B.A.S. (1996): “Organizational Culture, Leadership and Performance in Context: Trust And Rationality in Organizations”. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Rijksuniversiteit Limburg.
  • Kotter, J.P. and Heskett, J.L. (1992): Corporate Culture and Performance, The Free Press, New York. 40-77.
  • Lei, D., Hitt, M.A., and Bettis, R,. (1996): Dynamic Core Competences Through Met Learning And Strategic Context, Journal of Management, 22(4):549-569.
  • Lim, B. (1995): “Examining the Organizational Culture and Organizational Performance Link”, Leadership & Organization Development Journal 16(5):16- 21.
  • Marcoulides G. and Heck R. (1993): “Organizational Culture and Performance: Proposing and Testing a Model”. Organization Science, 4(2): 209-225.
  • McEvily, S. K. and Chakravarthy, B. (2002): “The Persistence of Knowledgebased Advantage: an Empirical Test for Product Performance and Technological Knowledge”, Strategic Management Journal, 23, 285-305.
  • Nelson, R.R. and Winter, S.G. (1982): An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Belknap Press of Harvard University, Cambridge, MA. Nickell, S. J. (1996): “Competition and Corporate Performance”, Journal of Political Economy, 104(4): 724–746.
  • Nickell, S., Nicolitsas. D., and N. Dryden., (1997): What Makes Firms Perform Well?, European Economic Review, 41(3): 783–796.
  • Nunally, J.C. (1978): Psychometric theory, New York, McGraw-Hill.
  • O’Dell CA. (1997): A Current Review of Knowledge Management Best Practice. Conference on Knowledge Management and the Transfer of Best Practices. Business Intelligence: London.
  • Oghonna, E. and Harris, L. (2000): “Leadership style, Organizational Culture and Performance: Empirical Evidence from UK Companies”. International Journal of Human Resource Management 11(4): 766-788.
  • Onken, M. H. (1999): “Temporal Elements Of Organizational Culture And Impact on Firm Performance”. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 14(3/4): 231- 243.
  • Özdemirci, F. and Aydın, C.(2008): “Kurumsal Bilgi Kaynakları ve Bilgi Yönetimi”. Türk Kütüphaneciliği. 22(1) 59-81.
  • Petrash, G. (1996): Managing Knowledge Assets for Value. Knowledge-Based Leadership Conference. Linkage Inc.: Boston, October.
  • Petty, M.M., Beadles, N.A., Lowery C.M., Chapman, D.E., Connel, D.W (1995): “Relationships Between Organizational Culture and Organizational Performance”, Psychological Reports, 76:483-492.
  • Robson, P. J.A. and Bennett, R. J. (2000): “SME Growth: The Relationship with Business Advice and External Collaboration”, Small Business Economics, 15(3):193–208.
  • Rousseau D.M. (1990): “Normative Beliefs in Fund-Raising Organizations”, Group & Organization Management, 15(4), 448-460.
  • Sarvay, M. (1999): “Knowledge Management and Competition in The Consulting Industry”. California Management Review, 41(2): 95–107.
  • Smith P. (2002): “A Performance Based Approach to Knowledge Management”, Journal of Knowledge Management Practice, March. Skyrme, D. and Amidon. D. (1998): “New Measures of Success”. Journal of Business Strategy, January/February: 20-24.
  • Soliman, F. and Spooner, K. (2000): “Strategies for Implementing Knowledge Management: Role of Human Resource Management”, Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(4), 337-345.
  • Spender, J.C. (1996): “Making Knowledge the Basis of a Dynamic Theory of the Firm”, Strategic Management Journal. 7: 45-62.
  • Starbuck, W.H. (1983): “Organizations as Action Generators”, American Sociological Review, 48:91-102.
  • Teece. D. (1998): “Capturing Value From Knowledge Assets: The New Economy, Markets for Know How and Intangible Assets”. California Management Review. 40(3):55-79.
  • Yeung, A. C. L., , Lai, K., and Yee, R. W,. (2007): “Organizational Learning, Innovativeness, and Organizational Performance: A Qualitative Investigation”, International Journal of Production Research, 45(11): 2459–2477.
  • Wiig, K. M. (1997): “Knowledge Management: An Introduction and Perspective”, Journal of Knowledge Management, 1(1): 6-14.
  • Willem, A. and Buelens, M. (2009): “Knowledge Sharing in İnter-Unit Cooperative Episodes: The Impact of Organizational Structure Dimensions,” International Journal of Information Management , 29, 151-160.
  • Zander, U., and Kogut. B.(1995): “Knowledge and The .Speed of the Transfer and Imitation of Organizational Capabilities: An Empirical Test”, Organization Science, 6: 76-92.
There are 65 citations in total.

Details

Other ID JA58DA34VN
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Nigar Demircan Çakar This is me

Sibel Yıldız This is me

Serkan Dur This is me

Publication Date February 1, 2010
Published in Issue Year 2010 Volume: 10 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Çakar, N. D., Yıldız, S., & Dur, S. (2010). THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS: THE EFFECTS OF ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE AND STRUCTURE. Ege Academic Review, 10(1), 71-93.
AMA Çakar ND, Yıldız S, Dur S. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS: THE EFFECTS OF ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE AND STRUCTURE. ear. February 2010;10(1):71-93.
Chicago Çakar, Nigar Demircan, Sibel Yıldız, and Serkan Dur. “THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS: THE EFFECTS OF ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE AND STRUCTURE”. Ege Academic Review 10, no. 1 (February 2010): 71-93.
EndNote Çakar ND, Yıldız S, Dur S (February 1, 2010) THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS: THE EFFECTS OF ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE AND STRUCTURE. Ege Academic Review 10 1 71–93.
IEEE N. D. Çakar, S. Yıldız, and S. Dur, “THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS: THE EFFECTS OF ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE AND STRUCTURE”, ear, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 71–93, 2010.
ISNAD Çakar, Nigar Demircan et al. “THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS: THE EFFECTS OF ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE AND STRUCTURE”. Ege Academic Review 10/1 (February 2010), 71-93.
JAMA Çakar ND, Yıldız S, Dur S. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS: THE EFFECTS OF ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE AND STRUCTURE. ear. 2010;10:71–93.
MLA Çakar, Nigar Demircan et al. “THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS: THE EFFECTS OF ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE AND STRUCTURE”. Ege Academic Review, vol. 10, no. 1, 2010, pp. 71-93.
Vancouver Çakar ND, Yıldız S, Dur S. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS: THE EFFECTS OF ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE AND STRUCTURE. ear. 2010;10(1):71-93.