Research Article

The effects of differentiated instruction on Turkish students’ L2 achievement, and student and teacher perceptions

Volume: 6 Number: 2 July 31, 2020
  • Ahmet Cihat Yavuz
EN

The effects of differentiated instruction on Turkish students’ L2 achievement, and student and teacher perceptions

Abstract

Endeavors have been invested to account for inefficient instruction, which is frequently attributed to disregarding learner idiosyncrasies. As a matter of course, differentiated instruction has begun to receive scholarly and professional attention in the hopes of ameliorating learner outcomes through learner-aware teaching. Despite a great deal of recorded research, little is known about how differentiated instruction is prepared and operationalized. This study, conducted at a private high school in Istanbul, Turkey, investigated the impact of differentiated instruction on Turkish L2 learners’ L2 achievement along with the perceptions of learners and teacher. Two intact classes were selected as control (N=14) and DI group (N=8). The control group was exposed to traditional instruction, while the DI group received differentiated instruction guided by the principles of constructivism, multiple intelligence theory (Gardner, 1993), and the differentiated instruction framework of Tomlinson (1999). Data collected by means of L2 achievement tests revealed that DI group outperformed the control group in overall L2 achievement. Learner reflective essays revealed that Turkish L2 learners found differentiated instruction as distinctive, entertaining, engaging, instructive, and interest-related, while teacher reflective journals raised the issues of time constraints, needs for learner awareness and training about differentiated instruction.

Keywords

References

  1. Affholder, L. P. (2003). Differentiated instruction in inclusive elementary classrooms (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Kansas, Education Faculty, Kansas.
  2. Alavinia, P., & Farhady, S. (2012). Using differentiated instruction to teach vocabulary in mixed ability classes with a focus on multiple intelligences and learning styles. International Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 2(4), 27-82.
  3. Aliakbari, M., & Haghighi, J. K. (2014). On the effectiveness of differentiated instruction in the enhancement of Iranian learners reading comprehension in separate gender education. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 182-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.405
  4. Anderson, L.W. (1995). Individualized instruction. In L.W. Anderson (Ed.). Encyclopedia of teaching and teacher education, (pp. 155-161). Oxford: Pergamon.
  5. Baumgartner, T., Lipowski, M., & Rush, C. (2003). Increasing reading achievement of primary and middle school students through differentiated instruction. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Saint Xavier University, Education Faculty, Chicago.
  6. Beecher, M., & Sweeny, S. M. (2008). Closing the achievement gap with curriculum enrichment and differentiation: One school's story. Journal of Advanced Academics, 19(3), 502-530. https://doi.org/10.4219/jaa-2008-815
  7. Blaz, D. (2006). Differentiated instruction: A guide for foreign language teachers. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education, Inc.
  8. Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. California: Sage.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Linguistics

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Ahmet Cihat Yavuz This is me
0000-0002-3246-952X
Türkiye

Publication Date

July 31, 2020

Submission Date

August 2, 2019

Acceptance Date

July 13, 2020

Published in Issue

Year 2020 Volume: 6 Number: 2

APA
Yavuz, A. C. (2020). The effects of differentiated instruction on Turkish students’ L2 achievement, and student and teacher perceptions. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 313-335. https://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.776002

Cited By