Investigating Pre-service Gifted Education Teachers’ Self-efficacy toward Science Teaching and Scientific Attitudes
Abstract
Problem Statement: Education of gifted has attracted attention for a few decades. Components of gifted education environments like identification, differentiation of teaching processes, social-emotional characteristics of gifted students and educating teachers of gifted students etc. have been studied in different studies. Gifted students have different learning needs apart from their pers. So teachers of gifted students should master on characteristics of gifted students and learning needs of them. Gifted students have intrinsic interest and motivation toward science and these students need their teachers to guide them effectively. So their teachers should have positive viewpoint and attitudes about science.
Purpose of the Study: The purpose of this study is to explore the pre-service gifted education teachers’ self-efficacy toward science teaching and scientific attitudes based on different variables (gender, grade level, etc.) and to assert the relationship between self-efficacy and scientific attitude.
Method: The general model of the research was a quantitative study, and ninety undergraduate students in the Gifted Education program were voluntarily participated in this study. The data were collected by the use of Scientific Attitude Inventory and the Science Teaching Efficacy Belief Instrument. The researcher used an unpaired t-test, analysis of variance and a correlation method to analyze the data.
Findings and Results:: The results indicated that there were significantly positive correlations between grade level and scientific attitude and participants’ self-efficacy skills for science teaching. In other words, students in higher grade levels show better self-efficacy and scientific attitudes for science teaching than students in lower grades. Additionally, even though the total of self-efficacy points toward science teaching were increased, the outcome expectancy points toward science teaching were not significantly increased.
Conclusions and Recommendations: It is concluded that pre-service gifted teachers’ scientific attitudes and self-efficacy toward scince teaching affect each other and correlate positively. In this regard, educational settings that provide effective opportunities to positively increase students’ both self-efficacy beliefs toward science teaching and scientific attitudes should be organized.
Keywords
References
- Altınok, H. (2004). Öğretmenlerin fen öğretimine yönelik tutumlarına ilişkin öğrenci algıları ve öğrencilerin fen bilgisi dersine yönelik tutum ve güdüleri [Teacher candidates’ evaluation of their teaching competencies]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 26, 1-8. Appleton, K. (2008). Developing science pedagogical content knowledge through mentoring elementary teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19(6), 523-545. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavior change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191 Demirbaş, M., & Yağbasan, R. (2006). Fen bilgisi öğretiminde bilimsel tutumların işlevsel önemi ve bilimsel tutum ölçeğinin Türkçe’ye uyarlanma çalışması [The functional importance of scientific attitudes in science teaching and adaptation of scientific attitude scale into Turkish]. Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(2), 271-299. Demirel, Ö. (1993). Eğitim Terimleri Sözlüğü [Dictionary for educational terms] (10th ed.). Ankara: Usem Yayınlar. Enochs, L. G., & Riggs, I. M. (1990). Further development of an elementary science teaching efficacy belief instrument: A preservice elementary scale. School Science and Mathematics, 90(8), 694-706. doi: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.1990.tb12048.x Enochs, L. G., Scharman, L. C., & Riggs, I. M. (1995). The relationship of pupil control to preservice elementary science teacher self-efficacy and outcome expectancy. Science Education, 79(1), 63-75. Gibson, S., & Dembo, M. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 569-582. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.76.4.569 Hoy, A. W., & Spero, R. B. (2005). Changes in teacher efficacy during the early years of teaching: A comparison of four measures. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 343-356. Karasar, N. (2005). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi: Kavramlar-İlkeler-Teknikler[Scientific research method: Concepts-principles-tecniques].Ankara: Nobel Yayınevi. Klassen, R. M., & Tze, V. M. C. (2014). Teachers’ self-efficacy, personality, and teaching effectiveness: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 12, 59-76.doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2014.06.001 Koballa, T. R., Bradbury, L. U., Glynn, S. M., & Deaton, C. M. (2008). Conceptions of science teacher mentoring and mentoring practice in an alternative certification program. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19(4), 391-411. Mattern, N., & Schau, C. (2002). Gender differences in science attitude-achievement relationships over time among white middle-school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(4), 324-340. doi: 10.1002/tea.10024 Moore, R. W., & Foy, R. L. H. (1997). The scientific attitude inventory: A revision (SAI II), Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(4), 327–336. Morell, P. D., & Lederman N.G. (1998). Students’ attitudes towards school and classroom science. School Science and Mathematics, 98(2), 76-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.1998.tb17396.x Özkan,Ö., Tekkaya, C., & Çakıroğlu, J. (2002). Fen bilgisi aday öğretmenlerin fen kavramlarını anlama düzeyleri, fen öğretimine yönelik tutum ve öz yeterlik inançları [Science pre-service teachers’ understand levels of scientific concepts, attitudes toward science teaching and self-efficacy believes]. Paper was presented in 5th Science and Mathematics Congress, Ankara. Palmer, D. H. (2001). Factors contrubuting to attitude exchange amongs preservice elementary teachers. Science Education, 86, 122-138. doi: 10.1002/sce.10007 Renzulli, J. S. (1968). Identifying key features in programs for the gifted. Exceptional Children, 35, 217-221. She, C. H., & Fisher, D. (2002). Teacher communication behavior and its association with students' cognitive and attitudinal outcomes in science in Taiwan. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 63-78. doi: 10.1002/tea.10009 Shoffner, M. (2009). The place of the personal: Exploring the affective domain through reflection in teacher preparation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(8), 783-789. Sisk, D. (1989). Creative teaching of the gifted. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. Strip, C. A., & Hirsch, G. (2000). Helping Gifted Children Soar. AZ: Great Potential Press Smutny, J., & Von Fremd, S. E. (2004). Differentiating for the young child. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press . Soprano, K., & Yang, L. (2013). Inquiring into my science teaching through action research: A case study on one pre-service teacher’s inquiry-based science teaching and self-efficacy. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11, 1351-1368. doi: 10.1007/s10763-012-9380-x Sönmez, S. (2007). Preschool teachers’ attitudes toward science and science teaching, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Middle East Technical University, Ankara. Tschanen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk-Hoy A. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68, 202-248. doi: 10.3102/00346543068002202 Tschanen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk-Hoy A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783-805. doi: 10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1 Tekin, H. (1993). Eğitimde Ölçme ve Değerlendirme [Measurement and evaluation in education]. Ankara: Yargı Yayınevi. Washton, E. S. (1971). Improving Elementary Teacher Education in Science. New York: Macmillan. Uluçınar-Sağır, Ş. (2012). The primary school students' attitude and anxiety toward science. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 11(2), 127-140. VanTassel-Baska, J., & Stambaugh, T. (2006). Comprehensive curriculum for gifted learners. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
-
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Sezen Camcı Erdogan
This is me
Publication Date
April 15, 2015
Submission Date
April 15, 2015
Acceptance Date
-
Published in Issue
Year 2015 Volume: 15 Number: 59