Jigsaw Yöntemiyle Coğrafya Eğitiminde Başarının Artırılması

Year 2025, Volume: 16 Issue: 32, 283 - 300, 19.12.2025

Fahrettin Engin , M. Taner Şengün , Cihat Turan

https://doi.org/10.58689/eibd.1646264

Abstract

Yenilenen coğrafya müfredatı, öğretmenlerin rehberlik ettiği, öğrencilerin ise deneyimsel öğrenme yoluyla aktif olarak bilgiyi inşa ettikleri öğrenci merkezli bir yaklaşımı vurgulamaktadır. Bu çalışma, Jigsaw işbirlikli öğrenme tekniğinin coğrafya dersinde öğrenci başarısı üzerindeki etkisini incelemektedir. Ön test-son test kontrol grubu deneysel tasarımı kullanılmıştır. 9. sınıf coğrafya müfredatının “Doğal Sistemler” ünitesini kapsayan bir başarı testi geliştirilmiş ve hem ön test hem de son test olarak uygulanmıştır. Deney grubu Jigsaw tekniği kullanılarak eğitim alırken, kontrol grubu geleneksel yöntemlerle eğitim almıştır. Çalışma, Elazığ merkezinde bulunan ve sınıf yerleştirmelerinin rastgele yapıldığı ve farklı akademik performans seviyelerine sahip öğrencilerin bulunduğu bir devlet lisesinde okuyan 58 9. sınıf öğrencisi (32 erkek ve 26 kız) ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Kontrol grubundaki öğrenci kayıpları nedeniyle, deney grubu 34 öğrenciden, kontrol grubu ise 24 öğrenciden oluşmuştur. Veri analizleri SPSS kullanılarak yapılmıştır. Ön test ve son test puanlarını karşılaştırmak için tanımlayıcı istatistikler ve bağımsız ve eşleştirilmiş örneklem t-testleri uygulanmıştır. Bulgular, gruplar içinde ve gruplar arasında ön test ve son test puanları arasında önemli farklılıklar olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Genel olarak, Jigsaw temelli eğitime katılım, geleneksel öğretime kıyasla öğrencilerin coğrafya başarılarında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir iyileşme sağlamıştır. Bu sonuçlar, işbirliğine dayalı öğrenmenin, öğrencilerin öğrenme çıktılarını geliştirmede geleneksel yöntemlerden daha etkili olduğunu göstermektedir.

Keywords

İşbirlikli öğrenme , jigsaw , coğrafya , akran öğrenmesi , interaktif öğrenme

Enhancing Achievement in Geography Education Through the Jigsaw Method

Abstract

The renewed geography curriculum emphasizes a student-centered approach in which teachers act as guides while students actively construct knowledge through experiential learning. This study investigates the effect of the Jigsaw cooperative learning technique on student achievement in geography. A pre-test–post-test control group experimental design was employed. An achievement test covering the “Natural Systems” unit of the 9th-grade geography curriculum was developed and administered as both the pre-test and post-test. The experimental group received instruction using the Jigsaw technique, while the control group was taught through traditional methods. The study was conducted with 58 9th-grade students (32 boys and 26 girls) enrolled in a public high school in central Elazığ, where class placements are random and include students with varying academic performance levels. Due to student attrition in the control group, the experimental group consisted of 34 students and the control group 24 students. Data analyses were conducted using SPSS. Descriptive statistics and independent and paired samples t-tests were applied to compare the pre-test and post-test scores. The findings revealed significant differences between the pre-test and post-test scores within and between groups. Overall, participation in the Jigsaw-based instruction produced a statistically significant improvement in students’ geography achievement compared to traditional teaching. These results indicate that cooperative learning is more effective than conventional methods in enhancing student learning outcomes.

Keywords

Cooperative learning , jigsaw , geography , peer learning , interactive learning

References

• Açıkgöz, K. Ü. (1992). İşbirlikli öğrenme: Kuram, araştırma ve uygulama. Uğurel Matbaası
• Açıkgöz, K. Ü. (2002). Aktif öğrenme. Eğitim Dünyası Yayınları.
• Aktın, K. (2010). The constructivist approach in social studies/history textbooks in Turkey, England, and the USA: The case of World War II (Doctoral dissertation). Marmara University, Türkiye.
• Altıparmak, M., & Nakiboğlu, M. (2005). The effect of cooperative learning in high school biology laboratories on students’ attitudes and achievement. Turkish Journal of Educational Sciences, 3(1), 36–52.
• Aronson, J. (2002). Stereotype threat: Contending and coping with unnerving expectations. In J. Aronson (Ed.), Improving academic achievement: Impact of psychological factors on education (pp. 279–304). Academic Press.
• Baer, J. (2003). Grouping and achievement in cooperative learning. College Teaching, 51(4), 169–174.
• Batdı, V. (2014). Jigsaw tekniğinin öğrencilerin akademik başarılarına etkisinin meta-analiz yöntemiyle incelenmesi. EKEV Akademi Dergisi, 18(58), 699-714.
• Baykara, K. (2000). A study on cooperative learning techniques and locus of control. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 18, 201–210.
• Bilgin, İ., & Geban, Ö. (2004). The effect of cooperative learning and gender on preservice primary school teachers’ attitudes toward science and their achievement in science education I course. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 26(26), 1–8.
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Doğanay, H. (2014). Methods of geography teaching: Teaching geography in high schools. Pegem Academy.
• Doğru, M., & Ünlü, S. (2012). The effect of using the Jigsaw IV technique on students' motivation, science anxiety, and academic achievement in science education. Mediterranean Journal of Humanities, 2(2), 57–66. https://mjh.akdeniz.edu.tr
• Gürbüz, H., Çakmak, M., & Derman, M. (2012). The effect of using the jigsaw technique in environmental education on students' academic achievement and students' opinions on this technique. In X. National Congress of Science and Mathematics Education (Niğde University, Niğde).
• Hedeen, T. (2003). The reverse jigsaw: A process of cooperative learning and discussion. Teaching Sociology, 31(3), 325–332.
• Hevedanlı, M., Oral, B., & Akbayın, H. (2005). The effect of cooperative learning, mastery learning and traditional teaching methods on student achievement in biology education. Journal of National Education, 166. http://yayim.meb.gov.tr/dergiler/166/index3-akbayin.htm
• Kocabaş, A. (1998). The effects of cooperative and traditional learning methods on attitudes toward music. Körpeoğlu Journal, 22(108).
• Langlois, S. (2001). Helping students to put together the pieces of the statistical puzzle with cooperative learning. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 5(2), 117–119.
• MEB. (2018). Geography curriculum. MEB Yayınları.
• MEB. (2024). Century of Türkiye Education Model – Geography Curriculum. Board of Education and Discipline. https://www.meb.gov.tr
• Sezer, A., & Tokcan, H. (2003). The effect of cooperative learning on academic achievement in geography education. Gazi University Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty, 23(3), 227–242. (Adapted from Howitt, 1997)
• Slavin, R. E. (1986). Using student team learning (3rd ed.). Johns Hopkins University, Center for Research on Elementary and Middle Schools.
• Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
• Suparno, P. (2004). The theory of multiple intelligences and its application in schools: How to apply Howard Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences. Kanisius.
• Türkmen, H., & Yamık, G. A. (2015). The effect of the Jigsaw II technique on student achievement in the topic of vertebrate animals. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 36, 33–46.
• Von Glasersfeld, E. (1989). Cognition, construction of knowledge, and teaching. Synthese, 80, 121–140.