The Effect of the Critical Literacy Approach on Pre-service Language Teachers’ Critical Reading Skills
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to measure the effect of the critical literacy approach on pre-service language teachers’ critical reading skills. The critical reading skills measured consisted of six levels: interpretation, analysis, inference, evaluation, explanation, and self-regulation.
Research Methods: This study was designed as a quasi-experiment which involved 56 pre-service teachers studying at the Indonesian Language Teaching Department, Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia. Research data was collected using a critical reading test. Prior to the study, a package of instructional materials was developed for the experimental group. Data was analyzed with descriptive statistics and ANCOVA test with pretest scores as the covariate. Significance level was determined at = .05.
Findings: The results of the study indicated that the critical literacy approach had a significant effect on the pre-service language teachers’ critical reading skills. The experimental group achieved better at critical reading skills and reached higher post-test scores on average. It indicated that the critical literacy approach had a significant effect on critical reading skills, which include interpretation, analysis, making an inference, evaluation, explanation, and self-regulation.
Implications for Research and Practice: Based on the results of the research, it can be concluded that the critical literacy approach was effective in improving the students’ critical reading skills. These findings suggest that the process of reading a text critically from the domination perspective can develop students’ critical thinking. Future research could possibly discuss the results of a test conducted to investigate the effectiveness of the critical literacy approach based on gender variables, cognitive ability levels, and reading habit.
Keywords
References
- Ali, S. (2011). Critical language awareness in pedagogic context. English Language Teaching, 4(4), 28–35. doi:10.5539/elt.v4n4p28
- Barnet, S. & Bedau, H. (2011). Critical thinking, reading, and writing. Boston & New York: Bedford/St. Martin’s.
- Bharuthram, S. (2012). Making a case for the teaching of reading across the curriculum in higher education. South African Journal of Education, 32, 205–214.
- Dimitrov, D. M., & Rumrill Jr, P. D. (2003). Pretest-posttest designs and measurement of change. Work, 20(2), 159–165.
- Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction. Fullerton: California State University.
- Facione, P. A. (2013). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts (Fifth edition). California: Measurment Reason LCC and Insight Assessment.
- Facione, P. A. (2015). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts (Sixth edition). California: Measurment Reason LCC and Insight Assessment.
- Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. New York: Longman.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
-
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Sultan Sultan
This is me
Ahmad Rofıuddın
This is me
Nurhadi Nurhadı
This is me
Endah Tri Prıyatnı4
This is me
Publication Date
September 20, 2017
Submission Date
September 20, 2017
Acceptance Date
-
Published in Issue
Year 1970 Volume: 17 Number: 71