Dinozorlaşma Sendromu: Bir Ölçek Geliştirme Çalışması

Abstract

Bu çalışmada öğretmenlerin ve okul yöneticilerinin dinozorlaşma algısını betimleyecek geçerli ve güvenilir ölçme aracı tasarlamak amaçlanmıştır. Araştırma nicel yöntemde tarama modeline göre tasarlanmıştır. Ölçeğin madde havuzu için makaleler incelenmiş ve verilerden beş tema oluşturulmuştur. Temalardan hareketle madde havuzu oluşturulmuş olup taslak form, Aydın ilindeki devlet okullarında görev yapan öğretmen ve okul yöneticilerine uygulanmıştır. Açımlayıcı Faktör Analizi için 125; Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizi için 172 öğretmen ve okul yöneticisi gönüllü olarak katılım sağlamıştır. Araştırmada öncelikle geçerliliği sağlamak için açımlayıcı ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizi yapılmış; güvenirlik için ise Cronbach’s Alpha iç tutarlık katsayıları incelenmiştir. Açımlayıcı Faktör Analizi sonucunda 18 maddelik 2 boyutlu çıkan ölçek % 76.28 oranında bir varyansla açıklanmaktadır. Ölçeğin iç tutarlılık katsayısı “.95” olarak hesaplanmış olup; model Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizi ile doğrulanmıştır ve 16 maddelik 2 boyutlu bir ölçek oluşturulmuştur. Geliştirilen modelin öğretmenlerin ve okul yöneticilerinin dinozorlaşma algısını ölçmede kullanılabileceği belirlenmiştir.

Keywords

• Dinozorlaşma ölçeği
• Okul yöneticileri
• Öğretmenler
• Ölçek geliştirme

Dinosaur Syndrome: A Scale Development Study

Abstract

The aim of this study was to design a valid and reliable measurement tool to describe teachers' and school administrators' perceptions of dinosaur syndrome. The research was designed according to the survey model in the quantitative method. For the item pool of the scale, articles were analyzed, and five themes were formed from the data. Based on the themes, an item pool was created, and the draft form was applied to teachers and school administrators working in public schools in Aydın province. For Exploratory Factor Analysis, 125 teachers and school administrators participated voluntarily; for Confirmatory Factor Analysis, 172 teachers and school administrators participated voluntarily. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to ensure validity and Cronbach's Alpha internal consistency coefficients were analyzed for reliability. As a result of the Exploratory Factor Analysis, the 18-item 2-dimensional scale is explained with a variance of 76.28%. The internal consistency coefficient of the scale was calculated as ".95" and Confirmatory Factor Analysis confirmed the model, and a 16-item 2-dimensional scale was formed. It was determined that the developed model could be used to measure the perception of the dinosaur syndrome of teachers and school administrators.

Keywords

• Dinosaurization scale
• School sdministrators
• Teachers
• Scale development

References

1. Balaman, F. & Baş, M. (2021). Adaptation of resistance to organizational change scale to Turkish: Validity-reliability study. Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education, 10 (2), 676-697. DOI: 10.30703/cije.751810.
2. Bringselius, L. (2014) Employee objections to organizational change: A framework for addressing management responses. Organization Development Journal, 32(1), 41- 54.
3. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). Factor analysis: Basic concepts and its use in scale development. Retrieved on 07.12.2022 from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/108451#:~:text=sener%20b%C3%BCy%C3%BCk%C3%B6zt%C3%BCrk&text=Daniel%20(1988)%20g%C3%C3%B6re,cited by Stapleton%2C%201997).
4. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Data analysis handbook for social sciences. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
5. Can, A. (2021). Quantitative data analysis in the scientific research process with SPSS. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
6. Çalışkan, A. (2019). Resistance to change: A scale adaptation study. Journal of Süleyman Demirel University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 24 (2), 237-252.
7. Çınar, H. (2021). Dinosaur syndrome. In N. Cemaloğlu (Ed.), Reflections of syndromes on education and management. (159-173) in Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
8. Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G. & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2012). Multivariate statistics for social sciences SPSS and LISREL Applications. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

9. Dent, E. B. & Goldberg, S. G. (1999). Challenging resistance to change. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 35(1), 25-41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886399351003
10. Ertürk Kayman, E. A. (2008). The level of realization of quantum leadership behaviors by the school administrators of the disseminator schools in the vocational education and training empowerment project (MEGEP) in Turkey. (Unpublished master's thesis). Hacettepe University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara.
11. George, D. & Mallery, M. (2010). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.
12. Gökbunar, R. & Ünal, A. G. (1999). Dinosaur syndrome in management and change in public administration. Atatürk University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 13(1), 45-58.
13. Jain, P., Asrani, C. & Jain, T. (2018). Resistance to change in an organization. Retrieved from https://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jbm/papers/Vol20-issue5/Version-7/E2005073743.pdf on 07.12.2022.
14. Kaptan, S. (1998). Scientific research and statistical techniques. Ankara: Tekışık Publications.
15. Karasar, N. (2020). Scientific research method. Concepts principles techniques. Ankara: Nobel Academic Publishing.
16. Karaxha, H. (2019). Methods for dealing with resistance to change. Baltic Journal of Real Estate Economics and Construction Management, 7, 290-299.
17. Karsantık, İ. & Çetin, M. (2021). Development of the academic leadership scale: Validity and reliability study. Journal of Higher Education,11(3),671-681. DOI: 10.2399/yod.20.578370
18. Kebabçı, S. & Erkal, H. (2009). Resistance to change- a constructive approach for managing resistant behaviors. Retrieved from http://www.diva-portal.se/smash/get/diva2:222586/FULLTEXT01.pdf on 07.12.2022.
19. Konan, N. & Mermer, S. (2021). Quantum leadership scale: Validity and reliability study. E-International Journal of Pedagogy, 1(1), 74-86. Retrieved from https://www.e-ijpa.com/index.php/pedandragoji/article/view/13.
20. Lawler, E. E. & Galbraith, J. R. (1994). Avoiding the Comorate I Dinosaur Syndrome. Retrieved from https://ceo.usc.edu/1994/05/21/avoiding-the-corporate-dinosaur-syndrome/ on 07.12.2022.
21. Marques, M. P. & Esposito, S.M. (2014). Improving change management: how communication nature influences resistance to change. Journal of Management Development, 33(4), 324 - 341.
22. Meydan, C. H. & Şeşen, H. (2011). Structural equation modeling AMOS applications. Ankara: Detay.
23. Naktiyok, A. (2007). Innovation orientation and organizational factors. Atatürk University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 21(2), 211-230.
24. Neyişçi, N. B. (2008). The level of realization of uncertainty avoidance behaviors of school administrators in the vocational education and training empowerment project (EGEP) in Turkey. Unpublished master’s Thesis, Institute of Social Sciences, Ankara.
25. Özdemir, M. (2020). Human resources management. Ankara: Anı Publishing.
26. Peterson, B. (2016). Signs that your company's a dinosaur and how to evolve. Accessed from https://www.inc.com/ben-peterson/3-signs-that-your-companys-a-dinosaur--andhow-to-evolve.html on 07.12.2022.
27. Radzi, N.S. & Othman, R. (2016). Resistance to change: The moderating effects of leader-member exchange and role breadth self-efficacy. Journal of Advanced Management Science, 4(1).
28. Schlechty, C. P. (2020). Rebuilding the school. Ankara: Remzi Kitabevi.
29. Sönmez, V. & Alacapınar, G.F. (2019). Exemplified scientific research methods. Ankara: Anı Publishing.
30. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Pearson.
31. Tavşancıl, E. (2005). Measurement of attitudes and data analysis with SPSS. Ankara: Nobel Publishing.
32. Tekindal, S. (2021). Quantitative qualitative mixed methods research designs and statistics. Ankara: Nobel Academic Publishing.
33. Ulutaş, M. & Arslan, H. (2018). Informatics Leadership Scale: A Scale Development Study. Marmara University Atatürk Faculty of Education Journal of Educational Sciences, 47 (47), 105-124.DOI: 10.15285/maruaebd.2739
34. Ulutaş, M. (2015). The relationship between informatics leadership, learning organization and university culture in higher education. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University.
35. Yeşil, S. (2013). Selected topics from new management approach considering globalization and changing environmental dynamics. Ankara: Seçkin Publishing.
36. Yurdakul, A. & Çelik, K. (2022). In-group commitment in educational organizations: A scale development study. Mersin University Journal of Faculty of Education, 18(2), 116-131.