Research Article

Irrigation Levels and Abscisic Acid Effects on the Yield and Fruit Quality of Strawberry

Number: 33 January 31, 2022
TR EN

Irrigation Levels and Abscisic Acid Effects on the Yield and Fruit Quality of Strawberry

Abstract

In this study, the effects of four irrigation regimes (IR125, IR100, IR75 and IR50) and Absisic Acid (ABA) application on the cv. Rubygem strawberries, considering yield, and some fruit quality characteristics (Soluble solid content, fruit firmness, pH and color properties) were investigated under Spanish type high tunnels in the Mediterranean region of Turkey. From March to May, 20 mol L-1 of Abscisic Acid was administered three times via foliar application. The treatments IR125, IR100, IR75, and IR50 received 712, 575, 438, and 301 mm of water, respectively, during the trial.. The highest average yield per plant was obtained from ABA IR125 combination as 1124.5 (g/plant). It was determined that the ABA application increased the yield by approximately 8%, although it was not statistically significant compared to the control conditions. In addition to this, abscisic acid applications had no statistically significant influence on pH, fruit color, fruit firmness, or fruit weight parameters, while a SSC parameters statistically significant effected. Based on our findings, it is expected that the IR125 and IR100 irrigation applications will be applied more frequently in future investigations. Furthermore, the findings suggest that combining ABA with the proper amount of irrigation water, as well as ABA applications in water stress or multiple stress circumstances, may be useful in increasing plant adaptation capacity

Keywords

Supporting Institution

cukurova universitesi

Project Number

FYL-2018-11307

Thanks

The Coordination Unit of Scientific Research Projects at Cukurova University provided financial assistance for this research through the project FYL-2018-11307

References

  1. Adak, N., & Pekmezci, M. (2011). Farklı fide tipleri ve yetiştirme ortamlarının topraksız kültür çilek yetiştiriciliği üzerine etkileri. Adak, N. (2010). Camarosa çilek çeşidinde değişik EC düzeylerinin verim ve kalite üzerine etkileri. Derim, 27(2), 22-33.
  2. Ağaoğlu, S. Y., & Gerçekçioğlu, R. (2013). Üzümsü Meyveler. Tomurcuk Ltd. ġti. Eğitim Yayınları, No: 1. Ders Kitabı, Ankara, 55-115.
  3. Ağır, H. B., & Saner, G. (2014). İzmir İli Emiralem Beldesinde Açıkta ve Örtüaltı Çilek Yetiştiriciliğinde Üretim Maliyetlerinin Belirlenmesi. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 51(2), 145-152.
  4. Çeliktopuz, E. (2019). Farkli Sulama Düzeyleri ve Biyoaktivatör Uygulamasinin İki Çilek Çeşidinde Verim Ve Meyve Kalitesi İle Besin Elementi İçerikleri Üzerine Etkisinin Belirlenmesi. Çukurova Üniversitisi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü. Tarımsal Yapılar ve Sulama Anabilim Dalı, Doktora Tezi, Adana.
  5. Ghaderi, N., Normohammadi, S., & Javadi, T. (2015). Morpho-physiological responses of strawberry (Fragaria× ananassa) to exogenous salicylic acid application under drought stress. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 17(1), 167-178.
  6. Gündüz, K., & Özdemir, E. (2012). Farklı yetiştirme yerlerinin bazı çilek genotiplerinin erkencilik indeksi, verim ve meyve kalite özellikleri üzerindeki etkileri. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 49(1), 27-36.
  7. Hoppula, K. I., & Salo, T. J. (2007). Tensiometer-based irrigation scheduling in perennial strawberry cultivation. Irrigation Science, 25(4), 401-409.
  8. Kaleci, N., & Günay, S. (2006). Çanakkale Koşullarinda Yetiştirilen Bazi Çilek Çeşitlerinin Fenolojik, Pomolojik Ve Verim Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi. Bahçe, 35(1), 47-54.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Engineering

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

January 31, 2022

Submission Date

August 10, 2021

Acceptance Date

November 3, 2021

Published in Issue

Year 2022 Number: 33

APA
Kapur, B., Çeliktopuz, E., Saridas, M. A., & Sarwarı, A. Q. (2022). Irrigation Levels and Abscisic Acid Effects on the Yield and Fruit Quality of Strawberry. Avrupa Bilim Ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 33, 258-266. https://doi.org/10.31590/ejosat.981197