BibTex RIS Cite

An Examination of Knowledge Sharing Behavior in the Context of the Theory of Planned Behavior and Social Exchange Theory: An Empirical Investigation on Dermatologists

Year 2016, Volume: 16 Issue: 2, 241 - 256, 01.05.2016

Aysun Çetin Melike Şentürk

Abstract

One of the most important factors that determine the growth pace of professions, and of science in the wider sense, takes places through the effective sharing of the professional knowledge by the individuals from various fields of profession. However, it is also known that those individuals who possess knowledge are inclined to hide it, instead of sharing it, due to various reasons. Therefore, the studies devoted to the examination of the factors affecting the knowledge sharing behavior at the individual level positively or negatively are vital to the humanity. In the study carried out by this motivation, the Theory of Planned Behavior and Social Exchange Theory were appropriated as the theoretical frameworks, and based on these, the relationships among “expectation of personal output”, “expectation of loss of knowledge power”, “expectation of reciprocity”, and “attitude towards knowledge sharing” were examined as the factors considered to be affecting the knowledge sharing behavior of individuals. In order to test the research hypotheses, a quantitative investigation was carried out based on the data obtained from physicians from 254 dermatologists across Turkey, among whom the knowledge sharing is of vital importance. Taking the research results into consideration, it has been seen that personal output and reciprocity expectations of dermatologists affect their attitudes towards knowledge sharing positively, whereas their expectations concerning the loss of knowledge power affect their attitudes towards knowledge sharing negatively. Moreover, it has also been observed that the attitude towards knowledge sharing affects the knowledge sharing behavior positively. The results of the study has confirmed the research model and has demonstrated the explanatory powers of the Theory of Planned Behavior and Social Exchange Theory in estimating dermatologists’ behavior of knowledge sharing

Keywords

Knowledge Sharing Behavior Personel Output Expectations Loss of Knowledge Power Reciprocity Expectation Theory of Planned Behavior Social Exchange Theory

References

  • Ajzen, I. (1985) From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of
  • Planned Behavior. Julius Kuhl ve Jürgen Beckmann (Editörler) “Action Control”, 11-39. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Ajzen, I. (1991) “The Theory of Planned Behavior”
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50 (2), 179-211. Ajzen, I. ve Fishbein, M. (1977) “Attitude-Behavior
  • Relations: A Theoretical Analysis and Review of Empirical Research” Psychological Bulletin, 84 (5), 888. Akgül, A. ve Çevik, O. (2005) İstatistiksel Analiz
  • Teknikleri, SPSS’te İşletme Yönetimi Uygulamaları, 2. Baskı, Ankara:Emek Ofset Ltd. Şti. Aydıntan, B., Göksel, A. ve Bingöl, D. (2010) “Örtülü
  • Bilgi Paylaşım Niyeti Üzerinde Sosyal Sermaye Ve Denetim Merkezi Odaklılığının Rolü: Hekimlikte Bir Alan Araştırması” Gazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 12 (1), 26. Bartol, K. M. ve Srivastava, A. (2002) “Encouraging
  • Knowledge Sharing: The Role of Organizational Reward Systems” Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 9(1), 64-76. Bayram, N. (2010) Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesine Giriş
  • AMOS Uygulamaları. Ankara:Ezgi Kitabevi. Bentler, P. M. ve Speckart, G. (1979) “Models of
  • Attitude–Behavior Relations” Psychological Review, 86 (5), 452. Bock, G. W. ve Kim, Y. G. (2002) “Breaking the Myths of Rewards: An Exploratory Study of Attitudes
  • About Knowledge Sharing” Information Resources Management Journal (IRMJ), 15(2), 14-21. Bock, G. W., Zmud, R. W., Kim, Y. G. ve Lee, J. N. (2005)
  • “Behavioral Intention Formation in Knowledge Sharing: Examining the Roles of Extrinsic Motivators, Social-Psychological Forces, and Organizational Climate” MIS Quarterly, 29 (1), 87-111. Chang, M. K. (1998) “Predicting Unethical Behavior:
  • A Comparison of the Theory of Reasoned Action and the Theory of Planned Behavior” Journal of Business Ethics, 17 (16), 1825–1834.
  • Chennamaneni, A. (2006) “Determinants of
  • Knowledge Sharing Behaviors: Developing and Testing an Integrated Theoretical Model” Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Teksas Üniversitesi. Chiu, C. M., Hsu, M. H. ve Wang, E. T. (2006)
  • “Understanding Knowledge Sharing in Virtual Communities: An Integration of Social Capital and Social Cognitive Theories” Decision Support Systems, (3), 1872-1888.
  • Cohen, D. (1998) “Towards a Knowledge Context:
  • Report on the First Annual U.C. Berkeley Forum on Knowledge and the Firm” California Management Review, 40 (3), 22-39. Constant, D., Kiesler, S. ve Sproull, L. (1994) “What’s
  • Mine is Ours, or is It? A Study of Attitudes About Information Sharing” Information Systems Research, 5 (4), 400-421. Cummings, J. N. (2004) “Work Groups, Structural
  • Diversity, and Knowledge Sharing in A Global Organization” Management Science, 50 (3), 352-364. Cropanzano, R. ve Mitchell, M. S. (2005) “Social
  • Exchange Theory: An Interdisciplinary Review” Journal of Management, 31(6), 874-900. Çelik, H. E. ve Yılmaz, V. (2013). Yapısal Eşitlik
  • Modellemesi Temel Kavramlar Uygulamalar- Programlama. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık. Demirel, Y.ve Seçkin, Z. (2008) “Bilgi ve Bigi
  • Paylaşımının Yenilikçilik Üzerine Etkisi”, Ç.Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 17 (1), 189-202
  • De Vries, R. E., Van den Hooff, B. ve de Ridder, J. A. (2006) “Explaining Knowledge Sharing the Role of
  • Team Communication Styles, Job Satisfaction, and Performance Beliefs” Communication Research, 33 (2), 135. Fishbein, M. ve Ajzen, I. (1975) Beliefs, Attitude,
  • Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley Pub Lishing Company, Reading, MA. Fortin, D. R. (2000) “Clipping Coupons in Cyberspace:
  • A Proposed Model of Behavior for Deal-Prone Consumers” Psychology and Marketing, 17, 515–534. Gray, P. H. (2001) “The Impact of Knowledge
  • Repositories on Power and Control in the Workplace,” Information Technology & People, 14(4), 368-384. Göksel, A., Aydıntan, B. ve Bingöl, D.(2011) “Örgütlerde
  • Bilgi Paylaşım Davranışı : Sosyal Sermaye Boyutundan Bir Bakış.” Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 65 (4), 87- Hair, J. F.; Bush, R.P. ve Ortinau, D.J. (2000). Marketing
  • Research A Practical Approach for the New Millenium, th Edition, Prentice Hall. Hall, H. (2001) Social Exchange for Knowledge
  • Exchange,” Managing Knowledge: Conversations and Critiques. Leicester Üniversitesi Management Centre, Nisan 2011.
  • Hansen, M.T., (1999) “The Search-Transfer Problem:
  • The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits, Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 82-111. Hendriks, P. (1999) “Why Share knowledge? The Influence of ICT on the Motivation for Knowledge
  • Sharing” Knowledge and Process Management, 6(2), 100. Hsu, M. H., Ju, T. L., Yen, C. H. ve Chang, C. M. (2007)
  • “Knowledge Sharing Behavior in Virtual Communities: The Relationship Between Trust, Self-efficacy, and Outcome Expectations” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65 (2), 153-169. Husted, K. ve Michailova, S. (2002) “Diagnosing and Fighting Knowledge-Sharing Hostility” Organizational Dynamics, 31 (1), 60-73.
  • Kankanhalli, A., Tan, B. C. ve Wei, K. K. (2005)
  • “Contributing Knowledge to Electronic Knowledge Repositories: An Empirical Investigation” MIS Quarterly, 113-143. Köseoğlu, M. A., S. Ocak ve G. Şimşek (2009) “Bilgi
  • Paylaşımını Etkileyen Faktörler Nelerdir?: Bir Kamu Hastanesi Örneği”, Uluslararası VII. Bilgi, Ekonomi ve Yönetim Kongresi, Yalova Üniversitesi- İstanbul Üniversitesi, 598- 612. Kubo I., Saka A. ve Pam S. L. (2001) “Behind the Scenes of Knowledge Sharing in a Japanese Bank” Human
  • Resource Development International, 4(4): 465–485. Kwok, J. S. ve Gao, S. (2004) “Knowledge Sharing
  • Community in P2P Network: A Study of Motivational Perspective” Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(1), 102. Lakhani, K. ve von Hippel, E. (2003) “How Open
  • Source Software Works: ‘Free’ User-to-User Assistance” Research Policy, 32(6), 923-943. Nonaka, I. (1994) “A Dynamic Theory of Organizational
  • Knowledge Creation”, Organization Science, 5 (1). 14- Nonaka I., ve Konno, N. (1998) “The Concept of ‘Ba’:
  • Building a Foundation for Knowledge Creation,” California Management Review, 40 (3), 40-54. O’Dell, C., Grayson, J.C ve Essaides, N. (2003) Ne
  • Bildiğimizi Bir Bilseydik, çev. Günhan Günay. Dışbank Kitapları, Rota, İstanbul. Polanyi, M. (1966) The Tacit Dimension. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
  • Quinn, J. B., Anderson, P. ve Finkelstein, S. (1996)
  • “Managing Professional Intellect: Making the Most of the Best” Harvard Business Review, 74(2), 71-80. Ruggles, R. (1998) “The State of the Notion: Knowledge
  • Management in Practice” California Management Review, 40 (3), 80-89. Ryu, S., Ho, S. H.ve Han, I. (2003) “Knowledge Sharing
  • Behavior of Physicians in Hospitals” Expert Systems with Applications, 25 (1), 113-122. Swift, M. L. ve Virick, M. (2013) “Perceived Support,
  • Knowledge Tacitness, and Provider Knowledge Sharing” Group & Organization Management, 38 (6), 742. Sheppard, B. H., Hartwick, J. ve Warshaw, P. R. (1988) “The Theory of Reasoned Action: A Meta- analysis of Past Research with Recommendations for Modifications and Future Research” Journal of
  • Consumer Research, 15 (3), 325–343. Szulanski, G. (1996) Exploring Internal Stickiness:
  • Impediments to the Transfer of Best Practice within the Firm” Strategic Management Journal, 17, 27-43. Wang, S. ve Noe, R. A. (2010) “Knowledge Sharing: A
  • Review and Directions for Future Research” Human Resource Management Review, 20 (2), 115-131. Wasko M. M. ve Faraj, S. (2000) “It is What One Does”:
  • Why People Participate and Help Others in Electronic Communities of Practice” The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9 (2), 155-173. Wasko, M. M. ve Faraj, S. (2005) “Why Should I share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge
  • Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice” MIS quarterly, 29(1), 35-57. Von Krogh, G., Ichijo, K. ve Nonaka. I. (2002) Bilginin
  • Üretimi, Çev. Günhan Günay, Dışbank Kitapları. İstanbul: Rota Yayınları. Yeniçeri, Ö. ve Demirel, Y. (2007) “Örgüt İçi Bilgi
  • Paylaşımına Yönelik Bireysel ve Örgütsel Engeller Üzerine Bir Araştırma”, Selçuk Üniversitesi Karaman İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 12, 221-234
  • Yi, J. (2009) “A Measure of Knowledge Sharing
  • Behavior: Scale Development and Validation” Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 7(1), 65- Zaim, H., Kurt, İ. ve Seçgin, G. (2012). “Örtülü Bilginin
  • Performansa Etkisi: Uluslararsı Bir Banka Uygulaması”, İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 21 (1). 425-442.

Bilgi Paylaşma Davranışının Planlı Davranış Teorisi ve Sosyal Değişim Teorisi Bağlamında İncelenmesi: Dermatologlar Üzerine Ampirik Bir Araştırma

Year 2016, Volume: 16 Issue: 2, 241 - 256, 01.05.2016

Aysun Çetin Melike Şentürk

Abstract

Mesleklerin ve daha genel anlamda bilimin gelişim hızını belirleyen en önemli etmenlerden birisi, meslek dallarında yer alan bireylerin birbirleri arasında profesyonel bilgiyi etkin bir şekilde paylaşmasından geçmektedir. Ancak, bilgiye sahip olan bireylerin çeşitli nedenlerden dolayı bilgiyi paylaşmak yerine saklama eğiliminde oldukları da bilinmektedir. Bu nedenle, birey seviyesinde bilgi paylaşma davranışını olumlu ve olumsuz olarak etkileyen çeşitli faktörlerin incelenmesine yönelik çalışmalar tüm insanlık için önem arz etmektedir. Bu motivasyonla gerçekleştirilen araştırmada, teorik çerçeve olarak Planlı Davranış Teorisi ve Sosyal Değişim Teorisi benimsenmiş ve bu teorilerden hareketle bireylerin bilgi paylaşma davranışını etkilediği düşünülen faktörler olarak “kişisel çıktı beklentisi”, “bilgi gücü kaybı beklentisi”, “karşılık beklentisi” ve “bilgi paylaşımına yönelik tutum” arasındaki ilişkiler incelenmiştir. Araştırma hipotezlerini test etmek için, bilgi paylaşımının hayati öneme sahip olduğu hekimlik mesleğini icra eden bireylerden Türkiye genelindeki 254 dermatologdan elde edilen verilerle nicel bir araştırma yürütülmüştür. Araştırmanın sonuçlarına göre, dermatologların kişisel çıktı ve karşılık beklentilerinin bilgi paylaşımına yönelik tutumlarını olumlu olarak; bilgi gücü kaybı beklentilerinin ise, olumsuz olarak etkilediği tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca, bilgi paylaşımına yönelik tutumun da bilgi paylaşma davranışını olumlu olarak etkilediği gözlemlenmiştir. Araştırmanın sonuçları, araştırma modelini doğrulamış ve dermatologların bilgi paylaşma davranışlarını tahmin etmede Planlı Davranış Teorisi ve Sosyal Değişim Teorisinin açıklayıcı etkisini ortaya koymuştur

Keywords

Bilgi Paylaşma Davranışı Kişisel Çıktı Beklentisi Bilgi Gücü Kaybı Beklentisi Karşılık Beklentisi Planlı Davranış Teorisi Sosyal Değişim Teorisi

References

  • Ajzen, I. (1985) From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of
  • Planned Behavior. Julius Kuhl ve Jürgen Beckmann (Editörler) “Action Control”, 11-39. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Ajzen, I. (1991) “The Theory of Planned Behavior”
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50 (2), 179-211. Ajzen, I. ve Fishbein, M. (1977) “Attitude-Behavior
  • Relations: A Theoretical Analysis and Review of Empirical Research” Psychological Bulletin, 84 (5), 888. Akgül, A. ve Çevik, O. (2005) İstatistiksel Analiz
  • Teknikleri, SPSS’te İşletme Yönetimi Uygulamaları, 2. Baskı, Ankara:Emek Ofset Ltd. Şti. Aydıntan, B., Göksel, A. ve Bingöl, D. (2010) “Örtülü
  • Bilgi Paylaşım Niyeti Üzerinde Sosyal Sermaye Ve Denetim Merkezi Odaklılığının Rolü: Hekimlikte Bir Alan Araştırması” Gazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 12 (1), 26. Bartol, K. M. ve Srivastava, A. (2002) “Encouraging
  • Knowledge Sharing: The Role of Organizational Reward Systems” Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 9(1), 64-76. Bayram, N. (2010) Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesine Giriş
  • AMOS Uygulamaları. Ankara:Ezgi Kitabevi. Bentler, P. M. ve Speckart, G. (1979) “Models of
  • Attitude–Behavior Relations” Psychological Review, 86 (5), 452. Bock, G. W. ve Kim, Y. G. (2002) “Breaking the Myths of Rewards: An Exploratory Study of Attitudes
  • About Knowledge Sharing” Information Resources Management Journal (IRMJ), 15(2), 14-21. Bock, G. W., Zmud, R. W., Kim, Y. G. ve Lee, J. N. (2005)
  • “Behavioral Intention Formation in Knowledge Sharing: Examining the Roles of Extrinsic Motivators, Social-Psychological Forces, and Organizational Climate” MIS Quarterly, 29 (1), 87-111. Chang, M. K. (1998) “Predicting Unethical Behavior:
  • A Comparison of the Theory of Reasoned Action and the Theory of Planned Behavior” Journal of Business Ethics, 17 (16), 1825–1834.
  • Chennamaneni, A. (2006) “Determinants of
  • Knowledge Sharing Behaviors: Developing and Testing an Integrated Theoretical Model” Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Teksas Üniversitesi. Chiu, C. M., Hsu, M. H. ve Wang, E. T. (2006)
  • “Understanding Knowledge Sharing in Virtual Communities: An Integration of Social Capital and Social Cognitive Theories” Decision Support Systems, (3), 1872-1888.
  • Cohen, D. (1998) “Towards a Knowledge Context:
  • Report on the First Annual U.C. Berkeley Forum on Knowledge and the Firm” California Management Review, 40 (3), 22-39. Constant, D., Kiesler, S. ve Sproull, L. (1994) “What’s
  • Mine is Ours, or is It? A Study of Attitudes About Information Sharing” Information Systems Research, 5 (4), 400-421. Cummings, J. N. (2004) “Work Groups, Structural
  • Diversity, and Knowledge Sharing in A Global Organization” Management Science, 50 (3), 352-364. Cropanzano, R. ve Mitchell, M. S. (2005) “Social
  • Exchange Theory: An Interdisciplinary Review” Journal of Management, 31(6), 874-900. Çelik, H. E. ve Yılmaz, V. (2013). Yapısal Eşitlik
  • Modellemesi Temel Kavramlar Uygulamalar- Programlama. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık. Demirel, Y.ve Seçkin, Z. (2008) “Bilgi ve Bigi
  • Paylaşımının Yenilikçilik Üzerine Etkisi”, Ç.Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 17 (1), 189-202
  • De Vries, R. E., Van den Hooff, B. ve de Ridder, J. A. (2006) “Explaining Knowledge Sharing the Role of
  • Team Communication Styles, Job Satisfaction, and Performance Beliefs” Communication Research, 33 (2), 135. Fishbein, M. ve Ajzen, I. (1975) Beliefs, Attitude,
  • Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley Pub Lishing Company, Reading, MA. Fortin, D. R. (2000) “Clipping Coupons in Cyberspace:
  • A Proposed Model of Behavior for Deal-Prone Consumers” Psychology and Marketing, 17, 515–534. Gray, P. H. (2001) “The Impact of Knowledge
  • Repositories on Power and Control in the Workplace,” Information Technology & People, 14(4), 368-384. Göksel, A., Aydıntan, B. ve Bingöl, D.(2011) “Örgütlerde
  • Bilgi Paylaşım Davranışı : Sosyal Sermaye Boyutundan Bir Bakış.” Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 65 (4), 87- Hair, J. F.; Bush, R.P. ve Ortinau, D.J. (2000). Marketing
  • Research A Practical Approach for the New Millenium, th Edition, Prentice Hall. Hall, H. (2001) Social Exchange for Knowledge
  • Exchange,” Managing Knowledge: Conversations and Critiques. Leicester Üniversitesi Management Centre, Nisan 2011.
  • Hansen, M.T., (1999) “The Search-Transfer Problem:
  • The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits, Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 82-111. Hendriks, P. (1999) “Why Share knowledge? The Influence of ICT on the Motivation for Knowledge
  • Sharing” Knowledge and Process Management, 6(2), 100. Hsu, M. H., Ju, T. L., Yen, C. H. ve Chang, C. M. (2007)
  • “Knowledge Sharing Behavior in Virtual Communities: The Relationship Between Trust, Self-efficacy, and Outcome Expectations” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65 (2), 153-169. Husted, K. ve Michailova, S. (2002) “Diagnosing and Fighting Knowledge-Sharing Hostility” Organizational Dynamics, 31 (1), 60-73.
  • Kankanhalli, A., Tan, B. C. ve Wei, K. K. (2005)
  • “Contributing Knowledge to Electronic Knowledge Repositories: An Empirical Investigation” MIS Quarterly, 113-143. Köseoğlu, M. A., S. Ocak ve G. Şimşek (2009) “Bilgi
  • Paylaşımını Etkileyen Faktörler Nelerdir?: Bir Kamu Hastanesi Örneği”, Uluslararası VII. Bilgi, Ekonomi ve Yönetim Kongresi, Yalova Üniversitesi- İstanbul Üniversitesi, 598- 612. Kubo I., Saka A. ve Pam S. L. (2001) “Behind the Scenes of Knowledge Sharing in a Japanese Bank” Human
  • Resource Development International, 4(4): 465–485. Kwok, J. S. ve Gao, S. (2004) “Knowledge Sharing
  • Community in P2P Network: A Study of Motivational Perspective” Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(1), 102. Lakhani, K. ve von Hippel, E. (2003) “How Open
  • Source Software Works: ‘Free’ User-to-User Assistance” Research Policy, 32(6), 923-943. Nonaka, I. (1994) “A Dynamic Theory of Organizational
  • Knowledge Creation”, Organization Science, 5 (1). 14- Nonaka I., ve Konno, N. (1998) “The Concept of ‘Ba’:
  • Building a Foundation for Knowledge Creation,” California Management Review, 40 (3), 40-54. O’Dell, C., Grayson, J.C ve Essaides, N. (2003) Ne
  • Bildiğimizi Bir Bilseydik, çev. Günhan Günay. Dışbank Kitapları, Rota, İstanbul. Polanyi, M. (1966) The Tacit Dimension. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
  • Quinn, J. B., Anderson, P. ve Finkelstein, S. (1996)
  • “Managing Professional Intellect: Making the Most of the Best” Harvard Business Review, 74(2), 71-80. Ruggles, R. (1998) “The State of the Notion: Knowledge
  • Management in Practice” California Management Review, 40 (3), 80-89. Ryu, S., Ho, S. H.ve Han, I. (2003) “Knowledge Sharing
  • Behavior of Physicians in Hospitals” Expert Systems with Applications, 25 (1), 113-122. Swift, M. L. ve Virick, M. (2013) “Perceived Support,
  • Knowledge Tacitness, and Provider Knowledge Sharing” Group & Organization Management, 38 (6), 742. Sheppard, B. H., Hartwick, J. ve Warshaw, P. R. (1988) “The Theory of Reasoned Action: A Meta- analysis of Past Research with Recommendations for Modifications and Future Research” Journal of
  • Consumer Research, 15 (3), 325–343. Szulanski, G. (1996) Exploring Internal Stickiness:
  • Impediments to the Transfer of Best Practice within the Firm” Strategic Management Journal, 17, 27-43. Wang, S. ve Noe, R. A. (2010) “Knowledge Sharing: A
  • Review and Directions for Future Research” Human Resource Management Review, 20 (2), 115-131. Wasko M. M. ve Faraj, S. (2000) “It is What One Does”:
  • Why People Participate and Help Others in Electronic Communities of Practice” The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9 (2), 155-173. Wasko, M. M. ve Faraj, S. (2005) “Why Should I share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge
  • Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice” MIS quarterly, 29(1), 35-57. Von Krogh, G., Ichijo, K. ve Nonaka. I. (2002) Bilginin
  • Üretimi, Çev. Günhan Günay, Dışbank Kitapları. İstanbul: Rota Yayınları. Yeniçeri, Ö. ve Demirel, Y. (2007) “Örgüt İçi Bilgi
  • Paylaşımına Yönelik Bireysel ve Örgütsel Engeller Üzerine Bir Araştırma”, Selçuk Üniversitesi Karaman İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 12, 221-234
  • Yi, J. (2009) “A Measure of Knowledge Sharing
  • Behavior: Scale Development and Validation” Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 7(1), 65- Zaim, H., Kurt, İ. ve Seçgin, G. (2012). “Örtülü Bilginin
  • Performansa Etkisi: Uluslararsı Bir Banka Uygulaması”, İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 21 (1). 425-442.
There are 58 citations in total.

Details

Other ID JA24KA83MN
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Aysun Çetin This is me

Melike Şentürk This is me

Publication Date May 1, 2016
Published in Issue Year 2016 Volume: 16 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Çetin, A., & Şentürk, M. (2016). An Examination of Knowledge Sharing Behavior in the Context of the Theory of Planned Behavior and Social Exchange Theory: An Empirical Investigation on Dermatologists. Ege Academic Review, 16(2), 241-256.
AMA Çetin A, Şentürk M. An Examination of Knowledge Sharing Behavior in the Context of the Theory of Planned Behavior and Social Exchange Theory: An Empirical Investigation on Dermatologists. ear. May 2016;16(2):241-256.
Chicago Çetin, Aysun, and Melike Şentürk. “An Examination of Knowledge Sharing Behavior in the Context of the Theory of Planned Behavior and Social Exchange Theory: An Empirical Investigation on Dermatologists”. Ege Academic Review 16, no. 2 (May 2016): 241-56.
EndNote Çetin A, Şentürk M (May 1, 2016) An Examination of Knowledge Sharing Behavior in the Context of the Theory of Planned Behavior and Social Exchange Theory: An Empirical Investigation on Dermatologists. Ege Academic Review 16 2 241–256.
IEEE A. Çetin and M. Şentürk, “An Examination of Knowledge Sharing Behavior in the Context of the Theory of Planned Behavior and Social Exchange Theory: An Empirical Investigation on Dermatologists”, ear, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 241–256, 2016.
ISNAD Çetin, Aysun - Şentürk, Melike. “An Examination of Knowledge Sharing Behavior in the Context of the Theory of Planned Behavior and Social Exchange Theory: An Empirical Investigation on Dermatologists”. Ege Academic Review 16/2 (May 2016), 241-256.
JAMA Çetin A, Şentürk M. An Examination of Knowledge Sharing Behavior in the Context of the Theory of Planned Behavior and Social Exchange Theory: An Empirical Investigation on Dermatologists. ear. 2016;16:241–256.
MLA Çetin, Aysun and Melike Şentürk. “An Examination of Knowledge Sharing Behavior in the Context of the Theory of Planned Behavior and Social Exchange Theory: An Empirical Investigation on Dermatologists”. Ege Academic Review, vol. 16, no. 2, 2016, pp. 241-56.
Vancouver Çetin A, Şentürk M. An Examination of Knowledge Sharing Behavior in the Context of the Theory of Planned Behavior and Social Exchange Theory: An Empirical Investigation on Dermatologists. ear. 2016;16(2):241-56.
 Download Cover Image