Exploring the role of strategy instruction: Young learners’ listening performance and strategy use

Year 2020, , 415 - 441, 30.11.2020

Pelin Irgin Ismail Hakki Erten

https://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.834676

Cited By: 1

Abstract

This paper reports on an exploratory investigation into the impacts of implicit instruction of listening strategies on strategy use and listening performance of young EFL learners in Turkey. Data from 34 lower-intermediate learners of English in two-4th grade-classes in a primary school were analysed to investigate to what extent their employment of listening strategies varied after 12-week-strategy instruction integrated into their listening activities, and whether there was any change in their awareness of top-down and bottom-up processes in listening comprehension. Qualitative instruments of listening interviews were employed in the experimental and control groups to explore young learners’ listening strategy use. Also, self-assessment grids and a pre- and post-test provided evidence of how the experimental group class had changed their reported strategy use and performance in listening comprehension. Analysis of the data revealed a difference in young learners’ listening performance and strategy use over the examined time period, including a reported change in awareness of listening, increase in self-confidence, and a greater willingness to engage in strategy use. These findings are discussed in terms of the development in listening comprehension in English. This study implies that listening strategy instruction should be integrated in second language listening classroom to better young learners’ listening.

Keywords

Listening comprehension, listening, strategy instruction, learner strategies, young learners

References

• Anderson, J. R. (2009). Cognitive psychology and its implications. New York: Worth Publishers.
• Borhany, M., Tahriri, A., & Tous, M. D. (2015). The impact of explicit/integrated instruction of listening comprehension strategies on EFL learners’ L2 listening comprehension and their overall strategy use. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 2(8), 128-144.
• Chamot, A. U. (1995). Learning strategies and listening comprehension. In D. & Rubin, A Guide for Teaching of Second Language Listening (pp.13-30). San Diego, California: Dominie Press.
• Chen, A. (2009). Listening strategy instruction: Exploring Taiwanese college students’ strategy development. Asian EFL Journal, 11(2), 54-85.
• Chen, A. (2015). The impacts of listening strategy instruction on strategy use and listening performance of EFL learners. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature, 3(5), 75-87.
• Cohen, A. D. (2003). Strategy training for second language learners. Digest: EDO-FL, 03-02. Retrieved from https://www.ericdigests.org/2004-4/language.htm
• Cohen, A.D., & Macaro, E. (2007). Language learning strategies: Thirty years of research and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Corbett, J., & O’Farrell, R. (2013). English Quest 4. Macmillan Education.
• Coyle, D. (2007). Strategic classrooms: Learning communities which nurture the development of learner strategies. Language Learning Journal, 35(1), 65-79.
• Cross, J. (2012). Listening strategy instruction (or extensive listening): A response to Renandya (2012). Retrieved from http://blog.nus.edu.sg/eltwo/files/2013/12/Listening-strategy-instruction-or-extensive-listening_editforpdf-15mvwem.pdf
• De Silva, R., & Graham, S. (2015). The effects of strategy instruction on writing strategy use for students of different proficiency levels. System, 53, 47-59.
• Dreyer, C., & Nel, C. (2003). Teaching reading strategies and reading comprehension within a technology-enhanced learning environment. System, 31(3), 349-365.
• Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford University Press.
• Field, J. (2008). Listening in the language classroom. Cambridge University Press.
• Field, J. (2014). Cognitive processing and foreign language use. In Driscoll, P., Macaro, E., and Swarbrick, A. (Eds.), Debates in modern languages education (pp.14-29). London: Routledge.
• Flowerdew, J., & Miller, L. (2005). Second language listening: Theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.
• Geranpayeh, A., & Taylor, L. (2013). Examining listening: Research and practice in assessing second language listening (Studies in Language Testing Vol. 35). Cambridge University Press.
• Goh, C. (2000). A cognitive perspective on language learners’ listening comprehension problems. System, 28(1), 55-75.
• Goh, C. (2002). Exploring listening comprehension tactics and their interaction patterns. System, 30, 185-206.
• Goh, C., & Taib, Y. (2006). Metacognitive instruction in listening for young learners. ELT Journal, 60(3), 222-232.
• Graham, S. (2011). Self-efficacy and academic listening. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10(2), 113-117.
• Graham, S. (2017). Supervising on how to design model for strategy intervention into the classroom environment. University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom.
• Graham, S., & Macaro, E. (2008). Strategy instruction in listening for lower-intermediate learners of French. Language Learning, 58, 747-783.
• Graham, S., & Santos, D. (2013). Selective listening in L2 learners of French. Language Awareness, 22(1), 56-75.
• Graham, S., Santos, D., & Francis-Brophy, E. (2014). Teacher beliefs about listening in a foreign language. Teaching and Teacher Education, 40, 44-60.
• Graham, S., Santos, D., & Vanderplank, R. (2010). Strategy clusters and sources of knowledge in French L2 listening comprehension. International Journal of Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 4, 1-20.
• Grenfell, M., & Macaro, E. (2007). Language learner strategies: Claims and critiques. In Cohen, A.D. and Macaro, E. (Eds.), Language learners’ strategies: Thirty years of research and practice (pp.9-28). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Hulstijn, J. H. (2003). Connectionist models of language processing and the training of listening skills with the aid of multimedia software. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 16(5), 413-425.
• Husserl, E. (1931). Ideas: General introduction to pure phenomenology. London: George Allan & Unwin.
• Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159-174.
• Liao, C. Y., & Yeldham, M. (2015). Taiwanese high school EFL teachers’ perceptions of listening instruction. The Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(2), 92-101.
• Lincoln, S. Y., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Liu, J., & Goh, C. (2006). Improving second language listening: Awareness and involvement. In Farrell, T.S.C. (Ed.), Language teacher research in Asia (pp.91-106). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
• Long, M. H., & Doughty, C. J. (2011). The handbook of language teaching. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.
• Macaro, E. (2006). Strategies for language learning and for language use: Revising the theoretical framework. The Modern Language Journal, 90(3), 320-337.
• Macaro, E., & Erler, L. (2008). Raising the achievement of young-beginner readers of French through strategy instruction. Applied Linguistics, 29(1), 90-119.
• Macaro, E., Graham, S., & Woore, R. (2015). Improving Foreign Language Teaching: Towards a research-based curriculum and pedagogy. London: Routledge.
• Mareschal, C. (2007). Student perceptions of a self-regulatory approach to second language listening comprehension development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
• Morse, J. M., & Niehaus, L. (2009). Mixed methods design: Principles and procedures. Walnut Creek; CA: Left Coast Press.
• Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Nakatani, Y. (2005). The effects of awareness-raising training on oral communication strategy use. The Modern Language Journal, 89(1), 76-91.
• Oxford, R. L. (2001). Language learning strategies. In R.Carter & D. Nunan (Eds.), Teaching English to speakers of other languages, (pp.166-172). Cambridge University Press.
• Plonsky, L. (2011). The effectiveness of second language strategy instruction: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 61(4), 993-1038.
• Renandya, W. A. (2012). Five reasons why listening strategy instruction might not work with lower proficiency learners. Retrieved from http://blog.nus.edu.sg/eltwo/files/2014/06/Five-Reasons-Why-Listening-Strategy-Instruction-Might-Not-Work-With-Lower-Proficiency-Learners_editforpdf-o13kt9.pdf
• Rost, M. (2011). Teaching and researching listening. Harlow: Pearson Education.
• Santos, D., Graham, S., & Vanderplank, R. (2008). Second language listening strategy research: Methodological challenges and perspectives. Evaluation & Research in Education, 21(2), 111-133.
• Simasangyaporn, N. (2016). The effects of listening strategy instruction on Thai learners’ self-efficacy, English listening comprehension and reported use of listening strategies (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Reading. Reading, the UK.
• Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Vandergrift, L. (2003). Orchestrating strategy use: Toward a model of the skilled second language listener. Language Learning, 53(3), 463-496.
• Vandergrift, L. (2007). Recent developments in second and foreign language listening comprehension research. Language Teaching, 40, 191-210.
• Vandergrift, L., & Goh, C. (2012). Teaching and learning second language listening. Abingdon: Routledge.
• Vandergrift, L., & Tafaghodtari, M. H. (2010). Teaching L2 learners how to listen does make a difference: An empirical study. Language Learning. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00559
• Yeldham, M., & Gruba, P. (2014). Toward an instructional approach to developing interactive second language listening. Language Teaching Research, 18(1), 33-53.
• Wilson, J. J. (2010). How to teach listening. England: Pearson Longman.
• Woore, R. (2007). Using poems and learner strategies to help learners decode the sounds of the L2. Language Learning Journal, 35(2), 175-188.
• Woore, R. (2014). Developing reading and decoding in the MFL classroom. In Driscoll, P., Macaro, E. and Swarbrick, A. (Eds.), Debates in modern languages education (pp.81-95). London: Routledge.