Motivation to Read: How Does It Change for Struggling Readers with and without Disabilities?

Abstract

Lack of reading motivation impedes upper elementary and secondary school students’ willingness to improve critical reading skills and strategies to be successful in school. Struggling readers often show a negative attitude towards reading tasks and manifest low motivation to read. Although the importance of motivation is clear, there is limited research on reading motivation of struggling adolescents with disabilities. This study examined whether reading motivation of struggling readers with and without disabilities significantly changed after an eighteen week period of reading instruction in two elementary schools and one high school in a Midwest state of the United States of America (USA). Findings yielded significant improvement in motivation for adolescents without disabilities while motivation scores declined for students with disabilities. An overview of students’ answers to survey questions is provided and some evidence-based methods that teachers can utilize to improve reading motivation of upper elementary and high school students are summarized

Keywords

• Motivation to Read, Reading, Motivation, Disabilities, Struggling Readers

Motivation to Read: How Does It Change for Struggling Readers with and without Disabilities?

Abstract

-

Keywords

• -

References

1. Biancarosa, C. & Snow, C. E. (2006). Reading next- A vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy: A report to Carnegie of New York (2nd ed.).
2. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education. Denton, C. A. & Vaughn, S. (2008). Reading and writing intervention for older students with disabilities: Possibilities and challenges. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 23, 61-62.
3. Fuchs, L. S. et al. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 2392
4. Gambrell, L. B. et al. (1996). Assessing motivation to read. The Reading Teacher, 49, 518-5
5. Grigg, W. et al. (2007). The nation’s report card: 12 th -grade reading and mathematics 2005 (NCES 2007-468). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National
6. Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved March 18, 2008, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2007468
7. Guthrie, J. T. & Humenick, N. M. (2004). Motivating students to read: Evidence for classroom practices that increase reading motivation and achievement. In P. McCardle
8. & V. Chhabra (Eds), The voice of evidence in reading research (pp. 329-354). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing. Guthrie, J. T. (2008). Reading motivation and engagement in middle and high school.

9. In J. T. Guthrie (Ed.), Engaging adolescents in reading (pp. 1-16). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. Hall, T. E. et al. (2000). Computer assisted instruction in reading for students with learning disabilities: A research synthesis. Education and Treatment of Children, 23, 173-1
10. Ivey, G. (1998). Discovering readers in the middle level school: A few helpful clues.
11. National Association of Secondary School Principal (NASSP) Bulletin, 82, 48-56. Lee, J. et al. (2007). The nation’s report card: Reading 2007 (NCES 2007-496).
12. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved November 5, 2007, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2007496
13. Marzano, R. J. (2003). What works in schools: Translating research into action.
14. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. McKenna, M. C. et al. (1995). Children’s attitudes toward reading: A national survey.
15. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 934-956. Moje, E. B. et al. (2000). Reinventing adolescent literacy for new times: Perennial and millennial issues. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 43, 400-410.
16. Morgan, P. L. & Fuchs, D. (2007). Is there a bidirectional relationship between children’s reading skills and reading motivation? Exceptional Children, 73, 165-183.
17. National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities (NJCLD). (2008). Adolescent literacy and older students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 31, 211-2
18. Newman, L. (2006, July). Facts from NLTS2: General education participation and academic performance of students with learning disabilities. Menlo Park, CA: SRI
19. International. Retrieved February 10, 2009, from http://www.nlts2.org/fact_sheets/nlts2_fact_sheet_2006_07.pdf
20. Pitcher. S. M. et al. (2007). Assessing adolescents’ motivation to read. Journal of
21. Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 50, 378-396. Roberts G. et al. (2008). Evidence-based strategies for reading instruction of older students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 23, 63
22. Strommen, L. T. & Mates, B. F. (2004). Learning to love reading: Interviews with older children and teens. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 48, 188-200.
23. Swanson, H. L. & Deshler, D. (2003). Instructing adolescents with learning disabilities: Converting a meta-analysis to practice. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 124-135.
24. Therrien, W. J. et al. (2006). Boosting fluency and comprehension to improve reading achievement. Teaching Exceptional Children, 38(3), 22-26.
25. Wagner, M. et al. (2003). The achievements of youth with disabilities during secondary school. A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). Menlo
26. Park, CA: SRI International. Retrieved February 12, 2009, from http://www.nlts2.org/reports/2003_11/nlts2_report_2003_11_ complete.pdf