The Effect of the Critical Literacy Approach on Pre-service Language Teachers’ Critical Reading Skills
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to measure the effect of the critical literacy approach on pre-service language teachers’ critical reading skills. The critical reading skills measured consisted of six levels: interpretation, analysis, inference, evaluation, explanation, and self-regulation.
Research Methods: This study was designed as a quasi-experiment which involved 56 pre-service teachers studying at the Indonesian Language Teaching Department, Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia. Research data was collected using a critical reading test. Prior to the study, a package of instructional materials was developed for the experimental group. Data was analyzed with descriptive statistics and ANCOVA test with pretest scores as the covariate. Significance level was determined at = .05.
Findings: The results of the study indicated that the critical literacy approach had a significant effect on the pre-service language teachers’ critical reading skills. The experimental group achieved better at critical reading skills and reached higher post-test scores on average. It indicated that the critical literacy approach had a significant effect on critical reading skills, which include interpretation, analysis, making an inference, evaluation, explanation, and self-regulation.
Implications for Research and Practice: Based on the results of the research, it can be concluded that the critical literacy approach was effective in improving the students’ critical reading skills. These findings suggest that the process of reading a text critically from the domination perspective can develop students’ critical thinking. Future research could possibly discuss the results of a test conducted to investigate the effectiveness of the critical literacy approach based on gender variables, cognitive ability levels, and reading habit.
Keywords
Kaynakça
- Ali, S. (2011). Critical language awareness in pedagogic context. English Language Teaching, 4(4), 28–35. doi:10.5539/elt.v4n4p28
- Barnet, S. & Bedau, H. (2011). Critical thinking, reading, and writing. Boston & New York: Bedford/St. Martin’s.
- Bharuthram, S. (2012). Making a case for the teaching of reading across the curriculum in higher education. South African Journal of Education, 32, 205–214.
- Dimitrov, D. M., & Rumrill Jr, P. D. (2003). Pretest-posttest designs and measurement of change. Work, 20(2), 159–165.
- Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction. Fullerton: California State University.
- Facione, P. A. (2013). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts (Fifth edition). California: Measurment Reason LCC and Insight Assessment.
- Facione, P. A. (2015). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts (Sixth edition). California: Measurment Reason LCC and Insight Assessment.
- Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. New York: Longman.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
-
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar
Sultan Sultan
Bu kişi benim
Ahmad Rofıuddın
Bu kişi benim
Nurhadi Nurhadı
Bu kişi benim
Endah Tri Prıyatnı4
Bu kişi benim
Yayımlanma Tarihi
20 Eylül 2017
Gönderilme Tarihi
20 Eylül 2017
Kabul Tarihi
-
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 1970 Cilt: 17 Sayı: 71