Feared L2 self as an emerging component of the reconceptualized L2 motivational self system

Abstract

The purpose of this non-experimental quantitative study was to measure Feared L2 Self (FL2S) as a new component of the existing L2 Motivational Self System (L2MSS) and offer a new model through partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). As for the instrument to measure L2 selves, an adopted survey consisting of 72 5-point Likert scale items, five open-ended questions, and a demographic questionnaire was distributed; however, for the purpose of this study, only L2 self related items and constructs were included in the measurement and structural model. The participants were 1022 adult English language learners (ELLs), and ELLs’ English learning experience was redefined as the collection of everyday ESL learning experiences. Results indicated that the strongest relationship was between English learning experience (ELExp) and Ideal L2 Self (IL2S) component, which is also supported by previous studies. Furthermore, the second strongest relationship was between Ought-to L2 Self (OL2S) and FL2S, as well as between ELExp and OL2S. FL2S was an emerging factor reconceptualizing the L2 Motivational Self System (R-L2MSS). Considering the large number of participants and the data obtained from all over the U.S., this study proposes a new and important concept. In the light of these results, implications are provided for ELLs and ESL teachers.

Keywords

• L2 motivational self system
• reconceptualized L2 motivational self system
• R-L2MSS
• feared L2 self
• possible selves
• feared self

References

1. Akçay, A. (2020). Perceptions of Turkish EFL instructors and their students on native and non-native accents of English and English as a lingua franca (ELF) (Unpublished Master’s thesis). Bilkent University, Ankara.
2. Al Harthi, S. E. (2014). The impact of positive views on language learning and pupils’ construction of L2: Imagined communities, possible selves, and investment in language learning. Arab World English Journal, 5(2). 70–86.
3. Al-Hoorie, A. H. (2018). The L2 motivational self system: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(4), 721-754. doi:10.14746/ssllt.2018.8.4.2
4. Ayhan, A. (2020). Investigation of the reconceptualized L2 motivational self system, foreign language classroom anxiety, perceived wellness, and achievement of repeat and non-repeat students (Unpublished Master’s thesis). Bilkent University, Ankara.
5. Baruch, Y., & Holtom, B. C. (2008). Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research. Human Relations, 61(8), 1139–1160.
6. Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5. doi:10.1177/1745691610393980
7. Bursali, N., & Öz, H. (2017). The relationship between ideal L2 self and willingness to communicate inside the classroom. International Journal of Higher Education, 6(4), 229–239. doi:10.5430/ijhe.v6n4p229
8. By, H., & Laohawiriyanon, C. (2019). The L2 motivational self system of low and high achievers in a Cambodian context. Journal of Language Teaching and Learning in Thailand, 57, 67–100.

9. Carver, C. C., Reynolds, S. L., & Scheier, M. F. (1994). The possible selves of optimists and pessimists. Journal of Research in Personality, 28, 133-141.
10. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (5th. Ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education Inc.
11. Csizér, K., & Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The internal structure of language learning motivation and its relationship with language choice and learning effort. The Modern Language Journal, 89, 19–36.
12. Csizér, K., & Kormos, J. (2009). Learning experiences, selves and motivated learning behaviour: A comparative analysis of structural models for Hungarian secondary and university learners of English. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp 98-119). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
13. Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The Psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14. Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The L2 motivational self system. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 9-42). Bristol, England: Multilingual Matters.
15. Dörnyei, Z. (2019). Towards a better understanding of the L2 learning experience, the cinderella of the L2 motivational self system. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 9(1), 19-30.
16. Dörnyei, Z., & Csizer, K. (2002). Some dynamics of language attitudes and motivation: Results of a longitudinal nationwide survey. Applied Linguistics, 23(4), 421–462.
17. Dörnyei, Z., Csizer, K., & Nemeth, N. (2006). Motivation, language attitudes and globalisation: A Hungarian perspective. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
18. Erten, İ. H. (2014). Interaction between academic motivation and student teachers’ academic achievement. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 152, 173–178. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.176
19. Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th. ed.). London, UK: Sage Publications Inc.
20. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
21. Fryer, M. & Roger, P. (2018). Transformations in the L2 self: Changing motivation in a study abroad context. System, 78. 159–172. doi:10.1016/j.system.2018.08.005
22. Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2007). Educational research: An introduction (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
23. Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. London, UK: Edward Arnold.
24. Gardner, R. C. (2001). Integrative motivation and second language acquisition. In Z. Dörnyei & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Motivation and second language acquisition (pp.1-19). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.
25. Gardner, R. C. (2007). Motivation and second language acquisition. Porta Linguarum. ISBN: 1697-7467. 9-27.
26. Gardner, R. C., & Lambert, W. E. (1959). Motivational variables in second language acquisition. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 13, 266–272.
27. Gardner, R. C., & Lambert, W. E. (1972). Attitudes and motivation. Rowley, MA: Newbury House Publishers.
28. Gardner, R. C., Masgoret, A. M., Tennant, J., & Mihic, L. (2004). Integrative motivation: Changes during a year-long intermediate-level language course. Language Learning, 54, 1–34.
29. Gregg, M., & Hall, C. (2006). Measurement of motivational imagery abilities in sport. Journal of Sports Sciences, 24(9), 961-971.
30. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Washington DC: SAGE Publications.
31. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Washington DC: SAGE Publications.
32. Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24.
33. Higgins, E.T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94, 319–340.
34. Higgins, E. T. (1998). Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 1-46.
35. Hoyle, R. H., & Sherrill, M. R. (2006). Future orientation in the self-system: Possible selves, self-regulation, and behavior. Journal of Personality, 74(6), 1673-1696.
36. Huang, H. T., Hsu, C. C., & Chen, S. W. (2015). Identification with social role obligations, possible selves, and L2 motivation in foreign language learning. System, 51, 28– 38. doi:10.1016/j.system.2015.03.003
37. Johnson, D. R., & Borden, L. A. (2012). Participants at your fingertips: Using Amazon’s Mechanical Turk to increase student–faculty collaborative research. Teaching of Psychology, 39, 245–251. doi:10.1177/0098628312456615
38. Kutner, M., Nachtsheim, C., Neter, J., & Li, W. (2005). Applied linear statistical models (5th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill Irwin.
39. Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41, 954-969.
40. Masgoret, A. M., & Gardner, R. C. (2003). Attitudes, motivation, and second language learning: A meta-analysis of studies conducted by Gardner and associates. Language Learning, 53, 167–210.
41. Mason, W., & Suri, S. (2012). Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 1–23. doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0124-6
42. Moskovsky, C., Assulaimani, T., Racheva, S., & Harkins, J. (2016). The L2 motivational self system and L2 achievement: A study of Saudi EFL learners. Modern Language Journal, 100(3), 641–654.
43. Oyserman, D., & Markus, H. (1990). Possible selves and delinquency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 112-125.
44. Ölmez-Çaglar, F., Mirici, I. H., & Erten, I. H. (2020). Measuring possible language teacher selves: A scale development study. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 7(1), 327–353.
45. Özkaynak, O. (2020). A structural equation model on translanguaging practices, foreign language classroom anxiety, reconceptualized L2 motivational self system, and foreign language achievement of emergent bilinguals (Unpublished Master’s thesis). Bilkent University, Ankara.
46. Özsoy, Ö. (2020). Investigating the relationship between the reflective practices and the possible language teacher selves of EFL instructors at a Turkish state university (Unpublished Master’s thesis). Bilkent University, Ankara.
47. Peker, H. (2016). Bullying victimization, feared second language self, and second language identity: Reconceptualizing second language motivational self system. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL.
48. Peker, H. (2020). The effect of cyberbullying and traditional bullying on English language learners’ national and oriented identities. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 9(1), 185-199. doi:10.14686/buefad.664122
49. Polat, N. (2011). Gender differences in motivation and L2 accent attainment: An investigation of young Kurdish learners of Turkish. The Language Learning Journal, (39)1, 19-41.
50. Rogelberg, S. G., & Stanton, J. M. (2007). Introduction: Understanding and dealing with organizational survey nonresponse. Organizational Research Methods, 10(2), 195– 209. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428106294693
51. Ryan, S. (2009). Self and identity in L2 motivation in Japan: the ideal L2 self and Japanese learners of English. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 120-143). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
52. Sakeda, M., & Kurata, N. (2016). Motivation and L2 selves: A study of learners of Japanese at an Australian university. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 13(1), 49–67.
53. Sprouse, J. (2011). A validation of Amazon Mechanical Turk for the collection of acceptability judgments in linguistic theory. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 155–167. doi:10.3758/s13428-010-0039-7
54. Subekti, A. S. (2018). L2 motivational self system and L2 achievement: A study of Indonesian EAP learners. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(1), 57–67. doi:10.17509/ijal.v8i1.11465
55. Taguchi, T., Magid, M., & Papi, M. (2009). The L2 motivational self system among Japanese, Chinese, and Iranian learners of English. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.). Motivation, language identity, and the L2 self (pp. 66-97). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
56. Tekten, B. (2020). An investigation of adult EFL learners' foreign language pronunciation anxiety and reconceptualized L2 motivational self system regarding English pronunciation in the context of a higher education institution in Turkey (Unpublished master’s thesis). Bilkent University, Ankara.
57. Toprak-Celen, E. (2020). A structural equation model on EFL tertiary level students' academic buoyancy, academic resilience, reconceptualized L2 motivational self system, and their academic achievement (Unpublished master’s thesis). Bilkent University, Ankara.
58. Ueki, M., & Takeuchi, O. (2013). Forming a clearer image of the ideal L2 self: The L2 motivational self system and learner autonomy in a Japanese EFL context. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 7(3), 238–252. doi:10.1080/17501229.2013.836205
59. Ushioda, E. (2009). A person-in-context relational view of emergent motivation, self and identity. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 215–228). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
60. Ushioda, E. (2011). Language learning motivation, self and identity: Current theoretical perspectives. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(3), 199-210.
61. Uslu-Ok, D. (2013). The future in the lives of Turkish international sojourners studying in America: The role of future time perspectives and possible selves in explaining motivation to learn English (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
62. Yaşar, D. I. (2020). An investigation of the relationship between EFL instructors’ perceptions on technology use and their possible language teacher selves. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Bilkent University, Ankara.
63. Yu, J., Brown, G. T. L., & Stephens, J. M. (2018). Retrospective case studies of successful Chinese learners of English: Continuity and change in self-identities over time and across contexts. System, 72, 124–138. doi:10.1016/j.system.2017.11.008