Yapay Zekâ Araçlarının İlkokulda Kullanılmasına Yönelik Akademisyen Görüşleri

Year 2025, Issue: 57, 67 - 80, 02.06.2025

Sena Ölçer , Burak Cesur , Zehra Kurşun - Şen , Elçin Çetinkale , Bilge Gök

https://doi.org/10.33418/education.1515939

Abstract

Bu araştırma, yapay zekâ tabanlı uygulamaların, özellikle ChatGPT gibi dil modellerinin, ilkokullarda öğretme-öğrenme sürecinde ve sınıf içi uygulamalarda nasıl kullanılabileceğine ilişkin akademisyen görüşlerini ortaya koymayı amaçlamaktadır. Araştırmada, nitel araştırma desenlerinden biri olan durum çalışması yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Çalışma grubunu, Türkiye'deki farklı devlet ve vakıf üniversitelerinde görev yapan, sınıf eğitimi alanında uzman 10 akademisyen oluşturmaktadır. Katılımcılar, amaçlı örnekleme yöntemiyle belirlenmiş ve veri toplama aracı olarak araştırmacılar tarafından geliştirilen yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme formu kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen nitel veriler, içerik analizi yöntemiyle sistematik bir biçimde analiz edilmiştir. Araştırmanın bulguları, yapay zekâ araçlarının özellikle ölçme-değerlendirme, materyal hazırlama ve müfredatı anlama gibi alanlarda öğretmenlerin iş yükünü azaltarak zaman tasarrufu sağladığını; ayrıca mesleki gelişimlerine destek olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Öğrenciler açısından ise bireysel öğrenmeyi desteklediği, motivasyonu artırdığı ve öğrenme hızına uyum sağladığı ifade edilmiştir. Bununla birlikte, etik ve güvenlik riskleri, üst düzey düşünme becerilerinin zayıflaması ve yanlış öğrenme gibi sınırlılıklara da dikkat çekilmiştir. Yapay zekâ araçlarının pedagojik amaçlarla, programla uyumlu biçimde kullanılması gerektiği vurgulanmıştır. Ayrıca, bu araçların sosyal bilgiler, Türkçe, matematik ve fen bilimleri derslerinde problem çözme, yaratıcı yazma ve kavram öğretimi gibi uygulamalarda etkili şekilde kullanılabileceği belirtilmiştir. Sonuç olarak, yapay zekânın ilkokul öğretimine dengeli ve bilinçli bir şekilde entegrasyonunun önemi vurgulanmakta; öğretmenlerin yapay zekâ okuryazarlığının ve etik farkındalıklarının geliştirilmesi önerilmektedir.

Keywords

Akademisyen görüşleri , ChatGPT , yapay zekâ

Ethical Statement

Etik kurul onayı Fatih Sultan Mehmet Vakıf Üniversitesi Yerel Etik Kurulu’ndan (Tarih: 07.12.2023, Sayı: 30/25) alınmıştır.

The Opinions of Academics on the Usage of Artificial Intelligence Tools in Primary Schools

Abstract

Within the scope of this research, it is aimed to obtain academician opinions on the use of artificial intelligence applications such as ChatGPT in the teaching-learning process and classroom applications in primary schools. In this research, the case study method, which is one of the qualitative research approaches, was used. The study group of the research consists of 10 academicians working in state and foundation universities. A semi-structured interview form prepared by the researchers was used as a data collection tool. The data obtained were analyzed by content analysis method. The findings reveal that artificial intelligence tools make significant contributions to the teaching-learning process in areas such as measurement and evaluation and material preparation; to teachers in terms of saving time and understanding the curriculum; to professional development in terms of following the literature and improving field knowledge; and to students in areas such as increasing motivation and supporting individual learning. However, negative aspects such as ethical and security issues, weakening of higher-order thinking skills in students, and mislearning were also pointed out. In addition, it was stated that artificial intelligence tools can be used effectively in various classroom applications in social studies, Turkish, mathematics and science courses. The study emphasizes the importance of balanced and conscious integration of artificial intelligence in education.

Keywords

Academic opinions , ChatGPT , artificial intelligence

Ethical Statement

Ethics committee approval was obtained from Fatih Sultan Mehmet Vakif University Local Ethics Committee (Date: 07.12.2023, Number: 30/25)

References

• Aslan, A. A. (2022). Using artificial intelligence in museum education. Art & Design, (30), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.18603/sanatvetasarim.1215186
• Baidoo-Anu, D., & Ansah, L. O. (2023). Education in the era of generative artificial intelligence (AI): Understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning. Journal of AI, 7(1), 52-62. https://doi.org/10.61969/jai.1337500
• Belda-Medina, J., & Calvo-Ferrer, J. R. (2022a). Preservice teachers’ knowledge and attitudes towards digital-game-based language learning. Education Sciences, 12(3), 182-198. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/educsci12030182
• Belda-Medina, J., & Calvo-Ferrer, J. R. (2022b). Using chatbots as AI conversational partners in language learning. Applied Sciences, 12(17), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3990/app12178427
• Berg, K. E., & Latin, R. W. (2008). Essentials of research methods in health, physical education, exercise science, and recreation. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
• Bozkurt, A., Xiao, J., Lambert, S., Pazurek, A., Crompton, H., Koseoglu, S., & Jandric, P. (2023). Speculative futures on ChatGPT and generative artificial intelligence (AI): A collective reflection from the educational landscape. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 18(1), 53-130. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7636568
• Caro, M. F., Josyula, D. P., Cox, M. T., & Jimenez, J. A. (2014). Design and validation of a metamodel for metacognition support in artificial intelligent systems. Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures, 9, 82-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bica.2014.07.002
• Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264-75278. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510
• Chiu, T. K. (2024). Future research recommendations for transforming higher education with generative AI. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100197
• Chomsky, N. (2023, March 8). The false promise of ChatGPT. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/08/opinion/noamchomsk-chatgpt-ai.html
• Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
• D’Mello, S., & Grasser, A. (2012). Dynamics of affective states during complex learning. Learning and Instruction, 22(2), 145-157. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.learninstruc.2011.10.001
• Demir-Dülger, E., & Gümüşeli, A. İ. (2023). Views of school principals and teachers on using artificial intelligence in education. ISPEC International Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 7(1), 133-153. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7766578
• Dinçer, S., & Doğanay, A. (2016). Adaptation study of a computer-supported teaching evaluation scale. Ondokuz Mayıs University Journal of Education Faculty, 35(1), 45-62. https://doi.org/10.7822/ omuefd.35.1.4
• Dinev, T., & Hu, Q. (2007). The centrality of awareness in the formation of user behavioral intervention toward protective information technologies. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(7), 386-408. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00133
• Erdemir, M., & İngeç, S. K. (2016). Investigating pre-service mathematics teachers’ innovation awareness and views regarding intelligent tutoring systems. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(12), 2783-2794. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.0 41212
• Fadel, C., Holmes, W., & Bialik, M. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
• Farrokhnia, M., Banihashem, S., Noroozi, O., & Wals, A. (2023). A swot analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 10(3). 460-474. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2195846
• Gao, Y., & Hu, X. (2018). The role of artificial intelligence in education: Current trends and future prospects. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 11(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10. 1109/ICISCT52966.2021.9670009
• Huang, L. (2023). Ethics of artificial intelligence in education: Student privacy and data protection. Science Insights Education Frontiers, 16(2), 2577-2587. https://doi.org/10.15354/sief.23.re202
• İşler, B., & Kılıç, M. (2021). The use and development of artificial intelligence in education. New Media Electronic Journal, 5(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.17932/IAU.EJNM.25480200.2021/ejnm_v5i1001
• Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. B. (2024). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. Sage Publications.
• Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., Stadler, M., … Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
• Khosvari, P., & Misra, S. (2019). Artificial intelligence in higher education: Current trends, challenges, and future directions. Smart Learning Environments, 6(1), 1-17.
• Kır, Ş., & Şenocak, D. (2022). The use of artificial intelligence in open and distance learning systems in the context of learner support services. Journal of Digital Technologies and Education, 1(1), 39-56. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6647642
• LeCompte, M. D., & Goetz, J. P. (1982). Problems of reliability and validity in ethnographic research. Review of Educational Research, 52(1), 31-60.
• Liu, C., Liao, M., Chang, C., & Lin, H. M. (2022). An analysis of children’ interaction with an AI chatbot and its impact on their interest in reading. Computers & Education, 189, 104576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104576
• Liu, G., & Ma, C. (2023). Measuring EFL learners’ use of ChatGPT in informal digital learning of English based on the technology acceptance model. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 17(4), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2023.2240316
• Lodge, A. (2024). Teachers’ perception of artificial intelligence in the classroom. [Doctoral dissertation, The Chicago School of Professional Psychology]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
• Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson.
• Luo, W., He, H., Liu, J., Berson, I. R., Berson, M. J., Zhou, Y., & Li, H. (2023). Aladdin’s genie or Pandora’s box for early childhood education? Experts chat on the roles, challenges, and developments of ChatGPT. Early Education and Development, 35(1), 96-113. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289 .2023.2214181
• McGarr, O. (2024). Exploring and reflecting on the influences that shape teacher Professional digital competence frameworks. Teachers and Teaching, 30(4), 509-525. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2024.2313641
• Meço, G., & Coştu, F. (2022). The use of artificial intelligence in education: A descriptive content analysis study. Journal of Social Sciences of Karadeniz Technical University, 12(23), 171-193.
• Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
• Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
• OECD (2019). How’s life in the digital age? Opportunities and risks of the digital transformation for people’s well-being. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264311800-en
• Packer (2011). The science of qualitative research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
• Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage Publications.
• Pradana, M., Elisa, H. P., & Syarifuddin, S. (2023). Discussing ChatGPT in education: A literature review and bibliometric analysis. Cogent Education, 10(2), 2243134. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X. 2023.2243134
• Saengudomlert, P., & Wongwanich, S. (2019). The negative impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on education: Perspectives from Thai teachers. In 6th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Applications (ICIEA), Tokyo, Japan.
• Sallam, M. (2023). ChatGPT utility in healthcare education, research, and practice: systematic review on the promising perspectives and valid concerns. Healthcare, 11(6), 887. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare 11060887
• Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22, 63-75.
• Silverman, D. (2010). Doing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
• Steele, J. (2023). To GPT or not to GPT? Empowering our students to learn with AI. Computer and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100160
• Su, J., & Yang, W. (2024). Powerful or mediocre? Kindergarten teachers’ perspectives on using ChatGPT in early childhood education. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(10), 6496-6508. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2266490
• Sumakula, D. T., Hamied, F. A., & Sukyadi, D. (2022). Artificial intelligence in EFL classrooms: Friend or foe? Learn Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 15(1), 232-256.
• Virvou, M., Tsiriga, V., & Maras, D. (2000). Evaluation of an ITS for the passive voice of the English language using the CIAO! framework. In Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2000 World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 1758-1759). Association fort the Advancement of Computing in Education. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED44778 2.pdf
• Williams, R., Park, H. W., Oh, L., & Breazeal, C. (2019). PopBots: designing an artificial intelligence curriculum for early childhood education. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 33(1), 9729-9736. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33019729
• Xiaogang, L. (2018). A research on distance education system based on artificial intelligence technology. In Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Big Data and Artificial Intelligence (pp. 98–102). Francis Academic Press
• Yang, W., Luo, H., & Su, J. (2022). Towards inclusiveness and sustainability of robot programming in early childhood: Child engagement, learning outcomes, and teacher perception. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(6), 1486-1510. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13266
• Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2013). Qualitative research methods in the social sciences (9th ed.). Seçkin Publications.
• Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage Publications.
• Zhou, J., Ke, P., Qiu, X., Huang, M. & Zhang, J. (2023). ChatGPT: Potential, prospects, and limitations. Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering, 25, 6-11. https://doi.org/10.1631/FITEE.2300089