Exploring the Relationship between Teaching Staff' Age and Their Attitude towards Information and Communications Technologies (ICT)

Abstract

Current research seeks to understand the relationship between teaching staff' age and their attitude toward ICT. Survey methodology is facilitated through the use of the questionnaires. The survey domain is a random sampling of teaching staff in Egyptian HEI. The population for this study was 500 full-time Faculty staff, and only 412 returned and completed questionnaires are considered as the study sample. The results showed that there is a moderate and positive relationship between the age of participants and their attitude towards ICT; thus, when considering attitude towards ICT by teaching staff members in Egyptians HEI, age is a significant factor. The result of this research has significant implications to HEI when they plan, develop, and adopt ICT. HEI has to consider that teaching staff' attitude towards ICT is related to their age

Keywords

• -

Exploring the Relationship between Teaching Staff' Age and Their Attitude towards Information and Communications Technologies (ICT)

Abstract

-

Keywords

• -

References

1. Adams, N. (2002). Educational computing concerns of postsecondary faculty. Journal of Research on Technology, 34(3), 285 – 303.
2. Albright, M. (1996). Instructional technology and higher education: Rewards, rights and responsibilities. Keynote Address at the Southern Regional Faculty and Instructional Development Consortium. Baton Rouge, LA. (ERIC Document
3. Reproduction Service No. ED 392 412). Barak, M. (2006). Instructional principles for fostering learning with ICT: teachers’ perspectives as learners and instructors. Education Information Technology, 11, pp. 121
4. Dawes, L. (2001). What stops teachers using new technology? In M. Leask (Ed.),
5. Issues in Teaching using ICT (pp. 61-79). London: Routledge. Elsaadani, M. (2011). MITAM - A Modified ICT Adoption Model for Developing
6. Countries: Case of Business Teaching in a Developing Country. LAP Lambert Academic Publishing – Germany. Grenier-Winther, J. (1999). Real issues in the virtual classroom. The French Review, 73 (2), 252–264.
7. Haghighi, S. & Eskandari, M. (2012). A study on barriers of using information technology on learning and teaching in elementary Schools, Management Science Letters, 2, pp. 417–424.
8. Hardin, J. & Ellington, A. (2005). Using multimedia to facilitate software instruction in an introductory modelling course. Informs Transaction on Education, 5(2), pp. 25-32.

9. Hernes, F. et al., (2000). Knowledge and competence in ICT among teachers in
10. Norway. Retrieved 15/10/2011 from http://www.ifip.or.at/con2000/iceut2000/ iceut09- 0pdf
11. Jacobsen, M. (1997). Bridging the gap between early adopters’ and mainstream faculty’s use of instructional technology. [Online]. Information Analysis. Retrieved July 13, 2010, from http://eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/16/ed/ pdf
12. Jennings, S. & Onwuegbuzie, A. (2001). Computer attitudes as a function of age, gender, math attitude, and developmental status. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 25(4), 367-384.
13. Johnson, M. et al., (1999). Technology as a change agent for the teaching process.
14. Theory into Practice, 38(1), Redefining Teacher Quality, 24–30. Kumar, N. Et al., (2008). Predictors of technology deployment among Malaysian
15. Teachers. American Journal of Applied Sciences. 5(9), pp. 1127-1134.
16. Lam, Y. (2000). Technophobia or technophilia? A preliminary look at why second language teachers do or do not use technology in their classrooms. Canadian Modern Language Review, 56(93), 389-420.
17. Liang, M. & Chao, J. (2002). Investigating into the Internet literacy of elementary and junior high school teachers in Taiwan. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 1(1), 129-131.
18. Look, D. (2005). Discussion paper: Impact of technology on education, PUSD
19. Excellence Committee, December 2005. Retrieved 19/11/2011 from http://pleasanton.k12.ca.us/Superintendent/Downloads/Technology.pdf
20. Luchatta, T. (2000). Gender and computers, toolbox or toystore? Gender differences and similarities among children, youth and college students concerning computing attitudes and use. Presented at the Spring 2000 Wisconsin Association of Academic
21. Librarians Conference, April 2000.
22. Meadowcroft, B. (2006). The impact of information technology on work and society.
23. Retrieved 24/9/2011 from www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/netdict?society
24. Mejiuni, O. & Obilade, O. (2006).The dialectics of poverty, educational opportunities, and ICTs, in A. Oduaran & H.S. Bhola (Eds), Widening access to education as social justice (pp. 139-148). The Netherlands: Springer.
25. Oscarson, D. (1976). Factors associated with vocational teacher proneness toward the adoption of innovations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic
26. Institute and State University. Ouzts, D. & Palombo, M. (2004). Technology in higher education: A study of perceptions of college professors. TechTrends, 48(5), pp. 17-22.
27. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5).
28. Sang, G. Et al., (2009). Factors support or prevent teachers from integrating ICT into classroom teaching: A Chinese perspective. Proceedings of the 17th International
29. Conference on Computers in Education. Hong Kong: Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education.], pp. 808-815. So, T. & Paula, S. (2006). e-Learning readines of Hong Kong teachers. University of South Australia.
30. Straub, E. (2009). Understanding technology adoption: theory and future directions for informal learning. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 625-649.
31. Sugar, W. et al., (2004). Examining teachers’ decisions to adopt new technology.
32. Educational Technology and Society, 7(4), 201–213. Teo, T. (2008). Assessing the computer attitudes of students: an Asian perspective.
33. Computers and Human Behavior, 24(4), 1634-1642. [SSCI]
34. United Nations Development Program (UNDP). (2002). Information, communication and knowledge-sharing, gender in development, learning and information pack, UNDP,
35. New York; Retrieved 1/8/2010 http://www.undp.org/gender/infopack.htm.
36. Williams, D. et al., (2000). Integrating ICT in professional practices an analysis of teachers’ needs based on a survey of primary and secondary teachers in Scottish schools. Journal of Information Technology in Teacher Education, 9(2), 167-82.
37. Ya'acob, A. et al., (2005). Implementation of the Malaysian Smart School: An
38. Investigation of Teaching-Learning Practices and Teacher-Student Readiness. Internet Journal of e-Language Learning & Teaching, 2(2), pp. 16-25. Zhang, P. & Aikman, S. (2007). Attitudes in ICT Acceptance and use. In J. Jacko (Ed.),
39. Human-Computer Interaction, Part I (pp. 1021-1030). Syracuse, NY: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.