BibTex RIS Cite

Decomposition Methods for the Analysis of Energy Consumption in Kyrgyzstan (2002-2011)

Year 2015, Volume: 15 Issue: 1, 39 - 52, 01.02.2015

Abstract

This paper aims to investigate sectorial (service, industry and agriculture)energy consumption in Kyrgyzstan economy for the 20025-2011 periods. The results indicate that the primary energy consumption has been increased as a result of production and structural effect but decreased as for intensity effect. Also production effect has the strongest influence on primary energy consumption in accordance with other two effects. It has been clearly seen that sectoral energy consumption increase with production closely. Rise in primary energy consumption during 2002-2011 periods was mostly due to rise in production. Similarly, structure effect has been come to conclusion as positive correlation with primary energy consumption because of increase in relative share of energy intensive sectors (especially industry) in national income. However results for intensity effect shows that till 2009, it decreased primary energy consumption, but after 2009, there has been moderate decrease in energy intensity in Kyrgyzstan economy

References

  • Ang, B.W. ve Liu, F.L. (2004) A “Generalized Fisc- her Index Approach to Energy Decomposition Analysis” Energy Economics, 26:757-763.
  • Ang, B.W. (2004) “Decomposition Analysis for Po- licy Making in Energy: Which Is Preferred Method?” Energy Policy, 32(9):1131-1139.
  • Asian Development Bank (2004) “Fact Sheet 2012” http://www.adb.org/publications/kyrgyz-republic-fact- sheet, (20.04. 2013).
  • Cornillie, J. ve Frankhauser, S. (2004) “The Energy Intensity of Transition Countries” Energy Economics, 26:283-295.
  • DEIK (2012) “Kırgızistan Ülke Bülteni” Dış Ekono- mik İlişkiler Kurulu, Ankara.
  • Ediger, V. ve Huvaz, Ö. (2006) “Examining the Sec- toral Energy Use in Turkish Economy (1980-2000) With the Help of Decomposition Analysis” Energy Conversati- on and Management, 47:732-745.
  • Egeli, H.A. ve Emsen, Ö.S. (2002) “Geçiş Sürecinde Kırgızistan Ekonomisi” Sosyal Bilimciler Dergisi, 103-116.
  • Granel, F. (2003) “A Comperative Analysis of Index Decomposition Methods” Master Thesis, National Uni- versity of Singapore, Singapore , Deparment of Industrial and System Engineering.
  • Greening, L., William, B., Schipper, L. ve Khrushch, M. (1997) “Comparison of Six Decomposition Met- hods: Application to Aggregate Energy Intensity for Manufacturing in 10 OECD Countries” Energy Econo- mic,19:375-390.
  • Hoekstra, R. ve Van Der Bergh, J. (2003) “Com- paring Structural and Index Decomposition Analysis” Energy Economics, 25:39-64.
  • Jungitz, A. (20.06.2013) “Decomposition Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Energy and Material Inputs in Germany” http://www.petre.org.uk/papers.htm
  • Kyrgyzstan Country Report, Transformation Index BTI 2012(2013) http://www.bti-project.org/country-re- ports/pse/kgz. (20.04.2013)
  • Ma, C. ve Stern, D. (2007) “China’sChanging Energy Intensity Trend, A Decomposition Analysis” Energy Eco- nomics, 30:1037-1053.
  • Mazat, N. ve Serrano, F. (2009) “An Analysis of Soviet Economic Growth From the 1950’s to the Collapse of USSR” Centro Sraffa Working Paper Series.
  • Ramazanoğlu, G. ve Acar, İ. (2003 ) “Bir Geçiş Eko- nomisi Örneği Olarak Kırgızistan: Siyasi Ekonomik ve Toplumsal Yanaşımlar” Review of Social, Economic and Business Studies , 7/8:385-402.
  • Steenhof, P. (2006) “Decomposition of Electricity Demand in China’s Industrial Sector” Energy Economics, 28:370-384.
  • Vehmas, J. (2010) “AB ve Türkiye’de CO2 Etkinliği Gelişimi” Finlandiya Geleceği Araştırma Merkezi Turku Ekonomi ve İş İdaresi Okulu.
  • Zhang, Z.X. (2003) “Why Did the Energy Intensity Fall in China’s Industrial Sector in 1990’s; The Relative Importance of Structural Change and Intensity Change” Energy Economics , 25:625-638.

Kırgızistan Enerji Tüketiminin Ayrıştırma Yöntemiyle Analizi (2002-2011)

Year 2015, Volume: 15 Issue: 1, 39 - 52, 01.02.2015

Abstract

Bu çalışma 2002-2011 yılları arasında Kırgızistan ekonomisi için sektörel enerji tüketimini ayrıştırma yöntemiyle analiz etmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Çalışmanın sonuçlarına göre sektörel enerji tüketiminin çıktı ve yapısal etki nedeniyle arttığı, yoğunluk etkisi nedeniyle düştüğü görülür. Ayrıca diğer iki etkiye göre çıktı etkisi sektörel enerji tüketimi üzerinde en güçlü etkiye sahiptir. Sektörel enerji tüketimi, üretim artışı ile daha çok ilşkili olduğu için, Kırgızistan ekonomisinde 2000 yılından sonra görülen hızlı ekonomik büyüme, çıktı etkisini enerji tüketimindeki artışın en önemli faktörü haline getirmiştir. Yapısal etki, milli gelir içinde tarım sektörünün payının azalmasına ve sanayi sektörünün payının artmasına bağlı olarak enerji tüketimindeki değişime arttırıcı yönde etki yapmıştır. Yoğunluk etkisi ise diğer iki etkinin tersine, ekonomide teknolojik gelişim bakımından son yıllarda görülen iyilştirmeler ve dışa açılma gibi nedenlerle enerji tüketimini düşürücü yönde etki yapmıştır

References

  • Ang, B.W. ve Liu, F.L. (2004) A “Generalized Fisc- her Index Approach to Energy Decomposition Analysis” Energy Economics, 26:757-763.
  • Ang, B.W. (2004) “Decomposition Analysis for Po- licy Making in Energy: Which Is Preferred Method?” Energy Policy, 32(9):1131-1139.
  • Asian Development Bank (2004) “Fact Sheet 2012” http://www.adb.org/publications/kyrgyz-republic-fact- sheet, (20.04. 2013).
  • Cornillie, J. ve Frankhauser, S. (2004) “The Energy Intensity of Transition Countries” Energy Economics, 26:283-295.
  • DEIK (2012) “Kırgızistan Ülke Bülteni” Dış Ekono- mik İlişkiler Kurulu, Ankara.
  • Ediger, V. ve Huvaz, Ö. (2006) “Examining the Sec- toral Energy Use in Turkish Economy (1980-2000) With the Help of Decomposition Analysis” Energy Conversati- on and Management, 47:732-745.
  • Egeli, H.A. ve Emsen, Ö.S. (2002) “Geçiş Sürecinde Kırgızistan Ekonomisi” Sosyal Bilimciler Dergisi, 103-116.
  • Granel, F. (2003) “A Comperative Analysis of Index Decomposition Methods” Master Thesis, National Uni- versity of Singapore, Singapore , Deparment of Industrial and System Engineering.
  • Greening, L., William, B., Schipper, L. ve Khrushch, M. (1997) “Comparison of Six Decomposition Met- hods: Application to Aggregate Energy Intensity for Manufacturing in 10 OECD Countries” Energy Econo- mic,19:375-390.
  • Hoekstra, R. ve Van Der Bergh, J. (2003) “Com- paring Structural and Index Decomposition Analysis” Energy Economics, 25:39-64.
  • Jungitz, A. (20.06.2013) “Decomposition Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Energy and Material Inputs in Germany” http://www.petre.org.uk/papers.htm
  • Kyrgyzstan Country Report, Transformation Index BTI 2012(2013) http://www.bti-project.org/country-re- ports/pse/kgz. (20.04.2013)
  • Ma, C. ve Stern, D. (2007) “China’sChanging Energy Intensity Trend, A Decomposition Analysis” Energy Eco- nomics, 30:1037-1053.
  • Mazat, N. ve Serrano, F. (2009) “An Analysis of Soviet Economic Growth From the 1950’s to the Collapse of USSR” Centro Sraffa Working Paper Series.
  • Ramazanoğlu, G. ve Acar, İ. (2003 ) “Bir Geçiş Eko- nomisi Örneği Olarak Kırgızistan: Siyasi Ekonomik ve Toplumsal Yanaşımlar” Review of Social, Economic and Business Studies , 7/8:385-402.
  • Steenhof, P. (2006) “Decomposition of Electricity Demand in China’s Industrial Sector” Energy Economics, 28:370-384.
  • Vehmas, J. (2010) “AB ve Türkiye’de CO2 Etkinliği Gelişimi” Finlandiya Geleceği Araştırma Merkezi Turku Ekonomi ve İş İdaresi Okulu.
  • Zhang, Z.X. (2003) “Why Did the Energy Intensity Fall in China’s Industrial Sector in 1990’s; The Relative Importance of Structural Change and Intensity Change” Energy Economics , 25:625-638.
There are 18 citations in total.

Details

Other ID JA88VU93KY
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Aziz Bostan This is me

Alper Yılmaz This is me

G. Afşin Ravanoğlu This is me

Publication Date February 1, 2015
Published in Issue Year 2015 Volume: 15 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Bostan, A., Yılmaz, A., & Ravanoğlu, G. A. (2015). Decomposition Methods for the Analysis of Energy Consumption in Kyrgyzstan (2002-2011). Ege Academic Review, 15(1), 39-52.
AMA Bostan A, Yılmaz A, Ravanoğlu GA. Decomposition Methods for the Analysis of Energy Consumption in Kyrgyzstan (2002-2011). ear. February 2015;15(1):39-52.
Chicago Bostan, Aziz, Alper Yılmaz, and G. Afşin Ravanoğlu. “Decomposition Methods for the Analysis of Energy Consumption in Kyrgyzstan (2002-2011)”. Ege Academic Review 15, no. 1 (February 2015): 39-52.
EndNote Bostan A, Yılmaz A, Ravanoğlu GA (February 1, 2015) Decomposition Methods for the Analysis of Energy Consumption in Kyrgyzstan (2002-2011). Ege Academic Review 15 1 39–52.
IEEE A. Bostan, A. Yılmaz, and G. A. Ravanoğlu, “Decomposition Methods for the Analysis of Energy Consumption in Kyrgyzstan (2002-2011)”, ear, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 39–52, 2015.
ISNAD Bostan, Aziz et al. “Decomposition Methods for the Analysis of Energy Consumption in Kyrgyzstan (2002-2011)”. Ege Academic Review 15/1 (February 2015), 39-52.
JAMA Bostan A, Yılmaz A, Ravanoğlu GA. Decomposition Methods for the Analysis of Energy Consumption in Kyrgyzstan (2002-2011). ear. 2015;15:39–52.
MLA Bostan, Aziz et al. “Decomposition Methods for the Analysis of Energy Consumption in Kyrgyzstan (2002-2011)”. Ege Academic Review, vol. 15, no. 1, 2015, pp. 39-52.
Vancouver Bostan A, Yılmaz A, Ravanoğlu GA. Decomposition Methods for the Analysis of Energy Consumption in Kyrgyzstan (2002-2011). ear. 2015;15(1):39-52.